Skip to content
Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter January 30, 2020

Ruling without Rules: Not Only Nudges. Regulation beyond Normativity

Giuseppe Lorini and Stefano Moroni
From the journal Global Jurist

Abstract

Often, when a problem arises, someone immediately declares: “There’s a regulatory gap to plug. What we need is a new rule.” As if everything could be solved with a new regulation. And, when we think of a regulation that can fix things, generally what we have in mind is a verbal – preferably written – regulation. There are two aspects we wish to highlight here. Firstly, behaviour can be regulated not only with verbal norms but also with non-verbal norms. Secondly, behaviour may even be regulated without any specific rule: this article is dedicated to this fascinating regulatory phenomenon.

References

Adams, J., E. L. Giles, E. McColl, and F. F. Sniehotta. 2014. “Carrots, Sticks and Health Behaviours: A Framework for Documenting the Complexity of Financial Incentive Interventions to Change Health Behaviours.” Health Psychology Review 8 (3): 286–95.Search in Google Scholar

Agamben, G. 2013. The Highest Poverty: Monastic Rules and Form-of-Life, Translated by Adam Kotsko. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ainsley, M., and N. Kosoy. 2015. “The Tragedy of Bird Scaring.” Ecological Economics 116: 122–31.Search in Google Scholar

Bargh, J. 2017. Before You Know It: The Unconsciuos Reasons We Do What We Do. London: William Heinemann.Search in Google Scholar

Bates, C. 2018. “Conviviality, Disability and Design in the City.” The Sociological Review 66 (5): 984– 99.Search in Google Scholar

Bateson, M., D. Nettle, and G. Roberts. 2006. “Cues of Being Watched Enhance Cooperation in a Real-World Setting.” Biology Letters 2: 412–14.Search in Google Scholar

Berger, J., M. Meredith, and C. Wheeler. 2008. “Contextual Priming: Where People Vote Affects How They Vote.” Proceedings of the National Accademy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 8846–49.Search in Google Scholar

Bishop, J., H. McKay, D. Parrott, and J. Allan. 2003. Review of International Research Literature regarding the Effectiveness of Auditory Bird Scaring Techniques and Potential Alternatives, London: Central Science Laboratories for the Department for Environmental Food and Rural Affairs.Search in Google Scholar

Bobbio, N. 1950. “Scienza del diritto e analisi del linguaggio.” Rivista trimestrale di diritto e procedura civile 4 (2): 342–67.Search in Google Scholar

Bobbio, N. 1958. Teoria della norma giuridica, Torino: Giappichelli.Search in Google Scholar

Boehme-Neßler, V. 2011. Pictorial Law: Modern Law and the Power of Pictures, Berlin: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Calo, R. 2014. “Code, Nudge, or Notice.” Iowa Law Review 99: 773–802.Search in Google Scholar

Chellew, C. 2019. “Defending Suburbia.” Canadian Journal of Urban Research 28 (1): 19–33.Search in Google Scholar

Chi, P., J. Chen, H. Chu, and J. Lo. 2008. “Enabling Calorie-Aware Cooking in a Smart Kitchen.” In Proceedings of the Persuasive Technology Third International Conference, edited by H. Oinas-Kukkonen, P. Hasle, M. Harjumaa, K. Segerståhl, and P. Øhrstrøm, 116–27. Berlin: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Chisiu, C. M. 2013. “Emotional Intelligence – Self-Education and Education by Example.” Postmodern Openings 4 (4): 35–48.Search in Google Scholar

Conte, A. G. 1988. “Eidos. An Essay on Constitutive Rules.” Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 11: 251–57.Search in Google Scholar

Conte, A. G. 1992. “Deontica Aristotelica.” Rivista internazionale di filosofia del diritto 69: 178–252.Search in Google Scholar

Czajkowski, M., K. Zagórska, and N. Hanley. 2019. “Social Norm Nudging and Preferences for Household Recycling.” Resource and Energy Economics 58: doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2019.07.004.Search in Google Scholar

Dant, T. 2004. “The Driver-Car.” Theory, Culture & Society 21 (4/5): 61–79.Search in Google Scholar

De Fine Licht, K. 2017. “Hostile Urban Architecture: A Critical Discussion of the Seemingly Offensive Art of Keeping People Away.” Etikk i praksis. Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 11 (2): 27–44.Search in Google Scholar

De Kort, Y. A. W., L. T. McCalley, and C. J. H. Midden. 2008. “Persuasive Trash Cans. Activation of Littering Norms by Design.” Environment and Behavior 40 (6): 870–91.Search in Google Scholar

Dixon, M. A., and J. A. Jacko. 1998. “An Investigation of Tactile and Visual Stimuli in the Roadway Environment.” Perceptual and Motor Skills 87: 387–94.Search in Google Scholar

Dudek, M. 2015. “Why are Words Not Enough? Or a Few Remarks on Traffic Signs,” in Problems of normativity, Rules and Rule-Following, edited by M. Araszkiewicz, P. Banaś, T. Gizbert-Studnicki, and K. Płeszka,, 363–72. Heidelberg: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Durkheim, É. 1895. Les règles de la methode sociologique, Paris: F. Lacan. English translation by W.D. Halls, The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: The Free Press, 1982.Search in Google Scholar

Frosch, C., D. Martinelli, and A. Unnikrishnan. 2019. “Evaluation of Shared Space to Reduce Traffic Congestion.” Journal of Advanced Transportation doi:10.1155/2019/6510396.Search in Google Scholar

Gabellini, P. 1996. “La norma figurata nel piano urbanistico contemporaneo.” In L’innovazione del piano, edited by G. Cinà, 84–99. Milano: Franco Angeli.Search in Google Scholar

Ganz, J. S. 1971. Rules. A Systematic Study, The Hague: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Grabosky, P. 2016. “Regulation by Ridicule: Humorous Denigration as a Regulatory Instrument.” Law, Culture and the Humanities 12 (2): 373–400.Search in Google Scholar

Hamilton-Baillie, B. 2004. “Urban Design: Why Don’t We Do It in the Road? Modifying Traffic Behavior through Legible Urban Design.” Journal of Urban Technology 11 (1): 43–62.Search in Google Scholar

Hamilton-Baillie, B. 2008. “Shared Space: Reconciling People, Places and Traffic.” Built Environment 34 (2): 161–81.Search in Google Scholar

Hammond, V., and C. Musselwhite. 2013. “The Attitudes, Perceptions and Concerns of Pedestrians and Vulnerable Road Users to Shared Space: A Case Study from the UK.” Journal of Urban Design 18 (1): 78–97.Search in Google Scholar

Hartswood, M., B. Grimpe, M. Jirotka, and S. Anderson. 2014. “Towards the Ethical Governance of Smart Society.” In Social Collective Intelligence, edited by D. Miorandi, V. Maltese, M. Rovatsos, A. Nijholt, and J. Stewart, 2–30. Berlin: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Hausman, D. M., and B. Welch. 2010. “Debate: To Nudge or Not to Nudge.” Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (1): 123–36.Search in Google Scholar

Hazard, G. C. 1981. “Legal Ethics: Legal Rules and Professional Aspirations.” Cleveland State Law Review 30: 571–76.Search in Google Scholar

Hermalin, B. E. 1998. “Toward an Economic Theory of Leadership: Leading by Example.” American Economic Review 88 (5): 1188–206.Search in Google Scholar

Hill, A. 2018. “Why Nudges Coerce: Experimental Evidence on the Architecture of Regulation.” Science and Engineering Ethics 24: 1279–95.Search in Google Scholar

Jia, X., H. Yue, X. Tian, and H. Yin. 2017. “Simulation of Pedestrian Flow with Evading and Surpassing Behavior in a Walking Passageway.” Simulation 93 (12): 1013–35.Search in Google Scholar

Jiang, L., J. Li, C. Shen, S. Yang, and Z. Han. 2014. “Obstacle Optimization for Panic Flow. Reducing the Tangential Momentum Increases the Escape Speed.” Plos One 9 (12): 1–15.Search in Google Scholar

Johnsen, S., S. Fitzpatrick, and B. Watts. 2018. “Homelessness and Social Control: A Typology.” Housing Studies 33 (7): 1106–26.Search in Google Scholar

Judge, S. M. 2006. “Codex Imaginarius: Visual Codes in Land Use Planning and Aesthetic Regulation.” Notre Dame Law Review 81 (4): 1595–627.Search in Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Search in Google Scholar

Kärrholm, M. 2007. “The Materiality of Territorial Production.” Space and Culture 10 (4): 437–53.Search in Google Scholar

Kelsen, H. 1965. “Eine phänomenologische Rechtstheorie.” Österreichische Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht 15: 353–409.Search in Google Scholar

Knappett, C. 2002. “Photographs, Skeuomorphs and Marionettes. Some Thoughts on mind, Agency and Object.” Journal of Material Culture 7 (1): 97–117.Search in Google Scholar

Koren, M. B.F. Skinner: The Man Who Taught Pigeons to Play Ping-Pong and Rats to Pull Levers 2013. Accessed December 2019. .Search in Google Scholar

Krecht, J. 1986. “The Normative Regulation.” Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 72 (4): 514–22.Search in Google Scholar

Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lockton, D., D. Harrison, and N. A. Stanton. 2010a. Design with Intent: 101 Patterns for Influencing Behaviour through Design, Windsor: Equifine.Search in Google Scholar

Lockton, D., D. J. Harrison, and N. A. Stanton. 2010b. “The Design with Intent Method: A Design Tool for Influencing User Behavior.” Applied Ergonomics 41 (3): 382–92.Search in Google Scholar

Lockton, D., D. J. Harrison, and N. A. Stanton. 2012. “Models of the User: Designers’ Perspectives on Influencing Sustainable Behavior.” Journal of Design Research 10 (1/2): 7–27.Search in Google Scholar

Lorimer, H. 2013. “Scaring Crows.” Geographical Review 103 (2): 177–89.Search in Google Scholar

Lorini, G. 2015. “La norma disegnata.” In Realtà, Verità, Rappresentazione, edited by P. L. Lecis, V. Busacchi, and P. Salis, 341–50. Milano: Franco Angeli.Search in Google Scholar

Lorini, G., and S. Moroni. 2017. “Come fare norme con disegni.” In Verità, Immagine, Normatività, edited by P. L. Lecis, G. Lorini, V. Busacchi, O. G. Loddo, and P. Salis, 419–37. Macerata: Quodlibet.Search in Google Scholar

Lorini, G., and S. Moroni. 2020. “How to Make Norms with Drawings. An Investigation of Normativity beyond the Realm of Words.” Semiotica 232 (Forthcoming).Search in Google Scholar

Marsh, R. E., W. A. Erickson, and T. P. Salmon. Bird Hazing and Frightening Methods and Techniques (with emphasis on containment ponds) 1991. Accessed December 2019. .Search in Google Scholar

Marsh, R. E., W. A. Erickson, and T. P. Salmon. (1992). “Scarecrows and Predator Models for Frightening Birds from Specific Areas,” Proceedings of the Fifteenth Vertebrate Pest Conference. Accessed December 2019. .Search in Google Scholar

Maynard, P. 2017. “Drawn Norms: the Example of Traffic Signs.” In Verità, Immagine, Normatività, edited by P. L. Lecis, G. Lorini, V. Busacchi, P. Salis, and O. G. Loddo, 327–52. Macerata: Quodlibet.Search in Google Scholar

McGreevy, P., and R. Boakes. 2011. Carrots and Sticks: Principles of Animal Training, Sydney: Darlington Press.Search in Google Scholar

McNichol, T. Roads Gone Wild 2004. Accessed December 2019. Available at .Search in Google Scholar

Miller, S. R. 2013. “The Visual and the Law of Cities.” Pace Law Review 33 (1): 183–233.Search in Google Scholar

Miltenberger, R. G. 2011. Behavior Modification: Principles and Procedures, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Search in Google Scholar

Monmonier, M. 2010. No Dig, No Fly, No Go. How Maps Restrict and Control, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Moroni, S., and G. Lorini. 2017. “Graphic Rules in Planning: A Critical Exploration of Normative Drawings Starting from Zoning Maps and Form-Based Codes.” Planning Theory 3 (16): 318–38.Search in Google Scholar

Norman, D. 1988. The Design of Everyday Things, New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Norman, D. 2013. The Design of Everyday Things. Revised and Expanded Edition, New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Nygaard, A., H. Biong, R. Silkoset, and R. E. Kidwell. 2017. “Leading by Example: Values-Based Strategy to Instill Ethical Conduct.” Journal of Business Ethics 145 (1): 133–39.Search in Google Scholar

Ozkaramanli, D., E. Özcan, and P. Desmet. 2017. “Long-Term Goals or Immediate Desires? Introducing a Toolset for Designing with Self-Control Dilemmas.” The Design Journal 20 (2): 219–38.Search in Google Scholar

Petrażycki, L. 1909–10. Teorija prava i gosudartva v svjazi c teoriej nravstvennosti, Sankt-Peterburg: Merkuševa.Search in Google Scholar

Petty, J. 2016. “The London Spikes Controversy: Homelessness, Urban Securitisation and the Question of ‘Hostile Architecture’.” International Journal for crime, Justice and Social Democracy 5 (1): 67–81.Search in Google Scholar

Pols, A. J. 2013. “How Artefacts Influence Our Actions.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (3): 575–87.Search in Google Scholar

Ramadan, M., M. Khaled, and H. H. El-Hage. 2015. “Using Speed Bump for Power Generation – Experimental Study.” Energy Procedia 75: 867–72.Search in Google Scholar

Ratcliffe, J. H., T. Taniguchi, E. R. Groff, and J. D. Wood. 2011. “The Philadelphia Foot Patrol Experiment: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Police Patrol Effectiveness in Violent Crime Hotspots.” Criminology 49 (3): 795–831.Search in Google Scholar

Ribes, D., S. Jackson, S. Geiger, M. Burton, and T. Finholt. 2013. “Artifacts that Organize: Delegation in the Distributed Organization.” Information and Organization 23: 1–14.Search in Google Scholar

Rosenberger, R. 2014. “Multistability and the Agency of Mundane Artifacts: From Speed Bumps to Subway Benches.” Human Studies 37 (3): 369–92.Search in Google Scholar

Rosenberger, R. 2017. Callous Objects. Designs against the Homeless, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rosenberger, R. 2019. “On Hostile Design: Theoretical and Empirical Prospects.” Urban Studies doi:10.1177/0042098019853778.Search in Google Scholar

Salau, T. A. O., A. O. Adeyefa, and S. A. Oke. 2004. “Vehicle Speed Control Using Road Bumps.” Transport 19 (3): 130–36.Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, H., W. Doppler, D. Heynen, and M. Rössler. 2013. Bird-Friendly Building with Glass and Light, Sempach: Swiss Ornithological Institute.Search in Google Scholar

Schraeder, M., R. S. Tears, and M. H. Jordan. 2005. “Organizational Culture in Public Sector Organizations: Promoting Change through Training and Leading by Example.” Leadership & Organization Development Journal 26 (6): 492–502.Search in Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. 1969. Speech Act: an Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality, New York: The Free Press.Search in Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. 2010. Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Selinger, E., and K. Whyte. 2011. “Is There a Right Way to Nudge? The Practice and Ethics of Choice Architecture.” Sociology Compass 5 (10): 923–35.Search in Google Scholar

Shih, L. H. 2016. “Persuasive Design for Products Leading to Health and Sustainability Using Case-Based Reasoning.” Sustainability 8: 318–32.Search in Google Scholar

Skinner, B. F. 1960. “Pigeons in a Pelican.” American Psychologist 15: 28–37.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, N., and P. Walters. 2018. “Desire Lines and Defensive Architecture in Modern Urban Environments.” Urban Studies 55 (13): 2980–95.Search in Google Scholar

Stevens, S. 2017. “Life and Letting Die: A Story of the Homeless, Autonomy, and Anti-Social Behaviour.” Organization Studies 38 (5): 669–90.Search in Google Scholar

Thaler, R., and C. Sunstein. 2008. Nudge. Improving Decision About Health, Wealth, and Happiness, New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Thaler, R., C. Sunstein, and J. Balz. 2013. “Choice Architecture.” In The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy, edited by E. Shafir, 428–39. Princeton: Princeton University PressSearch in Google Scholar

Thomas, J. L. 1945. “The ‘Scarecrow’ Function of the Police.” The Police Journal 18 (4): 298–304.Search in Google Scholar

Tiger, J. H., and G. P. Hanley. 2004. “Developing Stimulus Control of Preschooler Mands: An Analysis of Schedule-Correlated and Contingency-Specifying Stimuli.” Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 37 (4): 517–21.Search in Google Scholar

Tørning, K. 2013. “A Review of Four Persuasive Design Models.” International Journal of Conceptual Structures and Smart Applications 1 (2): 17–27.Search in Google Scholar

Tromp, N., P. Hekkert, and P. -P. Verbeek. 2011. “Design for Socially Responsible Behavior: A Classification of Influence Based on Intended User Experience.” Design Issues 27 (3): 3–19.Search in Google Scholar

Tuffin, R., J. Morris, and A. Poole. An Evaluation of the Impact of the National Reassurance Policing Programme 2006. Accessed December 2019. Home Office Research Studies. Available at .Search in Google Scholar

Vanderbilt, T. The Traffic Guru 2008. Available at  (Accessed December 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Verbeek, P. -P. 2006. “Materializing Morality. Design Ethics and Technological Mediation.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 31 (3): 361–80.Search in Google Scholar

Von Wright, G. H. 1951. “Deontic Logic.” Mind 60: 1–15.Search in Google Scholar

Witte, S. P., and C. Haas. 2005. “Research in Activity: An Analysis of Speed Bumps as Mediational Means.” Written Communication 22 (2): 127–65.Search in Google Scholar

Yeung, K. 2012. “Nudge as Fudge.” Modern Law Review 75 (1): 122–48.Search in Google Scholar

Yeung, K. 2015. “Design for the Value of Regulation.” In Handbook of ethics, Values and Technological Design, edited by M. J. van den Hoven, P. E. Vermaas, and I. van de Poel, 447–72. Dordecht: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Żełaniec, W. 2013. Create to Rule. Studies on Constitutive Rules, Milano: LED.Search in Google Scholar

Zhao, Y., M. Li, X. Lu, L. Tian, Z. Yu, K. Huang, Y. Wang, and T. Li. 2017. “Optimal Layout Design of Obstacles for Panic Evacuation Using Differential Evolution.” Physica A 465: 175–94.Search in Google Scholar

Znamierowski, Cz. 1924. Podstawowe pojęcia teorji prawa. Część I: Układ prawny i norma prawna, Poznań: Fiszer i Majewski.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-01-30

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston