Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag April 1, 2015

Merging Interactive Information Filtering and Recommender Algorithms – Model and Concept Demonstrator

Benedikt Loepp, Katja Herrmanny and Jürgen Ziegler
From the journal icom


To increase controllability and transparency in recommender systems, recent research has been putting more focus on integrating interactive techniques with recommender algorithms. In this paper, we propose a model of interactive recommending that structures the different interactions users can have with recommender systems. Furthermore, as a novel approach to interactive recommending, we describe a technique that combines faceted information filtering with different algorithmic recommender techniques. We refer to this approach as blended recommending. We also present an interactive movie recommender based on this approach and report on its user-centered design process, in particular an evaluation study in which we compared our system with a standard faceted filtering system. The results indicate a higher level of perceived user control, more detailed preference settings, and better suitability when the search goal is vague.


1. Baeza-Yates, R., and Ribeiro-Neto, B. Modern Information Retrieval. ACM, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

2. Bostandjiev, S., O’Donovan, J., and Höllerer, T. Taste-Weights: A visual interactive hybrid recommender system. In Proc. RecSys ‘12, ACM (2012), 35–42.Search in Google Scholar

3. Brooke, J. SUS – A quick and dirty usability scale. In Usability Evaluation in Industry. Taylor & Francis, 1996, 189–194.Search in Google Scholar

4. Burke, R. Hybrid web recommender systems. In The Adaptive Web. Methods and Strategies of Web Personalization, P. Brusilovsky, A. Kobsa and W. Nejdl, Eds., Springer, 2007, 377–408.Search in Google Scholar

5. Celik, I., Abel, F., and Siehndel, P. Towards a framework for adaptive faceted search on twitter. In Proc. DAH ’11 (2011).Search in Google Scholar

6. Chen, L., and Pu, P. Critiquing-based recommenders: Survey and emerging trends. User Mod. and User-Adapted Interaction 22, 1–2 (2012), 125–150.Search in Google Scholar

7. Chi, E. H. Transient user profiling. In Proc. Workshop on User Profiling (2004), 521–523.Search in Google Scholar

8. Dooms, S., de Pessemier, T., and Martens, L. Improving IMDb movie recommendations with interactive settings and filters. In Proc. RecSys ‘14, ACM (2014).Search in Google Scholar

9. Gantner, Z., Rendle, S., Freudenthaler, C., and Schmidt-Thieme, L. MyMediaLite: A free recommender system library. In Proc. RecSys ‘11, ACM (2011), 305–308.Search in Google Scholar

10. Girgensohn, A., Shipman, F., Chen, F., and Wilcox, L. DocuBrowse: Faceted searching, browsing, and recommendations in an enterprise context. In Proc. IUI ‘10, ACM (2010), 189–198.Search in Google Scholar

11. Hearst, M. A. Search User Interfaces. Cambridge University Press, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

12. Herrmanny, K., Schering, S., Berger, R., Loepp, B., Günter, T., Hussein, T., and Ziegler, J. MyMovieMixer: Ein hybrider Recommender mit visuellem Bedienkonzept. In Proc. Mensch & Computer ‘14, De Gruyter Oldenbourg (2014), 45–54.Search in Google Scholar

13. Jawaheer, G., Weller, P., and Kostkova, P. Modeling user preferences in recommender systems: A classification framework for explicit and implicit user feedback. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 4, 2 (2014), 8:1–8:26.Search in Google Scholar

14. Karimi, R., Freudenthaler, C., Nanopoulos, A., and Schmidt-Thieme, L. Exploiting the characteristics of matrix factorization for active learning in recommender systems. In Proc. RecSys ‘12, ACM (2012), 317–320.Search in Google Scholar

15. Knijnenburg, B. P., Willemsen, M. C., Gantner, Z., Soncu, H., and Newell, C. Explaining the user experience of recommender systems. User Mod. and User-Adapted Interaction, 22, 4–5 (2012), 441–504.Search in Google Scholar

16. Konstan, J. A., and Riedl, J. Recommender systems: From algorithms to user experience. User Mod. and User-Adapted Interaction 22, 1–2 (2012), 101–123.Search in Google Scholar

17. Koren, Y., Bell, R. M., and Volinsky, C. Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. IEEE Computer 42, 8 (2009), 30–37.Search in Google Scholar

18. Kuhlthau, C. C. Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user’s perspective. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 42, 5 (1991), 361–371.Search in Google Scholar

19. Loepp, B., Herrmanny, K. and Ziegler, J. Blended recommending: Integrating interactive information filtering and algorithmic recommender techniques. In Proc. CHI ‘15, ACM (to appear).Search in Google Scholar

20. Loepp, B., Hussein, T., and Ziegler, J. Choice-based preference elicitation for collaborative filtering recommender systems. In Proc. CHI ‘14, ACM (2014), 3085–3094.Search in Google Scholar

21. Mandl M. and Felfernig, A. Improving the Performance of Unit Critiquing. In Proc. UMAP ’12, Springer (2012), 176–187.Search in Google Scholar

22. Marchionini, G. Information Seeking in Electronic Environments. Cambridge University Press, 1995.Search in Google Scholar

23. McNee, S. M., Riedl, J. and Konstan, J. A. Being accurate is not enough: How accuracy metrics have hurt recommender systems. In Ext. Abstracts CHI ‘06, ACM (2006), 1097–1101.Search in Google Scholar

24. McNee, S. M., Riedl, J. and Konstan, J. A. Making recommendations better: An analytic model for human-recommender interaction. In Ext. Abstracts CHI ‘06, ACM (2006), 1103–1108.Search in Google Scholar

25. Moshagen, M. and Thielsch, M. T. Facets of visual aesthetics. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. St. 68, 10 (2010), 689–709.Search in Google Scholar

26. Pariser, E. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding From You. Penguin Press, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

27. Parra, D., Brusilovsky, P., and Trattner, C. See what you want to see: Visual user-driven approach for hybrid recommendation. In Proc. IUI ‘14, ACM (2014), 235–240.Search in Google Scholar

28. Pu, P., Chen, L., and Hu, R. A user-centric evaluation framework for recommender systems. In Proc. RecSys ‘11, ACM (2011), 157–164.Search in Google Scholar

29. Pu, P., Chen, L., and Hu, R. Evaluating recommender systems from the users perspective: Survey of the state of the art. User Mod. and User-Adapted Interaction 22, 4–5 (2012), 317–355.Search in Google Scholar

30. Pu, P., Faltings, B., Chen, L., Zhang, J., and Viappiani, P. Recommender Systems Handbook. Springer, 2010, ch. Usability Guidelines for Product Recommenders Based on Example Critiquing Research, 511–545.Search in Google Scholar

31. Ricci, F., Rokach, L., and Shapira, B. Recommender Systems Handbook. Springer, 2010, ch. Introduction to Recommender Systems Handbook, 1–35.Search in Google Scholar

32. Smyth, B., and McGinty, L. An analysis of feedback strategies in conversational recommenders. In Proc. AICS ‘03 (2003).Search in Google Scholar

33. Sacco, G. M., and Tzitzikas, Y. Dynamic Taxonomies and Faceted Search. Springer, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

34. Salton, G., and Buckley, C. Improving retrieval performance by relevance feedback. In Readings in Information Retrieval. Morgan Kaufmann, 1997, 355–364.Search in Google Scholar

35. Thai, V., Rouille, P.-Y., and Handschuh, S. Visual abstraction and ordering in faceted browsing of text collections. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 3, 2 (2012), 21:1–21:24.Search in Google Scholar

36. Tintarev, N., and Masthoff, J. Recommender Systems Handbook. Springer, 2010, ch. Designing and Evaluating Explanations for Recommender Systems, 479–510.Search in Google Scholar

37. Tvarožek, M., Barla, M., Frivolt, G., Tomša, M., and Bieliková, M. Improving semantic search via integrated personalized faceted and visual graph navigation. In Proc. SOFSEM ’08, Springer (2008), 778–789.Search in Google Scholar

38. Vig, J., Sen, S., and Riedl, J. Navigating the tag genome. In Proc. IUI ‘11, ACM (2011), 93–102.Search in Google Scholar

39. Voigt, M., Werstler, A., Polowinski, J., and Meißner, K. Weighted faceted browsing for characteristics-based visualization selection through end users. In Proc. EICS ’12, ACM (2012), 151–156.Search in Google Scholar

40. Xiao, B., and Benbasat, I. E-commerce product recommendation agents: Use, characteristics, and impact. MIS Quarterly 31, 1 (2007), 137–209.Search in Google Scholar

41. Yee, K.-P., Swearingen, K., Li, K. and Hearst, M. Faceted metadata for image search and browsing. In Proc. CHI ‘03, ACM (2003), 401–408.Search in Google Scholar

42. Zadeh, L. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 3 (1965), 338–353.Search in Google Scholar

43. Zhang, J., Jones, N., and Pu, P. A visual interface for critiquing-based recommender systems. In Proc. EC ‘08, ACM (2008), 230–239.Search in Google Scholar

44. Zhao, X., Zhang, W., and Wang, J. Interactive collaborative filtering. In Proc. CIKM ‘13, ACM (2013), 1411–1420.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2015-4-1
Published in Print: 2015-4-15

© 2015 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston