Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag July 19, 2022

Ethical, Legal & Participatory Concerns in the Development of Human-Robot Interaction

Lessons from Eight Research Projects with Social Robots in Real-World Scenarios

Felix Carros, Tobias Störzinger, Anne Wierling, Adrian Preussner and Peter Tolmie
From the journal i-com

Abstract

Research on Human-Robot Interaction is increasing as system become widely available and reached a level that enables smooth interactions. Yet, many research projects act in a silo mentality, in regard of participatory, ethical, or legal matters of social robotics. Knowledge about specific challenges is not universal and has often to be transferred from non-robotic contexts. We present findings in the three dimensions: participatory design, ethics for social robots and legal aspects. We accompanied eight research projects on social robots in real-world scenarios for three years. During that time, we spoke, observed, and helped (where possible) the research projects. This gave us specific insights into their work. Our findings work in three dimensions. In participatory design we observed that the trust relationship to users is essential to gain truthful insights and that a mixed method approach is promising. Regarding ethical aspects, we could see that ethical matters should be answered early on. And in the legal dimensions we noticed that the GDPR regulations are a challenge that often requires the help of experts. This work is reflecting on the observation of eight projects and is collecting lessons learned to help future projects and to learn from previous work.

References

[1] Azenkot, S., Feng, C., & Cakmak, M. (2016, March). Enabling building service robots to guide blind people a participatory design approach. In 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 3–10). IEEE.10.1109/HRI.2016.7451727Search in Google Scholar

[2] Carros F., Eilers H., Langendorf J., Gözler M., Wieching R., Lüssem J. (2022a). Roboter als intelligente Assistenten in Betreuung und Pflege – Grenzen und Perspektiven im Praxiseinsatz. In Pfannstiel, M. A. (eds) Künstliche Intelligenz im Gesundheitswesen. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33597-7_38.10.1007/978-3-658-33597-7_38Search in Google Scholar

[3] Carros, F., Schwaninger, I., Preussner, A., Randall, D., Wieching, R., Fitzpatrick, G., and Wulf, V. (2022b). Care Workers Making Use of Robots: Results of a Three-Month Study on Human-Robot Interaction within a Care Home. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’22), April 29–May 5, 2022, New Orleans, LA, USA. ACM, New Orleans, LA, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517435.10.1145/3491102.3517435Search in Google Scholar

[4] Carros, F., Meurer, J., Löffler, D., Unbehaun, D., Matthies, S., Koch, I., ... & Wulf, V. (2020, April). Exploring human-robot interaction with the elderly: results from a ten-week case study in a care home. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–12).10.1145/3313831.3376402Search in Google Scholar

[5] Carros, F., (2019). Roboter in der Pflege, ein Schreckgespenst?. Mensch und Computer 2019 – Workshopband. Bonn: Gesellschaft für Informatik e. V. https://doi.org/10.18420/muc2019-ws-588.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Choy, L. T. (2014). The strengths and weaknesses of research methodology: Comparison and complimentary between qualitative and quantitative approaches. IOSR journal of humanities and social science, 19(4), 99–104.10.9790/0837-194399104Search in Google Scholar

[7] Dahlbäck, N., Jönsson, A., & Ahrenberg, L. (1993). Wizard of Oz studies—why and how. Knowledge-based systems, 6(4), 258–266.10.1016/0950-7051(93)90017-NSearch in Google Scholar

[8] Dow, S., MacIntyre, B., Lee, J., Oezbek, C., Bolter, J. D., & Gandy, M. (2005). Wizard of Oz support throughout an iterative design process. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 4(4), 18–26.10.1109/MPRV.2005.93Search in Google Scholar

[9] Floridi, Luciano, & Sanders, J. W. (2004). On the Morality of Artificial Agents. Minds and Machines, 14(3), 349–379. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MIND.0000035461.63578.9d.10.1023/B:MIND.0000035461.63578.9dSearch in Google Scholar

[10] Kuckartz, U. (2014). Mixed methods: methodologie, Forschungsdesigns und Analyseverfahren. Springer-Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Manzeschke, A., Weber, K., Rother, E., & Fangerau, H. (2013). Ergebnisse der Studie „Ethische Fragen im Bereich Altersgerechter Assistenzsysteme“ (neue Ausg). VDI.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Misselhorn, Catrin. (2018). Grundfragen der Maschinenethik. 3., Durchges. Aufl. 2019. Ditzingen: Reclam, Philipp, jun. GmbH, Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Šabanović, S., Chang, W. L., Bennett, C. C., Piatt, J. A., & Hakken, D. (2015, August). A robot of my own: participatory design of socially assistive robots for independently living older adults diagnosed with depression. In International conference on human aspects of it for the aged population (pp. 104–114). Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-20892-3_11Search in Google Scholar

[14] Schuler, D., & Namioka, A. (Eds.). (1993). Participatory design: Principles and practices. CRC Press.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Störzinger, T., Carros, F., Wierling, A., Misselhorn, C., & Wieching, R. (2020). Categorizing Social Robots with Respect to Dimensions Relevant to Ethical, Social and Legal Implications. i-com, 19(1), 47–57.10.1515/icom-2020-0005Search in Google Scholar

[16] Tashakkori, A., Creswell, J. W., (2007). The New Era of Mixed Methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806293042.10.1177/2345678906293042Search in Google Scholar

[17] Tuli, F. (2010). The basis of distinction between qualitative and quantitative research in social science: Reflection on ontological, epistemological and methodological perspectives. Ethiopian Journal of Education and Sciences, 6(1).10.4314/ejesc.v6i1.65384Search in Google Scholar

[18] Wagner, I. (2018). Critical reflections on participation in design. In Socio-Informatics. Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198733249.003.0008Search in Google Scholar

[19] Wallach, Wendell. (2010). Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong. Oxford New York Hong Kong Madrid Toronto: Oxford University Press, USA.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-07-19
Published in Print: 2022-08-26

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Scroll Up Arrow