Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter August 7, 2015

A pilot project of an online cross-age tutoring program: crescent school virtual learning (vLearning)

  • Ronald Chow EMAIL logo


Traditional classroom teaching is the standard of education. However, there may be some students who feel uncomfortable approaching their teachers and may feel more at ease if they ask for assistance from their peers. There are two types of student-to-student tutoring methods that are supplements to classroom learning: peer tutoring between same-age students and cross-age tutoring between different-age children. Cross-age tutoring programs in which the tutor is 2–3 years older than the tutee have been reported to be more effective than those between same-age students in promoting student responsibility, empowerment and academic performance. A pilot online cross-age tutoring program was launched in September 2014 at Crescent School. A new website was designed, created and implemented with the permission and regular monitoring of the Student Services faculty for the online program – Crescent School Virtual Learning (vLearning). The program was well received and will undergo evaluation in the future.


Ms. Jennifer Ferguson (BA, BEd), Middle School Student Services, is the senior supervisor of vLearning. We would like to thank Mr. Aaron Dion (BA, BEd), Head of the Middle School, for his continued support of the program in addition to all of the tutors on the vLearning team.


1. Bloom S. Peer and cross-age tutoring in the schools: an individualized supplement to group instruction. Washington, DC: Educational Resource Information Center, 1975:66.Search in Google Scholar

2. Gaustad J. Peer and cross-age tutoring. ERIC Digest 1993;79:1–6.Search in Google Scholar

3. Anderson LB. A special kind of tutor. Teaching PreK-8 2007;37:56–7.Search in Google Scholar

4. Almassaad A, Alotaibi K. The attitudes and opinions of tutees and tutors toward using cross-age online tutoring. Psychol Res 2012;2:247–59.10.17265/2159-5542/2012.04.004Search in Google Scholar

5. Cairo L, Craig J. Cross-age tutoring phase II: an experiment. Tech Rep 2005;12:23.Search in Google Scholar

6. Weiss R. Academic tutoring: a review for Cypress College. Washington, DC: Educational Resource Information Centre, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

7. Topping KJ. The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: a typology and review of the literature. High Educ 1996;32:321–45.10.1007/BF00138870Search in Google Scholar

8. Davenport SV, Arnold M, Lassman M. The impact of cross-age tutoring on reading attitudes and reading achievements. Read Im 2004;41:3–12.Search in Google Scholar

9. Barone Schneider R. Cross-age tutoring. Childhood Educ 1997;73:136–43.10.1080/00094056.1997.10522671Search in Google Scholar

10. Gibbs SG. A comparison of the effects of cross-age tutoring and same-age tutoring on the reading achievement of elementary school students. Washington, DC: Educational Resource Information Center, 1982.Search in Google Scholar

11. Ankcorn D. The effect of cross-age tutoring by high schoolers on their understanding and ability to create a short story. Washington, DC: Educational Resource Information Center, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

12. de Vries F, Kester L, Sloep PB, van Rosmalen P, Pannekeet K, et al. Identification of critical time-consuming student support activities in e-learning. Res Learn Technol 2005;13:219–29.10.3402/rlt.v13i3.11219Search in Google Scholar

13. Jones RH, Garralda A, Li DCS, Lock G. International dynamics in on-line and face-to-face peer-tutoring sessions for second language writers. J Second Lang Writ 2006;15:1–23.10.1016/j.jslw.2005.12.001Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-7-5
Accepted: 2015-7-7
Published Online: 2015-8-7
Published in Print: 2016-11-1

©2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 1.3.2024 from
Scroll to top button