Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton April 2, 2015

Humor as an abrasive or a lubricant in social situations: Martineau revisited

  • Leslie Janes

    Leslie Janes obtained her Ph.D. at the University of Western Ontario in London, Canada and has been a faculty member at Brescia University College, an affiliate of the University of Western Ontario, since 2003. She has conducted research on many topics, including social cognition, attitudes, and humor.

    EMAIL logo
    and James Olson

    James Olson obtained his Ph.D. at the University of Waterloo and has been a faculty member at the University of Western Ontario in London, Canada, since 1978. He served as Chair of the Psychology Department from 1998 to 2003. He has conducted research on many topics, and has published more than 100 articles and chapters and has co-edited fifteen books. He has served as an Associate Editor of three scientific journals, including the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology from 1995 to 1998. He is currently the co-editor of the series Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

From the journal HUMOR

Abstract

In Martineau’s seminal chapter on the social functions of humor, he postulated some of the ways in which disparagement humor shapes social behavior. This research paper discusses three research studies that compared the effects of other-deprecating humor and self-deprecating humor on the observer and examines how they relate to Martineau’s theory. In our research, we hypothesized that people who observe ridicule of others experience “jeer pressure.” This inhibiting effect on behavior was expected to result in conformity to others’ opinions, fear about failing or standing out, and conventional thinking. In the first two studies, participants observed videotapes containing self-ridiculing humor, other-deprecating humor, or non-ridiculing/no humor. Participants then completed tasks assessing conforming, fear of failure, and creativity. Results of both studies showed that participants who observed ridicule of others were more conforming and more afraid of failing than participants who observed self-deprecating humor or the control condition. Study 3 examined the effects of ridicule of others versus self-deprecating humor on creativity using a more sophisticated creativity measure, and less caustic humor. Results supported the hypothesis that observing self-deprecating humor would result in higher levels of creativity compared to the other-ridicule condition. Implications of these findings for Martineau’s model are discussed.

About the authors

Leslie Janes

Leslie Janes obtained her Ph.D. at the University of Western Ontario in London, Canada and has been a faculty member at Brescia University College, an affiliate of the University of Western Ontario, since 2003. She has conducted research on many topics, including social cognition, attitudes, and humor.

James Olson

James Olson obtained his Ph.D. at the University of Waterloo and has been a faculty member at the University of Western Ontario in London, Canada, since 1978. He served as Chair of the Psychology Department from 1998 to 2003. He has conducted research on many topics, and has published more than 100 articles and chapters and has co-edited fifteen books. He has served as an Associate Editor of three scientific journals, including the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology from 1995 to 1998. He is currently the co-editor of the series Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

References

Atkinson, J. W. & G. H.Litwin. 1960. Achievement motive and test anxiety conceived as motive to approach success and motive to avoid failure. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology60. 5263.10.1037/h0041119Search in Google Scholar

Becker, A. B. 2012. Comedy types and political campaigns: The differential influence of other-directed hostile humor and self-ridicule on candidate evaluations. Mass Communications and Society15. 791812.10.1080/15205436.2011.628431Search in Google Scholar

Bippus, A. 2007. Factors predicting the perceived effectiveness of politicians’ use of humor during a debate. Humor20(2). 105121.10.1515/HUMOR.2007.006Search in Google Scholar

Bryant, J., D.Brown & S. L.Parks. 1981. Ridicule as an educational corrective. Journal of Educational Psychology73. 722727.10.1037/0022-0663.73.5.722Search in Google Scholar

Bryant, J., D.Brown, S. L.Parks & D.Zillmann. 1983. Children’s imitation of a ridiculed model. Human Communication Research10. 243255.10.1111/j.1468-2958.1983.tb00013.xSearch in Google Scholar

Ellithorpe, M., S.Esralew & L.Holbert. 2014. Putting the “self” in self-deprecation: When deprecating humor about minorities is acceptable. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research27. 401422.10.1515/humor-2014-0070Search in Google Scholar

Ferguson, M. A. & T. E.Ford. 2008. Disparagement humor: A theoretical and empirical review of psychoanalytic, superiority, and social identity theories. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research21. 283312.Search in Google Scholar

Ford, T. E., E. R.Wentzel & J.Lorion. 2001. Effects of exposure to sexist humor on perceptions of normative tolerance of sexism. European Journal of Social Psychology31. 677691.10.1002/ejsp.56Search in Google Scholar

Freud, S. 1960 (1905). Jokes and their relation to the unconscious. (James Strachey, Trans.). New York, NY: Norton.Search in Google Scholar

Greengross, G. & G. F.Miller. 2008. Dissing oneself versus dissing rivals: Effects of status, personality, and sex on the short-term and long-term attractiveness of self-deprecating and other-deprecating humor. Evolutionary Psychology6. 393408.Search in Google Scholar

Hobbes, T. 1968 (1651). Leviathan. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Janes, L. M. & J. M.Olson. 2000. Jeer pressure: The behavioral effects of observing ridicule of others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin26. 474485.10.1177/0146167200266006Search in Google Scholar

Janes, L. M., J. M.Olson & M.Dankiewitz. 2009. The effects of different humor styles on creativity. Unpublished manuscript.Search in Google Scholar

Kochersberger, A., T.Ford, J.Woodzicka, M.Romero-Sanchez & H.Carretero-Dios. 2014. The role of identification with women as a determinant of amusement with sexist humor. Humor: The International Journal of Humor Research27. 441460.10.1515/humor-2014-0071Search in Google Scholar

La Fave, L. 1972. Humor judgments as a function of reference groups and identification classes. In J. H.Goldstein & P. E.McGhee, The psychology of humor, 195210. New York, NY: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-288950-9.50016-XSearch in Google Scholar

Lundy, D. E., J.Tam & M. R.Cunningham. 1998. Heterosexual romantic preferences: The importance of humor and physical attractiveness for different types of relationships. Personal Relationships5. 311325.10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00174.xSearch in Google Scholar

Martin, R. A. 2001. Humor, laughter, and physical health: Methodological issues and research findings. Psychological Bulletin127. 504519.Search in Google Scholar

Martineau, W. H. 1972. A model of the social functions of humor. In J. H.Goldstein & P. E.McGhee (eds.), The psychology of humor, 101125. New York, NY: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-288950-9.50011-0Search in Google Scholar

Ryan, K. M. & J.Kanjorski. 1998. The enjoyment of sexist humor, rape attitudes, and relationship aggression in college students. Sex Roles38. 743756.Search in Google Scholar

Shapiro, J. P., R. F.Baumeister & J. W.Kessler. 1991. A three-component model of children’s teasing: Aggression, humor, and ambiguity. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology10. 459472.10.1521/jscp.1991.10.4.459Search in Google Scholar

Stocking, S. H. & D.Zillmann. 1976. Effects of humorous disparagement of self, friend, and enemy. Psychological Reports39. 455461.10.2466/pr0.1976.39.2.455Search in Google Scholar

Tajfel, H. 1978. The psychological structure of intergroup relations. In H.Tajfel (ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations, London: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tajfel, H. & J. C.Turner. 1986. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In William G.Austin & StephenWorcheland (eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations, 724. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.Search in Google Scholar

Torrance, E. P. 1962. Guiding creative talent. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.10.1037/13134-000Search in Google Scholar

Torrance, E. P. 1966. The Torrance tests of creative thinkingnormstechnical manual research editionverbal tests, forms A and Bfigural tests, forms A and B. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press.Search in Google Scholar

Torrance, E. P. & J.Presbury. 1984. The criteria of success used in 242 recent experimental studies of creativity. Creative Child & Adult Quarterly9. 238243.Search in Google Scholar

Torrance, E. P. & H. T.Safter. 1989. The long range predictive validity of the just suppose test. Journal of Creative Behavior23. 219223.10.1002/j.2162-6057.1989.tb00696.xSearch in Google Scholar

Wicker, F. W., W. L.Baron & A. C.Willis. 1980. Disparagement humor: Dispositions and resolutions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology39. 701709.10.1037/0022-3514.39.4.701Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, C. P. 1979. Jokes: Form, content, use, and function. New York, NY: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wolff, H. A., C. E.Smith & H. A.Murray. 1934. The psychology of humor: A study of responses to race-disparagement jokes. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology28. 341365.10.1037/h0075400Search in Google Scholar

Zillmann, D. 1983. Disparagement humor. In P. E.McGhee & J. H.Goldstein (eds.), Handbook of humor research, 85108. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-1-4612-5572-7_5Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2015-4-2
Published in Print: 2015-5-1

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton

Downloaded on 29.2.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/humor-2015-0021/pdf
Scroll to top button