Reviewed Publication:
Verlan Lewis. 2019. Ideas of Power: The Politics of American Party Ideology Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
References
Bailey, J. D. 2019. The Idea of Presidential Representation: An Intellectual and Political History. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.10.2307/j.ctvqmp36tSearch in Google Scholar
Bloch Rubin, R. 2017. Building the Bloc: Intraparty Organization in the U.S. Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108226967Search in Google Scholar
Calabresi, S. G., and C. S. Yoo. 2008. The Unitary Executive: Presidential Power From Washington to Bush. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.10.12987/yale/9780300121261.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Ceaser, J. W. 2006. Nature and History in American Political Development: A Debate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674029309Search in Google Scholar
Dearborn, J. A. 2019. “The ‘Proper Organs’ for Presidential Representation: A Fresh Look at the Budget and Accounting Act of 1921.” Journal of Policy History 31 (1): 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0898030618000325.Search in Google Scholar
DiSalvo, D. 2012. Engines of Change: Party Factions in American Politics, 1868–2010. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199891702.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Gerring, J. 1998. Party Ideologies in America, 1828–1996. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139174992Search in Google Scholar
Hollis-Brusky, A. 2015. Ideas With Consequences: The Federalist Society and the Conservative Counterrevolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kagan, E. 2001. “Presidential Administration.” Harvard Law Review 114 (8): 2245–385. https://doi.org/10.2307/1342513.Search in Google Scholar
Lee, F. E. 2009. Beyond Ideology: Politics, Principles, and Partisanship in the U.S. Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226470771.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
McCarty, N., K. T. Poole, and H. Rosenthal. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Orren, K., and S. Skowronek. 2017. The Policy State: An American Predicament. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674982659Search in Google Scholar
Skowronek, S. 1997. The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership From John Adams to Bill Clinton. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Skowronek, S. 2009. “The Conservative Insurgency and Presidential Power: A Developmental Perspective on the Unitary Executive.” Harvard Law Review 122 (8): 2070–103. https://harvardlawreview.org/2009/10/the-conservative-insurgency-and-presidential-power-a-developmental-perspective-on-the-unitary-executive/.Search in Google Scholar
Smith, R. M. 2014. “Ideas and the Spiral of Politics: The Place of American Political Thought in American Political Development.” American Political Thought 3 (1): 126–36. https://doi.org/10.1086/675651.Search in Google Scholar
TerBeek, C. 2020. “From Critique to Command: Brown v. Board of Education and the Political Development of Constitutional Originalism and the Republican Party, 1954–1971.” (working paper).Search in Google Scholar
Thomas, G. 2014. “Political Thought and Political Development.” American Political Thought 3 (1): 114–25. https://doi.org/10.1086/675655.Search in Google Scholar
Tulis, J. K., and N. Mellow. 2018. Legacies of Losing in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226515465.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston