Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter August 14, 2014

Determinants of abortion decisions among Ghanaian university students

Nana Nimo Appiah-Agyekum EMAIL logo , Constance Sorkpor and Samuel Ofori-Mensah

Abstract

Background: Unsafe abortion accounts for a significant proportion of maternal and reproductive health related mortalities and complications in developing countries. In Ghana and sub-Saharan Africa in general, abortion remains a significant barrier to achieving the health related MDGs. Yet, there exist a dearth of information on the determinants of abortion decisions among adolescents, students and other populations at risk.

Objectives: This study explores the factors that are likely to influence abortion decisions among University students in Ghana. It also explores their knowledge and perceptions on abortion.

Methods: Data were collected from 142 randomly sampled students of the University of Ghana through focus group discussions. Questions focused on their knowledge on abortion and the key determinants of their decisions to abort. The results were recorded, transcribed, and analysed qualitatively using the thematic analysis approach.

Results: The students were knowledgeable on abortion. In making decisions on abortion, the students considered their education, religious beliefs, health, economic factors, and family.

Conclusions: Factors such as societal pressure and peer influence that, to date, have been the backbone of sexual and reproductive health, anti-abortion stigma, and unsafe abortion education and interventions have minimal influence on abortion decisions among the students. Rather, these interventions must focus on their education, religious beliefs, health, economic factors, and family to make maximum impact.


Corresponding author: Nana Nimo Appiah-Agyekum, Department of Public Administration and Health Services Management, University of Ghana Business School PO Box LG 78 Legon, Accra Ghana, Phone: +0023 324 3748 218, E-mail: ; and Centre for Health Promotion Research, Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Christabel Nortey, Sonia Oklu, and Yvette Boateng for assisting with the focus group discussions and transcription.

References

1. Organization WH. Unsafe abortion: global and regional estimates of the incidence of unsafe abortion and associated mortality in 2008. 6th ed WHO; Geneva 2011.Search in Google Scholar

2. Grimes DA, Benson J, Singh S, Romero M, Ganatra B, et al. Unsafe abortion: the preventable pandemic. The Lancet 2006;368:1908–19.Search in Google Scholar

3. Pachankis JE. The psychological implications of concealing a stigma: a cognitive-affective-behavioral model. Psychol Bull 2007;133:328–45.Search in Google Scholar

4. Abiodun OM, Balogun OR. Sexual activity and contraceptive use among young female students of tertiary educational institutions in Ilorin, Nigeria. Contraception 2009;79:146–9.Search in Google Scholar

5. Criminal Code, Ghana Publishing corporation § 58–67 (1960).Search in Google Scholar

6. Criminal code (Ammendment Law), 102, Ghana Publishing Corporation (1985).Search in Google Scholar

7. Adanu RM, Tweneboah E. Reasons, fears, and emotions behind induced abortions in Accra, Ghana. Res Rev Inst Afr Stud 2005;20:1–9.Search in Google Scholar

8. Mack JW, Hilden JM, Watterson J, Moore C, Turner B, et al. Parent and physician perspectives on quality of care at the end of life in children with cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:9155–61.Search in Google Scholar

9. Fossey E, Harvey C, McDermott F, Davidson L. Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Aust NZ J Psychiat 2002;36:717–32.Search in Google Scholar

10. Knoxville Center for Reproductive Health. (2010). Abortion Questionnaire. Knoxville: Knoxville Center for Reproductive Health.Search in Google Scholar

11. Grbich C. Qualitative research in health: an introduction: London: Sage, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

12. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:77–101.Search in Google Scholar

13. Appiah-Agyekum NN, Suapim RH. Knowledge and awareness of HIV/AIDS among high school girls in Ghana. HIV/AIDS (Auckland, NZ) 2013;5:137–44.Search in Google Scholar

14. Aboagye PK, Gebreselassie H, Asare GQ, Mitchell EM, Addy J. An assessment of the readiness to offer contraceptives and comprehensive abortion care in the Greater Accra, Eastern and Ashanti regions of Ghana. Chapel Hill, NC, Ipas, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

15. Modi D. Factors influencing women’s attitudes towards abortion at the University of Pennsylvania. Perspect Psychol 2002;5:42–50.Search in Google Scholar

16. Silberschmidt M, Rasch V. Adolescent girls, illegal abortions and “sugar-daddies” in Dar es Salaam: Vulnerable victims and active social agents. Soc Sci Med 2001;52:1815–26.Search in Google Scholar

17. Mappes TA, DeGrazia D, Brand-Ballard J. Biomedical ethics: McGraw-Hill. Boston, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

18. Shah I, Ahman E. Unsafe abortion: global and regional incidence, trends, consequences, and challenges. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2009;31:1149–58.Search in Google Scholar

19. Francome C. Abortion in the USA and the UK: Ashgate Publishing, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

20. Morhee R, Morhee E. Overview of the law and availability of abortion services in Ghana. Ghana Med J 2006;40:80–6.Search in Google Scholar

21. Ahiadeke C. Incidence of induced abortion in southern Ghana. Int Fam Plan Perspec 2001;27:96–108.Search in Google Scholar

22. Finer LB, Frohwirth LF, Dauphinee LA, Singh S, Moore AM. Reasons US women have abortions: quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Perspect Sex Repro H 2005;37:110–8.Search in Google Scholar

23. Tabberer S, Hall C, Prendergast S, Webster A. Teenage pregnancy and choice: Joseph Rowntree Foundation York, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

24. Crock RJ. Abortion decision-making attitudes of adolescents attending Roman Catholic schools: ProQuest, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

25. Narendra A. Implications of sex and education on abortion attitudes: a cross-sectional analysis. Research Paper, Oregon State University: 2010. Available at: http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/xmlui/handle/1957/16262.Search in Google Scholar

26. Hubbard L. College aspirations among low-income African American high school students: Gendered strategies for success. Anthropol Educ Quart 1999;30:363–83.Search in Google Scholar

27. Jejeebhoy SJ, Sathar ZA. Women’s autonomy in India and Pakistan: the influence of religion and region. Popul Dev Rev 2001;27:687–712.Search in Google Scholar

28. Curlin FA, Lawrence RE, Chin MH, Lantos JD. Religion, conscience, and controversial clinical practices. N Engl J Med 2007;356:593–600.Search in Google Scholar

29. Bearinger LH, Sieving RE, Ferguson J, Sharma V. Global perspectives on the sexual and reproductive health of adolescents: patterns, prevention, and potential. The Lancet 2007;369:1220–31.Search in Google Scholar

30. Ellison CG, Echevarria S, Smith B. Religion and abortion attitudes among us hispanics: Findings from the 1990 Latino National Political Survey. Soc Sci Quart 2005;86:192–208.Search in Google Scholar

31. Adler NE, Ozer EJ, Tschann J. Abortion among adolescents. Am Psychol 2003;58:211–7.Search in Google Scholar

32. Lassey AT. Complications of induced abortions and their preventions in Ghana. E Afr Med J 1995;72:774–7.Search in Google Scholar

33. Biritwum R. Promoting and monitoring safe motherhood in Ghana. Ghana Med J 2006;40:78–9.Search in Google Scholar

34. Organization, WH. (1948). Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19–22 June, 1946; signed on 22 July 1946 by the representatives of 61 States (Official Records of the World Health Organization, no. 2, p. 100) and entered into force on 7 April 1948. Retrieved Dec. 11, 2004 from.Search in Google Scholar

35. Sedgh G. Abortion in Ghana. Issues in brief (Alan Guttmacher Institute) 2010;(2):1.Search in Google Scholar

36. Elul B. Determinants of induced abortion: an analysis of individual, household and contextual factors in Rajasthan, India. J Biosoc Sci 2011;43:1–17.Search in Google Scholar

37. Blank RM, George CC, London RA. State abortion rates the impact of policies, providers, politics, demographics, and economic environment. J Health Econ 1996;15:513–53.Search in Google Scholar

38. Matthews S, Ribar D, Wilhelm M. The effects of economic conditions and access to reproductive health services on state abortion rates and birthrates. Fam Plann Perspect 1997;29:52–60.Search in Google Scholar

39. Tunde AI. Socio-economical and sociological factors as predictors of illegal abortion among adolescent in akoko west local government area of ondo state, Nigeria. Public H Res 2013;3:33–6.Search in Google Scholar

40. Powell-Griner E, Trent K. Sociodemographic determinants of abortion in the United States. Demography 1987;24:553–61.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-2-23
Accepted: 2014-5-13
Published Online: 2014-8-14
Published in Print: 2015-2-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 1.12.2022 from frontend.live.degruyter.dgbricks.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijamh-2014-0011/html
Scroll Up Arrow