Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter March 31, 2020

Virtual Currencies: New Challenges to the Right to Privacy? An Assessment under the V AML Directive and the GDPR

Sara De Vido
From the journal Global Jurist

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to analyse virtual currencies, with specific regard to Bitcoins, in light of a specific human right, the right to privacy. In the first part, this contribution will reflect on the effectiveness of the Fifth European Union Anti-Money Laundering Directive (V AML Directive) in ‘regulating’ the exchange between fiat and virtual currencies for the purpose of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing. In the second part, it will explore whether the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is applicable or not to the virtual currencies network.

References

Allen, A. 2019. “Debating Ethics and Digital Life.” European Data Protection Law Review 1: 7. Search in Google Scholar

Article 29 Data Protection Working Party (WG29). 2015. Update of Opinion 8/2010 on applicable law in light of the CJEU judgement in Google Spain, 176/16/EN, WP 179 update. Search in Google Scholar

Baker McKenzie. 2017. Blockchains and Laws. Are they compatible? Accessed March 29, 2019. www.bakermckenzie.com. Search in Google Scholar

Baron, J., Angela O’Mahony, David Manheim, and Cynthia Dion-Schwarz. 2015. National Security Implications of Virtual Currencies, Santa Monica: Rand. Search in Google Scholar

Berberich, M., and M. Steiner. 2016. “Blockchain Technology and the GDPR – How to Reconcile Privacy and Distributed Ledgers?” European Data Protection Law Review 2 (3): 422. Search in Google Scholar

Bygrave, L. A. 1998. “Data Protection Pursuant to the Right to Privacy in Human Rights Treaties.” International Journal of Law and Information Technology 6: 247. Search in Google Scholar

Bygrave, L. A. 2014. Data Privacy Law: An International Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Campbell-Verduyn, M. 2018. “Introduction: What are Blockchains and How are They Relevant to Governance in the Contemporary Global Political Economy?” In Bitcoins and Beyond, edited by M. Campbell-Verduyn, 1. London, New York: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Campbell-Verduyn, M., and M. Goguen. 2018. “The Mutual Constitution of Technology and Global Governance: Bitcoin, Blockchains, and the International Anti- Money Laundering Regime.” In Bitcoins and Beyond, edited by M. Campbell-Verduyn, 69. London, New York: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

CNIL. 2018. (2. October). Blockchains. https://www.cnil.fr/sites/default/files/atoms/files/blockchain.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Commission. 2019. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council Assessing the Framework for Cooperation between Financial Intelligence Units, Brussels, 24.7.2019 COM(2019) 371 final. Search in Google Scholar

De Filippi, P., and A. Wright. 2018. Blockchain and the Law: the Rule of Code. Boston: Harvard University Press. Search in Google Scholar

De Terwangne, C., and C. Gayrel. 2017. “Flux transfrontières de données et exigence de protection adéquate à l’épreuve de la surveillance de masse. Les impacts de l’arrêt Schrems. ” Cahiers de droits européen. 35. Search in Google Scholar

De Vido, S. 2015. “Anti-money Laundering Measures versus European Union Fundamental Freedoms and Human Rights in the Recent Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Justice.” German Law Journal 16: 1271. Search in Google Scholar

De Vido, S. 2018. “Soft Organizations, Hard Powers: the FATF and the FSB as Standard-Setting Bodies.” Global Jurist, published online 11. February 2018. Search in Google Scholar

De Vido, S. 2019. “All that Glitters Is Not Gold: the Regulation of Virtual Currencies in the New EU V Anti-Money Laundering Directive.” Diritto pubblico comparato europeo online, forthcoming. Search in Google Scholar

Del Castillo, M. 2015. “The ‘Great Bitcoin Exodus’ Has Totally Changed New York’s Bitcoin Ecosystem.” New York Business Journal. https://www.bizjournals.com/newyork/news/2015/08/12/the-great-bitcoin-exodus-has-totally-changed-new.html. Search in Google Scholar

Diggelmann, O., and M. N. Cleis. 2014. “How the Right to Privacy Became a Human Right.” Human Rights Law Review 14: 441. Search in Google Scholar

Doguet, J. J. 2013. “The Nature of the Form: Legal and Regulatory Issues Surrounding the Bitcoin Digital Currency System.” Louisiana Law Review 73: 1126. Search in Google Scholar

EBA. 2019. Report with Advice for the European Commission on Crypto-assets. https://eba.europa.eu/documents/10180/2545547/ EBA+Report+on+crypto+assets.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

ESAs’ opinion. 2018. ESMA, EBA and EIOPA Warn Consumers on the Risks of Virtual Currencies. https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/esma50-164-1284_joint_esas_warning_on_virtual_currenciesl.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

EU Blockchain Observatory Forum. 2018. Blockchain for government and public services. https://www.eublockchainforum.eu/sites/default/files/reports/eu_observatory_blockchain_in_government_services_v1_2018-12-07.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Explanations relating to the Charter of Fundamental Rights. 2007. GU C 303 del 14.12.2007, 17–35. Search in Google Scholar

FATF. 2012–2018. International Standards on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism & Proliferation. The FATF Recommendations 2012 as updated in 2018. http://www.fatf-gafi.org/publications/fatfrecommendations/documents/fatf-recommendations.html. Search in Google Scholar

FATF. 2014. Virtual Currencies Key Definitions and Potential AML/CFT Risks. http://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/reports/Virtual-currency-key-definitions-and-potential-aml-cft-risks.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Finck, M. 2018. “Blockchains and Data Protection in the European Union.” European Data Protection Law Review 1: 17. Search in Google Scholar

Finck, M. 2019. Blockchain Regulation and Governance in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Finnemore, M., and D. B. Hollis. 2016. “Constructing Norms for Global Cybersecurity.” AJIL 110 (3): 425. Search in Google Scholar

Franco, P. 2014. Understanding Bitcoins, Cryptography, Engineering and Economics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. Search in Google Scholar

FATF. 2015. Guidance for a Risk-Based Approach.https://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/reports/Guidance-RBA-Virtual-Currencies.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Geist, M. 2001. “Is There a There There? Towards Greater Certainty for Internet Jurisdiction.” Berkeley Technology Law Journal 16: 1345. Search in Google Scholar

Giovannella, F. 2017. Copyright and Information Privacy. Cheltenham, Northampton: Elgar. Search in Google Scholar

Handbook. 2018. Handbook on European Data Protection Law. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Search in Google Scholar

Helberger, N., F. Zuiderveen Borgesius, and A. Reyna. 2017. “The Perfect Match? A Closer Look at the Relationship between EU Consumer Law and Data Protection Law.” CML Review 54 (5): 1427. Search in Google Scholar

IMF. 2016. Virtual Currencies and Beyond: Initial Considerations. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2016/sdn1603.pdf, 20. Search in Google Scholar

IPOL Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies. 2018. Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/supporting-analyses. Search in Google Scholar

Kranenborg, H. 2014. “Article 8,” in The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: a Commentary, edited by S. Peers, T. Hervey, J. Kenner, and A. Ward, 223. Oxford, Portland: Hart Pub. Search in Google Scholar

Lane, F. S. 2009. American Privacy. The 400-year History of Our Most Contested Right. Boston: Beacon Press. Search in Google Scholar

Leach, P. 2017. Taking a Case to the European Court of Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Maupin, J. 2015. “The ECJ’s First Bitcoin Decision: Right Outcome, Wrong Reasons?” https://voelkerrechtsblog.org/the-ecjs-first-bitcoin-decision-right-outcome-wrong-reasons/. Search in Google Scholar

Maupin, J. 2017. Mapping the Global Legal Landscape of Blockchain and Other Distributed Ledger Technologies. CIGI Papers No. 149. Search in Google Scholar

Nakamoto, S. 2008. Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System, 2008. www.bitcoin.org (last access to all websites 1. March 2019). Search in Google Scholar

Nowak, M. 2005. “Art. 17.” In CCPR Commentary, 2nd ed., edited by M. Nowal, 377. Kehl/Strassburg/Arlington: NP Engel Publishing. Search in Google Scholar

Rietiker, D., and A.-M. Beliveau. 2017. “G.S.B. V. Switzerland (European Court of Human Rights): Data Transfer in Tax Evasion Matters Did Not Violate Human Rights.” Suffolk University Law Review Online V: 16. Search in Google Scholar

Rodotà, S. 1999. Repertorio di fine secolo. Roma: Laterza. Search in Google Scholar

Ruotolo, G. M. 2012. Internet-ional Law. Profili di diritto internazionale pubblico della rete. Bari: Cacucci. Search in Google Scholar

Saluzzo, S. 2017. “Cross Border Data Flows and International Trade Law. The Relationship between EU Data Protection Law and the GATS.” Diritto del commercio internazionale, 807. Search in Google Scholar

Sancho, D. 2017. “The Concept of Establishment and Data Protection Law: Rethinking Establishment.” European Law Review 42: 491. Search in Google Scholar

Schütze, R. 2015. European Union Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Schwarts, P. M. 2004. “Property, Privacy and Personal Data.” Harward Law Review 117: 2056. Search in Google Scholar

Solmone, S. 2018. “The Access-based Jurisdictional Principle in Internet-related Cases.” GigaNet: Global Internet Governance Academic Network, Annual Symposium 2017. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3107317. Search in Google Scholar

Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy. 2019. Report Right to privacy, A/HRC/40/63. Search in Google Scholar

STOA. 2019. Blockchain and the General Data Protection Regulation. Brussels: EU publications. Search in Google Scholar

Svantesson, D. J. B. 2017. Solving the Internet Jurisdiction Puzzle. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

UNESCO. 2016. Privacy, free expression and transparency. Redefining their new boundaries in the digital age. http://www.unesco.org/new/internetstudy. Search in Google Scholar

Van Wegberg, R., J. J. Oerlemans, and O. Van Deventer. 2018. “Bitcoin Money Laundering: Mixed Results? an Explorative Study on Money Laundering of Cybercrime Proceeds Using Bitcoin.” Journal of Financial Crime 25: 419. Search in Google Scholar

Vandezande, N. 2018. Virtual Currency. A Legal Framework. Mortsel: Intersentia. Search in Google Scholar

Warren, S.D., and L.D. Brandeis. 1890. “The Right to Privacy.” Harvard Law Review 4: 193. Search in Google Scholar

Westin, A. 1967. Privacy and Freedom. New York: Atheneum Press. Search in Google Scholar

Whitman, J. Q. 2004. “The Two Western Cultures of Privacy: Dignity Vs. Liberty.” Yale Law Review 113: 1151. Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-03-31

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston