Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter (A) November 23, 2018

Are Languages like Atoms? On Modelling Language Spread as a Physicist

  • Katharina Prochazka EMAIL logo and Gero Vogl
From the journal Glottotheory

Abstract

In physics, the spread of particles such as atoms is called diffusion. The same term is employed in linguistics to describe the spread of language features or languages as a whole. In this paper, we investigate how models for physical diffusion can be transferred to linguistics to study language spread. We review the different ways of describing physical diffusion and then look at two types of models to study language spread. By examining the differences and similarities between speakers, languages and atoms, we show that it is important to be clear about what is being modelled: languages or speakers, as these are quite different but cannot be completely separated—languages cannot exist without speakers and vice versa.

Funding statement: Katharina Prochazka acknowledges funding from the University of Vienna (uni:docs fellowship).

References

Abrams, Daniel M. & Steven H. Strogatz. 2003. Linguistics: modelling the dynamics of language death. Nature 424(6951). 900–900.10.1038/424900aSearch in Google Scholar

Altmann, Gabriel & Peter Meyer. 2005. Physicists look at language. In G. Altmann, V. Levickij & V. Perebejnos (eds.), Problemy quantitativnoj lingvistiki, 42–59. Černivci: RUTA.Search in Google Scholar

Cooper, Robert L. 1982. A framework for the study of language spread. In Robert L. Cooper (ed.), Language spread: studies in diffusion and social change, 5–36. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Duchêne, Alexandre & Monica Heller. 2008. Discourses of endangerment: sociolinguistics, globalization and social order. In Alexandre Duchêne & Monica Heller (eds.), Discourses of endangerment: ideology and interest in the defence of languages, 1–13. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Fritzsche, Albrecht. 2018. Spreading innovations: models, designs and research directions. In Armin Bunde, Jürgen Caro, Jörg Kärger & Gero Vogl (eds.), Diffusive spreading in nature, technology and society, Chapter 14. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-67798-9_14Search in Google Scholar

Gal, Susan. 1996. Language shift. In Hans Goebl, Peter H. Nelde, Zdeněk Starý & Wolfgang Wölck (eds.), Kontaktlinguistik. An international handbook of the science of language and society, vol. 1, 586–593. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Heitjans, Paul & Jörg Kärger (eds.). 2005. Diffusion in condensed matter: methods, materials, models. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/3-540-30970-5Search in Google Scholar

Kandler, Anne. 2009. Demography and language competition. Human Biology 81(2–3). 181–210.10.3378/027.081.0305Search in Google Scholar

Kandler, Anne & James Steele. 2008. Ecological models of language competition. Biological Theory 3(2). 164–173.10.1162/biot.2008.3.2.164Search in Google Scholar

Kandler, Anne & Roman Unger. 2018. Modelling language shift. In Armin Bunde, Jürgen Caro, Jörg Kärger & Gero Vogl (eds.), Diffusive spreading in nature, technology and society, Chapter 18. Berlin: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Kandler, Anne, Roman Unger & James Steele. 2010. Language shift, bilingualism and the future of britain’s celtic languages. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 365(1559). 3855–3864.10.1098/rstb.2010.0051Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 2006. The social stratification of English in New York City. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511618208Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 2007. Transmission and diffusion. Language 83(2). 344–387.10.1353/lan.2007.0082Search in Google Scholar

Lieberson, Stanley. 1966. Language questions in censuses. Sociological Inquiry 36(2). 262–279.10.1111/j.1475-682X.1966.tb00629.xSearch in Google Scholar

Mackey, William & Donald Cartwright. 1979. Geocoding language loss from census data. In William Mackey & Jacob Ornstein (eds.), Sociolinguistic studies in language contact: methods and cases, 69–96. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783110810752.69Search in Google Scholar

Mehrer, Helmut. 2007. Diffusion in solids. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-71488-0Search in Google Scholar

Prochazka, Katharina & Gero Vogl. 2017. Quantifying the driving factors for language shift in a bilingual region. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(17). 4365–4369.10.1073/pnas.1617252114Search in Google Scholar

Rogers, Everett M. 2003. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schulze, Christian, Dietrich Stauffer & Søren Wichmann. 2007. Birth, survival and death of languages by Monte Carlo simulation. Communications in Computational Physics 3(2). 271–294.Search in Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 1974. Linguistic change and diffusion: description and explanation in sociolinguistic dialect geography. Language in Society 3(2). 215–246.10.1017/S0047404500004358Search in Google Scholar

Walters, Caroline E. 2014. A reaction–diffusion model for competing languages. Meccanica 49(9). 2189–2206.10.1007/s11012-014-9973-2Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-11-23
Published in Print: 2018-11-27

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 29.2.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/glot-2018-0005/pdf
Scroll to top button