Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter June 19, 2018

Grade Incentive to Boost Course Evaluation Response Rates

Helen Gordon, Eleanor Stevenson, Ann Brookhart and Marilyn H Oermann

Abstract

Abstract In most schools of nursing, students rate their satisfaction with courses and teachers at the end of the semester. Low response rates on these evaluations make it difficult to interpret the results. Students were incentivized to complete their course evaluations by adding 1–2 points to one test score in the course in exchange for 85 % or higher participation by the total cohort. Ongoing monitoring and communication to students by faculty during the process was critical to motivating students to complete course evaluations. When the incentive was employed, student participation ranged from a low of 90 % to a high of 100 % response rate. The added points did not change any of the students' grades. Incentivizing students to complete course evaluations is an effective strategy to boost response rates without changing final course grades.

References

Adams, M. J. D., & Umbach, P. D. (2012). Nonresponse and online student evaluations of teaching: Understanding the influence of salience, fatigue, and academic environments. Research in Higher Education, 53, 576–591. doi:10.1007/s11162-011-9240-5Search in Google Scholar

Algozzine, B., Beattie, J., Bray, M., Flowers, C., Gretes, J., Mohanty, G., & Spooner, F. (2010). Multi-method evaluation of college teaching. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 21(1), 27–49.Search in Google Scholar

Annan, S. L., Tratnack, S., Rubenstein, C., Metzler-Sawin, E., & Hulton, L. (2013). An integrative review of student evaluations of teaching: Implications for evaluation of nursing faculty. Journal of Professional Nursing, 29, e10–24. doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2013.06.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Benton, S. L., & Cashin, W. E. (2009). Student ratings of teaching: A summary of research and literature. Retrieved from http://www.ntid.rit.edu/sites/default/files/academic_affairs/Sumry%20of%20Res%20%2350%20Benton%202012.pdf. Accessed April 29, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Benton, S. L., & Ryalls, K. R. (2016). Challenging misconceptions about student ratings of instruction. Retrieved from https://www.ideaedu.org/Portals/0/Uploads/Documents/Challenging_Misconceptions_About_Student_Ratings_of_Instruction.pdf. Accessed April 29, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Boysen, G. A. (2015). Uses and misuses of student evaluations of teaching. Teaching of Psychology, 42, 109–118. doi:10.1177/0098628315569922Search in Google Scholar

Bush, M., Rushton, S., Conklin, J. L., & Oermann, M. H. (2018). Considerations for developing a student evaluation of teaching form. Teaching & Learning in Nursing, 13, 125–128. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2017.10.002Search in Google Scholar

Chapman, D. D., & Joines, J. A. (2017). Strategies for increasing response rates for online end-of-course evaluations. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(1), 47–60.Search in Google Scholar

Ford, Y. L. (2014). Using gainsharing to increase electronic end-of-course evaluation submissions. Nurse Educator, 39, 149–152. doi:10.1097/NNE.0000000000000039Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Gerbase, M. W., Germond, M., Cerutti, B., Vu, N. V., & Baroffio, A. (2015). How many responses do we need? Using generalizability analysis to estimate minimum necessary response rates for online student evaluations. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 27, 395–403. doi:10.1080/10401334.2015.1077126Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Goodman, J., Anson, R., & Belcheir, M. (2015). The effect of incentives and other instructor-driven strategies to increase online student evaluation response rates. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40, 958–970. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.960364Search in Google Scholar

Laguilles, J. S., Williams, E. A., & Saunders, D. B. (2010). Can Lottery incentives boost web survey response rates? Findings from four experiments. Research in Higher Education, 52, 537–553. doi:10.1007/s11162-010-9203-2Search in Google Scholar

Nulty, D. D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can be done?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 301–314.10.1080/02602930701293231Search in Google Scholar

Oermann, M. H. (2017). Student evaluations of teaching: There is more to course evaluations than student ratings. Nurse Educator, 42, 55–56. doi:10.1097/nne.0000000000000366Search in Google Scholar

Oermann, M. H., Conklin, J. L., Rushton, S., & Bush, M. (2018). Student evaluations of teaching:Guidelines for their use. Nursing Forum. [e-pub ahead of print]. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12249Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Patzer, B., Lazzara, B. H., Keebler, J. R., Madi, M. H., Dwyer, P., Huckstadt, A. A., & Smith-Campbell, B. (2017). Predictors of nursing graduate school success. Nursing Education Perspectives, 38, 272–274. doi:10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000172Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Toothaker, R., & Taliaferro, D. (2017). A phenomenological study of millennial students and traditional pedagogies. Journal of Professional Nursing, 33, 345–349. doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2017.01.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Uttl, B., White, C. A., & Gonzalez, D. W. (2017). Meta-analysis of faculty's teaching effectiveness: Student evaluation of teaching ratings and student learning are not related. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 54, 22–42. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.08.007Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-05-31
Accepted: 2018-06-08
Published Online: 2018-06-19

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Scroll Up Arrow