Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter February 8, 2017

Constitutional Politics in Contemporary Hungary

Tímea Drinóczi

Associate Professor at the Department of Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law, University of Pécs.

EMAIL logo
From the journal ICL Journal

Abstract

This paper argues that what has happened with and led to the 4th amendment to the Fundamental Law of Hungary adopted in 2013 (and to the 5th amendment of the same year) is a reasonable and simple consequence of the technique of the political power that has been exercised in Hungary since 2010 in the course of amending the former Constitution and of the preparation and adoption of the new one. In order to understand why the change is so drastic and radical, it is inevitable to assess constitutional politics between 1989 and 2010 from a perspective of the constitution-changing and -making powers and the methods and techniques employed. The outcomes of constitutional politics between 1989 and 2010 gave rise to political criticism and the developments related to the Constitution (Act XX of 1949) were also surrounded by evident dissatisfaction. Yet, what has been happening since 2010 is far more problematic in the light of constitutionalism and democratic values.

About the author

Tímea Drinóczi

Associate Professor at the Department of Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law, University of Pécs.

Published Online: 2017-2-8
Published in Print: 2016-3-1

© 2017 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 27.11.2022 from frontend.live.degruyter.dgbricks.com/document/doi/10.1515/icl-2016-0105/html
Scroll Up Arrow