Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter March 22, 2017

Student-Directed Video Validation of Psychomotor Skills Performance: A Strategy to Facilitate Deliberate Practice, Peer Review, and Team Skill Sets

Gregory A. DeBourgh ORCID logo and Susan K. Prion ORCID logo

Abstract

Background

Essential nursing skills for safe practice are not limited to technical skills, but include abilities for determining salience among clinical data within dynamic practice environments, demonstrating clinical judgment and reasoning, problem-solving abilities, and teamwork competence. Effective instructional methods are needed to prepare new nurses for entry-to-practice in contemporary healthcare settings.

Method

This mixed-methods descriptive study explored self-reported perceptions of a process to self-record videos for psychomotor skill performance evaluation in a convenience sample of 102 pre-licensure students.

Results

Students reported gains in confidence and skill acquisition using team skills to record individual videos of skill performance, and described the importance of teamwork, peer support, and deliberate practice.

Conclusion

Although time consuming, the production of student-directed video validations of psychomotor skill performance is an authentic task with meaningful accountabilities that is well-received by students as an effective, satisfying learner experience to increase confidence and competence in performing psychomotor skills.

References

ANA. (2015). Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements. Silver Spring, MD: American Nurses Association.Search in Google Scholar

ANCC. (2016). American Nurses Credentialing Center magnet recognition program. Retrieved from http://www.nursecredentialing.org/Magnet.Search in Google Scholar

Clapper, T. C., & Kardong-Edgren, S. (2012). Using deliberate practice and simulation to improve nursing skills. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 8(3), e109–e113.10.1016/j.ecns.2010.12.001Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Davis, K. K., Capozzoli, J., & Parks, J. (2009). Implementing peer review: Guidelines for managers and staff. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 33(3), 251–257.10.1097/NAQ.0b013e3181accb62Search in Google Scholar PubMed

DeBourgh, G. A. (2011). Psychomotor skills acquisition in novice learners: A case for contextual learning. Nurse Educator, 36(4), 144–149.10.1097/NNE.0b013e31821fdab1Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2009). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J., & Hoffman, R. R. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 683–703). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816796Search in Google Scholar

Edricssoon, K. A, Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406.10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363Search in Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A., Whyte, J., & Ward, P. (2007). Expert performance in nursing: Reviewing research on expertise in nursing within the framework of the expert-performance approach. Advances in Nursing Science, 30(1), E58–E71.10.1097/00012272-200701000-00014Search in Google Scholar PubMed

George, V., & Haag-Heitman, B. (2011). Nursing peer review: The manager’s role. Journal of Nursing Management, 19(2), 254–259.10.1111/j.1365-2834.2011.01225.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Liou, S. R., Chang, C. H., Tsai, H. M., & Cheng, C. Y. (2013). The effects of a deliberate practice program on nursing students’ perception of clinical competence. Nurse Education Today, 33(4), 358–363.10.1016/j.nedt.2012.07.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Oermann, M. H. (2011). Toward evidence-based nursing education: Deliberate practice and motor skill learning. Journal of Nursing Education, 50(2), 63–64.10.3928/01484834-20110120-01Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Oermann, M. H., & Gaberson, K. (2009). Evaluation and testing in nursing education (3rd ed.). New York: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Oermann, M. H., Kardong-Edgren, S., Odom-Maryon, T., Hallmark, B. F., Hurd, D., Rogers, N., & Smart, D. A. (2011). Deliberate practice of motor skills in nursing education: CPR as exemplar. Nursing Education Perspectives, 32(5), 311–315.10.5480/1536-5026-32.5.311Search in Google Scholar PubMed

TeamSTEPPS. (2011). TeamSTEPPS curriculum tools and materials. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Retrieved from http://teamstepps.ahrq.govgov/abouttoolsmaterials.htm.Search in Google Scholar

Ten Cate, O. (2013a) Competency-based education, entrustable professional activities, and the power of language. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5(1), 6–7.10.4300/JGME-D-12-00381.1Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Ten Cate, O. (2013b). Nuts and bolts of entrustable professional activities. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5(1), 157–158.10.4300/JGME-D-12-00380.1Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Wulf, G., Shea, C., & Lewthwaite, R. (2010). Motor skill learning and performance: A review of influential factors. Medical Education, 44, 75–84.10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03421.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2016-4-8
Revised: 2016-12-9
Accepted: 2016-12-10
Published Online: 2017-3-22

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Scroll Up Arrow