Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter November 7, 2017

Who are President Trump’s Allies in the House of Representatives?

Andrew J. Clarke and Jeffery A. Jenkins
From the journal The Forum

Abstract

We conduct a preliminary analysis of the first 200 days of the Donald Trump presidency, to determine who his principal allies in the US House have been. We build our analysis around three groups of Republicans, based on caucus affiliations: members of the Republican Main Street Partnership (RMSP), the Republican Study Committee (RSC), and the House Freedom Caucus (HFC). We find that House Republicans, regardless off caucus membership, broadly support President Trump and largely shared in the his electoral success. Yet, we also uncover suggestive evidence that the HFC is maneuvering into a position of influence with President Trump. Freedom Caucus members are more closely tied to his electoral performance than members of other conservative groups, and they appear to receive more time with the President relative to a comparable group of House Republicans. While these results are interesting, they are also initial and more time is needed to assess how President Trump builds a winning coalition with Republican House members.


Corresponding authors: Andrew J. Clarke, Assistant Professor, Department of Government and Law, Lafayette College, Easton, PA 18042-1780, USA; and Jeffery A. Jenkins, Provost Professor, Public Policy, Political Science, and Law; the Judith and John Bedrosian Chair of Governance and the Public Enterprise; and Director of the Bedrosian Center at the Sol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0626, USA

References

DiSalvo, Daniel. 2012. Engines of Change: Party Factions in American Politics, 18682010. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199891702.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Dunn, Susan. 2010. Roosevelt’s Purge: How FDR Fought to Change the Democratic Party. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Iacus, Stefano M., Gary King, and Giuseppe Porro. 2012. “Causal Inference Without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching.” Political Analysis 20 (1): 1–24.10.1093/pan/mpr013Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Frances E. 2009. Beyond Ideology: Politics, Principles and Partisanship in the U.S. Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226470771.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Frances E. 2016. Insecure Majorities: Congress and the Perpetual Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226409184.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lucas, DeWayne, and Iva E. Deutchman. 2007. “The Ideology of Moderate Republicans in the House.” The Forum 5 (2): 1–19.10.2202/1540-8884.1146Search in Google Scholar

McCarty, Nolan, and Boris Shor. 2015. “Partisan Polarization in the United States: Diagnoses and Avenues for Reform.” Working Paper, available at http://projects.iq.harvard.edu/files/pegroup/files/mccartyshor2015.pdf.10.2139/ssrn.2714013Search in Google Scholar

McCarty, Nolan, Keith Poole, and Howard Rosenthal. 2016. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. 2nd ed. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Milkis, Sydney M. 1985. “Franklin D. Roosevelt and The Transcendence of Partisan Politics.” Political Science Quarterly 100 (3): 4789–4504.10.2307/2151069Search in Google Scholar

Poole, Keith T., and Howard Rosenthal. 2007. Ideology and Congress. New Brunswick: Transaction.Search in Google Scholar

Price, Charles M., and Joseph Boskin. 1966. “The Roosevelt ‘Purge’: A Reappraisal.” The Journal of Politics 28 (3): 660–670.10.2307/2128161Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-11-7

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Scroll Up Arrow