Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter September 29, 2020

“Do Gun Policy Specifics Matter? Hyper-Polarization And The Decline Of Vote Splitting In Congress”

  • Genevieve Quinn EMAIL logo
From the journal The Forum


By tracing the changing electoral incentives and political circumstances of partisans in Congress over time, this paper unpacks how and why substantive policy content has lost its relevance for influencing Congressional voting on gun control. It argues that as gun control positions have crystallized to become part of partisan identity, policy specifics have come to matter less for partisans in Congress than the general pro gun control or pro gun rights position that a piece of legislation symbolizes. Today, regardless of the specific policy contents of a bill, a gun vote serves as a signaling device from members of Congress to their partisan supporters that they are either passionate defenders of the Second Amendment (Republicans) or fierce protectors of America’s children from gun violence (Democrats). That policy content has lost its relevance for Congressional voting on gun control is evident through the marked decline in vote splitting, the extinction of gun control moderates, and the all or nothing voting behavior of partisan shifters – those formerly pro-control Republicans, anti-control Democrats, and gun control moderates who shifted positions over time to vote the party line.

Corresponding author: Dr. Genevieve Quinn, Postdoctoral researcher, E-mail:


2016. “Opinions on Gun Policy and the 2016 Campaign”. The Pew Research Center. 26 Aug. in Google Scholar

Abramowitz, A., and K. Saunders. 2006. “Exploring the Bases of Partisanship in the American Electorate: Social Identity vs. Ideology.” Political Research Quarterly 59 : 175–87. in Google Scholar

A Study of Active Shooter Incidents in the United States between 2000 and 2013. Federal Bureau of Investigation Report 2013. 16 Sept.Search in Google Scholar

Baker, P., and M. D. Shear. 2013. Obama to ‘Put Everything I’ve Got’ into Gun Control. The New York Times. 13 Jan.Search in Google Scholar

Barbanel, J. 1992. From L.I. Teller Machines to Gas Stations, Suburban Robberies Are on the Rise. The New York Times. 18 Feb.Search in Google Scholar

Bartels, L. M. 2002. “Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions.” Political Behavior. 24: 117–50. in Google Scholar

Binder, S. 2016. Everything You Need to Know about the Democratic Senators Filibuster on Gun Control. The Monkey-Cage Blog: The Washington Post. 16 June.Search in Google Scholar

Black, E., and M. Black. 2002. The Rise of Southern Republicans. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Blake, A. 2013. Why the Assault Weapons Ban is Going Nowhere, Part 2. The Washington Post. 30 Jan.Search in Google Scholar

Blasko, E. 2013. Donnelly, Coats React to Senate Vote on Gun Control. South Bend 18 April.Search in Google Scholar

Brennan, P. G., A. J Lizotte, D. McDowall. 1993. “Guns, Southernness, and Gun Control.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology 9 (3): 289–307. September. in Google Scholar

Campbell, A., P. E. Converse, W. E. Miller, and D. E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

Carney, D. 1999. Gun Control Backers Get Upper Hand as Senate Passes New Restrictions. CQ Weekly. 22 May 57: 1204–7.Search in Google Scholar

Carsey, T., and G. Layman. 2006. “Changing Sides or Changing Minds? Party Identification and Policy Preferences in the American Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (2): 464–77. in Google Scholar

Clymer, A. 1991. Washington Talk; Gun Measure is a Lesson in Geography. The New York Times, p. 1. 2 May.Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, G. L. 2003. “Party over Policy: The Dominating Impact of Group Influence on Political Beliefs.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 (5): 818. in Google Scholar

Cohen, T. 2012. Candidates Show Little Appetite for New Gun Control Laws. 26 July.Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, A., D. Azrael, and M. Miller. 2014. Rate of Mass Shootings Has Tripled since 2011, Harvard Research Shows. Mother Jones. 15 Oct.Search in Google Scholar

Dloughy, J. 2004. Gun Lobby Shoots Down Liability Bill Rather than Accept Amendments. CQ Weekly. 6 March. 62: 588.Search in Google Scholar

Doherty, C. 2015. “A Public Opinion Trend that Matters: Priorities for Gun Policy.” The Pew Research Center. 9 Jan. for-gun-policy/.Search in Google Scholar

D’Onofrio, M. 2013. Congressman Frelinghuysen Fails to Lead on Gun Control. Livingston Patch. 2 Oct.Search in Google Scholar

Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.Search in Google Scholar

Drake, Bruce. 2013. “A Year after Newtown, Little Change in Public Opinion on Guns.” The Pew Research Center. 12 Dec. in-public-opinion-on-guns/.Search in Google Scholar

Dumain, E. 2017. Senate Democrats Who Backed ‘Concealed-Carry’ in 2013 No Longer on Board. The Charlotte Observer. 5 Dec.Search in Google Scholar

Eaton, W. J. “Ford, Carter, Reagan Push for Gun Ban.” The Los Angeles Times. 5 May 1994. in Google Scholar

Eilperin, J. 2000. House Democrats Seek a New Edge; Gephardt, Members Look for Ways to Get Votes of Rural White Men in 2002. The Washington Post. 8 Dec.Search in Google Scholar

Ferrell, D., and S. Sengupta. “A Stain Spreads in Suburbia: Issues of Teen Promiscuity, Forced Sex and Parental Neglect Rock Lakewood, once a Bastion of Morality.” The Los Angeles Times. 6 April 1993. in Google Scholar

Field, N. 2016. PA-sen: Toomey Votes Against Murphy Background Checks Amendment. 21 June.Search in Google Scholar

Fiorina, M. P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Franklin, C. H. 1984. “Issue Preferences, Socialization, and the Evolution of Party Identification.” American Journal of Political Science 28 (3). Aug. in Google Scholar

Freeman, J. 1986. “The Political Culture of the Democratic and Republican Parties.” Political Science Quarterly 101 (3): 327–56. in Google Scholar

Geiling, N. 2018. “Sen. Mark Warner Says He’s Changed His Position on an Assault Weapons Ban.” Think Progress. 25 March.Search in Google Scholar

Gray Davidson, O. 1993. Under Fire: The NRA and the Battle for Gun Control. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.Search in Google Scholar

Green, D., P. Bradley, and E. Schickler. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Grossman, M., and D. A. Hopkins. 2016. Asymmetric Politics: Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190626594.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

“Gun Ownership: Trends and Demographics.” The Pew Research Center. March 2013. in Google Scholar

Gun Policy Remains Divisive, but Several Proposals Still Draw Bipartisan Support. The Pew Research Center. October 18. 2018. in Google Scholar

Hamby, P. 2010. GOP Rivals Take Aim at Coats’ Senate Record. 12 Feb.Search in Google Scholar

Hetherington, M. 2001. “Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization.” American Political Science Review 95 (3): 619–31. Sep. in Google Scholar

Hsu, S. 2004. House Votes to Repeal DC Gun Limits. The Washington Post. 30 September.Search in Google Scholar

Igielnik, Ruth. 2017. “Rural and Urban Gun Owners have Different Experiences, Views on Gun Policy.” The Pew Research Center. 10 July.Search in Google Scholar

Iyengar, I. G. S., and Y. Lelkes. 2012. “Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76 (3): 405–31. Fall. in Google Scholar

Jacoby, W. G. 1988. “The Impact of Party Identification on Issue Attitudes.” American Journal of Political Science 32 (3): 643–61. Aug. in Google Scholar

Jones, J. 2013. Men, Married, Southerners Most Likely to Own Guns. The Gallup Organization. 1 Feb.Search in Google Scholar

Koppelman, A. 2007. Why Democrats Dumped Gun Control. Salon. 18 April.Search in Google Scholar

Krugman, P. 2007. On Being Partisan. The New York Times. 26 Jan.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, F. 2009. Beyond Ideology: Politics, Principles, and Partisanship in the U.S. Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226470771.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lerman, D. 1992. Nra Letter, Fox Stance at Odds. The Daily Press. 24 Oct.Search in Google Scholar

Levendusky, M. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226473673.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lima, C. 2017. Sen. Warner to Oppose Concealed Carry Push. Politico. 3 May.Search in Google Scholar

Mason, L. 2015. “I Disrespectfully Disagree: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (1): 128–45. January. in Google Scholar

McAneny, L. 1993. Americans Tell Congress: Pass Brady Bill, Other Tough Gun Laws. Gallup Poll Monthly. March.Search in Google Scholar

Melzer, S. 2009. Gun Crusaders: The NRA’s Culture War. New York: New York University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, W. E., and M. K. Jennings. 1986. Parties in Transition: A Longitudinal Study of Party Elites and Party Supporters. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, P. R., and P. J. Conover. 2015. “Red and Blue States of Mind: Partisan Hostility and Voting in the United States.” Political Research Quarterly 68 (2): 236. in Google Scholar

Mitchell, A., and F. Bruni. 1999. Suburban Districts Seen as Key in the Debate over Gun Control. The New York Times. 16 June.Search in Google Scholar

Mourning Another Second Amendment Hero: Rep. Harold L. Volkmer, R.I.P. National Rifle Association-Institute for Legislative Action. 22 April 2011. in Google Scholar

National Rifle Association–Institute for Legislative Action. 2002. Statement by NRA Chief Lobbyist Chris Cox On John Dingell’s Victory in Michigan 15. 7 Aug. in Google Scholar

National Rifle Association–Institute for Legislative Action. 2011. Mourning another Second Amendment Hero: Rep. Harold L. Volkmer, R.I.P. 22 April. in Google Scholar

Obama, B. 2012. Statement by the President on the School Shooting in Newtown, CT. 14 December. in Google Scholar

O’Keefe, ed. 2013. Congress Reacts to Obama’s Gun Control Proposals. The Washington Post. 16 Jan.Search in Google Scholar

Olinger, D., and P. Chronis. 1999. Guns Used in Attack Believed Bought through Private Deals. The Denver Post. 24 April.Search in Google Scholar

Olson, M. 1966. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Osterlund, P. 1991. NRA’s Tactics May Have Helped Make Imminent Gun Control Vote a ‘squeaker.’. The Baltimore Sun. 6 May.Search in Google Scholar

Oxford, A. 2018. “Pearce Supports Concealed Carry, Metal Detectors on Campuses.” 23 Feb.Search in Google Scholar

Polsby, N. W., and W. G. Mayer. 1999. “Ideological Cohesion in the American Two-Party System.” In On Parties: Essays Honoring Austin Ranney, edited by W. P. Nelson and E. W. Raymond, 219–54. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Governmental Studies.Search in Google Scholar

Poole, K. T., and H. Rosenthal. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Quinn, G. 2019. “From Brady to Murphy: Gun Control Polarization in the Decades since the 103rd Congress.” Doctoral thesis. in Google Scholar

Saad, L. 2011. Self-Reported Gun Ownership in U.S. is Highest Since 1993. The Gallup Organization. 26 Oct. in Google Scholar

Sinclair, B. 2006. Party Wars, Polarization, and the Politics of National Policy Making. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Search in Google Scholar

Skogan, W. G., and M. G. Maxfield. 1981. Coping with Crime: Individual and Neighborhood Reactions. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, B. L., and R. C. Huff. 1982. “Crime in the Country: The Vulnerability and Victimization of Rural Citizens.” Journal of Criminal Justice 10: 271–82. in Google Scholar

Smith, S. S. 2007. Party Influence in Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511812613Search in Google Scholar

Spitzer, R. J. 2012. The Politics of Gun Control, 5th ed. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Statement by NRA Chief Lobbyist Chris Cox on John Dingell’s Victory in Michigan 15. NRA Institute for Legislative Action. 7 Aug 2002. in Google Scholar

Stern, S. 2004. House Repeal of D.C. Gun Laws Not Likely to Advance Further, except as an Election Issue. CQ Weekly. 2 Oct.Search in Google Scholar

Stolberg, S. G. 2005. Congress Passes New Legal Shield for Gun Industry. The New York Times. 21 Oct.Search in Google Scholar

Tonso, W. 1982. Gun and Society: The Social and Existential Roots of the American Attachment to Firearms. Baltimore: University Press of America.Search in Google Scholar

Truman, D. 1959. The Congressional Party: A Case Study. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Tygiel, J. 2004. Ronald Reagan and the Triumph of American Conservatism. New York: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Wattenberg, M. P. 1984. The Decline of American Political Parties, 1952–1980. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

“What Happened to Dan Coats?” John Hostettler for U.S Senate Ad. in Google Scholar

Wilson, H. 2015. . The Triumph of the Gun Rights Argument: Why the Gun Control Debate is Over. Santa Barbara: Praeger.Search in Google Scholar

Wing, N. 2013. Mitch McConnell Gun Control Email: You’re ‘Literally Surrounded,’ They’re ‘Coming for Your Guns.’. The Huffington Post. 22 Jan.Search in Google Scholar

Wright, J. D., P. H. Rossi, and K. Daly. 1983. Under the Gun: Weapons, Crime, and Violence in America. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Youtube. 2010. Coats for Indiana Senate Ad Youtube.Com. April 13. in Google Scholar

Time Series Polling

Gun Rights vs. Gun Control. The Pew Research Center. in Google Scholar

Guns. The Gallup Organization. in Google Scholar

Most Important Problem. The Gallup Organization. in Google Scholar

The Congressional Record

For Roll Call Votes and Floor Debates: 103rd–115th Congress. in Google Scholar

Federal Bureau of Investigation Data

For violent crime rates, see Federal Bureau of Investigation. Uniform Crime Reporting Tool. in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-09-29

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 29.11.2023 from
Scroll to top button