Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton November 3, 2021

Diachronic Cognitive Linguistics

Past, present, and future

Stefan Hartmann

Abstract

Diachronic studies have played an increasingly important role in recent Cognitive Linguistics. This introductory paper provides an overview of some major lines of research in this field, starting with the inherently panchronic approach that characterizes most flavors of usage-based theory from Cognitive Grammar to recent complex adaptive systems approaches. In particular, the “constructionist turn” and the “quantitative turn” in Diachronic Cognitive Linguistics are discussed in detail. Diachronic Cognitive Linguistics is introduced as a multi-faceted, dynamic framework that aims at providing a holistic and nuanced picture of the complex interplay between language, cognition, and cultural evolution. In addition, this paper introduces the contributions to the present volume in some detail and discusses their relation to current research trends and paradigms within the broader framework of Diachronic Cognitive Linguistics.

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to Anatol Stefanowitsch for inviting me to edit this volume, and for his guidance throughout the editorial process. Thanks are also due to the editorial assistants Yoo Yung Lee and Amy Amoakuh as well as to the team at De Gruyter. I am also grateful to Carlotta J. Hübener, Yueh Hsin Kuo, Michael Pleyer, and Markus Schiegg for helpful comments and suggestions regarding the present introduction. Last but not least, many thanks to all contributors for making this volume possible.

References

Allan, Kathryn. 2008. Metaphor and metonymy: A diachronic approach. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Austin, Patrik. 2021. Theory of language: a taxonomy. SN Social Sciences 1(3). 78.10.1007/s43545-021-00085-xSearch in Google Scholar

Baayen, Harald. 1992. Quantitative Aspects of Morphological Productivity. In Geert E. Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1991, 109–149. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-2516-1_8Search in Google Scholar

Baayen, R. Harald. 1993. On Frequency, Transparency, and Productivity. In Geert E. Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1992, 181–208. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-017-3710-4_7Search in Google Scholar

Baayen, R. Harald. 2009. Corpus Linguistics in Morphology: Morphological Productivity. In Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö (eds.), Corpus Linguistics, 899–919. (HSK 29.2). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Baayen, R.H., D.J. Davidson & D.M. Bates. 2008. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59(4). 390–412.10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Paul & Jesse Egbert (eds.). 2016. Triangulating methodological approaches in corpus-linguistic research. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315724812Search in Google Scholar

Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2008. Productivity: Evidence from Case and Argument Structure in Icelandic. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.8Search in Google Scholar

Barðdal, Jóhanna & Spike Gildea. 2015. Diachronic Construction Grammar. Epistemological context, basic assumptions and historical implications. In Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea (eds.), Diachronic construction grammar, 1–49. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.18Search in Google Scholar

Beckner, Clay, Richard Blythe, Joan Bybee, Morten H. Christiansen, William Croft, Nick C. Ellis, John Holland, Jinyun Ke, Diane Larsen-Freeman & Tom Schoenemann. 2009. Language is a Complex Adaptive System: Position Paper. Language Learning 59 Suppl. 1. 1–26.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00533.xSearch in Google Scholar

Bentz, Christian. 2018. Adaptive languages: an information-theoretic account of linguistic diversity. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110560107Search in Google Scholar

Bergen, Benjamin K. 2012. Louder than Words: The New Science of How the Mind Makes Meaning. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Bergs, Alexander & Thomas Hoffmann. 2017. Special issue on cognitive approaches to the history of English: introduction. English Language and Linguistics 21(2). 193–202.10.1017/S1360674317000077Search in Google Scholar

Blakemore, Diane. 1987. Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Boas, Hans C. 2013. Cognitive Construction Grammar. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 233–252. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0013Search in Google Scholar

Börjars, Kersti, Nigel Vincent & George Walkden. 2015. On Constructing a Theory of Grammatical Change. Transactions of the Philological Society 113(3). 363–382.10.1111/1467-968X.12068Search in Google Scholar

Boroditsky, Lera, Lauren Schmidt & Webb Phillips. 2003. Sex, syntax, and semantics. In Dedre Gentner & Susan Goldin-Meadow (eds.), Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought, 61–79. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bowern, Claire & Bethwyn Evans. 2015. Editors’ introduction: Foundations of the new historical linguistics. In Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics, 1–42. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315794013Search in Google Scholar

Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2005. Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615962Search in Google Scholar

Broccias, Cristiano. 2012. The Syntax-Lexicon Continuum. In Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, 735–747. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0061Search in Google Scholar

Brugman, Claudia. 1988. The Story of Over: Polysemy, Semantics, and the Structure of the Lexicon. New York: Garland.Search in Google Scholar

Butler, Christopher & Francisco Gonzálvez-García (eds.). 2014. Exploring functional-cognitive space. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511750526Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L., Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Christiansen, Morten H. & Nick Chater. 2016. Creating language: integrating evolution, acquisition, and processing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/10406.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Cienki, Alan. 2013. Cognitive Linguistics: Spoken language and gesture as expressions of conceptualization. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva Ladewig, David McNeill & Sedinha Tessendorf (eds.), Body - language - communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, 182–201. (HSK 38.1). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110261318.182Search in Google Scholar

Collins, Jeremy. 2019. Some language universals are historical accidents. In Karsten Schmidtke-Bode, Natalia Levshina, Susanne Maria Michaelis & Ilja A. Seržant (eds.), Explanation in typology. Diachronic sources, functional motivations and the nature of the evidence, 41–67. Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar

Condorelli, Marco (ed.). 2020. Advances in historical orthography, c. 1500–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108674171Search in Google Scholar

Condorelli, Marco & Hanna Rutkowska. forthc. Cambridge Handbook of Historical Orthography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2009. Toward a Social Cognitive Linguistics. In Vyvyan Evans & Stéphanie Pourcel (eds.), New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics, vol. 24, 395–420. (Human Cognitive Processing). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.24.25croSearch in Google Scholar

Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2016. Cognitive Linguistics’ seven deadly sins. Cognitive Linguistics 27(4). 479–491.10.1515/cog-2016-0059Search in Google Scholar

De Smet, Hendrik. 2008. Functional Motivations in the Development of Nominal and Verbal Gerunds in Middle and Early Modern English. English Language and Linguistics 12. 55–102.10.1017/S136067430700250XSearch in Google Scholar

De Smet, Hendrik, Frauke D’hoedt, Lauren Fonteyn & Kristel Van Goethem. 2018. The changing functions of competing forms: Attraction and differentiation. Cognitive Linguistics 29(2). 197–234.10.1515/cog-2016-0025Search in Google Scholar

De Wit, Astrid, Peter Petré & Frank Brisard. 2020. Standing out with the progressive. Journal of Linguistics. 1–36.10.1017/S0022226719000501Search in Google Scholar

Denis, Derek & Sali A. Tagliamonte. 2018. The changing future: competition, specialization and reorganization in the contemporary English future temporal reference system. English Language and Linguistics 22(3). 403–430.10.1017/S1360674316000551Search in Google Scholar

Diessel, Holger. 2019. The Grammar Network: How Linguistic Structure Is Shaped by Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108671040Search in Google Scholar

Diewald, Gabriele. 2011. Pragmaticalization (Defined) as Grammaticalization of Discourse Functions. Linguistics 49(2). 365–390.10.1515/ling.2011.011Search in Google Scholar

Dücker, Lisa, Stefan Hartmann & Renata Szczepaniak. 2019. Historische Korpuslinguistik: Vorwort. Jahrbuch für Germanistische Sprachgeschichte 10(1). IX–X.10.1515/jbgsg-2019-0003Search in Google Scholar

Ebert, Christian. 2019. Der Rückgang pränominaler Genitive in der anstatt-Konstruktion. Syntaktischer Wandel oder Grammatikalisierung? In Lisa Dücker, Stefan Hartmann & Renata Szczepaniak (eds.), Historische Korpuslinguistik, 219–240. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/jbgsg-2019-0013Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Nick C., Matthew Brook O’Donnell & Ute Römer. 2013. Usage-based language: Investigating the latent structures that underpin acquisition. Language Learning 63. 25–51.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00736.xSearch in Google Scholar

Everett, Caleb. 2013. Linguistic relativity: evidence across languages and cognitive domains. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110308143Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. 1988. “The mechanisms of “Construction Grammar.” Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 35–55.10.3765/bls.v14i0.1794Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay & Mary Catherine O’Connor. 1988. Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone. Language 64(3). 501–538.10.2307/414531Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, Olga. 2013. An inquiry into unidirectionality as a foundational element of grammaticalization: On the role played by analogy and the synchronic grammar system in processes of language change. Studies in Language 37(3). 515–533.10.1075/bct.79.03fisSearch in Google Scholar

Fonteyn, Lauren. 2019. Categoriality in language change: the case of the English gerund. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190917579.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Fonteyn, Lauren, Hendrik De Smet & Lisbet Heyvaert. 2015. What It Means to Verbalize: The Changing Discourse Functions of the English Gerund. Journal of English Linguistics. 36–60.10.1177/0075424214564365Search in Google Scholar

Fonteyn, Lauren & Stefan Hartmann. 2016. Usage-based perspectives on diachronic morphology: A mixed-methods approach towards English ing-nominals. Linguistics Vanguard 2(1). doi: 10.1515/lingvan-2016-0057.10.1515/lingvan-2016-0057Search in Google Scholar

Fonteyn, Lauren & Andrea Nini. 2020. Individuality in syntactic variation: An investigation of the seventeenth-century gerund alternation. Cognitive Linguistics 31(2). 279–308.10.1515/cog-2019-0040Search in Google Scholar

Ford, Marilyn & Joan Bresnan. 2013. Using convergent evidence from psycholinguistics and usage. In Manfred G. Krug & Julia Schlüter (eds.), Research methods in language variation and change, 295–312. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511792519.020Search in Google Scholar

Frank, Roslyn M. & Nathalie Gontier. 2010. On Constructing a Research Model for Historical Cognitive Linguistics (HCL): Some Theoretical Considerations. In Margaret E. Winters, Heli Tissari & Kathryn Allan (eds.), Historical Cognitive Linguistics, 31–69. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110226447.31Search in Google Scholar

Fried, Mirjam. 2015. Irregular morphology in regular syntactic patterns: A case of constructional re-alignment. In Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea (eds.), Constructional Approaches to Language, vol. 18, 139–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.18.05friSearch in Google Scholar

Geeraerts, Dirk. 1997. Diachronic Prototype Semantics: A Contribution to Historical Lexicology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gelderen, Elly van. 2011. Grammaticalization and generative grammar: A difficult liaison. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, 43–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gibbs jr., Raymond W. 2006. Introspection and Cognitive Linguistics: Should we Trust our own Intuitions? Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 4(1). 135–151.10.1075/arcl.4.06gibSearch in Google Scholar

Gibbs jr., Raymond W. 2007. Why cognitive linguists should care more about empirical methods. In Monica Gonzalez-Marquez, Irene Mittelberg, Seana Coulson & Michael J. Spivey (eds.), Methods in Cognitive Linguistics, 2–18. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.18.06gibSearch in Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, Gerd. 2004. Mindless statistics. The Journal of Socio-Economics 33(5). 587–606.10.1016/j.socec.2004.09.033Search in Google Scholar

Givón, T. 2013. On the Intellectual Roots of Functionalism in Linguistics. In Shannon Bischoff & Carmen Jany (eds.), Functional Approaches to Language, 9–28. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110285321.9Search in Google Scholar

Glynn, Dylan. 2014a. Techniques and Tools: Corpus Methods and Statistics for Semantics. In Dylan Glynn & Justyana A. Robinson (eds.), Corpus Methods for Semantics, vol. 43, 307–341. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.43.12glySearch in Google Scholar

Glynn, Dylan. 2014b. Correspondence analysis. Exploring data and identifying patterns. In Dylan Glynn &. Justyana A. Robinson (eds.), Corpus Methods for Semantics: Quantitative Studies in Polysemy and Synonymy, 443–485. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.43.17glySearch in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 2013. Constructionist Approaches. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 15–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0002Search in Google Scholar

Grady, Joseph E. 1997. THEORIES ARE BUILDINGS revisited. Cognitive Linguistics 8(4). 267–290.10.1515/cogl.1997.8.4.267Search in Google Scholar

Greenhill, Simon J. 2016. Demographic correlates of language diversity. In Nick Riemer (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Semantics, 557–578. London, New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. 2014. Corpus and Quantitative Methods. In Jeannette Littlemore & John R. Taylor (eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics, 279–300. London: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. 2015. The most under-used statistical method in corpus linguistics: multi-level (and mixed-effects) models. Corpora 10(1). 95–125.10.3366/cor.2015.0068Search in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. 2019. On classification trees and random forests in corpus linguistics: Some words of caution and suggestions for improvement. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. doi: 10.1515/cllt-2018-0078.10.1515/cllt-2018-0078Search in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. 2021. (Generalized Linear) Mixed‐Effects Modeling: A Learner Corpus Example. Language Learning. doi: 10.1111/lang.12448.10.1111/lang.12448Search in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th., Beate Hampe & Doris Schönefeld. 2005. Converging Evidence: Bringing Together Experimental and Corpus Data on the Associations of Verbs and Constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 16(4). 635–676.10.1515/cogl.2005.16.4.635Search in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th., Beate Hampe & Doris Schönefeld. 2010. Converging Evidence II: More on the Association of Verbs and Constructions. In Sally Rice & John Newman (eds.), Empirical and Experimental Methods in Cognitive/Functional Research, 59–72. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. & Martin Hilpert. 2008. The Identification of Stages in Diachronic Corpora: Variability-Based Neighbor Clustering. Corpora 3(1). 59–81.10.3366/E1749503208000075Search in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. & Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds.). 2006. Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics: Corpus-Based Approaches to Syntax and Lexis. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197709Search in Google Scholar

Hampe, Beate. 2005. The psychological status of image schemas. In Beate Hampe (ed.), Image schemas in Cognitive Linguistics: Introduction, 1–12. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197532.0.1Search in Google Scholar

Harder, Peter. 2010. Meaning in mind and society: a functional contribution to the social turn in cognitive linguistics. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110216059Search in Google Scholar

Harder, Peter & Kaspar Boye. 2011. Grammaticalization and functional linguistics. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 56–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0005Search in Google Scholar

Hartmann, Stefan. 2014. Constructing a Schema: Word-Class Changing Morphology in a Usage-Based Perspective. In Martin Hilpert & Susanne Flach (eds.), Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, Vol. 2, 235–252. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/gcla-2014-0014Search in Google Scholar

Hartmann, Stefan. 2018a. Divergent theories, converging evidence: The constructional semantics of competing future constructions. In Beate Hampe & Susanne Flach (eds.), Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, Vol. 6, 91–114. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/gcla-2018-0005Search in Google Scholar

Hartmann, Stefan. 2018b. Derivational morphology in flux: a case study of word-formation change in German. Cognitive Linguistics 29(1). 77–119.10.1515/cog-2016-0146Search in Google Scholar

Hartmann, Stefan. 2020. Language change and language evolution: Cousins, siblings, twins? Glottotheory 11(1). 15–39.10.1515/glot-2020-2003Search in Google Scholar

Hartmann, Stefan & Michael Pleyer. 2021. Constructing a protolanguage: reconstructing prehistoric languages in a usage-based construction grammar framework. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 376(1824). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0200.10.1098/rstb.2020.0200Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 1999. Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics 37(6). 1043–1068.10.1515/ling.37.6.1043Search in Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613463Search in Google Scholar

Hengeveld, Kees & J. Lachlan Mackenzie. 2008. Functional discourse grammar: a typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278107.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Herbst, Thomas. 2011. The status of generalizations: Valency and argument structure constructions. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 59(4). 347–367.10.1515/zaa-2011-0406Search in Google Scholar

Herbst, Thomas & Peter Uhrig. 2019. Towards a valency and argument structure constructicon of English: Turning the valency patternbank into a constructicon. Lexicographica 35(2019). 87–104.10.1515/lex-2019-0006Search in Google Scholar

Heyvaert, Liesbet. 2003. A cognitive-functional approach to nominalization in English. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110903706Search in Google Scholar

Heyvaert, Liesbet. 2008. On the constructional semantics of gerundive nominalizations. Folia Linguistica 42(1–2). 39–82.10.1515/FLIN.2008.39Search in Google Scholar

Heyvaert, Liesbet, Stefan Hartmann & Hubert Cuyckens. 2019. Categorial shift: from description to theory and back again. Language Sciences 73, 1–9.10.1016/j.langsci.2018.11.001Search in Google Scholar

Hilpert, Martin. 2006. Distinctive Collexeme Analysis and Diachrony. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 2(2). 243–256.10.1016/j.langsci.2018.11.001Search in Google Scholar

Hilpert, Martin. 2013. Constructional Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139004206Search in Google Scholar

Hilpert, Martin. 2018. Three open questions in diachronic construction grammar. In Evie Coussé, Peter Andersson & Joel Olofsson (eds.), Grammaticalization meets construction grammar, 21–39. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.21.c2Search in Google Scholar

Hilpert, Martin & Florent Perek. 2015. Meaning change in a petri dish: constructions, semantic vector spaces, and motion charts. Linguistics Vanguard 1(1). 339–350.10.1515/lingvan-2015-0013Search in Google Scholar

Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2004. Lexicalization and Grammaticization: Opposite or Orthogonal? In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.), What Makes Grammaticalization?, 21–42. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197440Search in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse. Language 56(2). 251–299.10.1353/lan.1980.0017Search in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165525Search in Google Scholar

Hruschka, Daniel J., Morten H. Christiansen, Richard A. Blythe, William Croft, Paul Heggarty, Salikoko S. Mufwene, Janet B. Pierrehumbert & Shana Poplack. 2009. Building Social Cognitive Models of Language Change. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13. 464–469.10.1016/j.tics.2009.08.008Search in Google Scholar

Huber, Judith. 2017. Motion and the English verb: a diachronic study. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190657802.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Imo, Wolfgang. 2015. Interactional Construction Grammar. Linguistics Vanguard 1(1). 69–77.10.1515/lingvan-2015-0008Search in Google Scholar

Jacobs, Joachim. 2009. Valenzbindung oder Konstruktionsbindung? Eine Grundfrage der Grammatiktheorie. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 37(3). 490–513.10.1515/ZGL.2009.033Search in Google Scholar

Janda, Laura (ed.). 2013. Cognitive Linguistics: The Quantitative Turn. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110335255Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Keller, Rudi. 1994. Sprachwandel: Von der unsichtbaren Hand in der Sprache. Tübingen, Basel: Francke.Search in Google Scholar

Kempf, Luise. 2016. Adjektivsuffixe in Konkurrenz. Wortbildungswandel vom Frühneuhochdeutschen zum Neuhochdeutschen. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110429787Search in Google Scholar

Kirby, Simon. 2012. Language is an Adaptive System: The Role of Cultural Evolution in the Origins of Structure. In Maggie Tallerman & Kathleen R. Gibson (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution, 589–604. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199541119.013.0061Search in Google Scholar

Kumashiro, Toshiyuki. 2016. A cognitive grammar of Japanese clause structure. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.53Search in Google Scholar

Kuo, Yueh Hsin. forthc. Bidirectionality between modal and conditional constructions in Mandarin Chinese: A constructionalization account. Diachronica.10.1075/dia.20047.kuoSearch in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1990. The Invariance Hypothesis: Is Abstract Reason Based on Image-Schemas? Cognitive Linguistics 1(1). 39–74.10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.39Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 2003. Metaphors we live by. Updated Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1988. A Usage-Based Model. In Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (ed.), Topics in Cognitive Linguistics, 127–161. (Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science 50). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.50.06lanSearch in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1999. Assessing the Cognitive Linguistic Enterprise. In Theo Janssen & Gisela Redeker (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics, 13–59. (Cognitive Linguistics Research 15). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110803464.13Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2000. A Dynamic Usage-Based Model. In Michael Barlow & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Usage-Based Models of Language, 1–63. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 2017. Complexity theory: The lessons continue. In Lourdes Ortega & ZhaoHong Han (eds.), Complexity Theory and Language Development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman, 11–50. (Language Learning and Language Teaching 48). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.48.02larSearch in Google Scholar

Lehmann, Christian. 2015. Thoughts on Grammaticalization. 3rd ed. (Classics in Linguistics 1). Berlin: Language Science Press.10.26530/OAPEN_603353Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. 2003. Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613609Search in Google Scholar

Levshina, Natalia. 2015. How to do linguistics with R. Data exploration and statistical analysis. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.195Search in Google Scholar

Levshina, Natalia. 2016. When variables align: A Bayesian multinomial mixed-effects model of English permissive constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 27(2). 235–268.10.1515/cog-2015-0054Search in Google Scholar

Levshina, Natalia. 2020. Conditional Inference Trees and Random Forests. In Magali Paquot & Stefan Th. Gries (eds.), A Practical Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, 611–643. Cham: Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-46216-1_25Search in Google Scholar

Levshina, Natalia & Kris Heylen. 2014. A Radically Data-driven Construction Grammar: Experiments with Dutch causative constructions. In Ronny Boogaart, Timothy Colleman & Gijsbert Rutten (eds.), Extending the Scope of Construction Grammar. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110366273.17Search in Google Scholar

Li, Peggy & Lila Gleitman. 2002. Turning the tables: language and spatial reasoning. Cognition 83(3). 265–294.10.1093/oso/9780199828098.003.0023Search in Google Scholar

Majid, Asifa, Melissa Bowerman, Sotaro Kita, Daniel B.M. Haun & Stephen C. Levinson. 2004. Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(3). 108–114.10.1016/j.tics.2004.01.003Search in Google Scholar

Matlock, Teenie & Bodo Winter. 2015. Experimental Semantics. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, 771–790. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

McElreath, Richard. 2020. Statistical Rethinking. A Bayesian Course with R and Stan. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press.10.1201/9780429029608Search in Google Scholar

Mengden, Ferdinand von & Horst J. Simon. 2014. What is it then, this Grammaticalization? Folia Linguistica 48(2). 347–360.10.1515/flin.2014.012Search in Google Scholar

Mesoudi, Alex. 2011. Cultural evolution: How Darwinian theory can explain human culture and synthesize the social sciences. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226520452.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Mickan, Anne, Maren Schiefke & Anatol Stefanowitsch. 2014. Key is a llave is a Schlüssel: A failure to replicate an experiment from Boroditsky et al. 2003. In Martin Hilpert & Susanne Flach (eds.), Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 2013, 39–50. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/gcla-2014-0004Search in Google Scholar

Mihatsch, Wiltrud. 2005. Experimental Data vs. Diachronic Typological Data: Two Types of Evidence for Linguistic Relativity. In Stephan Kepser & Marga Reis (eds.), Linguistic Evidence, vol. 85, 371–392. (Studies in Generative Grammar). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197549.371Search in Google Scholar

Neels, Jakob. 2020. Refining frequency-effect explanations of grammaticalisation. PhD thesis. Leipzig: University of Leipzig.Search in Google Scholar

Nicenboim, Bruno & Shravan Vasishth. 2016. Statistical methods for linguistic research: Foundational Ideas-Part II: Statistical methods for linguistics–Part II. Language and Linguistics Compass 10(11). 591–613.10.1111/lnc3.12207Search in Google Scholar

Nichols, J. 1984. Functional Theories of Grammar. Annual Review of Anthropology 13(1). Annual Reviews. 97–117.10.1146/annurev.an.13.100184.000525Search in Google Scholar

Noël, Dirk & Timothy Colleman. 2021. Diachronic construction grammar. In Xu Wen & John R. Taylor (eds.), The Routledge handbook of cognitive linguistics, 662–675. (Routledge Handbooks in Linguistics). New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781351034708-44Search in Google Scholar

Oakley, Todd. 2007. Image Schemas. In Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, 214–235. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Perek, Florent. 2016. Using distributional semantics to study syntactic productivity in diachrony. A case study. Linguistics 54(1). 149–188.10.1515/ling-2015-0043Search in Google Scholar

Perek, Florent. 2018. Recent change in the productivity and schematicity of the way-construction: A distributional semantic analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 14(1). De Gruyter Mouton. 65–97.10.1515/cllt-2016-0014Search in Google Scholar

Perezgonzalez, Jose D. 2015. Fisher, Neyman-Pearson or NHST? A tutorial for teaching data testing. Frontiers in Psychology 6. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00223.10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00223Search in Google Scholar

Petré, Peter. 2017. The extravagant progressive: an experimental corpus study on the history of emphatic be V-ing. English Language and Linguistics 21(2). 227–250.10.1017/S1360674317000107Search in Google Scholar

Petré, Peter, Lynn Anthonissen, Sara Budts, Enrique Manjavacas, Emma-Louise Silva, William Standing & Odile A.O. Strik. 2019. Early Modern Multiloquent Authors (EMMA): Designing a large-scale corpus of individuals’ languages. ICAME Journal 43(1). 83–122.10.2478/icame-2019-0004Search in Google Scholar

Pijpops, Dirk, Isabeau De Smet & Freek Van de Velde. 2018. Constructional contamination in morphology and syntax. Four case studies. Constructions and Frames 10(2). 269–305.10.1075/cf.00021.pijSearch in Google Scholar

Pijpops, Dirk & Freek Van de Velde. 2016. Constructional contamination: How does it work and how do we measure it? Folia Linguistica 50(2). 543–581.10.1515/flin-2016-0020Search in Google Scholar

Plag, Ingo. 1999. Morphological Productivity: Structural Constraints in English Derivation. (Topics in English Linguistics 28). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Pleyer, Michael & James Winters. 2014. Integrating Cognitive Linguistics and Language Evolution Research. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum 11. 19–43.10.12775/ths-2014-002Search in Google Scholar

Pulvermüller, Friedemann, Bert Cappelle & Yury Shtyrov. 2013. Brain Basis of Meaning, Words, Constructions, and Grammar. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 397–415. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0022Search in Google Scholar

Richerson, Peter J. & Morten H. Christiansen (eds.). 2010. Cultural Evolution: Society, Technology, Language, and Religion. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, Seán G. 2018. Robust, Causal, and Incremental Approaches to Investigating Linguistic Adaptation. Frontiers in Psychology 9. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00166.10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00166Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, Seán G, Anton Killin, Angarika Deb, Catherine Sheard, Simon J Greenhill, Kaius Sinnemäki, José Segovia-Martín, Jonas Nölle, Aleksandrs Berdicevskis, Archie Humphreys-Balkwill, Hannah Little, Christopher Opie, Guillaume Jacques, Lindell Bromham, Peeter Tinits, Robert M Ross, Sean Lee, Emily Gasser, Jasmine Calladine, Matthew Spike, Stephen Francis Mann, Olena Shcherbakova, Ruth Singer, Shuya Zhang, Antonio Benítez-Burraco, Christian Kliesch, Ewan Thomas-Colquhoun, Hedvig Skirgård, Monica Tamariz, Sam Passmore, Thomas Pellard & Fiona Jordan. 2020. CHIELD: the causal hypotheses in evolutionary linguistics database. Journal of Language Evolution 5(2). 101–120.10.12775/3991-1.099Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, Seán & James Winters. 2013. Linguistic Diversity and Traffic Accidents: Lessons from Statistical Studies of Cultural Traits. PLoS One 8(8). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070902.10.1371/journal.pone.0070902Search in Google Scholar

Ronneberger-Sibold, Elke. 1994. Konservative Nominalflexion und klammerndes Verfahren im Deutschen. In Klaus-Michael Köpcke (ed.), Funktionale Untersuchungen zur deutschen Nominal- und Verbalmorphologie, 115–130. Tübingen: Niemeyer.10.1515/9783111339825-008Search in Google Scholar

Sanchez-Stockhammer, Christina. 2018. English compounds and their spelling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108181877Search in Google Scholar

Scherer, Carmen. 2007. The Role of Productivity in Word-Formation Change. In Joseph C. Salmons & Shannon Dubenion-Smith (eds.), Historical Linguistics 2005, 257–271. (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 284). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.284.19schSearch in Google Scholar

Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2000. English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells: From Corpus to Cognition. Vol. 34. (Topics in English Linguistics). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110808704Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2014. A blueprint of the entrenchment-and-conventionalization model. In Martin Hilpert & Susanne Flach (eds.), Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, Vol. 2, 3–25. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/gcla-2015-0002Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2017. A framework for understanding entrenchment and its psychological foundations. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Entrenchment and the Psychology of Language Learning. How We Reorganize and Adapt Linguistic Knowledge, 9–39. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.10.1037/15969-002Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2020. The dynamics of the linguistic system: usage, conventionalization, and entrenchment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198814771.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Schönefeld, Doris (ed.). 2011. Converging evidence. Methodological and theoretical issues for linguistic research. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.33Search in Google Scholar

Schoonjans, Steven. 2014. Is gesture subject to grammaticalization? Papers of the Linguistic Society of Belgium 8. 30–43.Search in Google Scholar

Shu, Dingfang, Lifei Zhang & Tian Li. 2019. General introduction: 30 years of Cognitive Linguistics in China. In Dingfang Shu, Hui Zhang & Lifei Zhang (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics and the Study of Chinese, 7–44. (Human Cognitive Processing 67). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/hcp.67.02shuSearch in Google Scholar

Smirnova, Elena & Tanja Mortelmans. 2010. Funktionale Grammatik: Konzepte und Theorien. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110223873Search in Google Scholar

Smirnova, Elena & Lotte Sommerer. 2020. Introduction: The nature of the node and the network – Open questions in Diachronic Construction Grammar. In Lotte Sommerer & Elena Smirnova (eds.), Nodes and networks in diachronic construction grammar, 2–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/cal.27.intSearch in Google Scholar

Steels, Luc. 2000. Language as a Complex Adaptive System. In Marc Schoenauer, Kalyanmoy Deb, Günter Rudolph, Xin Yao, Evelyne Lutton, Juan Julian Merelo & Hans-Paul Schwefel (eds.), Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, 17–26. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1917). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2011. Argument Structure: Item-Based or Distributed? Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 59(4). 369–386.10.1515/zaa-2011-0407Search in Google Scholar

Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Stefan Th. Gries. 2003. Collostructions: Investigating the Interaction of Words and Constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2). 209–243.10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03steSearch in Google Scholar

Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620904Search in Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali A. & R. Harald Baayen. 2012. Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change 24(02). 135–178.10.1017/S0954394512000129Search in Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali A., Mercedes Durham & Jennifer Smith. 2014. Grammaticalization at an early stage: future be going to in conservative British dialects. English Language and Linguistics 18(1). 75–108.10.1017/S1360674313000282Search in Google Scholar

Terkourafi, Marina. 2011. The Pragmatic Variable: Toward a Procedural Interpretation. language in Society 40. 343–372.10.1017/S0047404511000212Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael. 2009. The Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. In Edith Laura Bavin (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Child Language, 69–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511576164.005Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2008. The Grammaticalization of NP of NP Patterns. In Alexander Bergs & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), Constructions and Language Change, 23–45. (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 194). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2014. Towards a Constructional Framework for Studying Language Change. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 1(1). 3–21.10.1075/cogls.1.1.01traSearch in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale. 2010. Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalization: How Do They Intersect? In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalization, 19–44. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.90.04traSearch in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. (Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics 6). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Trousdale, Graeme. 2014. On the relationship between grammaticalization and constructionalization. Folia Linguistica 48(2). 557–577.10.1515/flin.2014.018Search in Google Scholar

Tummers, Jose, Kris Heylen & Dirk Geeraerts. 2005. Usage-based approaches in Cognitive Linguistics: A technical state of the art. 1(2). De Gruyter Mouton. 225–261.10.1515/cllt.2005.1.2.225Search in Google Scholar

Ungerer, Tobias & Stefan Hartmann. 2020. Delineating extravagance: Assessing speakers’ perceptions of imaginative constructional patterns. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34. 345–356.10.31234/osf.io/5ma6sSearch in Google Scholar

Walkden, George. 2019. The many faces of uniformitarianism in linguistics. Glossa 4(1). doi 10.5334/gjgl.88810.5334/gjgl.888Search in Google Scholar

Wheeler, Eric S. 2005. Multidimensional Scaling for Linguists. In Reinhard Köhler, Gabriel Altmann & Rajmund G. Piotrowski (eds.), Quantitative Linguistics, 548–553. (HSK 27). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Wilcox, Sherman. 2018. Ten lectures on cognitive linguistics and the unification of spoken and signed languages. (Distinguished Lectures in Cognitive Linguistics). Leiden; Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789004336773Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber. 1993. Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua 90(1). 1–25.10.1017/CBO9781139028370.010Search in Google Scholar

Winter, Bodo. 2019. Statistics for linguists: an introduction using R. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315165547Search in Google Scholar

Winter, Bodo & Martine Grice. 2021. Independence and generalizability in linguistics. Linguistics 59(5). 1251–1277.10.1515/ling-2019-0049Search in Google Scholar

Winters, Margaret E. 1987. Syntactic and semantic space: The development of the French subjunctive. In Anna Giacalone Ramat, Onofrio Carruba & Giuliano Bernini (eds.), Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.48.44winSearch in Google Scholar

Winters, Margaret E. 2010. Introduction: On the Emergence of Diachronic Cognitive Linguistics. In Margaret E. Winters, Heli Tissari & Kathryn Allan (eds.), Historical Cognitive Linguistics, 3–27. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110226447.3Search in Google Scholar

Winters, Margaret E. 2020. Historical linguistics: A cognitive grammar introduction. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.227Search in Google Scholar

Zehentner, Eva. 2019. Competition in Language Change: The Rise of the English Dative Alternation. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110633856Search in Google Scholar

Zeldes, Amir. 2012. Productivity in Argument Selection: From Morphology to Syntax. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110303919Search in Google Scholar

Zerubavel, Eviatar. 1997. Social mindscapes: an invitation to cognitive sociology. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zwaan, Rolf A., Alexander Etz, Richard E. Lucas & M. Brent Donnellann. 2017. Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001972.10.1017/S0140525X17001972Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-11-03
Published in Print: 2021-11-25

©2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston