Accessible Published by De Gruyter December 22, 2018

Isolation of pure pinosylvins from industrial knotwood residue with non-chlorinated solvents

Ida Poljanšek, Primož Oven, Viljem Vek, Jan-Erik Raitanen, Jarl Hemming and Stefan Willför
From the journal Holzforschung

Abstract

The aim of the study was to find appropriate non-chlorinated solvent systems for the extraction and separation of pure pinosylvin (PS) and pinosylvin monomethylether (PSMME) from Scots pine/Norway spruce wood residues. The extraction was performed in a pressurized solvent extractor and the purification and isolation of pure substances was done by flash chromatography. More precisely, pure PS was isolated via sequential flash chromatography in two repetitions in the gradient mode of the mobile phase, with cylcohexane (CX) and ethylacetate (EtOAc), beginning with 100% CX and ending up with 100% EtOAc. The extractives were qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed in terms of PS and PSMME contents by gas chromatography-flame ionization detector (GC-FID), gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR) spectroscopy.

Introduction

In recent years, much attention has been paid to plant polyphenols, which are considered to be health-promoting compounds. Stilbenes are one of the important polyphenol groups, of which resveratrol is the most investigated compound (Figure 1). Resveratrol is relevant because of its antimicrobial effect against various bacteria and dermatophytic fungi (Chan 2002; Lindberg et al. 2004; Välimaa et al. 2007). Another interesting compound from this group is pinosylvin (PS) (Figure 1), which also showed antimicrobial activity and cytotoxicity against a murine hepatic carcinoma cell line (Välimaa et al. 2007).

Figure 1: Structures of the stilbenes resveratrol, pinosylvin and pinosylvin monomethyl ether and two lignans, HMR and NTG.

Figure 1:

Structures of the stilbenes resveratrol, pinosylvin and pinosylvin monomethyl ether and two lignans, HMR and NTG.

Woody biomass including conifers and broadleaved species contain large amounts of extractable phenolic compounds in their heartwood and especially in the knots (Willför et al. 2003a),b,c; Pietarinen et al. 2006; Willför et al. 2007; Conde et al. 2014). Knots of softwood mainly contain lignans, oligolignans and stilbenes, whereas the characteristic compounds of wood from the genus Pinus are the stilbenes, PS and pinosylvin monomethyl ether (PSMME) (Figure 1) (Willför et al. 2003a); Willför et al. 2007). Knots are waste material in paper mills and must be eliminated from pulp due to their high content of extractives, which cause pitch deposition on paper (Allen 1980; Farrell et al. 1993; Gutierrez et al. 2001). Eckerman and Holmbom (2001) developed a convenient process for the separation of knots from oversized wood chips before pulping.

The extraction parameters for the isolation of specific polyphenols from Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris), such as stilbenes and lignans, were investigated by Fang et al. (2013). The polyphenol yields depend on the solvent polarity, extraction temperature and extraction time. Sequential extractions of pine knots with cylcohexane (CX) and EtOH/water mixture (95/5, v/v) was suggested for the production of PSs and nortrachelogenin (NTG) with high yields and high purity. Fang et al. (2013) proposed hot-water extraction for the recovery of NTG from the knots of Scots pine. In the present study, it was decided to use CX and EtOH/water (95/5, v/v) for the sequential extractions and hot water for the non-sequential extraction for the recovery of extractives from an industrial sample.

The chemical structures of some important stilbenes and lignans are presented in Figure 1. For food applications, the isolated substances must be of high purity. To obtain pure PS from woody biomass, chlorinated solvents, e.g. dichloromethane, are frequently described in the literature (Välimaa et al. 2007); Plumed-Ferrer et al. 2013). Different time-consuming multistage extraction procedures are also known (Celimene et al. 1999); Nilsson et al. 2002; Simard et al. 2008). However, PS isolation from knotwood on an industrial scale has other requirements, e.g. the use of non-chlorinated solvents, which have not yet been investigated.

The aim of the present work was therefore to develop a procedure that can be applied in large-scale extraction, isolation and purification for the industrial production of PS and PSMME for food applications. The source of these substances are pulping residuals with around 60% knotwood content from Norway spruce (Picea abies) and Scots pine, and the main challenge is an effective separation and isolation with non-chlorinated solvents. The chemical characterization of the hydrophilic extracts and pure isolated compounds belongs to the research objectives and was performed by gas chromatography-flame ionization detection (GC-FID), gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR) spectroscopy.

Materials and methods

Chemicals and reagents

All the solvents and reagents were of analytical grade. CX, MeOH, EtOH, ethyl acetate (EtOAc), acetone, petroleum ether (PET), dichloromethane (CH2Cl2) and sulfuric acid, as well as the reference compounds for the chromatographic analysis were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). The references were PS (HPLC, ≥97%), PSMME (HPLC, ≥97%), pinostilbene hydrate (PiSb, HPLC, ≥95%), pterostilbene (PtSb, HPLC, ≥97%), pinobanksin (PB, HPLC, ≥95%), NTG (HPLC, ≥95%) and pinocembrin (PC, HPLC, ≥95%).

Wood material

The industrial sample was taken from over-sized chips in a Finnish pulp mill. The sample contained a mixture of Norway spruce and Scots pine knots, with an approximate pine/spruce ratio of 60/40 with around 60% knot content. The chips for milling were dried at room temperature. Homogenization and milling of samples were carried out in a Retsch SM 2000 (Retsch GmbH, Haan, Germany) cutting mill, producing particles that passed through a 10 mesh (1.85 mm) screen. The wood meal sample was then transferred into plastic bags and stored in the dark at 8°C until further processing. The freeze-drying step after milling ensured almost complete removal of volatile compounds.

Extraction procedure

The samples were freeze-dried for 24 h in a Christ Alpha 1-4 LDplus lyophilisator (Christ, Osterode am Harz, Germany) and the extractions were performed in an accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) apparatus (Dionex Corp., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The dried samples (30 g) were transferred to a stainless-steel extraction cell, which was appropriately closed with filter paper, a metal frit and a plug screw. The extractor was first flushed (5 min) with a suitable solvent to remove all the impurities and solvent leftovers from the system.

Lipophilic and hydrophilic compounds were subsequently extracted using CX as a non-polar solvent and an EtOH/water mixture (95/5, v/v), which is best suited for the extraction of more polar extractives (Willför et al. 2003a),b). Subsequent extraction with CX and EtOH/water is a standard procedure for PS isolation in good yields (23.3–41.8 mg g−1) (Fang et al. 2013). This was the first hydrophilic extract (ethanol extract). For comparison, a second hydrophilic extract was obtained by extraction with only water (water extract). Water is the most appropriate solvent because of its low toxicity. The extraction conditions (Table 1) were selected based on preliminary tests. The obtained extracts were collected and evaporated to dryness in a vacuum evaporator. The temperature of the water bath was kept at 40°C. One flask each of CX, EtOH and water extracts were stored in labeled 250 ml glass bottles and kept at 4°C in the dark until further analysis.

Table 1:

Conditions for the first and second extraction.

ParameterFirst extraction with CX and EtOH/H2OSecond extraction with H2O
Lipophilic extractHydrophilic extractHydrophilic extract
Temp.90°C100°C140°C
Pressure13.4 Bar13.4 Bar13.4 Bar
Solvent100% CX95% EtOH+5% H2O100% H2O
Cell100 ml100 ml100 ml
Vial volume250 ml250 ml250 ml
Cycles3×5 min (static)3×5 min (static)3×5 min (static)

  1. CX, Cylcohexane.

After ASE extraction, the water extract was liquid-liquid (L-L) extracted using EtOAc and the composition of the EtOAc phase was analyzed using GC (ASE+L-L extraction with EtOAc). A second L-L extraction of the water ASE extract was performed using EtOAc in the presence of NaCl for better ionic strength (ASE+L-L extraction with EtOAc+NaCl) and the composition of the EtOAc phase was analyzed using GC (Table 2).

Table 2:

Content of phenolic compounds and wood resins of the industrial sample extracted with different solvents: PSMME, PS, NTG and HMR.

Extraction methodPinosylvinsΣ of other stilbenes

(mg g−1)
FA+RA

(mg g−1)
HMR

(mg g−1)
NTG

(mg g−1)
Σ of other lignans

(mg g−1)
PSMME

(mg g−1)
PS

(mg g−1)
Totala

(mg g−1)
Sequential extraction
 Cyclohexane8.40.08.40.3465.90.530.140.01
 EtOH/W (95/5)7.94.112.01,57.112.63.15.9
Non-sequential extraction
 Water 140°C3.32.65.90.40.721.410.414.2
ASE+L-L extraction with EtOAc
 Water 140°C3.12.65.70.360.720.39.813.7
ASE+L-L extraction with EtOAc+NaCl
 Water 140°C3.22.65.80.360.720.810.114.1

  1. ASE+L-L extraction with EtOAc, EtOAc phase analyzed by GC. ASE+L-L extraction with EtOAc+NaCl (see text), EtOAc phase analyzed by GC. amg g−1 based on freeze-dried wood.

  2. FA, Fatty acids; RA, resin acids; ASE, accelerated solvent extraction; L-L, liquid-liquid; GC, gas chromatography.

Thin layer chromatography (TLC)

TLC Silica gel 60 F254 aluminium sheets (20×20 cm2) with a 20×2.5 cm2 concentration zone (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) were applied. A mixture of CX and ethyl acetate (60/40, v/v) served as the developing solvent system. The analysis was performed in a saturated chromatographic chamber. For the visualization of the separated spots, spraying with H2SO4/EtOH/water (25/50/25 by vol.) was done. The migration distance was 8 cm. For separation, various solvent systems in different ratios (v/v) were tested, such as CX/EtOAc; CX/acetone; CH2Cl2/EtOH and EtOAc/PET (Table 3). The CH2Cl2/EtOH (95/5; v/v) solvent system was the reference mobile phase.

Table 3:

Separation of sample extract and RF values for PSMME, PS, NTG and HMR with a series of solvent systems.

Solvent system (v/v)RF PSMMEPSNTGHMR
CX/EtOAc
 30/700.830.730.580.40
 50/500.750.570.340.19
 60/400.630.350.190.04
 70/300.470.240.090.02
CX/acetone
 50/500.670.570.540.45
 60/400.500.380.220.16
 70/300.310.160.110.06
 80/200.190.06ndanda
CCl2H2/EtOH
 96/40.630.28nd0.25
EtOAc/PTE
 40/600.710.330.130.04
 60/400.880.830.600.47
Color
 H2SO4/EtOH/H2O (25:50:25) reagentYellowish brownBrownish redGrayish brownReddish brown

  1. Silica Gel 60 PF-254 plates (Merck).

  2. nd, Not detected; CX, cyclohexane; nda not detected because of overlapping signals with the other lignans.

Flash chromatography

The hydrophilic extract was fractionated into pure compounds of PS, PSMME and lignans by flash column chromatography on normal-phase silica gel columns. The evaporated hydrophilic extract dissolved in a small volume of EtOH was applied on a flash cartridge (Biotage Si 40M, Biotage/Dyax; Flash chromatography 1L, Uppsala, Sweden). The velocity of the mobile phase was 5.08 cm min−1 (2 in min−1). The hydrophilic extract was separated using a stepwise gradient of CX/EtOAc from 100:0 to 0:100 (v/v) [500 ml of 100% CX, 1500 ml of CX/EtOAc (80/20; v/v), 1000 ml of CX/EtOAc (60/40; v/v), 500 ml of 100% of EtOAc] and finally the column was washed with acetone until no spots could be observed on a TLC plate after separation. Each flash fraction (50 ml) was then analyzed using TLC, as described earlier, and the fractions containing pure PS and PSMME according to TLC (showing spots with similar retention factors) were combined and the solvent was evaporated to dryness in a vacuum evaporator. The purities of the isolated compounds were >96% according to HPLC analysis.

Silylation of the extracts

Before the GC analysis, the hydrophilic extracts were derivatized according to Willför et al. (2003a,b,c). Four milliliters of hydrophilic extracts were transferred to 10 ml vials and equipped with plastic screw caps. Betulinol (0.02 mg ml−1) and heneicosanoic acid (C21:0, 0.02 mg ml−1) served as the internal standards. Silylation agents were as follows: 80 μl of N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl) trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA, Supelco Analytical, Bellefonte, PA, USA), 20 μl of trimethylchlorosilane (TMCS, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and 20 μl of pyridine (70°C for 45 min). After cooling, the samples were transferred to 1.5 ml vials with glass micro-inserts and analyzed by GC-FID.

Chromatographic analysis

GC-FID analyses were performed on a Perkin Elmer GC, AutoSystem XL system (Perkin Elmer Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with an HP-1 column (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA; 25 m×0.20 mm i.d., film thickness 0.11 μm). H2 was the carrier gas at a flow rate of 0.8 ml min−1. Details: split mode injection (ratio 1:24); temperature program: 120°C (1 min hold)→320°C (6°C min−1), 15 min hold. The initial injector temperature (160°C, 0 min hold) was raised to 260°C (8°C min−1, 15 min hold), while the detector temperature was kept at 320°C. The chromatograms were processed using the TotalChrom software (Perkin Elmer Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). All the results, given in mg g−1 or % (w w−1), were calculated on a freeze-dried wood basis.

Identification of extractives using GC-MS

The HP 6890-5973 GC-MSD instrument (Hewlett Packard, Palo Alto, CA, USA) was equipped with a 7683 autosampler and a HP-1 column (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA; 25 m×0.20 mm i.d., film thickness 0.11 μm). The temperature of the MS transfer-line was 300°C and the MS ion source and quadrupole were kept at 230°C and 150°C, respectively. The temperature of the injector was 280°C. Helium was the carrier gas (0.8 ml min−1) and the injection was performed in a split mode (ratio 1:24). The column temperature program was as follows: 80°C (1 min hold) → 320°C (8°C min−1, 6 min hold). The mass selective detector (MS-EI, 70 eV) worked in the range of 35–800 m/z. Commercial libraries (NIST98/WILEY275) and the spectral library of Åbo Akademi University served for substance identification.

Identification of extractives by HPLC

Extracts obtained by ASE were evaporated to dryness, dissolved in MeOH and filtered through a 0.22 μm polyamide filter. Chemical screening of the extractives and purity evaluation of PS and PSMME were done by HPLC-photodiode array (HPLC-PDA) analysis (Accela 600, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to Vek et al. (2013) based on an octadecylsilyl (ODS) column (150 mm×4.6 mm i.d., 2.6 μm particle size, Accucore, Thermo Scientific), in which water and MeOH served as the mobile phase (1000 μl min−1, total analysis time of 30.2 min). The gradient system of elution: 5%→95% solvent B in 20 min with the following steps: 0–1 min: 5% B constant; 1–21 min: 5%–95% phase B; 21–23 min: 95% phase B constant; 23–23.10 min: 95%–100% phase B; 23.10–25.10 min: 100% phase B constant; 25.10–25.20 min: 100%–5% phase B, and finally: 25.20–30.20 min 5% phase B constant before each new injection. The phenolic compounds were detected at 280 nm, and trans-stilbene isomers were observed at 306 nm (Silva et al. 2014). The peaks were scanned by UV200→400 nm, and the peak assignments were done based on retention time (tR) and ultraviolet (UV) spectral comparison with those of analytical standards.

1H-NMR spectroscopy

The 300 MHz Unity Inova 300 Varian NMR spectrometer (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA) was used [dimethyl sulfoxide-d₆ (DMSO-d6) as the solvent, tetramethylsilane (TMS) as an internal standard, 25°C]. Details: 90° pulse angle, 5-s delay between pulses, 5 s acquisition time, 32 repetitions, and peak integration using VNMRJ rev. 1.1D software (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The assignment of individual signals was performed according to the literature (Ngo and Brown 1998; Celimene et al. 1999).

Results and discussion

Efficiency of extraction solvent systems

As seen in Table 1, two hydrophilic and one lipophilic fraction were obtained. The hydrophilic fractions contained PS, PSMME and various lignans, of which the most abundant compounds were NTG and hydroxylmatairesinol (HMR), corresponding to pine knotwood and spruce knotwood, respectively (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Higher content of PS and PSMME was obtained in EtOH-extract.GC-FID chromatograms of (a) ethanol/water (95:5) extract and (b) 100% water extract of industrial wood residue sample.

Figure 2:

Higher content of PS and PSMME was obtained in EtOH-extract.

GC-FID chromatograms of (a) ethanol/water (95:5) extract and (b) 100% water extract of industrial wood residue sample.

The results of the GC-FID analysis of all the extracts are presented in Table 2, in which the yields of the individual components are summarized, namely PSMME, PS, fatty acids (FA) plus resin acids (RA), NTG and HMR obtained by individual extraction procedures. Quantitative GC-FID analysis of the hydrophilic EtOH extract revealed that the mixture of spruce and pine knotwood extracts contained about 7.9 mg g−1 of PSMME, 4.1 mg g−1 of PS, lignan NTG (3.1 mg g−1) and the predominant lignan 7-hydroxymatairesinol (HMR – with two epimers), comprising 12.6 mg g−1 (based on freeze-dried wood). HMR was the main lignan in the spruce knotwood and NTG, in pine (Willför et al. 2003b).

The PS/PSMME ratio is dependent on the extraction solvent. For the sequential extraction with CX and EtOH/water as the solvents, 52% of PSMME of the total amount appeared in the CX extract (Table 2). The ratio of PS/PSMME was lower in the case of EtOH/water (95:5) extraction. PS is better soluble in water due to its more polar nature while PSMME with one OMe group is a partially non-polar molecule and, consequently, less soluble in water, although it is very soluble in CX. This is the reason why the PS/PSMME ratio was higher with water as the extraction solvent (Figure 2). The total yields were high, but the selectivity for phenolic compounds was low.

Sequential extraction with CX and EtOH/water (95:5) yielded higher amounts of the compounds PS, PSMME and NTG, than that in the case of non-sequential extraction with water. CX was an effective and selective solvent for both FA and RA and PSMME. On the other hand, the amounts of PS (2.6 mg g−1) and PSMME (3.3 mg g−1) in the water extract were relatively low (Table 2, Figure 2) and the quantity of PSMME was lower than that in the EtOH/water extract. As previously mentioned, this is due to the semi-polar character of PSMME. A relatively high percentage of polysaccharides and traces of various RAs (e.g. pimaric and abietic acids) are characteristic of the water extract.

After GC analysis, the extracts of the industrial knotwood were further analyzed by HPLC. The results showed linearity in the selected concentration range (1.56 mg l−1 to 100 mg l−1) for all the reference compounds (R2≥0.99). The separation of the reference mixture gave a chromatogram with the following elution order: NTG [11.7 min tR], PB (13.9 min tR), PS (15.3 min tR), PiSb (14.5 min tR), PC (16.5 min tR), PtSb (17.6 min tR) and PSMME (17.9 min tR). The total time of analysis was 30.2 min (Figure 3). The first compound eluted from the previously mentioned ODS column was NTG, which is also the most polar of the reference compounds, and PSMME eluted last due to its partially non-polar character. The most abundant peaks were assigned to NTG, PS and PSMME (Figure 3). The distinction between NTG and HMR was not possible for the HPLC of the EtOH/water (95:5) extract.

Figure 3: Identification of compounds in EtOH-extract was done by comparison of tR of external standards (estds).HPLC chromatogram monitored at 280 nm of (a) ethanol extract of the industrial wood residue sample (sb_40-60_etoh) and (b) mixture of reference compounds (estds).

Figure 3:

Identification of compounds in EtOH-extract was done by comparison of tR of external standards (estds).

HPLC chromatogram monitored at 280 nm of (a) ethanol extract of the industrial wood residue sample (sb_40-60_etoh) and (b) mixture of reference compounds (estds).

Mobile phases of the TC

For the isolation of individual compounds by flash chromatography, it was necessary to find the most suitable mobile phase. Four different solvent systems were tested in different ratios (v/v): CX/EtOAc, CX/acetone, CH2Cl2/EtOH and EtOAc/PET. In Table 3, the RF values for the stilbenes, PSMME and PS, and the lignans NTG and HMR with a series of solvent systems are listed. Satisfactory separation of the components with discernible distances between the spots of PS, PSMME, NTG and HMR was obtained with the solvent systems (a) CX/EtOAc, (b) CH2Cl2/EtOH and (c) PET/EtOAc. The solvent system CX/EtOAc was selected for a large-scale purification of the extracts. The reference solvent system CH2Cl2/EtOH was eliminated because of its chlorinated component, and PET/EtOAc was not considered either, because petrol ether is not a well-defined (pure) solvent.

Three different spots were observed on the TLC plates. The first, with the highest RF, was PSMME, the second was PS, and the last was NTG (Table 3). The spot at the starting position of the TLC plates represents the two isomers of HMR, which were eluted during flash column chromatography with 100% EtOAc (Table 3, Figure 5b ).

Figure 4: The GC-MSD and GC-electron ionization (EI)-MS spectra.(a) GC-MS and (b) EI-MS spectrum of isolated derivatized pinosylvin from ethanol/water (95:5) extract.

Figure 4:

The GC-MSD and GC-electron ionization (EI)-MS spectra.

(a) GC-MS and (b) EI-MS spectrum of isolated derivatized pinosylvin from ethanol/water (95:5) extract.

Figure 5: GC-MS confirmed the separation of NTG and HMR by flash chromatography.Total ion current GC-MS of (a) the last spot on TLC plates purified and isolated by as flash chromatography and (b) the 100% ethyl acetate fraction obtained by flash chromatography. Peak assignment: 1: C21:0 internal standard (ISTD), 2: 7R-todolactol, 3: 7S-todolactol, 4: NTG, 5: HMR 1, 6: HMR 2, 7: matairesinol, 8: NTG (8ʹ-OH not silylated), 9: conidendrin, 10: iso-HMR, 11: pinoresinol, 12: betulinol (ISTD).

Figure 5:

GC-MS confirmed the separation of NTG and HMR by flash chromatography.

Total ion current GC-MS of (a) the last spot on TLC plates purified and isolated by as flash chromatography and (b) the 100% ethyl acetate fraction obtained by flash chromatography. Peak assignment: 1: C21:0 internal standard (ISTD), 2: 7R-todolactol, 3: 7S-todolactol, 4: NTG, 5: HMR 1, 6: HMR 2, 7: matairesinol, 8: NTG (8ʹ-OH not silylated), 9: conidendrin, 10: iso-HMR, 11: pinoresinol, 12: betulinol (ISTD).

Isolation of pure pinosylvins (PS)

Water and EtOH extracts were treated with different purification methods because the quantity and PS/PSMME ratio in the water extract were low (Table 2). For the purification of the water extract, isolation of PS and PSMME was attempted with L-L extraction using EtOAc, while NaCl was added to the aqueous extract to increase its ionic strength. As a result, the major part of the PS and PSMME could be extracted by EtOAc. Polysaccharides have low solubility in the semi-polar EtOAc in contrast to the high solubility of PS and lignans, so PS and polysaccharides could be well separated.

Flash column chromatography was tested for the separation of PS and its derivatives from lignans. Various CX/EtOAc ratios with different volumes were tested in the gradient separation mode. The mixture of CX and EtOAc turned out to be promising: 500 ml of 100% CX followed by a mixture of 1500 ml of CX/EtOAc (80/20), 1000 ml of CX/EtOAc (60/40) and 500 ml of 100% of EtOAc; the column was finally flushed with 500 ml of 100% acetone.

Two consecutive flash column chromatography runs were performed to obtain pure PS. The first batch was obtained via the raw hydrophilic EtOH extraction, while for the second batch, only the fractions 21–26 of the first flash chromatography were combined and re-chromatographed. Pure PS was obtained after the second run. For individual compound identification, the samples were separated on a long capillary column by GC-MS, while MS means a quadrupole mass selective detector (MSD). In Figure 4, the GC-MSD and GC-electron ionization (EI)-MS spectra of isolated pure PS from EtOH/water (95/5) extract are presented. The other results are presented in Figure 5. In Figure 5a, the main peak on the GC chromatogram represents the lignan NTG, which appeared as the last spot on the TLC plate. The GC of the last fraction obtained by flash chromatography with 100% EtOAc is seen in Figure 5b. Two epimers of the lignan HMR were detectable by GC.

The isolated PSs were further checked by LC at 306 nm, as this wavelength is suitable for the monitoring of trans-stilbene isomers (Silva et al. 2014). The HPLC separation of pure isolated PS and PSMME is presented in Figure 6, and a 96% purity of the compounds was attested.

Figure 6: The purity of isolated PS and PSMME was 96%.HPLC chromatograms monitored at 306 nm of (a) PS and (b) PSMME isolated from the industrial knotwood sample.

Figure 6:

The purity of isolated PS and PSMME was 96%.

HPLC chromatograms monitored at 306 nm of (a) PS and (b) PSMME isolated from the industrial knotwood sample.

The 1H-NMR PS spectrum in DMSO-d6 is presented in Figure 7. The signal at 9.25 ppm (2H, s, -OH) corresponds to the -OH protons in PS, which was not observed in the 1H-NMR spectrum of PS in CDCl3. The doublet at 7.57 ppm (2H, d, J=7.2 Hz -HAr) represents the ortho protons of unsubstituted aromatic rings, and the signal at 7.36 ppm (2H, dd, J=7.5 Hz, J=15 Hz, -HAr) corresponds to the meta aromatic protons of the unsubstituted aromatic ring. The doublet at 7.28 ppm (1H, dd, J=7.5 Hz, J=15 Hz, -HAr) represents one aromatic proton at the para position of the unsubstituted aromatic ring (Figure 7). The proton signal of a double bond appears at 7.05 ppm (2H, s, -HAr). The doublet at 6.44 ppm (2H, d, J=2.1 Hz, -HAr) corresponds to the ortho protons of the substituted aromatic ring. The proton in the para position of the substituted aromatic ring appears at 6.16 as a doublet (2H, dd, J=2.1Hz, J=4.2 Hz -HAr).

Figure 7: 1H-NMR spectrum of PS.

Figure 7:

1H-NMR spectrum of PS.

Conclusions

It was demonstrated that an industrial residue consisting of a mixture of Scots pine and Norway spruce wood can be efficiently and sequentially extracted by pressurized solvent extraction with non-polar (CX) and polar (EtOH/water, 95/5) solvents. The most abundant compounds were the lignans, HMR and NTG, together with the stilbenes, PS and PSMME, indicating the presence of spruce and pine knotwood in the sample. CX yielded the highest amount of PSMME and EtOH/water 95:5 yielded the highest amount of PS. Hot water extraction gave lower amounts of PS and PSMME.

The novelty of this contribution is the presentation of a convenient and environmentally friendly method for the extraction, isolation and purification of PSs, which can be realized on an industrial scale without chlorinated solvents. TLC was proven to be a useful method for the fast screening of extracts and for preparative separation of stilbenes for further studies by flash chromatography, GC and HPLC. The presented method has a potential for scaling up in modern lignocellulosic biorefineries.

Acknowledgments

This work was conducted within the frame of the WoodWisdom ERA NET transnational project PINOBIO. The Slovenian part of the project was partially supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Sport of the Republic of Slovenia within the Programme Group P4-0015. We thank Assistant Professor Annika Smeds for the GC-MS analyses. This work was also part of activities at the Johan Gadolin Process Chemistry Centre, a Centre of Excellence of the Åbo Akademi University.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

References

Allen, L.H. (1980) Mechanisms and control of pitch deposition in newsprint mills. Tappi 63:81–87. Search in Google Scholar

Celimene, C., Micales, J., Ferge, L., Young, R. (1999) Efficacy of pinosylvins against white rot and brown rot fungi. Holzforschung 53:491–497. Search in Google Scholar

Chan, M.M.-Y. (2002) Antimicrobial effect of resveratrol on dermatophytes and bacterial pathogens of the skin. Biochem. Pharmacol. 63:99–104. Search in Google Scholar

Conde, E., Fang, W., Hemming, J., Willför, S., Domínguez, H., Parajó, J. (2014) Recovery of bioactive compounds from Pinus pinaster wood by consecutive extraction stages. Wood Sci. Technol. 48:311–323. Search in Google Scholar

Eckerman, C., Holmbom, B. (2001) Method for recovery of compression wood and/or normal wood from oversize chips. In PCT/FI101/00691. WO 02/09893 A1 (Finn.). Search in Google Scholar

Fang, W., Hemming, J., Reunanen, M., Eklund, P., Pineiro Enma, C., Poljanšek, I., Oven, P., Willför, S. (2013) Evaluation of selective extraction methods for recovery of polyphenols from pine. Holzforschung 67:843–851. Search in Google Scholar

Farrell, R.L., Blanchette, R.A., Brush, T.S., Hadar, Y., Iverson, S., Krisa, K., Wendler, P.A., Zimmerman, W. (1993) Cartapip (TM) – a biopulping product for control of pitch and resin acid problems in pulp-mills. J. Biotechnol. 30:115–122. Search in Google Scholar

Gutierrez, A., del Rio, J.C., Martinez, M.J., Martinez, A.T. (2001) The biotechnological control of pitch in paper pulp manufacturing. Trends Biotechnol. 19:340–348. Search in Google Scholar

Lindberg, L.E., Willför, S.M., Holmbom, B.R. (2004) Antibacterial effects of knotwood extractives on paper mill bacteria. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 31:137–147. Search in Google Scholar

Ngo, K.S., Brown, G.D. (1998) Stilbenes, monoterpenes, diarylheptanoids, labdanes and chalcones from Alpinia katsumadai. Phytochemistry 47:1117–1123. Search in Google Scholar

Nilsson, M., Wikman, S., Eklund, L. (2002) Induction of discolored wood in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris). Tree Physiol. 22:331–338. Search in Google Scholar

Pietarinen, S., Willför, S., Ahotupa, M., Hemming, J., Holmbom, B. (2006) Knotwood and bark extracts: strong antioxidants from waste materials. J. Wood Sci. 52:436–444. Search in Google Scholar

Plumed-Ferrer, C., Väkeväinen, K., Komulainen, H., Rautiainen, M., Smeds, A., Raitanen, J.-E., Eklund, P., Willför, S., Alakomi, H.-L., Saarela, M., von Wright, A. (2013) The antimicrobial effects of wood-associated polyphenols on food pathogens and spoilage organisms. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 164:99–107. Search in Google Scholar

Simard, F., Legault, J., Lavoie, S., Mshvildadze, V., Pichette, A. (2008) Isolation and identification of cytotoxic compounds from the wood of Pinus resinosa. Phytotherapy Res. 22:919–922. Search in Google Scholar

Silva, F., Figueiras, A., Gallardo, E., Nerin, C., Domingues, F.C. (2014) Strategies to improve the solubility and stability of stilbene antioxidants: a comparative study between cyclodextrins and bile acids. Food Chem. 145:115–125. Search in Google Scholar

Välimaa, A.-L., Honkalampi-Hämäläinen, U., Pietarinen, S., Willför, S., Holmbom, B., von Wright, A. (2007) Antimicrobial and cytotoxic knotwood extracts and related pure compounds and their effects on food-associated microorganisms. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 115:235–243. Search in Google Scholar

Vek, V., Oven, P., Poljansek, I. (2013) Quantitative HPLC analysis of catechin in wound-associated wood and knots of beech. Drvna Ind. 64:231–238. Search in Google Scholar

Willför, S., Hemming, J., Reunanen, M., Holmbom, B. (2003a) Phenolic and lipophilic extractives in Scots pine knots and stemwood. Holzforschung 57:359–372. Search in Google Scholar

Willför, S., Hemming, J., Reunanen, M., Eckerman, C., Holmbom, B. (2003b) Lignans and lipophilic extractives in Norway spruce knots and stemwood. Holzforschung 57:27–36. Search in Google Scholar

Willför, S., Ahotupa, M.O., Hemming, J.E., Reunanen, M.H.T., Eklund, P.C., Sjoholm, R.E., Eckerman, C.S.E., Pohjamo, S.P., Holmbom, B.R. (2003c) Antioxidant activity of knotwood extractives and phenolic compounds of selected tree species. J. Agricult. Food Chem. 51:7600–7606. Search in Google Scholar

Willför, S., Hafizo~glu, H., Tümen, I., Yazici, H., Arfan, M., Ali, M., Holmbom, B. (2007) Extractives of Turkish and Pakistani tree species. Eur. J. Wood and Wood Prod. 65:215–221. Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-07-04
Accepted: 2018-11-13
Published Online: 2018-12-22
Published in Print: 2019-05-27

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston