Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter March 5, 2020

It’s Trump’s Party and I’ll Cry if I Want To

Ronald B. Rapoport, Jack Reilly and Walter J. Stone
From the journal The Forum

Abstract

Based on analysis of a multi-wave national sample panel of Republican identifiers, we show the increasing coherence among rank and file Republicans around evaluations of Donald Trump. Differences between Republicans who preferred Trump for the GOP nomination and those who preferred another candidate (but, unlike the Never Trump group who said they could not support him in the general election if he won the nomination) are muted by the general election and 2018 waves. While “Never-Trumpers” in the nomination wave maintain their affective distance from Trump in the general election and 2018 waves, their evaluations become less negative. Our analysis suggests that Republicans’ favorability toward Trump increasingly aligned with their attitudes toward the Republican Party and their support for Trump’s effort to build a southern-border wall.

References

Achen, Christopher H., and Larry M. Bartels. 2017. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400888740Search in Google Scholar

Barber, Michael, and Jeremy C Pope. 2019. “Does Party Trump Ideology? Disentangling Party and Ideology in America.” American Political Science Review 113 (1): 1–17.10.1017/S0003055418000795Search in Google Scholar

Converse, Philip. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, edited by David Apter, 206–261. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.Search in Google Scholar

DiSalvo, Daniel. 2012. Engines of Change. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. 2019. Presidents and Parties in the Public Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226589480.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lenz, Gabriel S. 2012. Follow the Leader? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226472157.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Morgan, Stephen L. 2018. “Status Threat, Material Interests, and the 2016 Presidential Vote.” Socius 4: 1–17.10.1177/2378023118788217Search in Google Scholar

Mutz, Diana C. 2018. “Status Threat, Not Economic Hardship, Explains the 2016 Presidential Vote.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (19): E4330–E4339.10.1073/pnas.1718155115Search in Google Scholar

Rapoport, Ronald B., Alan I. Abramowitz, and Walter J. Stone. 2016. “Why Trump was Inevitable.” New York Review of Books. 63 (11): 8–10.Search in Google Scholar

Republican National Committee. 2013. “Growth and Opportunity Project.” Retrieved July 16: 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Sides, John, Michael Tesler, and Lynn Vavreck. 2018. Identity Crisis: The 2016 Presidential Campaign and the Battle for the Meaning of America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400888306Search in Google Scholar

Zaller, John and Stanley Feldman. 1992. “A Simple Theory of the Survey Response.” American Journal of Political Science 36 (3): 579–616.10.2307/2111583Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-03-05

©2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Scroll Up Arrow