Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter February 27, 2019

Is it a Chasm? Is it a Canyon? No, it is the Gender Gap

  • Heather L. Ondercin

    Heather L. Ondercin is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at Wichita State University. She researches how gender shapes political behavior over time in the United States. Her work has been published in outlets including Political Research Quarterly, Political Behavior, and Electoral Studies. She is working on a book project titled Politicized Identities and the Partisan Gender Gap.

    EMAIL logo
From the journal The Forum

Abstract

Many speculated that we would observe a gender gap in vote choice of historic proportions in the 2018 midterm elections. However, the 2018 gender gap was similar to gender gaps in previous elections. I argue that the gender gap is not about a specific candidate or election but is driven by gender differences in partisan attachments. Variation in the gender gap in Senate and gubernatorial elections highlight that the gender gap does not advantage a particular candidate or party and that women candidates do not increase the size of the gender gap. Race and class intersect with gender to shape the partisan attachments and vote choice of men and women. Finally, while the candidates and events surrounding the 2018 election likely did not impact the gender gap in 2018, I discuss how the 2018 election will shape the gender gap in future elections.

About the author

Heather L. Ondercin

Heather L. Ondercin is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at Wichita State University. She researches how gender shapes political behavior over time in the United States. Her work has been published in outlets including Political Research Quarterly, Political Behavior, and Electoral Studies. She is working on a book project titled Politicized Identities and the Partisan Gender Gap.

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Mirya Holman, Erin Cassese, and Jeff Carter for their insightful comments on this article. I would also like to thank Data for Progress for generously sharing some of their data on the 2018 election with me.

References

Alvarez, R. Michael, and Lisa Garcia Bedolla. 2003. “The Foundations of Latino Voter Partisanship: Evidence from the 2000 Election.” Journal of Politics 65 (1): 31–49.10.1111/1468-2508.t01-1-00002Search in Google Scholar

Barnes, Tiffany D., and Erin C. Cassese. 2017. “American Party Women: A Look at the Gender Gap Within Parties.” Political Research Quarterly 70 (1): 127–141.10.1177/1065912916675738Search in Google Scholar

Bartels, Larry M. 2000. “Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1952–1996.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (1): 35–50.10.2307/2669291Search in Google Scholar

Bejarano, Christina E. 2013. The Latino Gender Gap in U.S. Politics. Routledge.10.4324/9780203744437Search in Google Scholar

Berry, Marie, and Erica Chenowith. 2018. “Who Made the Women’s March.” In The Resistance The Dawn of The Anti-Trump Opposition Movement, edited by David S. Meyer and Sidney Tarrow. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Burns, Alexander, and Jonathan Martin. September 14, 2018. “Primary Season is (Finally) Over. Here Are Five Things We Learned.” The New York Times A14.Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, David E., and Christina Wolbrecht. 2006. “See Jane run: Women Politicians as Role Models for Adolescents.” The Journal of Politics 68 (2): 233–247.10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00402.xSearch in Google Scholar

Campbell, Angus, Philip Converse, Warren Miller, and Donald Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cassese, Erin C., and Tiffany D. Barnes. 2018. “Reconciling Sexism and Women’s Support for Republican Candidates: A Look at Gender, Class, and Whiteness in the 2012 and 2016 Presidential Races.” Political Behavior 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9468-2.10.1007/s11109-018-9468-2Search in Google Scholar

Cassese, Erin C., and Mirya R. Holman. 2019. “Playing the Woman Card: Ambivalent Sexism in the 2016 US Presidential Race.” Political Psychology 40 (1): 55–74.10.1111/pops.12492Search in Google Scholar

Center for American Women and Politics. 2017. The Gender Gap Voting Choices in Presidential Elections. Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University. http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/sites/default/files/resources/ggpresvote.pdf (last accessed December 5, 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Chira, Susan. November 15, 2018. “Banner Year for Female Candidates Doesn’t Extend to Republican Women” New York Times pA12.Search in Google Scholar

Dawson, Michael C. 1995. Behind the Mule: Race and Class in African-American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691212982Search in Google Scholar

De la Garza, R. O., and J. Cortina. 2007. “Are Latinos Republicans but Just Don’t Know it? The Latino Vote in the 2000 and 2004 Presidential Elections.” American Politics Research 35 (2): 202–223.10.1177/1532673X06294885Search in Google Scholar

Dittmar, Kely. 2018. “The Gender Gap in Voting: Setting the Record Straight” Footnotes a blog for the Center for American Women and Politics. http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/footnotes/gender-gap-voting-setting-record-straight (last accessed November 27, 2018)Search in Google Scholar

Dolan, Kathy. 2014. When Does Gender Matter? Women Candidates and Gender Stereotypes in American Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199968275.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Dolan, Kathy, and Kira Sanbonmatsu. 2009. “Do Gender Stereotypes Transcend Party?” Political Research Quarterly 62: 485–494.10.1177/1065912908322416Search in Google Scholar

