Abstract
Talk of fraud dominated President Donald J. Trump’s campaign and time in office. In this article, we explore whether members of Congress followed Trump’s lead in discussing all types of fraud, including electoral fraud as well as fraud, waste, and abuse. Using a unique dataset of the universe of congressional electronic newsletters from 2010 to 2021, we show that Republicans wrote to constituents about fraud much more than Democrats, especially about electoral fraud after Trump’s election, but it was Democrats who used angrier rhetoric to discuss fraud, a check on the President and many of the false claims about voter fraud in 2016 and 2020. These findings show an important aspect of the inter-party and inter-branch dynamics at play during Trump’s presidency; once keen to focus on fraud, waste and abuse in government congressional Republican attention shifted once the head of the executive branch was a co-partisan to parroting the claims of electoral and voter fraud made by the President.
References
Ansolabehere, S., and N. Persily. 2008. “Voter Fraud in the Eye of the Beholder.” Harvard Law Review 121: 1737–74.Search in Google Scholar
Berry, J., and S. Sobieraj. 2014. The Outrage Industry: Political Opinion Media and the New Incivility. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Blum, R. M. 2020. How the Tea Party Captured the GOP: Insurgent Factions in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226687667.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Brown, H. 2020. “Undermining the Social Welfare State through Investigating Fraud, Waste, and Abuse.” In Presented at 2020 PAR Symposium September 25.Search in Google Scholar
Brown, H. 2021. “Does Congress Still Care about Fraud, Waste, and Abuse: Yes, A Descriptive Analysis of Bills and Hearings, 1993–2016.” Public Integrity 23 (2): 181–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2020.1820700.Search in Google Scholar
Byers, J. S., and J. L. Carson. 2017. “Trump and the Republican Congress: The Challenges of Governing.” The Forum 15 (3): 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2017-0032.Search in Google Scholar
Clarke, A. J., and J. Jenkins. 2017. “Who are President Trump’s Allies in the House of Representatives?.” The Forum 15 (3): 415–29. https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2017-0029.Search in Google Scholar
Cormack, L. 2017. “DCinbox–Capturing Every Congressional Constituent E-Newsletter from 2009 Onwards.” The Legislative Scholar 2 (1): 27–34.Search in Google Scholar
Cormack, L., and H. Brown. 2021. “A Decade of Congressional Efforts to Conduct and Communicate Oversight of Medicare and Medicaid.” Public Policy & Aging Report 31 (2): 47–52, https://doi.org/10.1093/ppar/prab003.Search in Google Scholar
Cowburn, M., and M. Oswald. 2021. “Legislator Adoption of the Fake News Label: Ideological Differences in Republican Representative Use on Twitter.” The Forum 18 (3): 389–413. https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2020-2015.Search in Google Scholar
EdwardsIIIC. G. 2017. “No Deal: Donald Trump’s Leadership of Congress.” The Forum 15 (3): 451–97. https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2017-0031.Search in Google Scholar
Evans, J., and J. M. Hayden. 2019. Congressional Communication in the Digital Age. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Fording, R., and S. Schram. 2020. Hard White: The Mainstreaming of Racism in American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780197500484.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Fowler, E., and T. Ridout. 2014. “Political Advertising in 2014: The Year of the Outside Group.” The Forum 12 (4): 663–84.10.1515/for-2014-5030Search in Google Scholar
Fried, A., and D. B. Harris. 2015. “The Strategic Promotion of Distrust in Government in the Tea Party Age.” The Forum 13 (3): 417–43. https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2015-0028.Search in Google Scholar
Gelman, J., and S. L. Wilson. 2021. “Measuring Congressional Partisanship and its Consequences.” Legislative Studies Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12331.Search in Google Scholar
Gervais, B., H. K. Evans, and A. Russell. 2020. “Fear and Loathing on Twitter: Exploring Negative Rhetoric in Tweets during the 2018 Midterm Election.” In The Roads to Congress, edited by S. D. Foreman, M. L. Godwin, and W. C. Wilson. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-030-19819-0_3Search in Google Scholar
Gervais, B., and I. Morris. 2019. Reactionary Republicanism: How the Tea Party in the House Paved the Way for Trump’s Victory. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1017/S1537592718004516Search in Google Scholar
