Abstract
Jokes have been recognized as ways in which negative attitudes and prejudice can be communicated and enacted in hidden ways (e.g., Allport 1954; Freud 2004 [1905]). In this paper, we review the existing literature on the functions and effects of sexist humor, using Martineau’s (1972) model on the social functions of humor as well as Tajfel and Turner’s (2004 [1986]) Social Identity Theory (SIT) and Turner et al.’s (1987) Self Categorization Theory. Within these frameworks, we particularly focus on sex as an intergroup context and on the way sexist humor functions to a) enhance male in-group cohesion (sexist humor as a predictor) b) serves as a form of sexual harassment (sexist humor as an outcome) and c) amplifies self-reported rape proclivity and victim blame (sexist humor as a moderator). The paper concludes by highlighting gaps in the existing literature and providing directions for future research.
About the authors
Manuela Thomae is a Lecturer in Psychology at the University of Winchester. Her research focuses on the replication of WEIRD research findings in non-WEIRD contexts, intergroup contact, ambivalent sexism and sexist humor.
Afroditi Pina is a Lecturer in Forensic Psychology at the Centre of Research and Education in Forensic Psychology (CORE-FP) at the University of Kent. Her areas of expertise are sexual and cyber-harassment perpetrators and victims.
References
Abrams, Jessica R. & AmyBippus. 2011. An intergroup investigation of disparaging humor. Journal of Language and Social Psychology30(2). 193–201.10.1177/0261927X10397162Search in Google Scholar
Abrams, Dominic, G.Tendayi Viki, BarbaraMasser & GerdBohner. 2003. Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology84(1). 111–125.10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.111Search in Google Scholar
Allport, Gordon W.1954. The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.Search in Google Scholar
Angelone, D. J., RichardHirschman, SarahSuniga, MichaelArmey & AaronArmelie. 2005. The influence of peer interactions on sexually oriented joke telling. Sex Roles52(3/4). 187–199.10.1007/s11199-005-1294-4Search in Google Scholar
Boxer, Diana & FlorenciaCortés-Conde. 1997. From bonding to biting: Conversational joking and identity display. Journal of Pragmatics27. 275–294.10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00031-8Search in Google Scholar
Boxer, Christie F. & Thomas E.Ford. 2010. Sexist humor in the workplace: A case of subtle harassment. In JeraldGreenberg (ed.), Insidious workplace behaviour, 175–206. Boca Raton, FL: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Brewer, Marilynn B.1999. The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate?Journal of Social Issues55(3). 429–444.10.1111/0022-4537.00126Search in Google Scholar
Brown, Rupert. 2000. Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology30. 745–778.Search in Google Scholar
European Commission.2010. Feasibility study to assess the possibilities, opportunities and needs to standardise national legislation on violence against women, violence against children and sexual orientation violence [on-line]. Retrieved March 2014 from: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/eplive/expert/multimedia/20110405MLT17038/media_20110405MLT17038.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
European Commission. 2014. Boosting equality between women and men in the EU: Key actions and figures [on-line]. Retrieved August 2014 from: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/files/documents/140303_factsheet_progress_en.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Eyssel, Friederike & GerdBohner. 2007. The rating of sexist humor under time pressure as an indicator of spontaneous sexist attitudes. Sex Roles57(9/10). 651–660.10.1007/s11199-007-9302-5Search in Google Scholar
Ferguson, Mark A. & Thomas E.Ford. 2008. Disparagement humor: A theoretical and empirical review of psychoanalytic, superiority, and social identity theories. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research21(3). 283–312.Search in Google Scholar
Festinger, Leon, StanleySchachter & KurtBack. 1950. Social pressures in informal groups. New York, NY: Harper & Row.10.2307/3707362Search in Google Scholar
Fiske, Susan T. & PeterGlick. 1995. Ambivalence and stereotypes cause sexual harassment: A theory with implications for organizational change. Journal of Social Issues51(1). 97–115.10.1111/j.1540-4560.1995.tb01311.xSearch in Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Louise F. 1993. Sexual harassment: Violence against women in the workplace. American Psychologist48(10). 1070–1076.10.1037/0003-066X.48.10.1070Search in Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Louise F. & Sandra LShullman. 1993. Sexual harassment: A research analysis and agenda for the 1990s. Journal of Vocational Behavior42(1). 5–27.10.1006/jvbe.1993.1002Search in Google Scholar
Ford, Thomas E. 2000. Effects of sexist humor on tolerance of sexist events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin26(9). 1094–1107.10.1177/01461672002611006Search in Google Scholar
Ford, Thomas E., Christie F.Boxer, JacobArmstrong & Jessica R.Edel. 2008. More than just a joke: The prejudice releasing function of sexist humor. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin32(2). 159–170.10.1177/0146167207310022Search in Google Scholar
Ford, Thomas E.Ferguson, Mark A. & S.Kalair. 2002. Effects of sexist humor on tolerance of sexist events: The role of normative structure. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Sociological Association. Chicago.Search in Google Scholar
Ford, Thomas E. & Mark A.Ferguson. 2004. Social consequences of disparagement humor: A prejudiced norm theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review8(1). 79–94.10.1207/S15327957PSPR0801_4Search in Google Scholar
Ford, Thomas E., Erin R.Wentzel & JoliLorion. 2001. Effects of exposure to sexist humor on perceptions of normative tolerance of sexism. European Journal of Social Psychology31(6). 677–691.10.1002/ejsp.56Search in Google Scholar
Forsyth, Donelson R. 1983. An introduction to group dynamics. Monterey, CA: Brooks/.Search in Google Scholar
Freud, Siegmund. 2004. Der witz und seine beziehung zum unbewußten/der humor. Frankfurt (Main), Hessen, Germany: Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag.Search in Google Scholar
Glick, Peter & Susan T.Fiske. 2011. Ambivalent sexism revisited. Psychology of Women Quarterly35(3). 530–535.10.1177/0361684311414832Search in Google Scholar
Greenwood, Dara & Linda M.Isbell. 2002. Ambivalent sexism and the dumb blonde: Men’s and women’s reactions to sexist jokes. Psychology of Women Quarterly26(4). 341–350.10.1111/1471-6402.t01-2-00073Search in Google Scholar
Gwartney-Gibbs, Patricia A., JeanStockard & SusanneBohmer. 1987. Learning courtship aggression: The influence of parents, peers and personal experiences. Family Relations36(3). 276–282.Search in Google Scholar
Henkin, Barbara & Jefferson M.Fish. 1986. Gender and personality differences in the appreciation of cartoon humor. The Journal of Psychology120(2). 157–175.10.1080/00223980.1986.9712625Search in Google Scholar
Hogg, Michael A. 1993. Group cohesiveness: A critical review and some new directions. European Review of Social Psychology4(1). 85–111.10.1080/14792779343000031Search in Google Scholar
Hogg, Michael, A. & Scott A.Reid. 2006. Social identity, self-categorization, and the communication of group norms. Communication Theory16(1). 7–30.Search in Google Scholar
Hornsey, Matthew J. 2008. Social identity theory and self-categorization theory? A historical review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass2(1). 204–222.10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00066.xSearch in Google Scholar
Hornsey, Matthew, J.Russell Spears, IrisCremers & Michael A.Hogg. 2003. Relations between high and low power groups: The importance of legitimacy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin29(2). 216–227.10.1177/0146167202239047Search in Google Scholar
Hunt, Christopher J. & KarenGonsalkorale. 2014. Who cares what she thinks, what does he say? Links between masculinity, in-group bonding and gender harassment. Sex Roles70(1/2). 14–27.Search in Google Scholar
Kehily, Mary J. & AnoopNayak. 1997. Lads and laughter”: Humour and the production of heterosexual hierarchies. Gender and Education9(1). 69–88.10.1080/09540259721466Search in Google Scholar
LaFrance, Marianne & Julie A.Woodzicka. 1998. No laughing matter: Women’s verbal and nonverbal reactions to sexist humor. In Janet K.Swim & CharlesStangor (eds.), Prejudice: The target’s perspective, 61–80. San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-012679130-3/50038-7Search in Google Scholar
Lott, Bernice E. 1961. Group cohesiveness: A learning phenomenon. Journal of Social Psychology55(2). 275–286.10.1080/00224545.1961.9922183Search in Google Scholar
Lyman, Peter. 1987. The fraternal bond as a joking relationship: A case study of the role of sexist jokes in male group bonding. In Michael S.Kimmel (ed.), Changing men: New directions in research on men and masculinity, 148–163. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Malamuth, Neil M. 1981. Rape proclivity among males. Journal of Social Issues37(4). 138–157.10.1111/j.1540-4560.1981.tb01075.xSearch in Google Scholar
Martineau, William H. 1972. A model of the social functions of humor. In Jeffrey H.Goldstein and Paul E.McGhee (eds.), The psychology of humor: Theoretical perspectives and empirical issues, 101–125. New York, NY: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-288950-9.50011-0Search in Google Scholar
Masser, Barbara, G. TendayiViki & ClairPower. 2006. Hostile sexism and rape proclivity amongst men. Sex Roles54(7/8). 565–574.10.1007/s11199-006-9022-2Search in Google Scholar
Montemurro, Beth. 2003. Not a laughing matter: Sexual harassment as “material” on workplace-based situation comedies. Sex Roles48(9/10). 433–445.10.1023/A:1023578528629Search in Google Scholar
Moore, Timothy E., KarenGriffiths & BarbaraPayne. 1987. Gender, attitudes towards women, and the appreciation of sexist humor. Sex Roles16(9/10). 521–531.Search in Google Scholar
Reicher, Stephen, Russell Spears & S. AlexanderHaslam. 2010. The social identity approach in social psychology. In M. S.Wetherell & C. T.Mohanty (eds.), Sage Identities Handbook. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446200889.n4Search in Google Scholar
Roiphe, Katie. 1993. The morning after: Sex, fear and feminism. London, UK: Hamish Hamilton.Search in Google Scholar
Romero-Sánchez, Mónica, MercedesDurán, HugoCarretero-Dios, Jesús LMegías & MiguelMoya. 2010. Exposure to sexist humor and rape proclivity: The moderator effect of aversiveness ratings. Journal of Interpersonal Violence25(12). 2339–2350.10.1177/0886260509354884Search in Google Scholar
Ryan, Kathryn M. & JeanneKanjorski. 1998. The enjoyment of sexist humor, rape attitudes, and relationship aggression in college students. Sex Roles38(9/10). 743–756.Search in Google Scholar
Siebler, Frank, SaskiaSabelus & GerdBohner. 2008. A refined computer harassment paradigm: Validation, and test of hypotheses about target characteristics. Psychology of Women Quarterly32(1). 22–35.Search in Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri. 1982. Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology33. 1–39.10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245Search in Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri, Michael G.Billig, R. P.Bundy & ClaudeFlament. 1971. Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology1(2). 149–178.10.1002/ejsp.2420010202Search in Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri & John C.Turner. 1979. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In William G.Austin and StephenWorchel (eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations, 33–47. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Search in Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henry & John C.Turner. 2004. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In John T.Jost and JimSidanius (eds.), Political psychology: Key readings (key readings in social psychology), 276–293. New York, NY: Psychology Press.10.4324/9780203505984-16Search in Google Scholar
Thomae, Manuela & G.Tendayi Viki. 2013. Why did the woman cross the road? The effect of sexist humor on men’s rape proclivity. Journal of Social, Evolutionary and Cultural Psychology7(3). 250–269.Search in Google Scholar
Thomas, Caroline A. & Victoria M.Esses. 2004. Individual differences in reactions to sexist humor. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations7(1). 89–100.10.1177/1368430204039975Search in Google Scholar
Turner, John C. & Rupert J.Brown. 1978. Social status, cognitive alternatives and intergroup relations. In HenriTajfel (ed.), Differentiation between social groups, 201–234. London, UK: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar
Turner, John, Michael A.Hogg, Penelope J.Oakes, Stephen D.Reicher & Margaret S.Wetherell. 1987. Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. New York, NY: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Viki, G.Tendayi & Dominic Abrams. 2002. But she ws unfaithful: Benevolent sexism and reactions to rape victims who violate traditional gender role expectations. Sex Roles47(5/6). 289–293.Search in Google Scholar
Viki, G. Tendayi, PatrickChiroro & DominicAbrams. 2006. Hostile sexism, type of rape, and self-reported rape proclivity within a sample of Zimbabwean males. Violence Against Women12(8). 789–800.Search in Google Scholar
Viki, G. Tendayi, ManuelaThomae, AmyCullen & HannahFernandez. 2007. The effect of sexist humor and type of rape on men’s self-reported rape proclivity and victim blame. Current Research in Social Psychology13(10). 122–132.Search in Google Scholar
Woodzicka, Julie A. & Thomas E.Ford. 2010. A framework for thinking about the (not-so-funny) effects of sexist humor. Europe’s Journal of Psychology6(3). 174–95.10.5964/ejop.v6i3.217Search in Google Scholar
©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton
