Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter April 7, 2015

Homo biotechnologicus

Emil Višňovský
From the journal Human Affairs


The paper outlines the concept of the human being as homo biotechnologicus. This concept is just one version of many possible human self-interpretations, since human beings can answer their own fundamental question of ‘who are we?’ simply using their ‘human, all too human’ self-descriptions. However, technology is a substantial part of the human being as a natural being, and biotechnology is, moreover, its root. The biotechnology of today’s world means that humanity is set on a path to transcending its own human nature, with all the risky consequences that entails. The author considers these radical developments from the standpoint of posthumanism


Aristotle (1999). Nicomachean Ethics. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co.Search in Google Scholar

Bachelard, G. (1953). La materialisme rationel. Paris: PUF.Search in Google Scholar

Bainbridge, W. S. (2004). Early convergence research and education supported by the National Science Foundation. Ann NY Acad. Sci. 1013, 234-58.10.1196/annals.1305.017Search in Google Scholar

Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity.Search in Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1925/1988). Experience and nature. The Later Works of John Dewey, Vol. 1, 1925 - 1953.Search in Google Scholar

Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dusek, V. (2006). Philosophy of Technology - An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Düwell, M., Braarvig, J., Brownsword, R., & Mieth, D. (Eds.). (2014). The Cambridge handbook of human dignity. Interdisciplinary perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511979033Search in Google Scholar

Fukuyama, F. (2002). Our posthuman future.London: Profile Books.Search in Google Scholar

Gehlen, A. (1940/2014). Der Mensch, seine Natur und seine Stellung in der Welt. Wiebelsheim: AULAVerlag.Search in Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. 1977. The question concerning technology and other essays. New York and London: Garland Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Keekok, L. (2009). Homo faber: The unity of the history and philosophy of technology. In J. K. B. Olsen, E. Selinger, & S. Riis (Eds). New waves in philosophy of technology (pp. 13-39). Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Keulartz, F. W. J., Korthals, M., Schermer, M., & Swierstra, T. E. (Eds.). (2002). Pragmatist ethics for a technological culture. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-010-0301-8Search in Google Scholar

Kurzweil, R. (2005): The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. New York: Viking.Search in Google Scholar

Lippert-Ramussen, K., Thomsen, M. R., & Wamberg, J. (2012). The posthuman condition: Ethics, aesthetics and politics of biotechnological challenges. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Maturana, F., & Varela, H., (1973). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht: Reidel.Search in Google Scholar

Mitcham, C., & Schatzberg, E. (2009). Defining technology and the engineering sciences. In A.10.1016/B978-0-444-51667-1.50006-9Search in Google Scholar

Meijers (Ed.), Handbook of the philosophy of science. Vol. 9 (pp. 27-64). Amsterdam and London: Elsevier and North Holland.Search in Google Scholar

Plato (1997). Complete works. John M. Cooper (Ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co.Search in Google Scholar

Polanyi, M. (1967). The Tacit dimension. New York: Anchor Books.Search in Google Scholar

Salomon, J. J. (1992/1997). Technologický úděl (Technological fate). Praha: Filosofia.Search in Google Scholar

Savulescu, J., & Bostrom, N. (Eds.). (2009): Human enhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Šmajs, J. (2008). Filosofie - Obrat k Zemi (Philosophy - A turn to the earth). Praha: Academia. Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2015-4-7
Published in Print: 2015-4-1

© Institute for Research in Social Communication, Slovak Academy of Sciences