Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter March 12, 2021

Writing While Quarantined: A Personal Interpretation of Contemporary Comparative Constitutional Law

  • Mark Tushnet EMAIL logo
From the journal ICL Journal

Abstract

This Essay is a personal reflection on the state of scholarship in the field of comparative constitutional law. I draw parallels between the development of and reaction to ‘critical perspectives’ on domestic US comparative constitutional law today. I argue that the parallels have similar political roots, in concern that critical perspectives undermine the ability of constitutional law, whether domestic or comparative, to resist conservative and antiliberal tendencies. I conclude with some speculations about the source of the political commitments by scholars of comparative constitutional law, and in particular about the way the field’s overall cosmopolitanism affects scholarship on anti-cosmopolitan populisms.


Corresponding author: Mark Tushnet, William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Law Emeritus, Harvard Law School, Cambridge, USA, E-mail: ; I have profited from comments from several colleagues, but because of the personal nature of this Essay I refer to individuals only for specific points where comments led me to adjust my views.

Published Online: 2021-03-12
Published in Print: 2021-03-26

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 4.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/icl-2020-0041/html
Scroll to top button