Abstract
Strength grading is essential for the efficient use of structural timber. Although international standards exist for machine strength grading, visual grading is still regulated based on national rules, which are expected to allow safe and economic grading results. Although there are large differences in the graded output because the species, the cross section, and the origin of the timber influence the results, some of these standards are considered to be applicable universally. The present article demonstrates how the chosen standards influence the grading results. Depending on the parameters, the yields or the mechanical properties are low compared with the declared values. The results also show the efficiency and applicability of different national standards for strength grading of timber from various origins. Furthermore, it is recommended to reconsider the existing limits for source areas and cross sections given in the standard EN 1912.
We like to thank Olaf Strehl and Andreas Gossler of HFM for programming the grading rule routines into the database and our student assistants for measuring tens of thousands of knots.
References
Almazán, A.F.J., Prieto, H.E., Martitegui, A.F., Richter, C. (2008) Comparison of the Spanish visual strength grading standard for structural sawn timber (UNE 56544) with the German one (DIN4074) for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) from Germany. Holz. Roh. Werkst. 66:253–258.10.1007/s00107-008-0241-9Search in Google Scholar
Barrett, J.D., Lam, F., Lau, W. (1992) Size effects in visually graded softwood structural lumber. CIB W 18 Paper 25-6-5. Åhus, Sweden. Available at: cib-w18.com. Accessed on March 1, 2013.Search in Google Scholar
BS 4978 2007+A1. (2011) Visual Strength Grading of Softwood. BSI, London.Search in Google Scholar
DIN 4074-1:2012-06. (2012) Sortierung von Holz nach der Tragfähigkeit, Nadelschnittholz. DIN, Berlin.Search in Google Scholar
DS/INSTA 142. (2009) (E) Nordic Visual Strength Grading Rules for Timber. Dansk Standard, Charlottenlund.Search in Google Scholar
EN 1310. (1997) Round and Sawn Timber – Method of Measurement of Features. CEN European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.Search in Google Scholar
EN 338. (2010) Structural Timber – Strength Classes. CEN European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.Search in Google Scholar
EN 384. (2010) Structural Timber – Determination of Characteristic Values of Mechanical Properties and Density. CEN European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.Search in Google Scholar
EN 408. (2010) Timber Structures – Structural Timber and Glued Laminated Timber – Determination of Some Physical and Mechanical Properties. CEN European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.Search in Google Scholar
EN 1912. (2012) Structural Timber – Strength Classes – Assignment of Visual Grades and Species. CEN European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.Search in Google Scholar
Fewell, A. (1984) The determination of softwood strength properties for grades, strength classes and laminated timber for BS 5268: Part 2. CIB W 18 Paper 17-6-2. Rapperswil, Switzerland. Available at: cib-w18.com. Accessed on March 1, 2013.Search in Google Scholar
Johansson, C.J., Brundin, J., Gruber, R. (1992) Stress grading of Swedish and German timber. A comparison of machine stress grading and three visual grading systems. Building Technology. SP Report 23:94. Swedish National Testing and Research Institute, Borås, Sweden.Search in Google Scholar
NF B 52-001:2011 Règles d’utilisation du bois dans les constructions; Classement visuel pour employ en structure pour les principales essences résineuses et feuillues. AFNOR, Saint-Denis.Search in Google Scholar
Ranta-Maunus, A., Denzler, J.K., Stapel, P. (2011) Strength of European timber. Part 2. Properties of spruce and pine tested in Gradewood project. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, Finland.Search in Google Scholar
Riberholt, H. (2008) European spruce – Picea abies – graded by Chinese visual rules. Technical University of Denmark, Department of Civil Engineering, Lyngby, Denmark. BYG Rapport.Search in Google Scholar
Stapel, P., v.d. Kuilen, J.W., Rais, A. (2010) Influence of origin and grading principles on the engineering properties of european timber. CIB W 18 Paper 43-5-2. Nelson, New Zealand. Available at: cib-w18.com. Accessed on March 1, 2013.Search in Google Scholar
SIA 265/1:2009 Holzbau – Ergänzende Festlegungen. SIA, Zürich.Search in Google Scholar
Uzielli, L. (1986) Stress-grading by ECE standards of Italian-grown Douglas-fir dimension lumber from young thinnings. CIB W 18 Paper 19-5-1. Florence, Italy. Available at: cib-w18.com. Accessed on March 1, 2013.Search in Google Scholar
©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston
