Accessible Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter October 23, 2019

Calibration of MIMO Fully Polarimetric Imaging Radar Systems with Passive Targets

Georg Körner ORCID logo, Daniel Oppelt, Julian Adametz and Martin Vossiek
From the journal Frequenz

Abstract

The performance of polarimetric imaging radar systems depends greatly on how well they are calibrated. The complexity of the calibration procedure scales with the number of send and receive antennas, i. e. the size of the antenna array. This article proposes a practical and effective approach for calibrating a polarimetric near field MIMO imaging radar using only two simple passive targets. The calibration requires four measurement steps: An empty space measurement for suppressing direct mutual coupling between the channels. An offset short calibration with the specular reflection of a planar metal plate for the co-polarized channels. Two measurements with a dihedral reflector inclined at different angles for the cross-polarized calibration.

References

[1] J. Adametz and L.-P. Schmidt, “Threat object classification with a close range polarimetric imaging system by means of H-alpha decomposition,” in Eur. Radar Conf. 2013, 2013, pp. 77–80. Search in Google Scholar

[2] S. Nowok, S. Kueppers, H. Cetinkaya, M. Schroeder and R. Herschel, “Millimeter wave radar for high resolution 3D near field imaging for robotics and security scans,” in 18th Int. Radar Symp. (IRS), 2017, pp. 1–10. Search in Google Scholar

[3] I. Ullmann, J. Adametz, D. Oppelt, and M. Vossiek, “Millimeter wave radar imaging for non-destructive detection of material defects,” in AMA Conf. 2017, pp. 467–472, 2017. Search in Google Scholar

[4] D. Oppelt, J. Adametz, J. Groh, O. Goertz and M. Vossiek, “MIMO-SAR based millimeter-wave imaging for contactless assessment of burned skin,” in 2017 IEEE MTT-S Int. Symp., 2017, pp. 1383–1386. Search in Google Scholar

[5] M. Stolz, M. Li, Z. Feng, M. Kunert and W. Menzel, “High resolution automotive radar data clustering with novel cluster method.” in 2018 IEEE Radar Conf. (RadConf18). Search in Google Scholar

[6] A. Cenanovic, F. Gumbmann and L.-P. Schmidt, “Automated thread detection and characterization with a polarimetric multistatic imaging system,” in EUSAR 2012, 2012, pp. 195–198. Search in Google Scholar

[7] W. Wiesbeck and D. Kähny, “Single reference, three target calibration and error correction for monostatic, polarimetric free space measurements,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 10, pp. 1551–1558, 1991. Search in Google Scholar

[8] F. T. Ulaby and C. Elachi, Radar Polarimetry for Geoscience Applications. Norwood, MA: Artech House, Inc, 1990, pp. 197. Search in Google Scholar

[9] M. Bassi, A. Bevilacqua, A. Gerosa and A. Neviami, “Integrated SFCW transceivers for UWB breast cancer imaging: Architectures and circuit constraints,” in IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst., 2012, pp. 1228–1241. Search in Google Scholar

[10] W. Feng and L. S. M. Yi, “Near range radar imaging based on block sparsity and cross-correlation fusion algorithm,” in IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens, 2018. Search in Google Scholar

[11] J. R. Huynen, Phenomenological Theory of Radar Targets. Delft University of Technology, Delft University of Technology, 1970. Search in Google Scholar

[12] F. Gumbmann and L.-P. Schmidt, “Short range imaging with optimized sparse array,” in EUSAR, 2010, pp. 190–193. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Student, “The probable error of a mean,” Biometrika, pp. 1–25, 1908. Search in Google Scholar

[14] J. T. Kent, K. Mardia and J. Rao, “A characterization of the uniform distribution on the circle,” in Annals Stat., 1979, pp.882–889. Search in Google Scholar

[15] J.-S. Lee and E. Pottier, “Polarimetric radar imaging,” in Polarimetric Radar Imaging, J Brian, Ed. London: CRC Press, 2009, pp. 92–97. Search in Google Scholar

[16] A. Freeman and S. L. Durden, “A three-component scattering model for polarimetric SAR data,” in IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 1998, pp. 963–973. Search in Google Scholar

[17] A. Y. Y. S. G. P. S.-E. Sato, “Four-component scattering power decomposition with extended volume scattering model,” in IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett., 2012, pp.166–170. Search in Google Scholar

[18] Y. L. Sit, G. Li, S. Machala, H. Afrasiabi, C. Sturm and U. Lübbert, “BPSK-based MIMO FMCW automotive-radar concept for 3D position measurement,” in Proc. 15th Eur. Radar Conf., 2018, pp.289–292. Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-09-13
Published Online: 2019-10-23
Published in Print: 2019-11-26

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston