Abstract
This paper concerns how legal mechanisms intended to address domestic violence (DV) can be better designed to adequately consider its gendered impacts and complexity. I analyze two traditional legal approaches to DV: a focus on women-only mechanisms and a gender-neutral approach. I then analyze two jurisdictions that have adopted such approaches to DV: Brazil and the United States, respectively. While each approach has benefits, both also have significant costs. I argue that it is possible to imagine an alternative, substantially more flexible system that is neither focused on women nor is gender-neutral. This alternative, which I call the mosaic approach (MA), aims at making DV law and policy more effective, and more just, by focusing on a mosaic of vulnerabilities, which may be more or less related to gender. The MA then proposes using an empirically-based mosaic of DV policies that match and address these vulnerabilities. At the core of the MA is an insistence upon an ongoing public scrutiny of the political choices that lurk behind resource allocation and vulnerability prioritization. Because public policy and law require some degree of generality, the risk of stereotyping in policy-design is probably unavoidable. This paper argues that the best response to this concern is to bring it to the very forefront of policy-making by actively grappling with how we categorize and prioritize people.
References
Anderson, K. L.2002. Perpetrator or Victim? Relationships between Intimate Partner Violence and Wellbeing. Journal of Marriage and Family64:851–863.10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00851.xSearch in Google Scholar
Bank, W.2010. Achieving World Class Education in Brazil: The Next Agenda, Report (December 21).Search in Google Scholar
Barnett, O. W., C. Y.Lee, and R. E.Thelen. 1997. Differences in Forms, Outcomes, and Attributions of Self-Defense and Control of Interpartner Aggression. Violence Against Women3:462–481.10.1177/1077801297003005002Search in Google Scholar
Bartlett, K. T.2012. Feminist Legal Scholarship: A History through the Lens of the California Law Review. California Law Review100:381–430.Search in Google Scholar
Bates, E. A., N.Graham-Kevan, and J.Archer. 2014. Testing Predictions from the Male Control Theory of Men’s Partner Violence. Aggressive Behaviour40 (1):42–55.10.1002/ab.21499Search in Google Scholar
Benhabib, S., J.Butler, D.Cornell, and N.Fraser. 1995. Feminist Contentions – a Philosophical Exchange. Oxford, UK: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Bent-Goodley, T. B.2001. Eradicating Domestic Violence in the African American Community: A Literature Review and Action Agenda. Trauma, Violence & Abuse16:84–98.10.1177/1524838001002004003Search in Google Scholar
Bobonis, G. J.2011. The Impact of Conditional Cash Transfers on Marriage and Divorce. Economic Development and Cultural Change59 (2):281–312.10.1086/657123Search in Google Scholar
Bobonis, G. J., M.González-Brenes, and R.Castro. 2013. Public Transfers and Domestic Violence: The Roles of Private Information and Spousal Control. American Econ. Journal: Economic Policy5 (1):179–205.10.1257/pol.5.1.179Search in Google Scholar
Brady, T. M., and O. S.Ashley, eds. 2005. Women in Substance Abuse Treatment: Results from the Alcohol and Drug Services Study. Report: Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.10.1037/e434082005-001Search in Google Scholar
Butler, J.1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism And The Subversion Of Identity. Oxford, UK: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Butler, J.1994. Contingent Foundations. In Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange, edited by S.Benhabib, J.Butler, D.Cornell, and N.Fraser, 35–58. Oxford, UK: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Buzawa, E., and C.Buzawa, eds. 2003. Domestic Violence: The Criminal Justice Response, 3rd ed. New York, NY, USA: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Buzawa, E., C.Buzawa, and E.Stark, OBS: Responding to Domestic Violence 24–28, 34 2012. New York, NY, USA: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Catalano, S., E.Smith, H.Snyder, and M.Rand.2009. (Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice) Selected Findings – Female Victims of Violence. Available online at http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/fvv.pdf.10.1037/e525992010-001Search in Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2010. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2010 Summary Report.Search in Google Scholar
Cepia. 2007. Violence Against Women in the International Context: Challenges and Responses.Search in Google Scholar
Chermack, S. T., B.Booth, and G. M.Curran. 2006. Gender Differences in Correlates of Recent Physical Assault Among Untreated Rural and Urban at-Risk Drinkers: Role of Depression. Violence and Victims21:67–80.10.1891/0886-6708.21.1.67Search in Google Scholar
Costa, D. M., and J. C.Babcock. 2008. Articulated Thoughts of Intimate Partner Abuse Men During Anger Arousal: Correlates with Personality Disorder Features. Journal of Family Violence23:395–402.10.1007/s10896-008-9163-xSearch in Google Scholar
Dalton, C., and E.Schneider.2001. Dimensions of the Battering Experience: Race, Culture and the Experience of Abuse in Battered Women and the Law. New York, NY, USA: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Dixon, L., and K.Browne. 2003. The Heterogeneity of Spouse Abuse: A Review. Aggression and Violent Behavior8:17–130.10.1016/S1359-1789(02)00104-0Search in Google Scholar
Dunford, F. W., D.Huizinga, and D. S.Elliot. 1990. The Role of Arrest in Domestic Assault: The Omaha Police Experiment. Criminology28:183–206.10.1111/j.1745-9125.1990.tb01323.xSearch in Google Scholar
Eastern Kentucky University College of Justice and Safety. 2005. The Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics In The Commonwealth. Abstract available online at https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=248783.Search in Google Scholar
Edleson, J. L.1996. Controversy and Change in Batterers’ Programs. In Future Interventions with Battered Women and Their Families, edited by J.Edleson & Z. C.Eisikovits, 154–169.Search in Google Scholar
Fals-Stewart, W.2003. The Occurrence of Partner Physical Aggression on Days of Alcohol Consumption: A Longitudinal Diary Study. Journal of Consulting Psychology71:41–45.10.1037/0022-006X.71.1.41Search in Google Scholar
Frug, M. J.1992. A Postmodern Feminist Legal Manifesto (an Unfinished Draft). Harvard Law Review105 (5):1045.10.2307/1341520Search in Google Scholar
Frye, V., S.Wilt, and D.Schomberg.2000. Female Homicide in New York City, 1990–1997. Available at https://www1.nyc.gov/html/doh/downloads/pdf/ip/female97.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
George, D. T., M. J.Phillips, L.Doty, J. C.Umhau, and R. R.Rawlings. 2006. A Model Linking Biology, Behavior, and Psychiatric Diagnoses in Perpetrators of Domestic Violence. Medical Hypotheses67:345–353.10.1016/j.mehy.2006.01.049Search in Google Scholar
Gondolf, E. W.1999. Characteristics of Court Mandated Batterer in Four Cities: Diversity and Dichotomies. Violence Against Women5:1277–1293.10.1177/10778019922183372Search in Google Scholar
Goodmark, L.2013. A Troubled Marriage: Domestic Violence and the Legal System. New York, NY, USA: NYU Press.Search in Google Scholar
Halley, J.2006. Split Decisions. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Halley, J., and A.Parker, eds. 2011. After Sex? On Writing Since Queer Theory. Durham, NC, USA: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822393627Search in Google Scholar
Ibope/Instituto Patrícia Galvão. 2006. Percepções e Reações da Sociedade sobre a Violência contra a Mulher. [Social Perceptions and Reactions to Violence against Women].Search in Google Scholar
Ipea, Violência contra a mulher: feminicídios no Brasil, 2013. [Violence Against Women: Feminicides in Brazil].Search in Google Scholar
Jacobson, N. S., and J. M.Gottman.1998. When Men Batter Women: New insights into ending abusive relationships. New York, NY, USA: Simon & Schuster.Search in Google Scholar
Johnson, M.2006. Conflict and Control: Gender, Symmetry, and Asymmetry in Domestic Violence. Violence Against Women12:1003–1018.10.1177/1077801206293328Search in Google Scholar
Johnson, M.2007. The Intersection of Gender and Control. In Gender Violence: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited by L. L.O’Toole, J. R.Schiffman and M.Kiter Edwards, 257–268. New York, NY, USA: NYU Press.Search in Google Scholar
Johnson, M.2008. A typology of domestic violence: Intimate Terrorism, Violence Resistance and Situational Couple Violence. Lebanon, NH, USA: Northeastern University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kantor, G. K., and M. A.Straus. 1989. Substance Abuse as a Precipitant of Wife Abuse Victimization. American Journal of Alcohol Abuse15:173–189.10.3109/00952998909092719Search in Google Scholar
Kaysen, D., D.Pantalone, K. P.Lindgren, G. A.Clum, C.Lee, and P. A.Resick. 2007. Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Alcohol Use, and Physical Health Concerns. Journal of Behavioral Medicine31:115–125.10.1007/s10865-007-9140-5Search in Google Scholar
Krug, E. G., et al. eds. 2002. World Report on Violence and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization.10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11133-0Search in Google Scholar
Lipsey, M. W., D. B.Wilson, M. A.Cohen, and J. H.Derzon. 1997. Is There a Causal Relationship Between Alcohol Use and Violence. In Recent Developments in Alcoholism, edited by M.Galanter. New York, NY, USA: Plenum Press.Search in Google Scholar
Mattei, U., and A.di Robilant. 2001. The Art and Science of Critical Scholarship: Postmodernism and International Style in the Legal Architecture of Europe. Tulane Law Review3:1068.Search in Google Scholar
Moffitt, T. E., and A.Caspi. 1999. Findings about partner violence from the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study: Research in brief. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.10.1037/e311082004-001Search in Google Scholar
Munroe, A. H., and G.Stuart. 1994. Typology of Male Batterers: Three Subtypes and the Differences among Them. Psychological Bulletin116:476–497.10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.476Search in Google Scholar
Olsen, F.1990. The Sex of Law. In The Politics of Law- a Progressive Critique, edited by D.Kairys, 2nd edn, 455–459. New York, NY, USA: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar
Pattavina, A., et al. 2007. Policy Place an Perpetrators: Using NIBRS to Examine Arrest Practices in Intimate Partner Violence. Justice Research and Policy9 (2):31–52.10.3818/JRP.9.2.2007.31Search in Google Scholar
Rennison, C. M., and S.Welchans. 2000. Intimate Partner Violence (NCJ 178247). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.10.1037/e378132004-001Search in Google Scholar
Rodriguez, M. A., et al. 1999. Screening and Intervention for Intimate Partner Abuse: Practices and Attitudes of Primary Care Physicians.10.1001/jama.282.5.468Search in Google Scholar
Rosenblum, D.2010. Pregnant Man? A Conversation. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism22:207.Search in Google Scholar
Rosenblum, D.2011. Unsex Cedaw, or What’s Wrong with Women’s Rights. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law20:98–194.Search in Google Scholar
Saunders, D. G.1993. Husbands Who Assault: Multiple Profiles Requiring Multiple Responses. In Legal Responses to Wife Assault: Current Trends and Evaluation, edited by N. Z.Hilton, 9–36. New York, NY, USA: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Sedgwick, E.1991. Epistemology of the Closet. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA, USA: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar
Sedgwick, E.1993. Tendencies. Durham, NC, USA: Duke University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Seelau, S. M., and E. P.Seelau. 2005. Gender-Role Stereotypes and Perceptions of Heterosexual, Gay and Lesbian Domestic Violence. Journal of Family Violence20:363–370.10.1007/s10896-005-7798-4Search in Google Scholar
Siegel, R.1996. The Rule of Love”: Wife Beating as Prerogative and Privacy. The Yale Law Journal105:2117–2122.10.2307/797286Search in Google Scholar
Snitow, A.1996. A Gender Diary. In Feminism and History, edited by J.Wallach Scott, 506. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Swan, S. C., and D. L.Snow. 2002. A Typology of Women’s Use of Violence in Intimate Relationships. Violence Against Women8:286–319.10.1177/107780120200800302Search in Google Scholar
Wood, S. M.2004. Vawa’s Unfinished Business: The Immigrant Women Who Fall Through the Cracks. Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy11:141.Search in Google Scholar
World Health Organization. 2013. Global and Regional Estimates of Violence against Women: Prevalence and Health Effects of Intimate Partner Violence and Non-partner Sexual Violence.Search in Google Scholar
Lei No. 9.099, de 26 de setembro de 1995, D.O.U. de 27.09.1995 (Brazil).Search in Google Scholar
Lei No. 11.340 (“Maria da Penha statute”), August 7, 2006, D.O.U. 08.08.2006 (Brazil).Search in Google Scholar
United Nations. 2011. Brazilian Federal Government and Secretariat of Policies for Women, Homens Unidos pelo Fim da Violência contra as Mulheres [Men United for the Elimination of Violence against Women].Search in Google Scholar
Note
SJD Candidate, Harvard Law School; LL.M. (2012) Harvard Law School; LL.M. (2010) Rio de Janeiro’s PUC; LL.B. (2007) Rio de Janeiro State University.
©2015 by De Gruyter