Gilens, M. 2000. Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226293660.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Green, M. 2019. Legislative Hardball: The House Freedom Caucus and the Power of Threat-Making in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108677011Search in Google Scholar
Grossmann, M., and D. Hopkins. 2016. Asymmetric Politics: Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190626594.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Gutierrez, G., A. X. Ocampo, M. A. Barreto, and G. Segura. 2019. “Somos Más: How Racial Threat and Anger Mobilized Latino Voters in the Trump Era.” Political Science Quarterly 72 (4): 960–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912919844327.Search in Google Scholar
Hacker, J., and P. Pierson. 2010. Winner-Take-All Politics. New York: Simon & Schuster.Search in Google Scholar
Just, M. R., J. Saraceno, and A. Crigler. 2021. “Presidential Home Style: Trump in the Era of COVID-19.” The Forum 18 (3): 347–66. https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2020-2013.Search in Google Scholar
Kempf, R. 2015. “Crafting Accountability Policy: Designing Offices of Inspector General.” Policy and Society 34 (2): 137–49.10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.05.003Search in Google Scholar
Kempf, R., and J. Cabrera. 2019. “The De Facto Independence of Federal Offices of Inspector General.” The American Review of Public Administration 49 (1): 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074018783012.Search in Google Scholar
Light, P. 2011. Monitoring Government: Inspectors General and the Search for Accountability. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lipinski, D. 2009. Congressional Communication: Content and Consequences. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Search in Google Scholar
Minnite, L. C. 2010. The Myth of Voter Fraud. Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press.10.7591/9780801459061Search in Google Scholar
Mutz, D. 2018. “Status Threat, Not Economic Hardship, Explains the 2016 Presidential Vote.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 15 (19): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1718155115.Search in Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 2017. “Powerlessness and the Politics of Blame.” National Endowment for the Humanities. Available at: https://www.neh.gov/about/awards/jefferson-lecture/martha-nussbaum-biography.Search in Google Scholar
Parker, D., and M. Dull. 2009. “Divided We Quarrel: The Politics of Congressional Investigations, 1947-2004.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 34 (3): 319–45, https://doi.org/10.3162/036298009788897790.Search in Google Scholar
Pearson, K. 2017. “President Trump and Congressional Republicans: Uncertain Teamwork in the 115th Congress.” The Forum 15 (3): 513–24. https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2017-0033.Search in Google Scholar
Phoenix, D. L. 2019. The Anger Gap: How Race Shapes Emotion in Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108641906Search in Google Scholar
Phoenix, D. L., and M. Arora. 2018. “From Emotion to action among Asian Americans: Assessing the Roles of Threat and Identity in the age of Trump.” Politics, groups, and Identities 6 (3): 357–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2018.1494011.Search in Google Scholar
Poole, K., and H. Rosenthal. 1984. “The Polarization of American Politics.” The Journal of Politics 46 (4): 1061–79.10.2307/2131242Search in Google Scholar
Russell, A. 2021. “Conservatives and Asymmetric Polarization.” In Conservative Political Communication: How Right-Wing Media and Messaging (Re)Made American Politics, edited by S. E. Jarvis, pp. 166–76. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781351187237-11Search in Google Scholar
Skowronek, S., J. Dearborn, and D. King. 2021. Phantoms of a Beleaguered Republic: The Deep State and the Unitary Executive. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780197543085.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Towler, C., and C. Parker. 2018. “Between Anger and Engagement: Donald Trump and Black America.” The Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics 3 (1): 219–53. https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2017.38.Search in Google Scholar
Webster, S. 2020. American Rage: How Anger Shapes Our Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108868303Search in Google Scholar
Williamson, V., T. Skocpol, and J. Coggin. 2011. “The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism.” Perspectives on Politics 9 (1): 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/s153759271000407x.Search in Google Scholar
Young, D. 2020. Irony and Outrage: The Polarized Landscape of Rage, Fear, and Laughter in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190913083.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
