Abstract
Increased emphasis on the use of simulation by nursing education providers is evident world-wide. It is unclear what the implications of this initiative are for academic staff within nursing programs. Programs report a range of responses to simulation pedagogy amongst faculty ranging from enthusiasm to avoidance. This study identified a wide range of concerns encapsulating the staff themselves, their concern for students as well as organisational considerations that impact staff perceptions. Methods: Nineteen in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with faculty in a school of nursing and midwifery. Thematic analysis of data was carried out. Results: This study reinforced other earlier research related to staff feelings about the introduction of a simulation program or uptake of existing equipment and facilities. This study reflects the knowledge and experience staff had of simulation and highlights the importance of ensuring all members have a collective frame of reference in order to create shared language and vision. Conclusion: This study adds to the research on staff attitudes to simulation by identifying the preconceived ideas that contribute to idea formation and relates this to the insight and self-efficacy of the faculty members.
References
Adamson, K. (2010). Integrating human patient simulation into associate degree nursing curricula. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 6(3), e75–e81.10.1016/j.ecns.2009.06.002Search in Google Scholar
Akhtar-Danesh, N., Baxter, P., Valaitis, R. K., Stanyon, W., & Sproul, S. (2009). Nurse faculty perceptions of simulation use in nursing education. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 31(3), 312–329.10.1177/0193945908328264Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Banning, M. (2005). Approaches to teaching: Current opinions and related research. Nurse Education Today, 25(7), 502–508.10.1016/j.nedt.2005.03.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Billings, D. M., & Halstead, J. A. (2005). Teaching in nursing: A guide for faculty (2nd ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Saunders.Search in Google Scholar
Clifford, C. (1996). Role: A concept explored in nursing education. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 23(6), 1135–1141.10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.01219.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
Cook, D. A., Hatala, R., Brydges, R., Zendejas, B., Szostek, J. H., Wang, A. T., … Hamstra, S. J. (2011). Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA, 306(9), 978–988.10.1001/jama.2011.1234Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Dowie, I., & Phillips, C. (2011). Supporting the lecturer to deliver high-fidelity simulation. Nursing Standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain): 1987), 25(49), 35.10.7748/ns.25.49.35.s52Search in Google Scholar
Gore, T., Hunt, C. W., Parker, F., & Raines, K. H. (2011). The effects of simulated clinical experiences on anxiety: Nursing students’ perspectives. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 7(5), e175–e180.10.1016/j.ecns.2010.02.001Search in Google Scholar
Guzic, B. L., McIlhenny, C. V., Knee, D. R., LeMoine, J. K., Wendekier, C. M., Demuth, B. R., & Bapat, A. (2012). Distance learning and clinical simulation in senior baccalaureate nursing education. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 8(1), e459–e467.10.1016/j.ecns.2011.04.005Search in Google Scholar
Jansen, D. A., Johnson, N., Larson, G., Berry, C., & Brenner, G. H. (2009). Nursing faculty perceptions of obstacles to utilizing manikin-based simulations and proposed solutions. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 5(1), e9–e16.10.1016/j.ecns.2008.09.004Search in Google Scholar
Jeffries, P. (2008). Getting in S.T.E.P. with simulations: Simulations take educator preparation. Nursing Education Perspectives, 29(2), 70.Search in Google Scholar
Jones, A. L., & Hegge, M. (2007). Faculty comfort levels with simulation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 3(1), e15–e19.10.1016/j.ecns.2009.05.034Search in Google Scholar
King, C. J., Moseley, S., Hindenlang, B., & Kuritz, P. (2008). Limited use of the human patient simulator by nurse faculty: An intervention program designed to increase use. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 5(1), 1–17.10.2202/1548-923X.1546Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar
Lapkin, S., & Levett-Jones, T. (2011). A cost-utility analysis of medium vs. high fidelity human patient simulation manikins in nursing education. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20, 3543–3552.10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03843.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
Mackenzie, K. M. (2009). Who should teach clinical skills to nursing students?British Journal of Nursing (Mark Allen Publishing), 18(7), 395–398.10.12968/bjon.2009.18.7.41651Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Moizer, J., Lean, J., Towler, M., & Abbey, C. (2009). Simulations and games: Overcoming the barriers to their use in higher education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10(3), 207–224.10.1177/1469787409343188Search in Google Scholar
Norman, G., Dore, K., & Grierson, L. (2012). The minimal relationship between simulation fidelity and transfer of learning. Medical Education, 46, 636–647.10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04243.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
Owen, S., Ferguson, K., & Baguley, I. (2005). The clinical activity of mental health lecturers. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 12, 310–316.10.1111/j.1365-2850.2005.00841.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
Seropian, M. A., Driggers, B., Taylor, J., Gubrud-Howe, P., & Brady, G. (2006). The Oregon simulation experience: A statewide simulation network and alliance. Simulation in Healthcare: Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 1(1), 56–61.10.1097/01266021-200600110-00007Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Sinclair, B., & Ferguson, K. (2009). Integrating simulated teaching/learning strategies in undergraduate nursing education. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 6(1), 1–11.10.2202/1548-923X.1676Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Smith, J. A., & Eatough, V. (2007). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In E.Lyons & A.Coyle (Eds.), Analysing qualitative data in Psychology, 51–64. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446207536.d10Search in Google Scholar
Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2008). Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods. In J. A.Smith (Eds.), Interpretative phenomenological analysis (2nd ed., pp. 51–80). London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar
Starkweather, A. R., & Kardong-Edgren, S. (2008). Diffusion of innovation: Embedding simulation into nursing curricula. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 5(1), 1–14.10.2202/1548-923X.1567Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Tuoriniemi, P., & Schott-Baer, D. (2008). Implementing a high fidelity simulation program in a community college setting. Nursing Education Perspectives, 29(2), 105–109.10.1097/00024776-200803000-00012Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Waxman, K. T., Nichols, A. A., O‘Leary-Kelley, C., & Miller, M. (2011). The evolution of a statewide network: The bay area simulation collaborative. Simulation in Healthcare, 6(6), 345–351.10.1097/SIH.0b013e31822eacccSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
Ziv, A., Wolpe, P. R., Small, S. D., & Glick, S.. (2003). Simulation-based medical education: An ethical imperative. Academic Medicine, 78(8), 783–787.10.1097/00001888-200308000-00006Search in Google Scholar PubMed
©2015 by De Gruyter
