Abstract
Adnominals of different types in the texts of 16 popular modern Russian authors were analyzed to examine gender based differences. The study was conducted with the help of discriminant analysis which revealed considerable differences in female and male authors’ adnominal styles and allowed to build a discriminant model of several types of adnominals.
References
Andreev, S., Popescu, I-I., Altmann, G. (2017). On Russian adnominals. Glottometrics 35. P. 64–83.Search in Google Scholar
Andreev, S., Lupea, M., Altmann, G. (2017). Belza chains of adnominals. Glottometrics 39. P. 72–86.Search in Google Scholar
Beljajeva, A. Yu. (2002). Osobennosty rechevogo povedenija mujchin i jenschin [Peculiarities of male and female speech behavior] PhD thesis. Saratov: Saratovskij gosudarstvennij universitet.Search in Google Scholar
Hellinger, М. (1991) Feminist Linguistics and Linguistic Relativity. Working Paper on Language, Gender and Sexism 1 (1). P. 25–37.Search in Google Scholar
Kirilina, A.V. (2000). Genderniye issledovanija v zarubzhnoj i otechestvennoj lingvistike [Gender studies in domestic and foreign linguistics]. Obschestvennije nauki I sovremennost. No. 4. P. 138–143.Search in Google Scholar
Kirilina, A.V. (1999). Gender: lingvisticheskije aspekti [Gender: linguistic aspects]. Moskva, Institut sotsiologii RAN.Search in Google Scholar
Klecka, W.R. (1989). Discriminantnij analiz [Discriminant analysis – tranl. from W.R. Klecka Discriminant analysis. Seventh Printing, 1985]. In: I.S. Yevtukov (ed.) Factornij, clasternij i discriminantnij analiz. Moscow: Financi i statistika. P. 78–138.Search in Google Scholar
Koch I. (2013). Analysis of Multivariate and High-Dimensional Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139025805Search in Google Scholar
Koppel, M, Argamon, S., Shimoni, A.R. (2002). Automatically categorizing written texts by author gender. Literary and Linguistic Computing. Vol. 17, No. 4. P. 401–412.10.1093/llc/17.4.401Search in Google Scholar
Mikros, G.K. (2009). Content words in authorship attribution: An evaluation of stylometric features in a literary corpus. In: Reinhard Köhler (ed.) Studies in Quantitative Linguistics 5: Issues in Quantitative Linguistics. Lüdenscheid: RAM-Verlag. P. 61–75.Search in Google Scholar
Mikros, G., Carayannis, G. (2000). Modern Greek corpus taxonomy. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluations. Athens, Greece (31 May – 2 June). European Language Resources Association. Vol. 3. P. 129–34.Search in Google Scholar
Poddubnyj, V., Kravcova, A. (2010). Statistical reduction of the feature soace of text styles. In: P. Grzybek, E. Kelih, J. Macutek(eds.) Text and Language. Structures-Functions-Interrelations. Quantitative Perspectives. Praesense Verlag. Wien. P. 159–169.Search in Google Scholar
Potapov, V.V. (1997). Yazik zhenschin i muzhchin: phoneticheskaja differentsiatsija [Language for females and males: phonetic differentiation]. Izvestija АN. Ser. Lit. i jaz. V. 56. No. 3. P. 52–62.Search in Google Scholar
Ramayah, Т., Ignatius, J., Leen, J.Y.A. and Chiun, L.M. (2014). Discriminant Analysis. In: J.I. Barragues, A. Morais (eds). Probability and Statistics. A Didactic Introduction. CRC Press Taylor &. Francis Group. Boca Raton, London, New York. P. 384–415.Search in Google Scholar
Romaine, S. (1999). Communicating Gender. London. Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Tambouratzis, G., Markantonatou, S., Hairetakis, N., Vassiliou, M., Tambouratzis, D. and Carayannis, G. (2004). Discriminating the registers and styles in the Modern Greek language. Part 1: Diglossia in stylistic analysis. Literary and Linguistic Computing. Vol. 19, No. 2. P. 197–220.10.1093/llc/19.2.197Search in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston