Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Lizenziert Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung Veröffentlicht von De Gruyter 5. März 2020

Pro-Trade Blocs in the US Congress

ByungKoo Kim EMAIL logo und Iain Osgood EMAIL logo
Aus der Zeitschrift The Forum

Abstract

Who supports trade in the US Congress? We uncover the ideological space of trade voting, focusing on trade agreements and development policy as two fundamental cleavages around globalization. We then cluster members of Congress into coherent voting blocs, and identify the most pro-trade voting blocs in each Chamber. We find that these blocs: cross party lines; are ideologically heterogeneous; and are over-represented on the committees with jurisdiction over trade. We then examine two leading theories of Congressional voting – on constituency characteristics and campaign contributions – and find support for each using our learned voting blocs. Members of pro-trade blocs have defended their constituents’ and contributors’ interests by speaking out to confront the Trump administration’s protectionism. We conclude that unsupervised learning methods provide a valuable tool for exploring the multifaceted and dynamic divisions which characterize current debates over global economic integration.


Corresponding authors: ByungKoo Kim, PhD Candidate, Department of Political Science, University of Michigan, Haven Hall, 505 S. State St, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, USA, and Iain Osgood Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Michigan, Haven Hall, 505 S. State St, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, USA

References

Austen-Smith, David. 1995. “Campaign Contributions and Access.” American Political Science Review 89 (3): 566–581.10.2307/2082974Suche in Google Scholar

Bailey, Michael A., Judith Goldstein, and Barry R. Weingast. 1997. “The Institutional Roots of American Trade Policy: Politics, Coalitions, and International Trade.” World Politics 49 (3): 309–338.10.1353/wp.1997.0007Suche in Google Scholar

Baldwin, Robert E., and Christopher S. Magee. 2000. “Is Trade Policy for Sale? Congressional Voting on Recent Trade Bills.” Public Choice 105 (1–2): 79–101.10.3386/w6376Suche in Google Scholar

Bauer, Raymond A., Ithiel de Sola Pool, and Lewis Anthony Dexter. 1963. “American Business & Public Policy.” The International Executive 5 (3): 25–27.10.4324/9781351315647Suche in Google Scholar

Baumgartner, Frank R., Jeffrey M. Berry, Marie Hojnacki, Beth L. Leech, and David C. Kimball. 2009. Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, who Loses, and why. University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226039466.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Beaulieu, Eugene. 2002. “The Stolper–Samuelson Theorem Faces Congress.” Review of International Economics 10 (2): 343–360.10.1111/1467-9396.00336Suche in Google Scholar

Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Laura W. Arnold, and Christopher J. W. Zorn. 1997. “The Strategic Timing of Position Taking in Congress: A Study of the North American Free Trade Agreement.” American Political Science Review 91 (2): 324–338.10.2307/2952359Suche in Google Scholar

Chin, Michelle L. 2005. “Constituents versus Fat Cats: Testing Assumptions about Congressional Access Decisions.” American Politics Research 33 (6): 751–786.10.1177/1532673X05275632Suche in Google Scholar

Conley, Richard S. 1999. “Derailing Presidential Fast-Track Authority: The Impact of Constituency Pressures and Political Ideology on Trade Policy in Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 52 (4): 785–799.10.1177/106591299905200406Suche in Google Scholar

Destler, Irving M. 2005. American Trade Politics. Columbia University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Engel, Steven T., and David J. Jackson. 1998. “Wielding the Stick Instead of the Carrot: Labor PAC Punishment of Pro-NAFTA Democrats.” Political Research Quarterly 51 (3): 813–828.10.1177/106591299805100312Suche in Google Scholar

Hall, Richard L., and Alan V. Deardorff. 2006. “Lobbying as Legislative Subsidy.” American Political Science Review 100 (1): 69–84.10.1017/S0003055406062010Suche in Google Scholar

Hiscox, Michael J. 1999. “The Magic Bullet? The RTAA, Institutional Reform, and Trade Liberalization.” International Organization 53 (4): 669–698.10.1162/002081899551039Suche in Google Scholar

Hiscox, Michael J. 2002a. “Commerce, Coalitions, and Factor Mobility: Evidence from Congressional Votes on Trade Legislation.” American Political Science Review 96 (3): 593–608.10.1017/S0003055402000357Suche in Google Scholar

Hiscox, Michael J. 2002b. International Trade and Political Conflict: Commerce, Coalitions, and Mobility. Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691214863Suche in Google Scholar

Irwin, Douglas A., and Randall S. Kroszner. 1999. “Interests, Institutions, and Ideology in Securing Policy Change: The Republican Conversion to Trade Liberalization After Smoot-Hawley.” The Journal of Law and Economics 42 (2): 643–674.10.1086/467437Suche in Google Scholar

Kalla, Joshua L., and David E. Broockman. 2016. “Campaign Contributions Facilitate Access to Congressional Officials: A Randomized Field Experiment.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (3): 545–558.10.1111/ajps.12180Suche in Google Scholar

