Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton March 19, 2010

The status of the auxiliary do in L1 and L2 English negative clauses

  • Susana Perales

Abstract

This paper addresses the issue of whether negative sentences containing auxiliary do in L1 and L2 English share the same underlying syntactic representation. To this end, I compare the negative sentences produced by 77 bilingual (Spanish/Basque)L2 learners of English with the corresponding data available for L1 acquirers reported on in Schütze (Carson, The status of he/she don't and theories of root infinitives, 2001), under the assumption that L1 and L2 grammars may be underspecified for Tense and/or Agreement features. I conclude that, despite similarities in the type of errors children and L2 learners produce, the L2 data do not show evidence of underspecification. Rather, it appears that L2 learners use a lexical strategy whereby they adopt don't as an independent preverbal negative marker.

Published Online: 2010-03-19
Published in Print: 2010-March

© Walter de Gruyter

Downloaded on 28.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/iral.2010.001/html
Scroll to top button