Skip to content
Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter April 18, 2015

Is there a correlation between body proportion and choice of profession?

Can Cemal Cingi, Nuray Bayar Muluk, Deniz Hanci, Elvin Onarıcı Güngör and Cemal Cingi

Abstract

Objective: We made anthropometric measurements to compare body proportions of university students and to investigate the tendency of the students with more developed bodies in choosing profession for university education.

Methods: A total of 204 male students [group 1: students of School of Physical Education and Sports” (SPESp) (n=88), group 2: students of Faculty of Fine Arts (FFArts) (n=59), and group 3: students of Faculty of Medicine (FMed) (n=57)] were included, and anthropometric measurements were performed.

Results: “Height”; “chest circumference”; “difference of inspiration and expiration of chest circumference” values of the SPESp students were higher than the others (FFArts and FMed). In the SPESp students, chest circumference and chest expansion capacity by inspiration developed more. This shows the positive impact of sport on respiratory functions. Additionally, the legs are longer in students engaged in regular sports.

Conclusion: Exercise is important for all subjects in terms of body development, growth, and oxygenization and to decrease cardiovascular risk factors. For the development of the ideal body anthropometric rates, obesity prevention, and for the growth of healthy generations, governments should give importance to sports and take incentive measures to increase children and young people’s interest in the sport.


Corresponding author: Nuray Bayar Muluk, Birlik Mahallesi, Zirvekent 2. Etap Sitesi, C-3 blok, No: 62/43, 06610 Çankaya/Ankara, Turkey, Phone: +90 312 4964073, +90 532 7182441, Fax: +90 312 4964073, E-mail: ; ; and Faculty of Medicine, ENT Department, Kırıkkale University, Kırıkkale, Turkey

Acknowledgments

“Except data collection, the preparation of this paper, including the design and planning, was supported by Continuous Education and Scientific Research Association”. There was no financial support. There was only scientific support.

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

1. Ulijaszek SJ. Between-population variation in pre-adolescent growth. Eur J Clin Nutr 1994;48(Suppl 1):S5–13; discussion S13–4.Search in Google Scholar

2. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), Anthropometry Procedures Manual, January 2007. Available at: (Received online at February 1st 2013).Search in Google Scholar

3. Anthropometry. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Available at: (Received online at February 1st 2013).Search in Google Scholar

4. Hagan RD, Smith MG, Gettman LR. Marathon performance in relation to maximal aerobic power and training indices. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1981;13:185–9.Search in Google Scholar

5. Kenney WK, Hodgson JL. Variables predictive of performance in elite middle-distance runners. Brit J Sports Med 1985;19:207–9.Search in Google Scholar

6. Knechtle B, Duff B, Welzel U, Kohler G. Body mass and circumference of upper arm are associated with race performance in ultra-endurance runners in a multi-stage race: the Isarrun 2006. Res Q Exerc Sport 2009;80:262–8.Search in Google Scholar

7. Siders WA, Lukaski HC, Bolonchuk WW. Relationships among swimming performance, body composition and somatotype in competitive collegiate swimmers. J Sports Med Phys Fit 1993;33:166–71.Search in Google Scholar

8. Geladas ND, Nassis GP, Pavlicevic S. Somatic and physical traits affecting sprint swimming performance in young swimmers. Int J Sports Med 2005;26:139–44.Search in Google Scholar

9. Knechtle B, Baumann B, Knechtle P, Rosemann T. Speed during training and anthropometric measures in relation to race performance by male and female open-water ultra-endurance swimmers. Percept Mot Skills 2010;111:463–74.Search in Google Scholar

10. Legaz Arrese A, González Badillo JJ, Serrano Ostáriz E. Differences in skinfold thicknesses and fat distribution among top-class runners. J Sports Med Phys Fit 2005;45:512–7.Search in Google Scholar

11. Backup K. Clinical tests for the musculoskeletal system examinations-signs-phenomena, 2nd ed. Stuttgart: Thieme, 2008:10.Search in Google Scholar

12. Bjorntorp P. Fat cell distribution and metabolism. Ann NY Acad Sci 1987;499:66–72.Search in Google Scholar

13. Hoffman J. Norms for fitness, performance and health. Human Kinetics, Champaign, USA: Sheridan Books, 2006:87.Search in Google Scholar

14. World Medical Association General Assembly. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Int Bioethique 2004;15:124–9.Search in Google Scholar

15. Singal P, Bhatnagar DP, Kaur S. Anthropometric profile and development of facial hair in male athletes. J Exerc Sci Physiother 2006;2:52–8.Search in Google Scholar

16. Malina RM. Physical growth and maturity characteristics of young athletes. In: Magill RA, Ash MJ, Smoel FL, editors. Children and youth in sports. A contemporary anthropology. Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetic Publishers, 1977.Search in Google Scholar

17. Oppliger R, Clark BA, Maylew IL, Haywood KM. Strength, flexibility and body composition differences between age group swimmers and non-swimmers. Aust J Sc Med Sports 1986;18:14–6.Search in Google Scholar

18. Gorostiaga EM, Llodio I, Ibáñez J, Granados C, Navarro I, et al. Differences in physical fitness among indoor and outdoor elite male soccer players. Eur J Appl Physiol 2009;106:483–91.Search in Google Scholar

19. Maloney WJ, Fried J. Vitruvian man – Leonardo da Vinci’s interpretation of the golden proportion and its application in modern dentistry. Webmed Central Dentistry 2011;2:WMC001879.Search in Google Scholar

20. Pollio V. The ten books on architecture, Book III, Chapter I, ‘On symmetry: in temples and in the human body’. Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press, 1914:12–31.Search in Google Scholar

21. Waist circumference and waist-hip ratio. Report of a WHO Expert Consultation Geneva, 8–11 December 2008. Available at: (Received online at February 1st 2013).Search in Google Scholar

22. Ford ES, Mokdad AH, Giles WH. Trends in waist circumference among U.S. adults. Obes Res 2003;11:1223–31.Search in Google Scholar

23. Shimokata H, Tobin JD, Muller DC, Elahi D, Coon PJ, et al. Studies in the distribution of body fat: I. Effects of age, sex, and obesity. J Gerontol 1989;44:M66–73.Search in Google Scholar

24. Lahti-Koski M, Harald K, Männistö S, Laatikainen T, Jousilahti P. Fifteen-year changes in body mass index and waist circumference in Finnish adults. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2007;14:398–404.Search in Google Scholar

25. Valkeinen H, Aaltonen S, Kujala UM. Effects of exercise training on oxygen uptake in coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2010;20: 545–55.Search in Google Scholar

26. Dyer AR, Elliott P, Shipley M, For The Intersalt Cooperative Research G. Body mass index versus height and weight in relation to blood pressure findings for the 10,079 persons in The Intersalt Study. Am J Epidemiol 1990;131:589–96.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-2-2
Accepted: 2015-3-18
Published Online: 2015-4-18
Published in Print: 2016-5-1

©2016 by De Gruyter