Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter September 7, 2021

Retreating from Redistribution? Trends in Democratic Party Fidelity to Economic Equality, 1984–2020

Amelia Malpas and Adam Hilton
From the journal The Forum

Abstract

During his presidency, Barack Obama described rising economic inequality as “the defining challenge of our time.” But a growing number of scholars and journalists argue that rising inequality is in part a result of the Democratic Party’s diminishing fidelity to an egalitarian economic agenda and its embrace of neoliberalism. In this article, we assess the veracity of this claim through a content analysis of all national Democratic Party platforms issued since 1984. We find that broad assertions of Democratic retreat from economic equality are for the most part exaggerated. Specifically, we argue that Democrats’ support for egalitarian policies has been complex and varied over time, with a marked decline under the influence of the New Democrats in the 1990s followed by a significant resurgence thereafter. However, while party support for equalizing policies has rebounded overall, the extent of the party’s commitment to specific policies varies according to the purported deservingness of beneficiaries. Our findings have important implications for debates concerning Democratic Party change, the politics of inequality, and the policy agenda of the Joe Biden administration.


Corresponding author: Adam Hilton, Mount Holyoke College, South Hadley, MA, USA, E-mail:

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge the helpful advice on earlier drafts of this article by Jessica Hejny, Charlton Copeland, and E.J. Fagan.

References

Achen, C. H., and L. M. Bartels. 2016. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400882731Search in Google Scholar

Ahlquist, J. S. 2017. “Labor Unions, Political Representation, and Economic Inequality.” Annual Review of Political Science 20: 409–32, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051215-023225.Search in Google Scholar

Alphonso, G. 2015. “From Need to Hope: The American Family and Poverty in Partisan Discourse, 1900–2012.” Journal of Policy History 27: 592–635, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0898030615000287.Search in Google Scholar

Baer, K. 2000. Reinventing Democrats: The Politics of Liberalism from Reagan to Clinton. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Search in Google Scholar

Bartels, L. M. 2016. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400883363Search in Google Scholar

Bawn, K., M. Cohen, D. Karol, S. Masket, H. Noel, and J. Zaller. 2012. “A Theory of Political Parties: Groups, Policy Demands and Nominations in American Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 10: 571–97, https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592712001624.Search in Google Scholar

Benn Michaels, W. 2006. The Trouble with Diversity: How We Learned to Love Identity and Ignore Inequality. New York: Picador.Search in Google Scholar

Berry, J. M. 1999. The New Liberalism: The Rising Power of Citizen Groups. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bertram, E. 2015. The Workfare State: Public Assistance Politics from the New Deal to the New Democrats. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.10.9783/9780812206258Search in Google Scholar

Biden, J. 2021. Remarks By President Biden on the American Rescue Plan. White House Briefing Room. March 12.Search in Google Scholar

Brooks, D. 2021. Joe Biden is a Transformational President. New York Times. March 11.10.1142/9789811252457_0002Search in Google Scholar

Brown, M. K. 1999. Race, Money, and the American Welfare State. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.10.7591/9781501722356Search in Google Scholar

Burns, A. 2020. Seeking: Big Democratic Ideas that Make Everything Better. New York Times. May 17.Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, A. L. 2007. “Universalism, Targeting, and Participation.” In Remaking America: Democracy and Public Policy in an Era of Inequality, edited by S. Joe, H. Jacob and M.Suzanne. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Search in Google Scholar

Canes-Wrone, B. 2006. Who Leads Whom? Presidents, Policy, and the Public. Chicago: Chicago University Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226092492.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Corn, D. 2012. “Secret Video: Romney Tells Millionaire Donors what He Really Thinks of Obama Voters.” Mother Jones 17.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, A. S. 2019. “In the Private Interest? Business Influence and American Democracy.” In Can America Govern Itself?, edited by F. E. Lee and N.McCarty. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108667357.002Search in Google Scholar

Derysh, I. 2019. “Joe Biden to Rich Donors: ‘Nothing Would Fundamentally Change’ If He’s Elected.” Salon. https://www.salon.com/2019/06/19/joe-biden-to-rich-donors-nothing-would-fundamentally-change-if-hes-elected/.Search in Google Scholar

DiSalvo, D. 2008. “The Death and Life of the New Democrats.” Forum 6, https://doi.org/10.2202/1540-8884.1249.Search in Google Scholar

Druckman, J. N., and L. R. Jacobs. 2015. Who Governs? Presidents, Public Opinion, and Manipulation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226234557.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Edsall, T. B., and M. Edsall. 1992. Chain Reaction: The Impact of Race, Rights, and Taxes on American Politics. New York: Norton.Search in Google Scholar

Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1177/095892879100100108Search in Google Scholar

Fagan, E. J. 2018. “Marching Orders? US Party Platforms and Legislative Agenda Setting 1948–2014.” Political Research Quarterly 71: 949–59, https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912918772681.Search in Google Scholar

Ferguson, T., and J. Rogers. 1986. Right Turn: The Decline of the Democrats and the Future of American Politics. New York: Hill and Wang.Search in Google Scholar

Fiorina, M. P. 2017. Unstable Majorities: Polarization, Party Sorting, and Political Stalemate. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.Search in Google Scholar

Frank, T. 2016. Listen, Liberal. New York: Metropolitan Books.Search in Google Scholar

Fraser, N. 2017. “From Progressive Neoliberalism to Trump and beyond.” American Affairs 1: 46–64.Search in Google Scholar

Fraser, S., and G. Gerstle, eds. 1989. The Rise and Fall of the New Deal Order, 1930–1980. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691216256Search in Google Scholar

From, A. 2013. The New Democrats and the Return to Power. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Search in Google Scholar

Frymer, P. 1999. Uneasy Alliances: Race and Party Competition in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Geismer, L. 2015. Don’t Blame Us: Suburban Liberals and the Transformation of the Democratic Party. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400852420Search in Google Scholar

Geismer, L. 2019. “Democrats and Neoliberalism.” Vox. June 11. https://www.vox.com/polyarchy/2019/6/11/18660240/democrats-neoliberalism.Search in Google Scholar

Gerring, J. 1998. Party Ideologies in America, 1828–1996. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139174992Search in Google Scholar

Gerstle, G. 2018. “The Rise and Fall(?) of America’s Neoliberal Order.” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 28: 241–64, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0080440118000129.Search in Google Scholar

Gilens, M. 1999. Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226293660.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Gordon, L. 1994. Pitied But Not Entitled: Single Mothers and the History of Welfare. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Grimmer, J., and B. M. Stewart. 2013. “Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts.” Political Analysis 21: 267–97, https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mps028.Search in Google Scholar

Hacker, J. S. 1997. The Road to Nowhere: The Genesis of President Clinton’s Plan for Health Security. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691221199Search in Google Scholar

Hacker, J. S. 2002. The Divided Welfare State: The Battle over Public and Private Social Benefits in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511817298Search in Google Scholar

Hacker, J. S., and P. Paul. 2005. Off Center: The Republican Revolution and the Erosion of American Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hacker, J. S., and P. Paul. 2010. Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer – and Turned its Back on the Middle Class. New York: Simon and Schuster.Search in Google Scholar

Hale, J. F. 1995. “The Making of the New Democrats.” Political Science Quarterly 110: 207–32, https://doi.org/10.2307/2152360.Search in Google Scholar

Harvey, D. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199283262.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Hertel-Fernandez, A. 2019. State Capture: How Conservative Activists, Big Business, and Wealthy Donors Reshaped the States – And the Nation. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hilton, A. 2021. True Blues: The Contentious Transformation of the Democratic Party. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.10.2307/j.ctv18dvvw9Search in Google Scholar

Hilton, A., and A. Malpas. 2021. Biden’s Democrats Want to Roll Back the Reagan Era. Are the Party and the Country Ready? Washington Post Monkey Cage. March 19.Search in Google Scholar

HoSang, D. M., and J. E. Lowndes. 2019. Producers, Parasites, Patriots: Race and the New Right-Wing Politics of Precarity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.10.5749/j.ctvdjrrcqSearch in Google Scholar

Howard, C. 2007. The Welfare State Nobody Knows: Debunking Myths about US Social Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691235226Search in Google Scholar

Inglehart, R. 1977. The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Inglehart, R. 2007. “Changing Values Among Western Publics from 1970 to 2006.” West European Politics 31: 130–46.10.1080/01402380701834747Search in Google Scholar

Ingram, H. M., and A. L. Schneider. 2004. “Public Policy and the Social Construction of Deservedness.” In Deserving and Entitled: Social Constructions of Public Policy, edited by A.L. Schneider, and H.M. Ingram. Albany: State University of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jordan, S., C. M. L. Webb, and B. Can Wood. 2014. “The President, Polarization and the Party Platforms, 1944–2012.” The Forum 12: 169–89, https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2014-0024.Search in Google Scholar

Kabaservice, G. 2012. Rule and Ruin: The Downfall of Moderation and the Destruction of the Republican Party, from Eisenhower to the Tea Party. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Katz, M. B. 2008. The Price of Citizenship: Redefining the American Welfare State. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Search in Google Scholar

Katz, M. B. 2013. The Undeserving Poor: America’s Enduring Confrontation with Poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Katznelson, I. 2005. When Affirmative Action was White: An Untold History of Racial Inequality in Twentieth-Century America. New York: Norton.Search in Google Scholar

Kelly, N. J. 2019. America’s Inequality Trap. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kirkpatrick, J. 1976. The New Presidential Elite: Men and Women in National Politics. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Search in Google Scholar

Konczal, M. 2015. “Economic Prospects: A Progressive Economic Agenda.” New Labor Forum 24: 106–8, https://doi.org/10.1177/1095796014560759.Search in Google Scholar

Konczal, M. 2018. “How Ideology Works.” Dissent. 22 January. https://www.dissentmagazine.org/blog/neoliberalism-forum-mike-konczal.Search in Google Scholar

Kohler-Hausmann, J. 2017. Getting Tough: Welfare and Imprisonment in 1970s America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.23943/princeton/9780691174525.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kwak, J. 2019. “Take Back Our Party.” American Prospect. 9 December https://prospect.org/takebackourparty.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, F. E. 2016. Insecure Majorities: Congress and the Perpetual Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226409184.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, V. 2019. Ideas of Power: The Politics of American Party Ideology Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108568852Search in Google Scholar

Lieberman, R. C. 1998. Shifting the Color Line: Race and the American Welfare State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mann, T. E., and N. J. Ornstein. 2012. It’s Even Worse than it Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collided with the New Politics of Extremism. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Marx, I., L. Salanauskaite, and G. Verbist. 2016. “For the Poor, but Not Only the Poor: On Optimal Pro-poorness in Redistributive Policies.” Social Forces 95: 1–24, https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sow058.Search in Google Scholar

McCarty, N., K. T. Poole, and R. Howard. 2016. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Medvic, S. K. 2007. “Old Democrats in New Clothing? An Ideological Analysis of a Democratic Party Faction.” Party Politics 13: 587–609, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068807080087.Search in Google Scholar

Mettler, S. 1998. Dividing Citizens: Gender and Federalism in New Deal Public Policy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.10.7591/9781501728822Search in Google Scholar

Mettler, S., and A. Milstein. 2007. “American Political Development from Citizens’ Perspective: Tracking Federal Government’s Presence in Individual Lives over Time.” Studies in American Political Development 21: 110–30, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0898588x07000156.Search in Google Scholar

Mudge, S. L. 2018. Leftism Reinvented: Western Parties from Socialism to Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctv2867r6Search in Google Scholar

Murakawa, N. 2014. The First Civil Right: How Liberals Built Prison America. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Obama, B. 2011. Remarks By the President on the Economy in Osawatomie, Kansas. White House Office of the Press Secretary. 6 December.Search in Google Scholar

Obama, B. 2013. Inaugural Address By President Barack Obama. White House Office of the Press Secretary. 21 January.Search in Google Scholar

Osnos, E. 2020. “Can Biden’s Center Hold?” The New Yorker. August 23.Search in Google Scholar

Ott, J. 2018. “Words Can’t Do the Work for Us.” Dissent. 22 January. https://www.dissentmagazine.org/blog/neoliberalism-forum-julia-ott.Search in Google Scholar

Payne, L. W. 2013. ““If Elected, I [Still] Promise”: American Party Platforms – 1980–2008.” Journal of Political Science 41: 35–62, https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x12453757.Search in Google Scholar

Piketty, T. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Belknap Press.10.4159/9780674369542Search in Google Scholar

Piketty, T. 2019. Brahmin Left vs. Merchant Right: Rising Inequality and the Changing Structure of Political Conflict. Paris: Paris School of Economics. May 24.Search in Google Scholar

Pomper, G. 1967. ““If Elected, I Promise”: American Party Platforms.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 11: 318–52, https://doi.org/10.2307/2108616.Search in Google Scholar

Pomper, G., and S. S. Lederman. 1980. Elections in America: Control and Influence in Democratic Politics. New York: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Reed, A. Jr, ed. 1999. Without Justice for All: The New Liberalism and Our Retreat from Racial Equality. Boulder: Westview Press.Search in Google Scholar

ReedJr.A. 2014. “Nothing Left: The Long, Slow Surrender of American Liberals.” Harper’s Magazine. https://harpers.org/archive/2014/03/nothing-left-2/2/.Search in Google Scholar

Rodgers, D. 2018. The Uses and Abuses of Neoliberalism, Dissent Winter, 78–87.Search in Google Scholar

Rosenfeld, J. 2014. What Unions No Longer Do. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674726215Search in Google Scholar

Schram, S. F., J. Soss, and R. C. Fording, eds. 2003. Race and the Politics of Welfare Reform. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.11932Search in Google Scholar

Shafer, B. E. 2010. “The Pure Partisan Institution: National Party Conventions as Research Sites.” In The Oxford Handbook of American Political Parties and Interest Groups, edited by L. Sandy Maisel, and J.M. Berry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Shear, M. D., H. Carl, and M. Jonathan. 2021. With Relief Plan, Biden Takes on New Role: Crusader for the Poor. New York Times. March 11.Search in Google Scholar

Shklar, J. N. 1998. American Citizenship: The Quest for Inclusion. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Shoch, J. 2001. Trading Blows: Party Competition and U.S. Trade Policy in a Globalizing Era. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Search in Google Scholar

Skocpol, T. 1996. Boomerang: Health Care Reform and the Turn against Government. New York: Norton.Search in Google Scholar

Skocpol, T. 2003. Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Search in Google Scholar

Skocpol, T., and V. Williamson. 2012. The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199832637.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Skowronek, S. 1997. The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership from John Adams to Bill Clinton. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, M. A. 2010. “The Mobilization and Influence of Business Interests.” In The Oxford Handbook of American Political Parties and Interest Groups, edited by L. Sandy Maisel, and J.M. Berry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199542628.003.0023Search in Google Scholar

Soss, J., R. C. Fording, and S. F. Schram. 2011. Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226768786.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Starr, P. 2011. Remedy and Reaction: The Peculiar American Struggle over Health Reform. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Stein, J. 2016. “We Asked 8 Political Scientists if Party Platforms Matter. Here’s what We Learned.” Vox. July 12. https://www.vox.com/2016/7/12/12060358/political-science-of-platforms.Search in Google Scholar

Stiglitz, J. E. 2002. Globalization and its Discontents. New York: Norton.Search in Google Scholar

Tankersley, J., and J. DeParle. 2021. Two Decades After the ‘End of Welfare,’ Democrats Are Changing Direction. New York Times. March 13.Search in Google Scholar

Victor, J. N., and G. Y. Reinhardt. 2018. “Competing for the Platform: How Organized Interests Affect Party Positioning in the United States.” Party Politics 24: 265–77, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068816678888.Search in Google Scholar

Weaver, R. K. 2000. Ending Welfare as We Know it. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.Search in Google Scholar

Weaver, T. P. R. 2021. “Market Privilege: The Place of Neoliberalism in American Political Development.” Studies in American Political Development 35: 104–26, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0898588x20000206.Search in Google Scholar

Wilkerson, J., and A. Casas. 2017. “Large-Scale Computerized Text Analysis in Political Science: Opportunities and Challenges.” Annual Review of Political Science 20: 529–44, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052615-025542.Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, J. Q. 1962. The Amateur Democrat: Club Politics in Three Cities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.1093/oxfordjournals.pa.a053964Search in Google Scholar

Werner, A., O. Lacewell, and A. Volkens. 2015. “Manifesto Coding Instructions.” February. https://manifesto-project.wzb.eu/down/papers/handbook_2014_version_5.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Wolin, S. S. 2008. Democracy Inc: Managed Democracy and the Specter of Inverted Totalitarianism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Woolley, J. T., and G. Peters. n.d. The American Presidency Project. Also available at https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-09-07

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Scroll Up Arrow