Esdall, Thomas. 2018. “What Happens if the Gender Gap Becomes a Gender Chasm?” The New York Times. Opinion.Search in Google Scholar

Fernandez, Kenneth E., and Matthew C. Dempsey. 2017. “The Local Political Context of Latino Partisanship.” Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics 2 (2): 201–232.10.1017/rep.2017.5Search in Google Scholar

Ghitza, Yair. 2018. “What Happenend Next Tuesday” Medium.https://medium.com/@yghitza_48326/what-happened-next-tuesday-e4e6637a4b81 Last accesed December 15, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Green, Donald P., Bradley Palmquist, and Eric Schickler. 2004. Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Grenell, Alexis. 2018. “White Women, Come Get Your People” The New York Times. Opinion.Search in Google Scholar

Jacobs, Ben. November 14, 2018. “Photo of New House Membership Show Gap in Diversity” The Guardian.Search in Google Scholar

Junn, Jane. 2017. “The Trump Majority: White Womanhood and the Making of Female Voters in the US.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 5 (2): 343–352.10.1080/21565503.2017.1304224Search in Google Scholar

Klain, Rondald A. October 17, 2018. “Five Reasons Democrats Can Still Solider on to Midterm Victories” Accessed on-line https://wapo.st/2pYCaIi?tid=ss_tw&utm_term=.c0a2c7a85f2b. Last accessed February 3, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

Klar, Samara, and Yanna Krupnikov. 2016. Independent Politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316471050Search in Google Scholar

Ladam, Christina, Jeffrey J. Harden, and Jason H. Windett. 2018. “Prominent Role Models: High-Profile Female Politicians and the Emergence of Women as Candidates for Public Office.” American Journal of Political Science 62 (2): 369–381.10.1111/ajps.12351Search in Google Scholar

Lizotte, Mary-Kate. 2017. “Gender, Partisanship, and Issue Gaps.” Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 17 (1): 379–405.10.1111/asap.12144Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Jonathan, and Alexander Burns. September 30, 2018. “For Nominee, G.O.P Takes a Big Gamble.” The New York Times A22.Search in Google Scholar

Mason, Lilliana. 2018. Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became our Identity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226524689.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Montoya, Celest, Christina Bejarano, and Sylvia Manzano. 2011. “Tracking the Latino Gender Gap: Gender Attitudes Across Sex, Borders, and Generations.” Politics & Gender 7 (4): 521–549.10.1017/S1743923X11000341Search in Google Scholar

Ondercin, Heather L. 2017. Who is Responsible for the Gender Gap? The Dynamics of Men’s and Women’s Democratic Macropartisanship, 1950–2012.” Political Research Quarterly 70 (4): 749–761.10.1177/1065912917716336Search in Google Scholar

Ondercin, Heather L. 2018. “The Evolution of Women’s (and Men’s) Partisan Attachments.” In 100 Years of the Nineteenth Amendment: An Appraisal of Women’s Political Activism, edited by Holly McKammon and Lee Ann Banaszak. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ondercin, Heather L., and Jeffrey L. Bernstein. 2007. “Context Matters: the Influence of State and Campaign Factors on the Gender Gap in Senate Elections, 1988–2000.” Politics & Gender 3 (1): 33–53.10.1017/S1743923X07070031Search in Google Scholar

Plutzer, Eric, and John F. Zipp. 1996. “Identity Politics, Partisanship, and Voting for Women Candidates.” Public Opinion Quarterly 60 (1): 30–57.10.1086/297738Search in Google Scholar

Sargent, Greg. 2018. “Trump Couldn’t Hold Back About Christine Ford – There is no Bottom.” The Washington Post.Search in Google Scholar

Swers, Michele L. 2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226772738.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Swers, Michele L. 2013. Women in the Club: Gender and Policy Making in the Senate. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226022963.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Waldman, Paul. September 17, 2018. “American Women are Watching the Kavanaugh Controversy Very Closely.” The Washington Post. Accessed on-line https://wapo.st/2QDtSSw?tid=ss_tw&utm_term=.acdda7addc98. Last accessed February 3, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

Weller, Nicholas, and Jane Junn. 2018. “Racial Identity and Voting: Conceptualizing White Identity in Spatial Terms.” Perspective in Politics 16 (2): 436–448.10.1017/S1537592717004285Search in Google Scholar

Wolbrecht, Christina, and David E. Campbell. 2017. “Role Models Revisited: Youth, Novelty, and the Impact of Female Candidates.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 5 (3): 418–434.10.1080/21565503.2016.1268179Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-02-27
Published in Print: 2018-12-19

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 4.12.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/for-2018-0040/html
Scroll to top button