Keech, William R., and Kyoungsan Pak. 1995. “Partisanship, Institutions, and Change in American Trade Politics.” The Journal of Politics 57 (4): 1130–1142.10.2307/2960405Suche in Google Scholar

Kerner, Andrew, and Jane Lawrence Sumner. 2016. “Salvation by Good Works?: Offshoring, Corporate Philanthropy, and Public Attitudes Toward Trade Policy.” In Politics & Markets in the Developing World” Conference, The DeVoe Moore Center & the Florida State University Political Science Department February, 11–13.10.1111/ecpo.12146Suche in Google Scholar

Lee, Jieun, and Iain Osgood. 2019. “Exports, Jobs, Growth! Congressional Hearings on US Trade Agreements.” Economics & Politics 31 (1): 1–26.10.1111/ecpo.12121Suche in Google Scholar

Lohmann, Susanne, and Sharyn O’halloran. 1994. “Divided Government and US Trade Policy: Theory and Evidence.” International Organization 48 (4): 595–632.10.1017/S0020818300028320Suche in Google Scholar

Magee, Stephen P., William A. Brock, and Leslie Young. 1989. Black Hole Tariffs and Endogenous Policy Theory: Political Economy in General Equilibrium. Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Margalit, Yotam. 2011. “Costly Jobs: Trade-related Layoffs, Government Compensation, and Voting in US Elections.” American Political Science Review 105 (1): 166–188.10.1017/S000305541000050XSuche in Google Scholar

Martin, Andrew D., Kevin M. Quinn, and Jong Hee Park. 2011. “MCMCpack: Markov Chain Monte Carlo in R.”10.18637/jss.v042.i09Suche in Google Scholar

McChesney, Fred S. 1997. Money for Nothing: Politicians, Rent Extraction, and Political Extortion. Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Milbrath, Lester W. 1976. The Washington Lobbyists. Chicago, IL: Rand-McNally.Suche in Google Scholar

O’Halloran, Sharyn. 1994. Politics, Process, and American Trade Policy. University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.14032Suche in Google Scholar

Osgood, Iain. 2020. “Vanguards of Globalization: Organization and Political Action Among America’s Pro-Trade Firms.” Forthcoming, Business & Politics.10.1017/bap.2019.31Suche in Google Scholar

Owen, Erica. 2017. “Exposure to Offshoring and the Politics of Trade Liberalization: Debate and Votes on Free Trade Agreements in the US House of Representatives, 2001–2006.” International Studies Quarterly 61 (2): 297–311.10.1093/isq/sqx020Suche in Google Scholar

Powell, Eleanor Neff, and Justin Grimmer. 2016. “Money in Exile: Campaign Contributions and Committee Access.” The Journal of Politics 78 (4): 974–988.10.1086/686615Suche in Google Scholar

Rogowski, Ronald. 1987. “Political Cleavages and Changing Exposure to Trade.” American Political Science Review 81 (4): 1121–1137.10.4324/9781315254166-13Suche in Google Scholar

Rogowski, Ronald. 1989. “Commerce and Coalitions: How Trade Affects Domestic Political Alignments.”10.1515/9780691219431Suche in Google Scholar

Rommel, Tobias, and Stefanie Walter. 2018. “The Electoral Consequences of Offshoring: How the Globalization of Production Shapes Party Preferences.” Comparative Political Studies 5: 133–56.10.1177/0010414017710264Suche in Google Scholar

Rudolph, Thomas J. 1999. “Corporate and Labor PAC Contributions in House Elections: Measuring the Effects of Majority Party Status.” The Journal of Politics 61 (1): 195–206.10.2307/2647782Suche in Google Scholar

Schattschneider, Elmer Eric. 1935. Politics, Pressures and the Tariff. Prentice-Hall, Inc.Suche in Google Scholar

Scheve, Kenneth F., and Matthew J. Slaughter. 2001. “What Determines Individual Trade-Policy Preferences?” Journal of International Economics 54 (2): 267–292.10.3386/w6531Suche in Google Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Barry R. Weingast. 1987. “The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power.” American Political Science Review 81 (1): 85–104.10.1017/CBO9780511816406.042Suche in Google Scholar

Smith, Mark A. 2000. American Business and Political Power: Public Opinion, Elections, and Democracy. University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226764658.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Steagall, Jeffrey W., and Ken Jennings. 1996. “Unions, PAC Contributions, and the NAFTA Vote.” Journal of Labor Research 17 (3): 515–521.10.1007/BF02685863Suche in Google Scholar

Uslaner, Eric M. 1998. “Let the Chits Fall where they may? Executive and Constituency Influences on Congressional Voting on NAFTA.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 347–371.10.2307/440358Suche in Google Scholar

Weingast, Barry R., and William J. Marshall. 1988. “The Industrial Organization of Congress; or, why Legislatures, like Firms, are not Organized as Markets.” Journal of Political Economy 96 (1): 132–163.10.1086/261528Suche in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2019-0035).


Published Online: 2020-03-05

©2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 29.11.2022 von frontend.live.degruyter.dgbricks.com/document/doi/10.1515/for-2019-0035/html?lang=de
Scroll Up Arrow