Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton February 11, 2021

Impersonated personae – paralanguage, dialogism and affiliation in stand-up comedy

Lorenzo Logi and Michele Zappavigna
From the journal HUMOR

Abstract

This paper argues that paralinguistic resources employed by stand-up comedians to construe textual personae (impersonated characters) make a substantial contribution to the creation of humor by allowing the comedian to distance themselves from particular social values and by referencing shared cultural stereotypes. A stretch of stand-up comedy discourse is analyzed to explore how gesture and voice quality contribute to the construal of projected personae. These are mapped in relation to the interaction between comedian and audience to discern how they evoke specific social values. The results suggest that textual personae are deployed by the comedian to embody stereotypes that connote particular value positions, and that the comedian can construe blended or hybrid personae through the use of multiple semiotic resources. Impersonation thus constitutes a powerful resource for negotiating social values in order to generate tension and create humor.


Corresponding author: Lorenzo Logi, School of the Arts and Media, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, E-mail:

References

Aarons, Debra, & Marcra Mierowsky. 2017. How to do things with jokes: Speech acts in standup comedy. The European Journal of Humour Research 5(4). 158–168. https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2017.5.4.aarons.Search in Google Scholar

Attardo, Salvatore. 1994. Linguistic theories of humor. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Attardo, Salvatore. 2015. Humour and Laughter. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton & D. Schiffrin (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis, 2nd ed., 168–188. Malden, MA;Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell.10.1002/9781118584194.ch8Search in Google Scholar

Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhaĭlovich. 1981. The dialogic imagination: Four essays (Caryl Emerson & Michael Holquist, Trans. Michael Holquist Ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Search in Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. (1972). Mythologies (Annette Lavers, Trans.). New York: Hill and Wang.Search in Google Scholar

Bell, Allan & Andy Gibson. 2011. Staging language: An introduction to the sociolinguistics of performance. Journal of SocioLinguistics 15(5). 555–572. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00517.x.Search in Google Scholar

Bergson, Henri. (1911). Laughter: an essay on the meaning of the comic (Cloudesley Brereton & Fred Rothwell, Trans.). New York: Macmillan.10.1037/13772-000Search in Google Scholar

Bühler, Karl. 1934. Sprachtheorie, Vol. 2. Jena Fischer.Search in Google Scholar

Chovanec, Jan & Villy Tsakona. 2018. Investigating the dynamics of humor. In Villy Tsakona & Jan Chovanec (eds.), The Dynamics of Interactional Humor: Creating and negotiating humor in everyday encounters, Vol. 7, 1–28. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/thr.7.01choSearch in Google Scholar

Clark, Herbert H. 2016. Depicting as a method of communication. Psychological Review 123(3). 324. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000026.Search in Google Scholar

Dancygier, Barbara. 2005. Blending and narrative viewpoint: Jonathan Raban’s travels through mental spaces. Language and Literature 14(2). 99–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947005051281.Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Catherine E. 2017. Sociolinguistic approaches to humor. The Routledge handbook of language and humor, 472–488. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315731162-33Search in Google Scholar

Dudis, Paul G. 2004. Body partitioning and real-space blends. Cognitive Linguistics 15(2). 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2004.009.Search in Google Scholar

Eggins, Suzanne & Diana Slade. 1997. Analyzing casual conversation. New York; London: Cassell.Search in Google Scholar

Everts, Elisa. 2003. Identifying a particular family humor style: A sociolinguistic discourse analysis. Humor 16(4). 369–412. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2003.021.Search in Google Scholar

Gillespie, Alex & Flora Cornish. 2010. Intersubjectivity: Towards a dialogical analysis. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 40(1). 19–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2009.00419.x.Search in Google Scholar

Glick, Douglas J. 2007. Some performative techniques of stand-up comedy: An exercise in the textuality of temporalization. Language & Communication 27(3). 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2007.01.003.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1956. The presentation of self in everyday life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Greenbaum, Andrea. 1999. Stand-up comedy as rhetorical argument: An investigation of comic culture. Humor-International Journal of Humor Research 12(1). 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1999.12.1.33.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. 1989. Spoken and written language. Victoria: Deakin University.Search in Google Scholar

Hoey, Micheal. 2005. Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Hood, Susan. 2011. Body language in face-to-face teaching: A focus on textual and interpersonal meaning. Semiotic Margins: Meaning in Multimodalities. 31–52.Search in Google Scholar

Izzard, Eddie. 1999. Dress to kill. USA: Ella Communications.Search in Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail. 1979. A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance declination. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday language: studies in ethnomethodology, 79–96. Irvington Publishers: distributed by Halsted Press.Search in Google Scholar

Keisalo, Marianna. 2016. ‘Picking People to Hate’: Reversible reversals in stand-up comedy. Suomen Antropologi: Journal of the Finnish Anthropological Society 41(4). 62–76.Search in Google Scholar

Kendon, Adam. 1997. Gesture. Annual Review of Anthropology 26(1). 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.109.Search in Google Scholar

Kendon, Adam. 2004. Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511807572Search in Google Scholar

Knight, Naomi K. 2008. “Still cool…and american too!”: An SFL Analysis of Deferred Bonds in Internet Messaging Humour. In Nina Nørgaard (ed.), Systemic functional linguistics in use, Odense working papers in language and communication, Vol. 29.Search in Google Scholar

Knight, Naomi K. 2010. Laughing our bonds off: Conversational humour in relation to affiliation. University of Sydney Dissertation/Thesis. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/2123/6656.Search in Google Scholar

Knight, Naomi K. 2011. The interpersonal semiotics of having a laugh. In Shoshana Dreyfus, Susan Hood & Maree Stenglin (eds.), Semiotic margins: Meaning in multimodalities, 7–30. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Kotthoff, Helga. 2000. Gender and joking: On the complexities of women’s image politics in humorous narratives. Journal of Pragmatics 32(1). 55–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(99)00031-4.Search in Google Scholar

Koziski, Stephanie. 1984. The standup comedian as anthropologist: Intentional culture critic. The Journal of Popular Culture 18(2). 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3840.1984.1802_57.x.Search in Google Scholar

Kress, Gunther R. & Theo van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. Edward Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Kress, Gunther R. & Theo van Leeuwen. 2006. Reading images: The grammar of visual design, 2 ed. Psychology Press.10.4324/9780203619728Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1966. The social stratification of English in New York city. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lazar, Michelle M. & Cheris Kramarae. 2011. Gender and power in discourse. In Teun A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction, 217–240. Sage.10.4135/9781446289068.n11Search in Google Scholar

Linell, Per. 2009. Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically. IAP.Search in Google Scholar

Logi, Lorenzo & Michele Zappavigna. 2019. Dialogic resources in interactional humour. Journal of Pragmatics 153. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.010.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, James R. 2004. Mourning: How we get aligned. Discourse & Society 15(2–3). 321–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926504041022.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, James R. (2008). Tenderness: realisation and instantiation in a Botswanan town. Paper presented at the 34th international systemic functional congress. Odense: Syddansk University.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, James R. & David Rose. 2007. Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause, 2 ed. Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, James R. & Maree Stenglin. 2006. Materializing reconciliation: Negotiating difference in a transcolonial exhibition. In T. Royce & B. W. (eds.), New directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse, 215–238. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, James R. & Peter R. R. White. 2005. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230511910Search in Google Scholar

Martin, James R. & Michele Zappavigna. 2019. Embodied meaning: A systemic functional perspective on paralanguage. Functional Linguistics 6(1). 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-018-0065-9.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, James R., Michele Zappavigna, Paul Dwyer & Chris Cléirigh. 2013. Users in uses of language: Embodied identity in Youth Justice Conferencing. Text & Talk 33(4–5). 467–496. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2013-0022.Search in Google Scholar

Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 2004. The evolution of language: a systemic functional exploration of phylogenetic phases. In G. Williams & A. Lukin (eds.), The development of language. Functional perspectives on species and individuals, 45–90. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 2007. The multimodal page: A systemic functional exploration. In W. Bowcher & T. Royce (eds.), New directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse, 1–62.Search in Google Scholar

Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 2009. Multisemiosis and context-based register typology: Registerial variation in the complementarity of semiotic systems. In The world told and the world shown, 11–38. Springer.Search in Google Scholar

McNeill, David. 1992. Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

McNeill, David. 2012. How language began: Gesture and speech in human evolution. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139108669Search in Google Scholar

Mintz, Lawrence E. 1985. Standup comedy as social and cultural mediation. American Quarterly 37(1). 71–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/2712763.Search in Google Scholar

Ngo, Thu, James R. Martin, Susan Hood, Claire Painter, Bradley A. Smith & Michele Zappavigna. Modelling paralanguage using systemic functional semiotics (forthcoming). Bloomsbury Academic.Search in Google Scholar

Norrick, Neal R. 1993. Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nuyts, Jan. 2010. Cognitive linguistics and functional linguistics. In The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738632.013.0020Search in Google Scholar

Pao, Angela Chia-yi. 2004. False accents: Embodied dialects and the characterization of ethnicity and nationality. Theatre Topics 14(1). 353–372. https://doi.org/10.1353/tt.2004.0008.Search in Google Scholar

Parrill, Fey & Eve Sweetser. 2004. What we mean by meaning: Conceptual integration in gesture analysis and transcription. Gesture 4(2). 197–219.10.1075/gest.4.2.05parSearch in Google Scholar

Rutter, Jason. 2001. Rhetoric in stand-up comedy: Exploring performer-audience interaction. Stylistyka 10. 307–325.Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1989. An analysis of the course of a Joke’s telling in conversation. In J. Sherzer & R. Bauman (eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking, 2 ed., 337–353. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611810.022Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1998. Body torque. Social Research 65(3). 535–596.Search in Google Scholar

Schwarz, Jeannine. 2010. Linguistic aspects of verbal humor in stand-up comedy.Search in Google Scholar

Searle, John R. 1975. The logical status of fictional discourse. New Literary History 6(2). 319–332. https://doi.org/10.2307/468422.Search in Google Scholar

Sekine, Kazuki, Miranda L. Rose, Abby M. Foster, Michelle C. Attard & Lucette E. Lanyon. 2013. Gesture production in aphasic discourse: In-depth description and preliminary predictions. Aphasology 27(9). 1031–1049. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2013.803017.Search in Google Scholar

Sidnell, Jack. 2006. Coordinating gesture, talk, and gaze in reenactments. Research on Language and Social Interaction 39(4). 377–409. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3904_2.Search in Google Scholar

Stenglin, Maree. 2008. Interpersonal meaning in 3D space: How a bonding icon gets its ‘charge’. Multimodal semiotics: Functional analysis in contexts of education, 50–66.Search in Google Scholar

Sweetser, Eve & Kasmiri Stec. 2016. Maintaining multiple viewpoints with gaze. In B. Dancygier, W.-l. Lu & A. Verhagen (eds.), Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities, 237–258. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.10.1515/9783110365467-011Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, Sandra A. & Ryoko Suzuki. 2014. Reenactments in conversation: Gaze and recipiency. Discourse Studies 16(6). 816–846. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445614546259.Search in Google Scholar

Tsakona, Villy & Jan Chovanec (eds.). 2018. The dynamics of interactional humor. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/thr.7Search in Google Scholar

van Leeuwen, Theo. 1999. Speech, music, sound. New York: St. Martin’s Press.10.1007/978-1-349-27700-1Search in Google Scholar

Vandelanotte, Lieven. 2012. Wait till you got started. In Barbara Dancygier & Eve Sweetser (eds.), Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective, 198–218. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139084727.015Search in Google Scholar

Verhagen, Arie. 2007. Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax, and cognition. Oxford University Press on Demand.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226702.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Verhagen, Arie. 2016. Introduction: On tools for weaving meaning out of viewpoint threads. In Barbara Dancygier, Wei-lun Lu & Arie Verhagen (eds.), Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities, 1–10. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.10.1515/9783110365467-002Search in Google Scholar

Vigouroux, Cécile B. 2015. Genre, heteroglossic performances, and new identity: Stand-up comedy in modern French society. Language in Society 44(2). 243–272. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404515000068.Search in Google Scholar

Vološinov, Valentin Nikolaevich. (1995). Marxism and the philosophy of language (L. Matjka & I. R. Titunik, Trans.). London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

White, Peter R. R. 2001. An introductory course in appraisal analysis.Search in Google Scholar

White, Peter R. R. 2019. Analyzing evaluative language: Applying the appraisal framework. In Seminar series held at Sydney University.Search in Google Scholar

Williams, Lindsay. 2019. Nurturing affiliation: The interpersonal, multimodal work of stand-up comedians. University of New England.Search in Google Scholar

Zappavigna, Michele. 2019. Ambient affiliation and #brexit: Negotiating values about experts through censure and ridicule. In V. Koller, S. Kopf & M. Miglbauer (eds.), Discourses of Brexit, 48–68. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781351041867-4Search in Google Scholar

Zhao, Sumin. 2011. Learning through multimedia interaction: The construal of primary social science knowledge in web-based digital learning materials. Dissertation/Thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-11-18
Accepted: 2020-04-16
Published Online: 2021-02-11
Published in Print: 2021-08-26

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston