Abstract
This article takes the notion of rebelliousness as the starting point for an analysis of eighteenth-century Dutch political humor. In several recent publications from humor scholars, the rebellious image of political humor in today’s world is questioned. This skepticism towards the idea of humor as a form of rebellion is connected to four sources of political humor that were published as part of the conflict between the reformist Patriots and the conservative Orangists, that took place in the Dutch Republic during the 1780s. It is shown that, comparable to the situation in contemporary political humor, the rebellious outlook of these sources is to a large extent a matter of rhetoric and convention. Their crossing of social and cultural boundaries and their attacks on the powers that be are part of a long cultural tradition, of which the actual social impact is doubtful. Also, the humor used in these sources contains obvious disciplinary tendencies, that emasculate their rebellious potential in yet another way. The new insights regarding political humor of the past that are thus produced prove the scholarly relevance of connecting theoretical perspectives based on the study of contemporary humor to historical cases of humor.
Acknowledgement
I would like to thank the members of the research group Early Modern News and Information Culture of the University of Amsterdam, the anonymous reviewers, and my good friend and fellow traveler in the field of Dutch humor studies Dick Zijp for their valuable comments on earlier versions of this article.
References
Altena, Peter. 2015. Who is the ape, who the human? Reize door het Aapenland (1788) and Die Affenkönige oder die Reformation des Affenlandes (1789) considered. In Marijke Meijer Drees & Sonja De Leeuw (eds.), The power of satire, 135–146. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/thr.2.10altSearch in Google Scholar
Anonymous [Henrik Sterck]. 1782. Lanterne magique of toverlantaern [Lanterne magique or magic lantern]. Amsterdam: Dirk de Man [et al.].Search in Google Scholar
Anonymous [Nicolaas Hoefnagel]. 1782. De vrolyke Walon met de rarekiek-kas [The merry Walloon with the peepshow]. S.l. [Amsterdam].Search in Google Scholar
Balzer, Richard. 1998. Peepshows: A visual history. New York: Abrams.Search in Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri. 1914 [1900]. Laughter: An essay on the meaning of the comic. New York: The Macmillan Company.Search in Google Scholar
Billig, Michael. 2005. Laughter and ridicule: Towards a social critique of humour. London: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781446211779Search in Google Scholar
Bremmer, Jan & Herman Roodenburg (eds.). 1997. A cultural history of humour. Cambridge: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar
Carrell, Amy. 2008. Historical views of humor. In Victor Raskin & Willibald Ruch (eds.), The primer of humor research, 303–332. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110198492.303Search in Google Scholar
Crangle, Richard, Mervyn Heard & Ine Van Dooren (eds.). 2005. Realms of light: Uses and perceptions of the magic lantern from the 17th to the 21st century. Ripon: Magic Lantern Society.Search in Google Scholar
Darnton, Robert. 2010. The devil in the holy water, or the art of slander from Louis XIV to Napoleon. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Search in Google Scholar
Deen, Femke, David Onnekink & Michel Reinders (eds.). 2011. Pamphlets and politics in the Dutch Republic. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/ej.9789004191785.i-261Search in Google Scholar
Dickie, Simon. 2011. Cruelty and laughter: Forgotten comic literature and the unsentimental eighteenth century. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226146201.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Gatrell, Vic. 2006. City of laughter: Sex and satire in eighteenth-century. London & New York: Walker.Search in Google Scholar
Graf, Fritz. 1997. Cicero, Plautus and Roman laughter. In Jan Bremmer & Herman Roodenburg (eds.), A cultural history of humor, 29–39. Cambridge: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar
Griffin, Dustin. 1994. Satire: A critical reintroduction. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.Search in Google Scholar
Grijzenhout, Frans, Wijnand Mijnhardt & Niek van Sas (eds.). 1987. Voor vaderland en vrijheid: De revolutie van de patriotten [For fatherland and freedom: The revolution of the patriots]. Amsterdam: De Bataafsche Leeuw.Search in Google Scholar
Harms, Roeland. 2011. Pamfletten en publieke opinie: Massamedia in de zeventiende eeuw [Pamphlets and public opinion: Mass media in the seventeenth century]. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Holm, Nicholas. 2012. Dissent in jest: The political aesthetics of contemporary media humour. Hamilton, ON: McMaster University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Jones, Jeffrey. 2010. Entertaining politics: Satiric television and political engagement. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Search in Google Scholar
Klein, Stephan. 1995. Patriots Republikanisme: Politieke cultuur in Nederland (1766–1787) [Patriot Republicanism: Political culture in the Netherlands (1766–1787)]. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.10.5117/9789053561942Search in Google Scholar
Le Goff, Jacques. 1997. Laughter in the middle ages. In Jan Bremmer & Herman Roodenburg (eds.), A cultural history of humor, 40–53. Cambridge: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar
Medovoi, Leerom. 2005. Rebels: Youth and the cold war origins of identity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822387299Search in Google Scholar
Morreall, John. 2008. Philosophy and religion. In Victor Raskin & Willibald Ruch (eds.), The primer of humor research, 211–242. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110198492.211Search in Google Scholar
Nieuwenhuis, Ivo. 2014a. Onder het mom van satire: Laster, spot en ironie in Nederland, 1780–1800 [Under the guise of satire: Slander, ridicule and irony in the Netherlands, 1780–1800]. Hilversum: Verloren.Search in Google Scholar
Nieuwenhuis, Ivo. 2014b. Geen effectiever vermaak dan leedvermaak: Humor als retorisch wapen in de Lanterne magique of toverlantaern (1782-83) [No more effective freude than schadenfreude: Humor as a rhetorical weapon in the Lanterne magique of toverlantaern (1782-83)]. TS: Tijdschrift voor Tijdschriftstudies 36. 101–118.10.18352/ts.315Search in Google Scholar
Nieuwenhuis, Ivo. 2016. Politiek op de kermis: Het genre van de gefingeerde rarekiekvertoning [Politics at the fair: The genre of the fake peepshow]. Mededelingen van de Stichting Jacob Campo Weyerman 39(1). 1–16.Search in Google Scholar
Quintero, Ruben (ed.). 2007. A companion to satire: Ancient and modern. Malden, MA: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470996959Search in Google Scholar
Raskin, Victor & Willibald Ruch (eds.). 2008. The primer of humor research. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110198492Search in Google Scholar
Reinders, Michel. 2013. Printed pandemonium: Popular print and politics in the Netherlands 1650–72. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004243170Search in Google Scholar
Rosendaal, Joost. 2005. De Nederlandse Revolutie: Vrijheid, volk en vaderland, 1783-1799 [The Dutch revolution: Freedom, people and fatherland, 1783-1799]. Nijmegen: Vantilt.Search in Google Scholar
Ruch, Willibald. 1998. Foreword and overview. Sense of humor: A new look at an old concept. In Willibald Ruch (ed.), The sense of humor: Explorations of a personality characteristic, 3–14. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter10.1515/9783110804607.3Search in Google Scholar
Schama, Simon. 1977. Patriots and liberators: Revolution in the Netherlands, 1780-1813. London: Collins.Search in Google Scholar
Tsakona, Villy. 2013. Parliamentary punning: Is the opposition more humorous than the ruling party? European Journal of Humour Research 1(2). 101–111.10.7592/EJHR2013.1.2.tsakona2Search in Google Scholar
Van Sas, Niek. 1987. Opiniepers en politieke cultuur [Opinion press and political culture]. In Frans Grijzenhout, Wijnand Mijnhardt & Niek van Sas (eds.), Voor vaderland en vrijheid: De revolutie van de patriotten, 97–130. Amsterdam: De Bataafsche Leeuw.Search in Google Scholar
Verberckmoes, Johan. 1997. The comic and the Counter-Reformation in the Spanish Netherlands. In Jan Bremmer & Herman Roodenburg (eds.), A cultural history of humor, 76–89. Cambridge: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar
Verberckmoes, Johan. 1998. Schertsen, schimpen en schateren: Geschiedenis van het lachen in de Zuidelijke Nederlanden, zestiende en zeventiende eeuw [Jesting, jeering and roaring: History of laughter in the Southern Netherlands, sixteenth and seventeenth century]. Nijmegen: SUN.Search in Google Scholar
Woordenboek der Nederlandsche Taal [Dictionary of the Dutch language]. Online. http://gtb.inl.nl/.Search in Google Scholar
Zijp, Dick. 2014. Re-thinking Dutch cabaret: The conservative implications of humour in the Dutch cabaret tradition. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam MA thesis.Search in Google Scholar
© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
