Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter January 24, 2014

PI and Fuzzy-Controlled 3-Phase 4-Wire Interleaved Buck Active Power Filter with Shoot-Through Elimination for Power Quality Improvement using RTDS Hardware

  • Anup Kumar Panda EMAIL logo and Ranjeeta Patel

Abstract

In this paper, shoot-through current elimination DC–AC converter circuit has been presented with the application of active power filter (APF). The intuitive analysis of the shoot-through in the conventional DC–AC converter has been reported first. Interleaved buck (IB) converter is adopted to eliminate the shoot-through current, thereby increasing the reliability of the interleaved buck–based active power filter (IB-APF). The 3-phase 4-wire IB-APF eliminates the current harmonics produced by the load just as a conventional one does and are innately immune to “shoot-through” phenomenon, with the elimination of special protection features required in conventional inverter circuits. A comparison has been made about the compensation capabilities of the IB-APF with the PI and fuzzy logic controller (FLC) used by idiq control strategy under different supply voltage conditions. The idiq control strategy used for extracting the three-phase reference current for IB-APF, evaluating their performance here in MATLAB/Simulink environment and also implemented using real-time digital simulator hardware (OPAL-RT hardware). The RTDS result verifies that the total harmonic distortion percentage of the source current can be reduced below 5% according to IEEE-519 standard recommendations on harmonic limits.

References

1. AkagiH. New trends in active filters for power conditioning . IEEE Trans Ind Appl1996;32:131222.10.1109/28.556633Search in Google Scholar

2. AkagiH. Active harmonic filters . Proc IEEE2005;93:212841.10.1109/JPROC.2005.859603Search in Google Scholar

3. PengFZ, OttGW Jr, AdamsDJ. Harmonic and reactive power compensation based on the generalized instantaneous reactive power theory for three-phase four systems . IEEE Trans Power Electron1998;13:117481.10.1109/63.728344Search in Google Scholar

4. SoaresV, VerdelhoP, MarquesGD. Active power filter control circuit based on the instantaneous active and reactive current id–iq method. IEEE Power Electron Spec Conf1997;2:1096101.Search in Google Scholar

5. ChenZ, ChenM.Active filter solutions with high reliability for more electric aircraft . In: Proceedings of IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON), Montreal, QC, 2012:197203.10.1109/IECON.2012.6388808Search in Google Scholar

6. ChenZ, ChenM, luoY, ShiL.A family of shunt active power filter based on the interleaved buck switch cell . In: Proceedings of IEEE Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), Phoenix, AZ, 2011:11027.10.1109/ECCE.2011.6063897Search in Google Scholar

7. OliveiraAC, JacobinaCB, LimaAM. Improved dead-time compensation for sinusoidal PWM inverters operating at high switching frequencies . IEEE Trans Ind Electron2007;54:2295304.10.1109/TIE.2007.894770Search in Google Scholar

8. CiroA, GiuseppeT. Predictive compensation of dead-time effects in VSI feeding induction motors . IEEE Trans Ind Appl2001;37:85663.10.1109/28.924768Search in Google Scholar

9. StanlyGR, BradshawKM. Precision DC-to-AC power conversion by optimization of the output current waveforms-the half bridge revisited . IEEE Trans Power Electron1999;14:37280.10.1109/63.750191Search in Google Scholar

10. StanleyGR.Opposed current power converter . U.S. patent, Application no. 5657219, 1997.Search in Google Scholar

11. StanleyGR.Half-bridge gate driver optimized for hard switching . U.S. patent, Application no. 6556053 B2, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

12. ZargariNR, ZiagosPD, GezaJ. A two-switch high–performance current regulated DC/AC converter module . IEEE Trans Ind Appl1995;31:5839.10.1109/28.382119Search in Google Scholar

13. BusoS, MalesaniL, MattavelliP. Comparison of current control for active filter applications . IEEE Trans Ind Electron1998;45:7229.10.1109/41.720328Search in Google Scholar

14. ChenZ, ChenM, luoY, ShiL.Interleaved buck cell based full bridge shunt active power filter . In: Proceedings of IEEE Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), Phoenix, AZ, Raleigh, NC, 2012:9961007.10.1109/ECCE.2012.6342710Search in Google Scholar

15. ChenL, PengFZ. Dead-time elimination for voltage source inverters . IEEE Trans Power Electron2008;23:57480.10.1109/TPEL.2007.915766Search in Google Scholar

16. KleinJ.AN-6003 “shoot-through” in synchronous buck converters . Available at: http://WWW.fairchildsemi.com.Search in Google Scholar

17. SoaresV, VerdelhoP, MarquesGD. An instantaneous active and reactive current component method for active filters . IEEE Trans Power Electron2000;15:660–9.10.1109/63.849036Search in Google Scholar

18. MikkliS, PandaAK. RTDS hardware implementation and simulation of 3-ph 4-wire SHAF for mitigation of current harmonics with p–q and Id–Iq control strategies using fuzzy logic controller . Int J Emerg Electric Power Syst2011;12:1–24.10.2202/1553-779X.2758Search in Google Scholar

19. AredesM, HafnerJ, HeumanK. Three phase four wire shunt active filter control strategies . IEEE Trans Power Electron1997;12:3118.10.1109/63.558748Search in Google Scholar

20. MikkiliS, PandaAK. Real time implementation of PI and fuzzy logic controller based shunt active power filter control strategies for power quality improvement . Int J Electr Power Energy Syst2012;43:111426. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes. 2012.06.045.Search in Google Scholar

21. ZadehLA. Fuzzy sets. Information and control . 1965;8:33853.10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-XSearch in Google Scholar

22. MamdaniEH. Application of fuzzy logic to appropriate reasoning using linguistic synthesis . IEEE Trans Comput1997;26:118291.10.1109/TC.1977.1674779Search in Google Scholar

23. LeeCC. Fuzzy logic in control systems: fuzzy logic controller-part I . IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern1990;20:40418.10.1109/21.52551Search in Google Scholar

24. DixonJW, ContardoJM, MoranLA. A fuzzy-controlled active front-end rectifier with current harmonic filtering characteristics and minimum sensing variables . IEEE Trans Power Electron1999;14:7249.10.1109/63.774211Search in Google Scholar

25. HoltzJ. Pulse width modulation A survey . IEEE Trans Electron1992;39:41020.10.1109/41.161472Search in Google Scholar

26. BoseBK. An adaptive hysteresis band current control technique of a voltage feed PWM inverter for machine drive system . IEEE Trans Ind Electron1990;37:4026.10.1109/41.103436Search in Google Scholar

27. KaleM, OzdemirE. An adaptive hysteresis band current controller for shunt active power filters . Electric Power Syst Res2005;73:1139.10.1016/j.epsr.2004.06.006Search in Google Scholar

28. HolmesDG, LipoTA. Pulse width modulation for power converters. Piscataway, NJ: John Wieley & Sons. Inc., IEEE Press, 2003.10.1109/9780470546284Search in Google Scholar

29. RT-Lab Professional. Available at: http://WWW.opal-rt.com/product/rt-lab-professionals.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2014-1-24
Published in Print: 2014-4-1

©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston

Downloaded on 5.2.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijeeps-2013-0104/html
Scroll to top button