Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton August 28, 2019

The predictable semiotic essence of humor

Christian Hempelmann
From the journal HUMOR

Abstract

This short paper responds to Oring’s renewed and detailed criticism of the General Theory of Verbal Humor (2019). While conceding the need for some clarifications and elaborations in multidisciplinary collaboration, it mainly points to misunderstandings and misdirections of that criticism.

References

Anderson, Robert. 2016. The rashomon effect and communication. Canadian Journal of Communication 41(2). 249–265.10.22230/cjc.2016v41n2a3068Search in Google Scholar

Hempelmann, Christian F. 2004. Script oppositeness and logical mechanism in punning. HUMOR – International Journal of HUMOR Research 17(4). 381–392.10.1515/humr.2004.17.4.381Search in Google Scholar

Hempelmann, Christian F. & Salvatore Attardo. 2011. Resolutions and their incongruities: Further thoughts on logical mechanisms. HUMOR – International Journal of HUMOR Research 24(2). 125–149.10.1515/HUMR.2011.008Search in Google Scholar

Kao, Justine T., Roger Levy & Noah D. Goodman. 2016. A computational model of linguistic humor in puns. Cognitive Science 40(5). 1270–1285.10.1111/cogs.12269Search in Google Scholar

Paolillo, John C. 1998. Gary Larson’s Far Side: Nonsense? Nonsense! Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 11(3). 261–290.10.1515/humr.1998.11.3.261Search in Google Scholar

Raskin, Victor. 1985. Semantic mechanisms of humor. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-6472-3Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-08-28
Published in Print: 2019-10-25

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston