Skip to content
Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter July 4, 2018

Nonlinearity and focalisation in Attila Janisch’s Másnap

Tamás Csönge


The essay’s aim is to examine the relationship between perspective and nonlinear temporal structure in Attila Janisch’s 2004 film, Másnap, which is loosely based on Alain Robbe-Grillet’s Le Voyeur (1955). My analysis revolves around the understanding of two important narratological distinctions, that between a nonlinear presentation of events and a paradoxical plot, and that between narrative focalizalization and textual focalization. According to David Bordwell, the most widespread definition of linearity is when the successive events of A, B and C are presented in the narrative in their chronological order. Any other form of their presentation results in a nonlinear narrative. But Másnap is a special type of narrative, which highlights the limitation of such traditional dichotomies, because a consistent order of events cannot be reconstructed. Many critics tried to grasp the core of the film’s narrative by trying to put together the original timeline of events, relying on false indicators of logic and coherence, while they failed to recognize the narrative’s real rhetorical purpose in preventing a consistent and unambiguous plot to be established. The narrative’s complexity lies in the fact that both assumptions – that it depicts a subjective experience of time and a storyworld with strange temporality – are necessary to explain the film’s unusual, fragmented structure and interpret its events. I point out how the film requires us to reinterpret the meanings attached to the familiar techniques of continuity editing and how it converts the practices of the early Nouveau Roman, which marginalizes traditional plot-structures, the notion of character, and conventional descriptions of objects, to interact with a subjective vision governed by a fictional mind.


Bal, Mieke. 2009. Narratology: Introduction to the theory of narrative. Toronto, Buffalo & London: University of Toronto Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bálint, Katalin. 2011. Are women really focalized? PsyArt Journal 15. (accessed 28 June 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Ben-Shaul, Nitzan. 2007. Film: The key concepts. Oxford & New York: Berg.Search in Google Scholar

Berliner, Todd & Dale J. Cohen. 2011. The illusion of continuity: Active perception and the classical editing system. Journal of Film and Video 63(1). 44–63.Search in Google Scholar

Bordwell, David. 1985. Narration in the fiction film. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bori, Erzsébet, 2004. Midőn egy nyári nap utazó... Másnap [If on a summer’s day a traveler... Másnap]. Filmvilág 11. 16–17.Search in Google Scholar

Branigan, Edward. 1984. Point of view in cinema: A theory of narration and subjectivity in classical film. Berlin: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Branigan, Edward. 1992. Narrative comprehension and film, London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Deleyto, Celestino. 1991. Focalisation in film narrative. Atlantis 13(1–2). 159–177.Search in Google Scholar

Genette, Gérard. 1983. Narrative discourse: An essay in method. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Gelencsér, Gábor. 2004. Árnyékvilág. Filmvilág .4. 4–8. Search in Google Scholar

Gunning, Tom. 1986. The cinema of attractions: Early film, its spectator and the avant-garde. Wide angle 8(3–4). 63–70.Search in Google Scholar

Jahn, Manfred. 1996. Windows of focalization: Deconstructing and reconstructing a narratological concept. Style 30 (2). 241–267.Search in Google Scholar

Kolozsi, László. 2004. Labirintus játék [Labyrinth game]. Filmkultúra 2004. (accessed 28 June 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Kuhn, Markus & Johann N. Schmidt. 2014. Narration in film (revised version). In Peter Hühn et al. (eds.), the living handbook of narratology. Hamburg: Hamburg University Press. (accessed 28 June 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Marx, György. 2015. Másnap, Janisch Attila filmje, Örvényben [Másnap, a film of Attila Janisch, in a maelstrom] (accessed 28 June 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Metz, Christian. 1982. The imaginary signifier: Psychoanalysis and the cinema. Trans. Celia Britton, Annwyl Williams, Beb Brewster & Alfred Guzzetti. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Niederhoff, Burkhard. 2001. Fokalisation und Perspektive: Ein Plädoyer für friedliche Koexistenz. Poetica 33. 1–21.Search in Google Scholar

Niederhoff, Burkhard. 2013. Focalization. In Peter Hühn et al. (eds.), the living handbook of narratology . Hamburg: Hamburg University Press. (accessed 28 June 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Richardson, Brian. 2002. Beyond story and discourse: Narrative time in postmodern and nonmimetic fiction. In Brian Richardson (ed.), Narrative dynamics: Essays on time, plot, closure, and frames. Columbus: Ohio State University Press. 47–63.Search in Google Scholar

Robbe-Grillet, Alain. 1965. For a new novel: Essays on fiction. Trans. Richard Howard. New York: Grove Press. 133–142.Search in Google Scholar

Schlickers, Sabine. 2009. Focalization, ocularization and auricularization in film and literature. In Peter Hühn et al. (eds.), Point of view, perspective, and focalization: Modeling mediation in narrative. Berlin: De Gruyter. 243–258.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Tim J. 2011. The attentional theory of cinematic continuity, Birbeck: University of London. (accessed 28 June 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Verstraten, Peter. 2009. Film narratology (trans. Stefan van der Lecq). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wolf, Werner. 2004. Aesthetic illusion as an effect of fiction. Style 38. 325–351.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-07-04
Published in Print: 2018-06-28

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston