Abstract
Background:
Understanding how adolescents acquire health knowledge and where they currently seek answers to health-related questions may facilitate the development of interventions that will be both engaging and effective, and may help to improve health over the short- and long-term.
Objective:
The present study sought to investigate the perception and use of sources of health knowledge by young adolescents as stratified by gender.
Methods:
Thirty 50-min long focus groups were conducted with 143 participants. Focus group questions were built around the following three main categories: sources of knowledge, including preferred sources, sources accessed for general health, and sources accessed for personal/sensitive health; health information and behaviour change, including characteristics of health knowledge presentation that have influenced behaviour change; and learning preferences to promote behaviour change. Content analysis of focus group transcripts was performed.
Results:
The use of sources of health knowledge was similar between genders, with some differences noted between sources accessed for general as compared to personal health questions. As well, motivation appeared to be the primary influence of health behaviour change, with knowledge being reported as both as positive and neutral influence, most notably in the areas of diet and exercise. Lastly, adolescents reported several characteristics of health knowledge presentation that they felt would motivate positive behaviour change, including engaging and participatory activities.
Conclusion:
These results should be considered in the development of interventions to improve health-related behaviour in adolescents, although future research to quantify the use of sources of health knowledge by this population is recommended.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by funding from the Dairy Farmers of Ontario (DFO). M. Racey is supported by a Highly Qualified Personnel award from the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA). DFO and OMAFRA had no role in the design, analysis, writing or submission of this article. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The authors gratefully acknowledge the adolescents from the schools who provided insight regarding factors affecting dairy intake. The authors also acknowledge the Upper Grand District School Board, the principals and the teachers for allowing the researchers to their schools. This study was approved for ethics by the Research Ethics Board at the University of Guelph.
References
1. Gray NJ, Klein JD, Noyce PR, Sesselberg TS, Cantrill JA. Health information-seeking behaviour in adolescence: the place of the internet. Soc Sci Med 2005;60:1467–78.1565268010.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.010Search in Google Scholar
2. Currie C, Zanotti C, Morgan A, Currie D, de Looze M, et al., editors. Social determinants of health and well-being among young people. Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study: international report from the 2009/2010 survey. Copenhagen, WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2012 (Health Policy for Children and Adolescents, No. 6).Search in Google Scholar
3. Ott MA, Rosenberger JG, McBride KR, Woodcox SG. How do adolescents view health? Implications for state health policy. J Adolesc Health 2011;48:398–403.10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.07.01921402270Search in Google Scholar
4. Aten MJ, Siegel DM, Roghmann KJ. Use of health services by urban youth: a school-based survey to assess differences by grade level, gender, and risk behaviour. J Adolesc Health 1996:19;258–66.889710310.1016/S1054-139X(96)00029-8Search in Google Scholar
5. Roberts KC, Shields M, de Groh M, Aziz A, Gilbert J. Overweight and obesity in children and adolescents: Results from the 2009–2011 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Stat Can Health Rep 2012;23:3.Search in Google Scholar
6. Waters E, de Silva-Sangiorski A, Hall BJ, Brown T, Campbell KJ, et al. Interventions preventing obesity in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;12:CD001871.10.1002/14651858.CD001871.pub3Search in Google Scholar
7. Colley RC, Garriguet D, Janssen I, Craig CL, Clarke J, et al. Physical activity of Canadian children and youth: accelerometer results from the 2007 to 2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Health Rep 2011;22:15–23.21510586Search in Google Scholar
8. O’Dea J. Children and adolescents’ eating habits and attitudes: preliminary findings from the national nutrition and physical activity study. NutriDate 2004;15:1–4.Search in Google Scholar
9. Deckelbaum RJ, Williams CL. Childhood obesity: the health issue. Obes Res 2001;9(Suppl 4):239S–43S.10.1038/oby.2001.125Search in Google Scholar
10. Odea J. Prevention of child obesity: “First, do no harm.” Health Educ Res 2005;20:259–65.1532830310.1093/her/cyg116Search in Google Scholar
11. Ackard DM, Neumark-Sztainer D. Health care information sources for adolescents: age and gender differences on use, concerns, and needs. J Adolesc Health 2001;29:170–6.10.1016/S1054-139X(01)00253-111524215Search in Google Scholar
12. Powers AR, Struempler BJ, Guarino A, Parmer SM. Effects of a nutrition education program on the dietary behavior and nutrition knowledge of second-grade and third grade students. J Sch Health 2005;75:129–33.1598700610.1111/j.1746-1561.2005.tb06657.xSearch in Google Scholar
13. Stanton B, Cole M, Galbraith J, Li X, Pendleton S, et al. Randomized trial of a parent intervention: parents can make a different in long-term adolescent risk behaviours, perceptions and knowledge. J Am Med Assoc 2004;158:947–55.10.1001/archpedi.158.10.947Search in Google Scholar
14. Casazza K, Ciccazzo M. The method of delivery of nutrition and physical activity information may play a role in eliciting behavior changes in adolescents. Eat Behav 2007;8:73–82.1717485410.1016/j.eatbeh.2006.01.007Search in Google Scholar
15. Morgan DL. Focus groups. Annu Rev 1996;22:129–52.10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129Search in Google Scholar
16. McNeely C, Shew ML, Beuhring T, Sieving R, Miller BC, et al. Mothers’ influence on the timing of first sex among 14- and 15-year olds. J Adolesc Health 2002;31:256–65.10.1016/S1054-139X(02)00350-612225738Search in Google Scholar
17. Cooley E, Toray T, Wang MC, Valdez NN. Maternal effects of daughters’ eating pathology and body image. Eat Behav 2008;9:52–61.1816732310.1016/j.eatbeh.2007.03.001Search in Google Scholar
18. Maxwell KA. Friends: the role of peer influence across adolescent risk behaviours. J Youth Adolesc 2002:31;267–77.10.1023/A:1015493316865Search in Google Scholar
19. Marcell AV, Halpern-Felsher BL. Adolescents’ beliefs about preferred resources for help vary depending on the health issue. J Adolesc Health 2007:41;61–8.1757753510.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.02.006Search in Google Scholar
20. Use, understand, and create: a digital literacy framework for Canadian schools. Media Smarts. Available at: http://mediasmarts.ca/teacher-resources/use-understand-create-digital-literacy-framework-canadian-schools.Search in Google Scholar
21. Neumark-Sztainer D, Story M, Hannan PJ, Rex J. New moves: a school-based obesity prevention program for adolescent girls. Prev Med 2003;37:41–51.10.1016/S0091-7435(03)00057-412799128Search in Google Scholar
22. Marquez O, Racey M, Preyde M, Hendrie GA, Newton G. Interventions to increase dairy consumption in adolescents: a systematic review. Infant Child Adolesc Nutr 2015;7:242–54.10.1177/1941406415600752Search in Google Scholar
23. Graham H, Zidenberg-Cherr S. California teachers perceive school gardens as an effective nutritional tool to promote healthful eating habits. J Am Diet Assoc 2005;105:1797–800.10.1016/j.jada.2005.08.03416256767Search in Google Scholar
24. Morris JL, Zidenberg-Cherr S. Garden-enhanced curriculum improves fourth-grade school children’s knowledge of nutrition and preferences for some vegetables. J Am Diet Assoc 2002;102:91–3.1179450910.1016/S0002-8223(02)90027-1Search in Google Scholar
25. Lineberger SE, Zajicek JM. School gardens: can a hands-on teaching tool affect students’ attitudes and behaviors regarding fruit and vegetables. Hortic Technol 2000;10:593–7.10.21273/HORTTECH.10.3.593Search in Google Scholar
26. Baranowski T, Baranowski J, Cullen KW, Marsh T, Islam N, et al. Squire’s quest! Dietary outcome evaluation of a multimedia game. Am J Prev Med 2003;24:52–61.1255402410.1016/S0749-3797(02)00570-6Search in Google Scholar
27. Muth ND, Chatterjee A, Williams D, Cross A, Flower K. Making an IMPACT: effect of a school-based pilot intervention. N C Med J 2008;69:432–40.1925617910.18043/ncm.69.6.432Search in Google Scholar
28. Warren J, Henry J, Lightowler H, Bradshaw SM, Perwaiz S. Evaluation of a pilot school programme aimed at the prevention of obesity in children. Health Promot Int 2003;18:287–96.10.1093/heapro/dag40214695360Search in Google Scholar
29. Statistics Canada. 2013. BLINDED, CY, Ontario (Code 3523008) (table). National Household Survey (NHS) Profile. 2011 National Household Survey. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 99-004-XWE. Ottawa. Available at: http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/nhs-enm/2011/dp-pd/prof/index.cfm?Lang=E.Search in Google Scholar
30. Minaker L, McCrager L, Lambraki I, Jessup L, Driezen P, et al. School region socio-economic status and geographic locale is associated with food behaviour of Ontario and Alberta adolescents. Can J Public Health 2006;97:357–61.1712087210.1007/BF03405342Search in Google Scholar
31. Henry C, Whiting SJ, Phillips T, Finch SL, Zello GA, et al. Impact of the removal of chocolate milk from school milk programs for children in Saskatoon, Canada. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2015;40:245–50.10.1139/apnm-2014-024225585706Search in Google Scholar
32. Sacks D. Position statement: age limits and adolescents. Canadian Paediatric Society, Adolescent Health Committee, 2014. Available at: http://www.cps.ca/documents/position/age-limits-adolescents.Search in Google Scholar
Supplemental Material:
The online version of this article (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijamh-2016-0002) offers supplementary material, available to authorized users.
©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston