Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter June 9, 2018

Affective Polarization and Ideological Sorting: A Reciprocal, Albeit Weak, Relationship

Yphtach Lelkes
From the journal The Forum

Abstract

American partisans are far more hostile towards out-party members than they were 40 years ago. While this phenomenon, often called affective polarization, is well-documented, political scientists disagree on its cause. One group of scholars believes that affective polarization is driven by processes related to social identity theory. In particular, cross-cutting identities have declined in America, and toxic political communication continuously primes partisan identities and resentment. Recently, several scholars have pointed to another phenomenon as the root cause of affective polarization: partisan sorting, i.e. the alignment of partisan identities with ideologically consistent issue positions. I review evidence in favor of each claim, and provide additional evidence that affective polarization has increased about as much among those who are not sorted as among those who are sorted. Furthermore, while sorting is only related to affective polarization among the most politically knowledgeable, affective polarization has increased across all levels of political knowledge. Finally, affective polarization may also increase sorting, further complicating any clear cut causal relationship.

References

Abramowitz, A. I. 2010. The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Abramowitz, A. I., and K. L. Saunders. 2008. “Is Polarization a Myth?” The Journal of Politics 70 (02): 542–555.Search in Google Scholar

Abramowitz, A. I., and S. Webster. 2016. “The Rise of Negative Partisanship and the Nationalization of U.S. Elections in the 21st Century.” Electoral Studies 41: 12–22.Search in Google Scholar

Abramowitz, A. I., and S. Webster. 2018. “Negative Partisanship: Why Americans Dislike Parties But Behave Like Rabid Partisans.” Political Psychology 39: 119–135.Search in Google Scholar

Abrams, D., and M. A. Hogg. 1988. “Comments on the Motivational Status of Self-Esteem in Social Identity and Intergroup Discrimination.” European Journal of Social Psychology 18 (4): 317–334.Search in Google Scholar

Ahler, D. J., and G. Sood. 2018. “The Parties in Our Heads: Misperceptions About Party Composition and Their Consequences.” Journal of Politics. In press.Search in Google Scholar

Bakker, B. N., Y. Lelkes, and A. Malka. 2018. An Expressive Utility Account of Partisan Cue Receptivity: Cognitive Resources in the Service of Identity Expression. Working Paper.Search in Google Scholar

Bartels, L. M. 1996. “Uninformed Votes: Information Effects in Presidential Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (1): 194–230.Search in Google Scholar

Bougher, L. D. 2017. “The Correlates of Discord: Identity, Issue Alignment, and Political Hostility in Polarized America.” Political Behavior 39 (3): 731–762.Search in Google Scholar

Boxell, L., M. Gentzkow, and J. M. Shapiro. 2017. “Greater Internet Use is Not Associated with Faster Growth in Political Polarization Among US Demographic Groups.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (3): 201706588.Search in Google Scholar

Brady, H., and P. Sniderman. 1985. “Attitude Attribution: A Group Basis for Political Reasoning.” The American Political Science Review 79 (4): 1061–1078.Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, A., P. E. Converse, W. E. Miller, and D. E. Stokes. 1960. The {A}merican Voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Carpini, M. X. D., S. Keeter, and M. X. Delli Carpini. 1997. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Converse, P. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Politics.” In Ideology and Discontent, edited by D. Apter, 206–261. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe, 1964.Search in Google Scholar

Deutsch, M., and H. B. Gerard. 1955. “A Study of Normative and Informational Social Influences Upon Individual Judgment.” The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 51 (3): 629.Search in Google Scholar

Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy (Vol. 13, p. 310). New York: Harper. doi:10.2307/444355.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, C., and J. A. Stimson. 2009. “Symbolic ideology in the American electorate.” Electoral Studies 28 (3): 388–402.Search in Google Scholar

Finkel, S. E. 1995. Causal Analysis with Panel Data (No. 105). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Fiorina, M. P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Geer, J. G. 2012. “The News Media and the Rise of Negativity in Presidential Campaigns.” PS - Political Science and Politics 45 (3): 422–427.Search in Google Scholar

Gilens, M. 2001. “Political Ignorance and Collective Policy Preferences.” American Political Science Review 95 (2): 379–396.Search in Google Scholar

Gitlin, T. 2016. “The Outrage Industry: Political Opinion Media and the New Incivility By Jeffrey M. Berry and Sarah Sobieraj Oxford University Press. 2014. 288 pages. $29.95 hardcover.” Social Forces 95 (1): e26–e26.Search in Google Scholar

Huddy, L., L. Mason, and L. Aarøe. 2015. “Expressive Partisanship: Campaign Involvement, Political Emotion, and Partisan Identity.” American Political Science Review 109 (1): 1–17.Search in Google Scholar

Iyengar, S., and S. J. Westwood. 2015. “Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (3): 690–707.Search in Google Scholar

Iyengar, S., G. Sood, and Y. Lelkes. 2012. “Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76 (3): 405–431.Search in Google Scholar

Kinder, D. R., and N. P. Kalmoe. 2017. Neither Liberal nor Conservative: Ideological Innocence in the American Public. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, F. E. 2016. Insecure Majorities: Congress and the Perpetual Campaign. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lelkes, Y., and P. M. Sniderman. 2016. “The Ideological Asymmetry of the American Party System.” British Journal of Political Science 46 (04): 825–844.Search in Google Scholar

Lelkes, Y., G. Sood, and S. Iyengar. 2017. “The Hostile Audience: The Effect of Access to Broadband Internet on Partisan Affect.” American Journal of Political Science 61 (1): 5–20.Search in Google Scholar

Lenz, G. S. 2009. “Learning and Opinion Change, Not Priming: Reconsidering the Priming Hypothesis.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (4): 821–837.Search in Google Scholar

Levendusky, M. S. 2009. “The Microfoundations of Mass Polarization.” Political Analysis 17 (2): 162–176.Search in Google Scholar

Malka, A., and Y. Lelkes. 2010. “More than Ideology: Conservative–Liberal Identity and Receptivity to Political Cues.” Social Justice Research 23 (2–3): 156–188.Search in Google Scholar

Margolis, M. F. 2018. “How Politics Affects Religion: Partisanship, Socialization, and Religiosity in America.” The Journal of Politics 80 (1): 30–43.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, G. J., and A. Yurukoglu. 2017. “Bias in Cable News: Persuasion and Polarization.” American Economic Review 107 (9): 2565–2599.Search in Google Scholar

Mason, L. 2015. ““I Disrespectfully Agree”: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (1): 128–145.Search in Google Scholar

Mason, L. 2016. “A Cross-Cutting Calm: How Social Sorting Drives Affective Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80 (S1): 351–377.Search in Google Scholar

Mason, L. 2018. “Ideologues Without Issues the Polarizing Consequences of Ideological Identities.” Public Opinion Quarterly 82 (S1): 280–301.Search in Google Scholar

Mason, L., and J. Wronski. 2018. “One Tribe to Bind Them All: How Our Social Group Attachments Strengthen Partisanship.” Political Psychology 39: 257–277.Search in Google Scholar

Ridout, T. N., E. Franklin Fowler, M. M. Franz, and K. Goldstein. 2018. “The Long-Term and Geographically Constrained Effects of Campaign Advertising on Political Polarization and Sorting.” American Politics Research 46 (1): 3–25.Search in Google Scholar

Rogowski, J. C., and J. L. Sutherland. 2016. “How Ideology Fuels Affective Polarization.” Political Behavior 38 (2): 485–508.Search in Google Scholar

Rubin, M., and M. Hewstone. 1998. “Social Identity Theory’s Self-Esteem Hypothesis: A Review and Some Suggestions for Clarification.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 2 (1): 40–62.Search in Google Scholar

Sobieraj, S., and J. M. Berry. 2011. “From Incivility to Outrage: Political Discourse in Blogs, Talk Radio, and Cable News.” Political Communication 28 (1): 19–41.Search in Google Scholar

Sood, G., and S. Iyengar. 2016. “Coming to Dislike Your Opponents: The Polarizing Impact of Political Campaigns.” Available at SSRN: or .Search in Google Scholar

Sood, G., and S. Iyengar. 2017. “All in the Eye of the Beholder.” In The Feeling, Thinking Citizen: Essays in Honor of Milton Lodge, 1st ed., edited by H. Lavine and C. Taber, 195–228. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Tajfel, H. 1982. “Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations.” Annual Review of Psychology 33 (1): 1–39.Search in Google Scholar

Turner, J. C. 1981. “Towards a Cognitive Redefinition of the Social Group.” Current Psychology of Cognition 1 (2): 93–118.Search in Google Scholar

Webster, S. W., and A. I. Abramowitz. 2017. “The Ideological Foundations of Affective Polarization in the U.S. Electorate.” American Politics Research 45 (4): 621–647.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-6-9

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston