Diachronic Cognitive Linguistics

References

Allan, Kathryn. 2008. Metaphor and metonymy: A diachronic approach. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Austin, Patrik. 2021. Theory of language: a taxonomy. SN Social Sciences 1(3). 78.10.1007/s43545-021-00085-xSearch in Google Scholar

Baayen, Harald. 1992. Quantitative Aspects of Morphological Productivity. In Geert E. Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1991, 109–149. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-2516-1_8Search in Google Scholar

Baayen, R. Harald. 1993. On Frequency, Transparency, and Productivity. In Geert E. Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1992, 181–208. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-017-3710-4_7Search in Google Scholar

Baayen, R. Harald. 2009. Corpus Linguistics in Morphology: Morphological Productivity. In Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö (eds.), Corpus Linguistics, 899–919. (HSK 29.2). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Baayen, R.H., D.J. Davidson & D.M. Bates. 2008. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59(4). 390–412.10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Paul & Jesse Egbert (eds.). 2016. Triangulating methodological approaches in corpus-linguistic research. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315724812Search in Google Scholar

Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2008. Productivity: Evidence from Case and Argument Structure in Icelandic. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.8Search in Google Scholar

Barðdal, Jóhanna & Spike Gildea. 2015. Diachronic Construction Grammar. Epistemological context, basic assumptions and historical implications. In Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea (eds.), Diachronic construction grammar, 1–49. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.18Search in Google Scholar

Beckner, Clay, Richard Blythe, Joan Bybee, Morten H. Christiansen, William Croft, Nick C. Ellis, John Holland, Jinyun Ke, Diane Larsen-Freeman & Tom Schoenemann. 2009. Language is a Complex Adaptive System: Position Paper. Language Learning 59 Suppl. 1. 1–26.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00533.xSearch in Google Scholar

Bentz, Christian. 2018. Adaptive languages: an information-theoretic account of linguistic diversity. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110560107Search in Google Scholar

Bergen, Benjamin K. 2012. Louder than Words: The New Science of How the Mind Makes Meaning. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Bergs, Alexander & Thomas Hoffmann. 2017. Special issue on cognitive approaches to the history of English: introduction. English Language and Linguistics 21(2). 193–202.10.1017/S1360674317000077Search in Google Scholar

Blakemore, Diane. 1987. Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Boas, Hans C. 2013. Cognitive Construction Grammar. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 233–252. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0013Search in Google Scholar

Börjars, Kersti, Nigel Vincent & George Walkden. 2015. On Constructing a Theory of Grammatical Change. Transactions of the Philological Society 113(3). 363–382.10.1111/1467-968X.12068Search in Google Scholar

Boroditsky, Lera, Lauren Schmidt & Webb Phillips. 2003. Sex, syntax, and semantics. In Dedre Gentner & Susan Goldin-Meadow (eds.), Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought, 61–79. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bowern, Claire & Bethwyn Evans. 2015. Editors’ introduction: Foundations of the new historical linguistics. In Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics, 1–42. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315794013Search in Google Scholar

Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2005. Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615962Search in Google Scholar

Broccias, Cristiano. 2012. The Syntax-Lexicon Continuum. In Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, 735–747. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0061Search in Google Scholar

Brugman, Claudia. 1988. The Story of Over: Polysemy, Semantics, and the Structure of the Lexicon. New York: Garland.Search in Google Scholar

Butler, Christopher & Francisco Gonzálvez-García (eds.). 2014. Exploring functional-cognitive space. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511750526Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L., Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Christiansen, Morten H. & Nick Chater. 2016. Creating language: integrating evolution, acquisition, and processing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/10406.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Cienki, Alan. 2013. Cognitive Linguistics: Spoken language and gesture as expressions of conceptualization. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva Ladewig, David McNeill & Sedinha Tessendorf (eds.), Body - language - communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, 182–201. (HSK 38.1). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110261318.182Search in Google Scholar

Collins, Jeremy. 2019. Some language universals are historical accidents. In Karsten Schmidtke-Bode, Natalia Levshina, Susanne Maria Michaelis & Ilja A. Seržant (eds.), Explanation in typology. Diachronic sources, functional motivations and the nature of the evidence, 41–67. Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar

Condorelli, Marco (ed.). 2020. Advances in historical orthography, c. 1500–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108674171Search in Google Scholar

Condorelli, Marco & Hanna Rutkowska. forthc. Cambridge Handbook of Historical Orthography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2009. Toward a Social Cognitive Linguistics. In Vyvyan Evans & Stéphanie Pourcel (eds.), New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics, vol. 24, 395–420. (Human Cognitive Processing). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.24.25croSearch in Google Scholar

Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2016. Cognitive Linguistics’ seven deadly sins. Cognitive Linguistics 27(4). 479–491.10.1515/cog-2016-0059Search in Google Scholar

De Smet, Hendrik. 2008. Functional Motivations in the Development of Nominal and Verbal Gerunds in Middle and Early Modern English. English Language and Linguistics 12. 55–102.10.1017/S136067430700250XSearch in Google Scholar

De Smet, Hendrik, Frauke D’hoedt, Lauren Fonteyn & Kristel Van Goethem. 2018. The changing functions of competing forms: Attraction and differentiation. Cognitive Linguistics 29(2). 197–234.10.1515/cog-2016-0025Search in Google Scholar

De Wit, Astrid, Peter Petré & Frank Brisard. 2020. Standing out with the progressive. Journal of Linguistics. 1–36.10.1017/S0022226719000501Search in Google Scholar

Denis, Derek & Sali A. Tagliamonte. 2018. The changing future: competition, specialization and reorganization in the contemporary English future temporal reference system. English Language and Linguistics 22(3). 403–430.10.1017/S1360674316000551Search in Google Scholar

Diessel, Holger. 2019. The Grammar Network: How Linguistic Structure Is Shaped by Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108671040Search in Google Scholar

Diewald, Gabriele. 2011. Pragmaticalization (Defined) as Grammaticalization of Discourse Functions. Linguistics 49(2). 365–390.10.1515/ling.2011.011Search in Google Scholar

Dücker, Lisa, Stefan Hartmann & Renata Szczepaniak. 2019. Historische Korpuslinguistik: Vorwort. Jahrbuch für Germanistische Sprachgeschichte 10(1). IX–X.10.1515/jbgsg-2019-0003Search in Google Scholar

Ebert, Christian. 2019. Der Rückgang pränominaler Genitive in der anstatt-Konstruktion. Syntaktischer Wandel oder Grammatikalisierung? In Lisa Dücker, Stefan Hartmann & Renata Szczepaniak (eds.), Historische Korpuslinguistik, 219–240. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/jbgsg-2019-0013Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Nick C., Matthew Brook O’Donnell & Ute Römer. 2013. Usage-based language: Investigating the latent structures that underpin acquisition. Language Learning 63. 25–51.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00736.xSearch in Google Scholar

Everett, Caleb. 2013. Linguistic relativity: evidence across languages and cognitive domains. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110308143Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. 1988. “The mechanisms of “Construction Grammar.” Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 35–55.10.3765/bls.v14i0.1794Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay & Mary Catherine O’Connor. 1988. Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone. Language 64(3). 501–538.10.2307/414531Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, Olga. 2013. An inquiry into unidirectionality as a foundational element of grammaticalization: On the role played by analogy and the synchronic grammar system in processes of language change. Studies in Language 37(3). 515–533.10.1075/bct.79.03fisSearch in Google Scholar

Fonteyn, Lauren. 2019. Categoriality in language change: the case of the English gerund. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190917579.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Fonteyn, Lauren, Hendrik De Smet & Lisbet Heyvaert. 2015. What It Means to Verbalize: The Changing Discourse Functions of the English Gerund. Journal of English Linguistics. 36–60.10.1177/0075424214564365Search in Google Scholar

Fonteyn, Lauren & Stefan Hartmann. 2016. Usage-based perspectives on diachronic morphology: A mixed-methods approach towards English ing-nominals. Linguistics Vanguard 2(1). doi: 10.1515/lingvan-2016-0057.10.1515/lingvan-2016-0057Search in Google Scholar

Fonteyn, Lauren & Andrea Nini. 2020. Individuality in syntactic variation: An investigation of the seventeenth-century gerund alternation. Cognitive Linguistics 31(2). 279–308.10.1515/cog-2019-0040Search in Google Scholar

Ford, Marilyn & Joan Bresnan. 2013. Using convergent evidence from psycholinguistics and usage. In Manfred G. Krug & Julia Schlüter (eds.), Research methods in language variation and change, 295–312. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511792519.020Search in Google Scholar

Frank, Roslyn M. & Nathalie Gontier. 2010. On Constructing a Research Model for Historical Cognitive Linguistics (HCL): Some Theoretical Considerations. In Margaret E. Winters, Heli Tissari & Kathryn Allan (eds.), Historical Cognitive Linguistics, 31–69. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110226447.31Search in Google Scholar

Fried, Mirjam. 2015. Irregular morphology in regular syntactic patterns: A case of constructional re-alignment. In Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea (eds.), Constructional Approaches to Language, vol. 18, 139–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.18.05friSearch in Google Scholar

Geeraerts, Dirk. 1997. Diachronic Prototype Semantics: A Contribution to Historical Lexicology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gelderen, Elly van. 2011. Grammaticalization and generative grammar: A difficult liaison. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, 43–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0004Search in Google Scholar

Gibbs jr., Raymond W. 2006. Introspection and Cognitive Linguistics: Should we Trust our own Intuitions? Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 4(1). 135–151.10.1075/arcl.4.06gibSearch in Google Scholar

Gibbs jr., Raymond W. 2007. Why cognitive linguists should care more about empirical methods. In Monica Gonzalez-Marquez, Irene Mittelberg, Seana Coulson & Michael J. Spivey (eds.), Methods in Cognitive Linguistics, 2–18. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.18.06gibSearch in Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, Gerd. 2004. Mindless statistics. The Journal of Socio-Economics 33(5). 587–606.10.1016/j.socec.2004.09.033Search in Google Scholar

Givón, T. 2013. On the Intellectual Roots of Functionalism in Linguistics. In Shannon Bischoff & Carmen Jany (eds.), Functional Approaches to Language, 9–28. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110285321.9Search in Google Scholar

Glynn, Dylan. 2014a. Techniques and Tools: Corpus Methods and Statistics for Semantics. In Dylan Glynn & Justyana A. Robinson (eds.), Corpus Methods for Semantics, vol. 43, 307–341. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.43.12glySearch in Google Scholar

Glynn, Dylan. 2014b. Correspondence analysis. Exploring data and identifying patterns. In Dylan Glynn &. Justyana A. Robinson (eds.), Corpus Methods for Semantics: Quantitative Studies in Polysemy and Synonymy, 443–485. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.43.17glySearch in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 2013. Constructionist Approaches. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 15–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0002Search in Google Scholar

Grady, Joseph E. 1997. THEORIES ARE BUILDINGS revisited. Cognitive Linguistics 8(4). 267–290.10.1515/cogl.1997.8.4.267Search in Google Scholar

Greenhill, Simon J. 2016. Demographic correlates of language diversity. In Nick Riemer (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Semantics, 557–578. London, New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. 2014. Corpus and Quantitative Methods. In Jeannette Littlemore & John R. Taylor (eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics, 279–300. London: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. 2015. The most under-used statistical method in corpus linguistics: multi-level (and mixed-effects) models. Corpora 10(1). 95–125.10.3366/cor.2015.0068Search in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. 2019. On classification trees and random forests in corpus linguistics: Some words of caution and suggestions for improvement. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. doi: 10.1515/cllt-2018-0078.10.1515/cllt-2018-0078Search in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. 2021. (Generalized Linear) Mixed‐Effects Modeling: A Learner Corpus Example. Language Learning. doi: 10.1111/lang.12448.10.1111/lang.12448Search in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th., Beate Hampe & Doris Schönefeld. 2005. Converging Evidence: Bringing Together Experimental and Corpus Data on the Associations of Verbs and Constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 16(4). 635–676.10.1515/cogl.2005.16.4.635Search in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th., Beate Hampe & Doris Schönefeld. 2010. Converging Evidence II: More on the Association of Verbs and Constructions. In Sally Rice & John Newman (eds.), Empirical and Experimental Methods in Cognitive/Functional Research, 59–72. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. & Martin Hilpert. 2008. The Identification of Stages in Diachronic Corpora: Variability-Based Neighbor Clustering. Corpora 3(1). 59–81.10.3366/E1749503208000075Search in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. & Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds.). 2006. Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics: Corpus-Based Approaches to Syntax and Lexis. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197709Search in Google Scholar

Hampe, Beate. 2005. The psychological status of image schemas. In Beate Hampe (ed.), Image schemas in Cognitive Linguistics: Introduction, 1–12. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197532.0.1Search in Google Scholar

Harder, Peter. 2010. Meaning in mind and society: a functional contribution to the social turn in cognitive linguistics. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110216059Search in Google Scholar

Harder, Peter & Kaspar Boye. 2011. Grammaticalization and functional linguistics. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 56–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0005Search in Google Scholar

Hartmann, Stefan. 2014. Constructing a Schema: Word-Class Changing Morphology in a Usage-Based Perspective. In Martin Hilpert & Susanne Flach (eds.), Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, Vol. 2, 235–252. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/gcla-2014-0014Search in Google Scholar

Hartmann, Stefan. 2018a. Divergent theories, converging evidence: The constructional semantics of competing future constructions. In Beate Hampe & Susanne Flach (eds.), Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, Vol. 6, 91–114. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/gcla-2018-0005Search in Google Scholar

Hartmann, Stefan. 2018b. Derivational morphology in flux: a case study of word-formation change in German. Cognitive Linguistics 29(1). 77–119.10.1515/cog-2016-0146Search in Google Scholar

Hartmann, Stefan. 2020. Language change and language evolution: Cousins, siblings, twins? Glottotheory 11(1). 15–39.10.1515/glot-2020-2003Search in Google Scholar

Hartmann, Stefan & Michael Pleyer. 2021. Constructing a protolanguage: reconstructing prehistoric languages in a usage-based construction grammar framework. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 376(1824). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0200.10.1098/rstb.2020.0200Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 1999. Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics 37(6). 1043–1068.10.1515/ling.37.6.1043Search in Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613463Search in Google Scholar

Hengeveld, Kees & J. Lachlan Mackenzie. 2008. Functional discourse grammar: a typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278107.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Herbst, Thomas. 2011. The status of generalizations: Valency and argument structure constructions. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 59(4). 347–367.10.1515/zaa-2011-0406Search in Google Scholar

Herbst, Thomas & Peter Uhrig. 2019. Towards a valency and argument structure constructicon of English: Turning the valency patternbank into a constructicon. Lexicographica 35(2019). 87–104.10.1515/lex-2019-0006Search in Google Scholar

Heyvaert, Liesbet. 2003. A cognitive-functional approach to nominalization in English. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110903706Search in Google Scholar

Heyvaert, Liesbet. 2008. On the constructional semantics of gerundive nominalizations. Folia Linguistica 42(1–2). 39–82.10.1515/FLIN.2008.39Search in Google Scholar

Heyvaert, Liesbet, Stefan Hartmann & Hubert Cuyckens. 2019. Categorial shift: from description to theory and back again. Language Sciences 73, 1–9.10.1016/j.langsci.2018.11.001Search in Google Scholar

Hilpert, Martin. 2006. Distinctive Collexeme Analysis and Diachrony. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 2(2). 243–256.10.1016/j.langsci.2018.11.001Search in Google Scholar

Hilpert, Martin. 2013. Constructional Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139004206Search in Google Scholar

Hilpert, Martin. 2018. Three open questions in diachronic construction grammar. In Evie Coussé, Peter Andersson & Joel Olofsson (eds.), Grammaticalization meets construction grammar, 21–39. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.21.c2Search in Google Scholar

Hilpert, Martin & Florent Perek. 2015. Meaning change in a petri dish: constructions, semantic vector spaces, and motion charts. Linguistics Vanguard 1(1). 339–350.10.1515/lingvan-2015-0013Search in Google Scholar

Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2004. Lexicalization and Grammaticization: Opposite or Orthogonal? In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.), What Makes Grammaticalization?, 21–42. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197440Search in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse. Language 56(2). 251–299.10.1353/lan.1980.0017Search in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165525Search in Google Scholar

Hruschka, Daniel J., Morten H. Christiansen, Richard A. Blythe, William Croft, Paul Heggarty, Salikoko S. Mufwene, Janet B. Pierrehumbert & Shana Poplack. 2009. Building Social Cognitive Models of Language Change. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13. 464–469.10.1016/j.tics.2009.08.008Search in Google Scholar

Huber, Judith. 2017. Motion and the English verb: a diachronic study. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190657802.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Imo, Wolfgang. 2015. Interactional Construction Grammar. Linguistics Vanguard 1(1). 69–77.10.1515/lingvan-2015-0008Search in Google Scholar

Jacobs, Joachim. 2009. Valenzbindung oder Konstruktionsbindung? Eine Grundfrage der Grammatiktheorie. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 37(3). 490–513.10.1515/ZGL.2009.033Search in Google Scholar

Janda, Laura (ed.). 2013. Cognitive Linguistics: The Quantitative Turn. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110335255Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Keller, Rudi. 1994. Sprachwandel: Von der unsichtbaren Hand in der Sprache. Tübingen, Basel: Francke.Search in Google Scholar

Kempf, Luise. 2016. Adjektivsuffixe in Konkurrenz. Wortbildungswandel vom Frühneuhochdeutschen zum Neuhochdeutschen. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110429787Search in Google Scholar

Kirby, Simon. 2012. Language is an Adaptive System: The Role of Cultural Evolution in the Origins of Structure. In Maggie Tallerman & Kathleen R. Gibson (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution, 589–604. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199541119.013.0061Search in Google Scholar

Kumashiro, Toshiyuki. 2016. A cognitive grammar of Japanese clause structure. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.53Search in Google Scholar

Kuo, Yueh Hsin. forthc. Bidirectionality between modal and conditional constructions in Mandarin Chinese: A constructionalization account. Diachronica.10.1075/dia.20047.kuoSearch in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1990. The Invariance Hypothesis: Is Abstract Reason Based on Image-Schemas? Cognitive Linguistics 1(1). 39–74.10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.39Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 2003. Metaphors we live by. Updated Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1988. A Usage-Based Model. In Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (ed.), Topics in Cognitive Linguistics, 127–161. (Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science 50). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.50.06lanSearch in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1999. Assessing the Cognitive Linguistic Enterprise. In Theo Janssen & Gisela Redeker (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics, 13–59. (Cognitive Linguistics Research 15). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110803464.13Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2000. A Dynamic Usage-Based Model. In Michael Barlow & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Usage-Based Models of Language, 1–63. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 2017. Complexity theory: The lessons continue. In Lourdes Ortega & ZhaoHong Han (eds.), Complexity Theory and Language Development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman, 11–50. (Language Learning and Language Teaching 48). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.48.02larSearch in Google Scholar

Lehmann, Christian. 2015. Thoughts on Grammaticalization. 3rd ed. (Classics in Linguistics 1). Berlin: Language Science Press.10.26530/OAPEN_603353Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. 2003. Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613609Search in Google Scholar

Levshina, Natalia. 2015. How to do linguistics with R. Data exploration and statistical analysis. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.195Search in Google Scholar

Levshina, Natalia. 2016. When variables align: A Bayesian multinomial mixed-effects model of English permissive constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 27(2). 235–268.10.1515/cog-2015-0054Search in Google Scholar

Levshina, Natalia. 2020. Conditional Inference Trees and Random Forests. In Magali Paquot & Stefan Th. Gries (eds.), A Practical Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, 611–643. Cham: Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-46216-1_25Search in Google Scholar

Levshina, Natalia & Kris Heylen. 2014. A Radically Data-driven Construction Grammar: Experiments with Dutch causative constructions. In Ronny Boogaart, Timothy Colleman & Gijsbert Rutten (eds.), Extending the Scope of Construction Grammar. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110366273.17Search in Google Scholar

Li, Peggy & Lila Gleitman. 2002. Turning the tables: language and spatial reasoning. Cognition 83(3). 265–294.10.1093/oso/9780199828098.003.0023Search in Google Scholar

Majid, Asifa, Melissa Bowerman, Sotaro Kita, Daniel B.M. Haun & Stephen C. Levinson. 2004. Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(3). 108–114.10.1016/j.tics.2004.01.003Search in Google Scholar

Matlock, Teenie & Bodo Winter. 2015. Experimental Semantics. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, 771–790. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

McElreath, Richard. 2020. Statistical Rethinking. A Bayesian Course with R and Stan. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press.10.1201/9780429029608Search in Google Scholar

Mengden, Ferdinand von & Horst J. Simon. 2014. What is it then, this Grammaticalization? Folia Linguistica 48(2). 347–360.10.1515/flin.2014.012Search in Google Scholar

Mesoudi, Alex. 2011. Cultural evolution: How Darwinian theory can explain human culture and synthesize the social sciences. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226520452.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Mickan, Anne, Maren Schiefke & Anatol Stefanowitsch. 2014. Key is a llave is a Schlüssel: A failure to replicate an experiment from Boroditsky et al. 2003. In Martin Hilpert & Susanne Flach (eds.), Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 2013, 39–50. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/gcla-2014-0004Search in Google Scholar

Mihatsch, Wiltrud. 2005. Experimental Data vs. Diachronic Typological Data: Two Types of Evidence for Linguistic Relativity. In Stephan Kepser & Marga Reis (eds.), Linguistic Evidence, vol. 85, 371–392. (Studies in Generative Grammar). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197549.371Search in Google Scholar

Neels, Jakob. 2020. Refining frequency-effect explanations of grammaticalisation. PhD thesis. Leipzig: University of Leipzig.Search in Google Scholar

Nicenboim, Bruno & Shravan Vasishth. 2016. Statistical methods for linguistic research: Foundational Ideas-Part II: Statistical methods for linguistics–Part II. Language and Linguistics Compass 10(11). 591–613.10.1111/lnc3.12207Search in Google Scholar

Nichols, J. 1984. Functional Theories of Grammar. Annual Review of Anthropology 13(1). Annual Reviews. 97–117.10.1146/annurev.an.13.100184.000525Search in Google Scholar

Noël, Dirk & Timothy Colleman. 2021. Diachronic construction grammar. In Xu Wen & John R. Taylor (eds.), The Routledge handbook of cognitive linguistics, 662–675. (Routledge Handbooks in Linguistics). New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781351034708-44Search in Google Scholar

Oakley, Todd. 2007. Image Schemas. In Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, 214–235. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Perek, Florent. 2016. Using distributional semantics to study syntactic productivity in diachrony. A case study. Linguistics 54(1). 149–188.10.1515/ling-2015-0043Search in Google Scholar

Perek, Florent. 2018. Recent change in the productivity and schematicity of the way-construction: A distributional semantic analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 14(1). De Gruyter Mouton. 65–97.10.1515/cllt-2016-0014Search in Google Scholar

Perezgonzalez, Jose D. 2015. Fisher, Neyman-Pearson or NHST? A tutorial for teaching data testing. Frontiers in Psychology 6. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00223.10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00223Search in Google Scholar

Petré, Peter. 2017. The extravagant progressive: an experimental corpus study on the history of emphatic be V-ing. English Language and Linguistics 21(2). 227–250.10.1017/S1360674317000107Search in Google Scholar

Petré, Peter, Lynn Anthonissen, Sara Budts, Enrique Manjavacas, Emma-Louise Silva, William Standing & Odile A.O. Strik. 2019. Early Modern Multiloquent Authors (EMMA): Designing a large-scale corpus of individuals’ languages. ICAME Journal 43(1). 83–122.10.2478/icame-2019-0004Search in Google Scholar

Pijpops, Dirk, Isabeau De Smet & Freek Van de Velde. 2018. Constructional contamination in morphology and syntax. Four case studies. Constructions and Frames 10(2). 269–305.10.1075/cf.00021.pijSearch in Google Scholar

Pijpops, Dirk & Freek Van de Velde. 2016. Constructional contamination: How does it work and how do we measure it? Folia Linguistica 50(2). 543–581.10.1515/flin-2016-0020Search in Google Scholar

Plag, Ingo. 1999. Morphological Productivity: Structural Constraints in English Derivation. (Topics in English Linguistics 28). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Pleyer, Michael & James Winters. 2014. Integrating Cognitive Linguistics and Language Evolution Research. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum 11. 19–43.10.12775/ths-2014-002Search in Google Scholar

Pulvermüller, Friedemann, Bert Cappelle & Yury Shtyrov. 2013. Brain Basis of Meaning, Words, Constructions, and Grammar. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 397–415. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0022Search in Google Scholar

Richerson, Peter J. & Morten H. Christiansen (eds.). 2010. Cultural Evolution: Society, Technology, Language, and Religion. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, Seán G. 2018. Robust, Causal, and Incremental Approaches to Investigating Linguistic Adaptation. Frontiers in Psychology 9. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00166.10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00166Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, Seán G, Anton Killin, Angarika Deb, Catherine Sheard, Simon J Greenhill, Kaius Sinnemäki, José Segovia-Martín, Jonas Nölle, Aleksandrs Berdicevskis, Archie Humphreys-Balkwill, Hannah Little, Christopher Opie, Guillaume Jacques, Lindell Bromham, Peeter Tinits, Robert M Ross, Sean Lee, Emily Gasser, Jasmine Calladine, Matthew Spike, Stephen Francis Mann, Olena Shcherbakova, Ruth Singer, Shuya Zhang, Antonio Benítez-Burraco, Christian Kliesch, Ewan Thomas-Colquhoun, Hedvig Skirgård, Monica Tamariz, Sam Passmore, Thomas Pellard & Fiona Jordan. 2020. CHIELD: the causal hypotheses in evolutionary linguistics database. Journal of Language Evolution 5(2). 101–120.10.12775/3991-1.099Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, Seán & James Winters. 2013. Linguistic Diversity and Traffic Accidents: Lessons from Statistical Studies of Cultural Traits. PLoS One 8(8). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070902.10.1371/journal.pone.0070902Search in Google Scholar

Ronneberger-Sibold, Elke. 1994. Konservative Nominalflexion und klammerndes Verfahren im Deutschen. In Klaus-Michael Köpcke (ed.), Funktionale Untersuchungen zur deutschen Nominal- und Verbalmorphologie, 115–130. Tübingen: Niemeyer.10.1515/9783111339825-008Search in Google Scholar

Sanchez-Stockhammer, Christina. 2018. English compounds and their spelling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108181877Search in Google Scholar

Scherer, Carmen. 2007. The Role of Productivity in Word-Formation Change. In Joseph C. Salmons & Shannon Dubenion-Smith (eds.), Historical Linguistics 2005, 257–271. (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 284). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.284.19schSearch in Google Scholar

Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2000. English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells: From Corpus to Cognition. Vol. 34. (Topics in English Linguistics). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110808704Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2014. A blueprint of the entrenchment-and-conventionalization model. In Martin Hilpert & Susanne Flach (eds.), Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, Vol. 2, 3–25. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/gcla-2015-0002Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2017. A framework for understanding entrenchment and its psychological foundations. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Entrenchment and the Psychology of Language Learning. How We Reorganize and Adapt Linguistic Knowledge, 9–39. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.10.1037/15969-002Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2020. The dynamics of the linguistic system: usage, conventionalization, and entrenchment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198814771.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Schönefeld, Doris (ed.). 2011. Converging evidence. Methodological and theoretical issues for linguistic research. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.33Search in Google Scholar

Schoonjans, Steven. 2014. Is gesture subject to grammaticalization? Papers of the Linguistic Society of Belgium 8. 30–43.Search in Google Scholar

Shu, Dingfang, Lifei Zhang & Tian Li. 2019. General introduction: 30 years of Cognitive Linguistics in China. In Dingfang Shu, Hui Zhang & Lifei Zhang (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics and the Study of Chinese, 7–44. (Human Cognitive Processing 67). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/hcp.67.02shuSearch in Google Scholar

Smirnova, Elena & Tanja Mortelmans. 2010. Funktionale Grammatik: Konzepte und Theorien. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110223873Search in Google Scholar

Smirnova, Elena & Lotte Sommerer. 2020. Introduction: The nature of the node and the network – Open questions in Diachronic Construction Grammar. In Lotte Sommerer & Elena Smirnova (eds.), Nodes and networks in diachronic construction grammar, 2–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/cal.27.intSearch in Google Scholar

Steels, Luc. 2000. Language as a Complex Adaptive System. In Marc Schoenauer, Kalyanmoy Deb, Günter Rudolph, Xin Yao, Evelyne Lutton, Juan Julian Merelo & Hans-Paul Schwefel (eds.), Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, 17–26. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1917). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2011. Argument Structure: Item-Based or Distributed? Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 59(4). 369–386.10.1515/zaa-2011-0407Search in Google Scholar

Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Stefan Th. Gries. 2003. Collostructions: Investigating the Interaction of Words and Constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2). 209–243.10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03steSearch in Google Scholar

Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620904Search in Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali A. & R. Harald Baayen. 2012. Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change 24(02). 135–178.10.1017/S0954394512000129Search in Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali A., Mercedes Durham & Jennifer Smith. 2014. Grammaticalization at an early stage: future be going to in conservative British dialects. English Language and Linguistics 18(1). 75–108.10.1017/S1360674313000282Search in Google Scholar

Terkourafi, Marina. 2011. The Pragmatic Variable: Toward a Procedural Interpretation. language in Society 40. 343–372.10.1017/S0047404511000212Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael. 2009. The Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. In Edith Laura Bavin (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Child Language, 69–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511576164.005Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2008. The Grammaticalization of NP of NP Patterns. In Alexander Bergs & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), Constructions and Language Change, 23–45. (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 194). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2014. Towards a Constructional Framework for Studying Language Change. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 1(1). 3–21.10.1075/cogls.1.1.01traSearch in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale. 2010. Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalization: How Do They Intersect? In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalization, 19–44. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.90.04traSearch in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. (Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics 6). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Trousdale, Graeme. 2014. On the relationship between grammaticalization and constructionalization. Folia Linguistica 48(2). 557–577.10.1515/flin.2014.018Search in Google Scholar

Tummers, Jose, Kris Heylen & Dirk Geeraerts. 2005. Usage-based approaches in Cognitive Linguistics: A technical state of the art. 1(2). De Gruyter Mouton. 225–261.10.1515/cllt.2005.1.2.225Search in Google Scholar

Ungerer, Tobias & Stefan Hartmann. 2020. Delineating extravagance: Assessing speakers’ perceptions of imaginative constructional patterns. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34. 345–356.10.31234/osf.io/5ma6sSearch in Google Scholar

Walkden, George. 2019. The many faces of uniformitarianism in linguistics. Glossa 4(1). doi 10.5334/gjgl.88810.5334/gjgl.888Search in Google Scholar

Wheeler, Eric S. 2005. Multidimensional Scaling for Linguists. In Reinhard Köhler, Gabriel Altmann & Rajmund G. Piotrowski (eds.), Quantitative Linguistics, 548–553. (HSK 27). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Wilcox, Sherman. 2018. Ten lectures on cognitive linguistics and the unification of spoken and signed languages. (Distinguished Lectures in Cognitive Linguistics). Leiden; Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789004336773Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber. 1993. Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua 90(1). 1–25.10.1017/CBO9781139028370.010Search in Google Scholar

Winter, Bodo. 2019. Statistics for linguists: an introduction using R. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315165547Search in Google Scholar

Winter, Bodo & Martine Grice. 2021. Independence and generalizability in linguistics. Linguistics 59(5). 1251–1277.10.1515/ling-2019-0049Search in Google Scholar

Winters, Margaret E. 1987. Syntactic and semantic space: The development of the French subjunctive. In Anna Giacalone Ramat, Onofrio Carruba & Giuliano Bernini (eds.), Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.48.44winSearch in Google Scholar

Winters, Margaret E. 2010. Introduction: On the Emergence of Diachronic Cognitive Linguistics. In Margaret E. Winters, Heli Tissari & Kathryn Allan (eds.), Historical Cognitive Linguistics, 3–27. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110226447.3Search in Google Scholar

Winters, Margaret E. 2020. Historical linguistics: A cognitive grammar introduction. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.227Search in Google Scholar

Zehentner, Eva. 2019. Competition in Language Change: The Rise of the English Dative Alternation. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110633856Search in Google Scholar

Zeldes, Amir. 2012. Productivity in Argument Selection: From Morphology to Syntax. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110303919Search in Google Scholar

Zerubavel, Eviatar. 1997. Social mindscapes: an invitation to cognitive sociology. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zwaan, Rolf A., Alexander Etz, Richard E. Lucas & M. Brent Donnellann. 2017. Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001972.10.1017/S0140525X17001972Search in Google Scholar