Skip to content
Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag November 14, 2018

Slowing Down Interactions on Tangible Tabletop Interfaces

A Comparative User Study in the Context of Collaborative Problem Solving

Cathia Lahure and Valérie Maquil
From the journal i-com

Abstract

This paper describes the results from a comparative study with 14 pupils using two different versions of a tangible tabletop application on satellite communication. While one of the versions was designed in a way to allow the resolution of the tasks in a pure trial-and-error approach, the second version prevented this by adding a button which had to be pressed in order to calculate and display results. The results of the study show that the design of the button and the associated scoring system was indeed successful in slowing down interactions and increasing thinking time. However, the knowledge acquisition was lower for the version with the button as compared to the one supporting trial-and-error. We discuss the results of this study and, in particular, argue for the need to carefully balance usability, task complexity and the learning dimension in the design of interactive tabletops for learning.

References

[1] Dimitra Anastasiou, Valérie Maquil, Eric Ras, and Mehmetcan Fal. 2016. Design implications for a user study on a tangible tabletop. In Proceedings of IDC 2016 – The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 499–505. 10.1145/2930674.2935982.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Alissa N. Antle, Joshua Tanenbaum, Allen Bevans, Katie Seaborn, and Sijie Wang. 2011. Balancing act: Enabling public engagement with sustainability issues through a multi-touch tabletop collaborative game. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 6947 LNCS, PART 2: 194–211. 10.1007/978-3-642-23771-3_16.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Alissa N. Antle and Alyssa F. Wise. 2013. Getting down to details: Using theories of cognition and learning to inform tangible user interface design. Interacting with Computers 25, 1: 1–20. 10.1093/iwc/iws007.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Alissa Antle, Alyssa F. Wise, and Kristine Nielsen. 2011. Towards Utopia: designing tangibles for learning. In International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 11–20. 10.1145/1999030.1999032.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Aaron Bangor, Philip T. Kortum, and James T. Miller. 2008. An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 24, 6: 574–594. 10.1080/10447310802205776.Search in Google Scholar

[6] John Brooke. 1996. SUS – A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry 189, 194: 4–7. 10.1002/hbm.20701.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Jean Ho Chu, Paul Clifton, Daniel Harley, Jordanne Pavao, and Ali Mazalek. 2014. Mapping Place: Supporting Cultural Learning through a Lukasa-inspired Tangible Tabletop Museum Exhibit. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI ’15): 261–268. 10.1145/2677199.2680559.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Pierre Dillenbourg and Michael Evans. 2011. Interactive tabletops in education. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 6, 4: 491–514. 10.1007/s11412-011-9127-7.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Ylva Fernaeus, Jakob Tholander, and Martin Jonsson. 2008. Towards a New set of Ideals: Consequences of the Practice Turn in Tangible Interaction. Forum American Bar Association 1, 3/4: 223–230. 10.1145/1347390.1347441.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Richard R. Hake. 1998. Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics 66, 1: 64–74. 10.1119/1.18809.Search in Google Scholar

[11] S. G. Hart. 2006. Nasa-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 Years Later. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 50, 9: 904–908. 10.1177/154193120605000909.Search in Google Scholar

[12] M. Horn, Zeina Atrash Leong, and Florian Block. 2012. Of BATs and APEs: an interactive tabletop game for natural history museums. In Proceedings of the …: 2059–2068. 10.1145/2207676.2208355.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Michael S. Horn, Erin Treacy Solovey, and Robert J.K. Jacob. 2008. Tangible Programming and Informal Science Learning: Making TUIs Work for Museums. In IDC ’08 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Interaction design and children: 194–201. 10.1145/1463689.1463756.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Eva Hornecker. 2012. Beyond Affordance: Tangibles’ Hybrid Nature. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction: 175–182. 10.1145/2148131.2148168.Search in Google Scholar

[15] B. Limbu, V. Maquil, E. Ras, and A. Weinberger. 2015. Tomb of osiris: Gamifying the assessment of collaborative complex problem solving skills on tangible tabletops. 10.1007/978-3-319-27704-2_7.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Valerie Maquil, Eric Tobias, Dimitra Anastasiou, Hélène Mayer, and Thibaud Latour. 2017. COPSE: Rapidly Instantiating Problem Solving Activities based on Tangible Tabletop Interfaces. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, June: 16. 10.1145/3095808.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Emma Mercier and S. Higgins. 2014. Creating joint representations of collaborative problem solving with multi-touch technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 30, 6: 497–510. 10.1111/jcal.12052.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Sara Price, Taciana Pontual Falcão, Jennifer G. Sheridan, and George Roussos. 2009. The effect of representation location on interaction in a tangible learning environment. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction – TEI ’09: 85. 10.1145/1517664.1517689.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Eric Ras, Samuel Greiff, and Eric Tobias. 2014. Moving Towards the Assessment of Collaborative Problem Solving Skills With a Tangible User Interface. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 13, 4: 95–104.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Hayne W. Reese. 2011. The Learning-by-Doing Principle. Behavioral Development Bulletin 11: 1–19. 10.1037/h0100597.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Yvonne Rogers, Youn-kyung Lim, William R. Hazlewood, and Paul Marshall. 2009. Equal Opportunities: Do Shareable Interfaces Promote More Group Participation Than Single User Displays? Human-Computer Interaction 24, 1/2: 79–116. 10.1080/07370020902739379.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Yvonne Rogers and Henk Muller. 2006. A framework for designing sensor-based interactions to promote exploration and reflection in play. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 64, 1: 1–14. 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.05.004.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Yvonne Rogers, Mike Scaife, Silvia Gabrielli, Hilary Smith, and Eric Harris. 2002. A Conceptual Framework for Mixed Reality Environments: Designing Novel Learning Activities for Young Children. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 11, January 2017: 677–686. 10.1162/105474602321050776.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Stacey D. Scott, Carpendale Sheelagh, and Kori M. Inkpen. 2004. Territoriality in collaborative tabletop workspaces. In Computer Supported Cooperative Work: 294–303. 10.1145/1031607.1031655.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Danae Stanton, Victor Bayon, Helen Neale, Ahmed Ghali, Steve Benford, Sue Cobb, Rob Ingram, Claire O’Malley, John Wilson, and Tony Pridmore. 2001. Classroom collaboration in the design of tangible interfaces for storytelling. the SIGCHI conference, 3: 482–489. 10.1145/365024.365322.Search in Google Scholar

[26] E. Tobias, V. Maquil, and T. Latour. 2015. TULIP: A widget-based software framework for tangible tabletop interfaces. In EICS 2015 – Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems. 10.1145/2774225.2775080.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Ulrich von Zadow, Sandra Buron, Tina Harms, Florian Behringer, Kai Sostmann, and Raimund Dachselt. 2013. SimMed: Combining Simulation and Interactive Tabletops for Medical Education. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems – CHI ’13: 1469. 10.1145/2470654.2466196.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Guillaume Zufferey, Patrick Jermann, Aurélien Lucchi, and Pierre Dillenbourg. 2009. TinkerSheets: using paper forms to control and visualize tangible simulations. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction, 377–384. 10.1145/1517664.1517740.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-11-14
Published in Print: 2018-12-19

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston