Accessible Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Oldenbourg February 28, 2018

Mobile learning in environmental citizen science: An initial survey of current practice in Germany

Ulrike Sturm, Alexandra Moormann and Astrid Faber

Abstract

Citizen science is a growing approach in science and the opportunities of new technologies and learning are considered more and more. We give an overview of the current practice of mobile learning in Germany by conducting an explorative survey among environmental citizen science projects using mobile apps. This study supports the idea that education is relevant in citizen science, and apps affect the learning experience of participants. However, several obstacles were identified that need to be considered, to be able to fully exploit the benefits of mobile learning in citizen science.

Funding statement: This publication was written as part of the project ‘Stadtnatur entdecken’, funded by the Federal Ministry of the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (BMUB).

Acknowledgment

We would like to thank Prof. Dr. Armin Lude, David Ziegler and the German citizen science platform buergerschaffenwissen.de for their help and support. We also thank Korantema Anyimadu for reviewing our English language.

References

1. P. Behrens, M. Calmbach, C. Schleer, W. Klingler and T. Rathgeb. Mediennutzung und Medienkompetenz in jungen Lebenswelten. Media Perspektiven 4: 195–218, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

2. G. Bela, T. Peltola, J. C. Young, B. Balázs, I. Arpin, G. Pataki, J. Hauck, E. Kelemen, L. Kopperoinen, A. Van Herzele, H. Keune, S. Hecker, M. Sûskevičs, H. E. Roy, P. Itkonen, M. Külvik, M. László, C. Basnou, J. Pino and A. Bonn. Learning and the transformative potential of citizen science. Conservation Biology, 30(5): 990–999, 2016.10.1111/cobi.12762 Search in Google Scholar

3. R. Bonney, C. B. Cooper, J. Dickinson, S. Kelling, T. Phillips, K. V. Rosenberg and J. Shirk. Citizen science: A developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. Bioscience, 59(11): 977–984, 2009.10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9 Search in Google Scholar

4. R. Bonney, J. L. Shirk, T. B. Phillips, A. Wiggins, H. L. Ballard, A. J. Miller-Rushing and J. K. Parrish. Next Steps for Citizen Science. Science, 343(6178): 1436–1437, 2014.10.1126/science.1251554 Search in Google Scholar

5. J. P. Cohn. Citizen Science: Can Volunteers Do Real Research? BioScience, 58(3): 192–197, 2008.10.1641/B580303 Search in Google Scholar

6. D. Brossard, B. Lewenstein and R. Bonney. Scientific knowledge and attitude change: The impact of a citizen science project. International Journal of Science Education, 27(9): 1099–1121, 2005.10.1080/09500690500069483 Search in Google Scholar

7. R. Cronje, S. Rohlinger, A. Crall and G. Newman. Does participation in citizen science improve scientific literacy? A study to compare assessment methods. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 10: 135–145, 2011.10.1080/1533015X.2011.603611 Search in Google Scholar

8. J. L. Dickinson, J. Shirk, D. Bonter, R. Bonney, R.L. Crain, J. Martin, T. Phillips and K. Purcell. The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6): 291–297, 2012.10.1890/110236 Search in Google Scholar

9. M. Haklay: Citizen Science and Volunteered Geographic Information: Overview and Typology of Participation, Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge, D. Z. Sui, S. Elwood and M. F. Goodchild editors. Springer Verlag, 2013. Search in Google Scholar

10. C. Jennett, L. Kloetzer, D. Schneider, I. Iacovides, A. L. Cox, M. Gold, B. Fuchs, A. Eveleigh, K. Mathieu, Z. Ajani and Y. Talsi. Motivations, learning and creativity in online citizen science. Journal of Science Communication, 15(3): A05–19, 2016. Search in Google Scholar

11. Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest (mpfs). JIM 2016 – Jugend, Information, (Multi-) Media, pp. 6–12, 2016. Search in Google Scholar

12. R. C. Jordan, S. A. Gray, D. V. Howe, W. R. Brooks and J. G. Ehrenfeld. Knowledge Gain and Behavioral Change in Citizen-Science Programs. Conservation Biology, 25(6): 1148–1154, 2011.10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01745.x Search in Google Scholar

13. J. Kelemen-Finan, C. Knoll and U. Pröbstl-Haider. Citizen Science – voll cool oder nur doof? Laienmonitoring als Beitrag zur Umweltbildung bei Jugendlichen. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung, 45: 171–176, 2013. Search in Google Scholar

14. L. Kloetzer, D. Schneider, C. Jennett, I. Iacovides, A. Eveleigh, A. L. Cox and M. Gold. Learning by volunteer computing, thinking and gaming: What and how are volunteers learning by participating in Virtual Citizen Science? Proceedings of the 2013 European Research Conference of the network of Access, Learning Careers and Identities. pp. 73–92. Linköping, Sweden, September 2013. Search in Google Scholar

15. L. Kloetzer, J. Da Costa and D. K. Schneider. Not so passive: engagement and learning in Volunteer Computing projects. Human Computation, 3(1): 25–68, 2016. Search in Google Scholar

16. C. Kullenberg and D. Kasperowski. What is citizen science? – A scientometric meta-analysis. PLoS One, 11(1), 2016. Search in Google Scholar

17. A. M. Land-Zandstra, J. L. A. Devilee, F. Snik, F. Buurmeijer and J. M. van den Broek. Citizen science on a smartphone: Participants’ motivations and learning. Public Understanding of Science, 25(1): 45–60, 2016.10.1177/0963662515602406 Search in Google Scholar

18. A. Lude, S. Schaal, M. Bullinger and S. Bleck. Mobiles, ortsbezogenes Lernen in der Umweltbildung und Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung. Schneider Verlag Hohengehren, 2013. Search in Google Scholar

19. P. Mayring. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. Beltz, 2010. Search in Google Scholar

20. G. Newman, A. Wiggins, A. Crall, E. Graham, S. Newman, K. Crowston. The future of citizen science: emerging technologies and shifting paradigms. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6): 298–304, 2012.10.1890/110294 Search in Google Scholar

21. C. O’Malley, G. Vavoula, J. P. Glew, J. Taylor, M. Sharples, P. Lefrere. Guidelines for learning/teaching/tutoring in a mobile environment. Public deliverable from the MOBILearn project (D.4.1). 2005. Search in Google Scholar

22. L. Pettibone, K. Vohland and D. Ziegler. Understanding the (inter)disciplinary and institutional diversity of citizen science: A survey of current practice in Germany and Austria. PLoS ONE, 12(6), 2017. Search in Google Scholar

23. C. A. Price and H.-S. Lee. Changes in participants’ scientific attitudes and epistemological beliefs during an astronomical citizen science project. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(7): 773–801, 2013.10.1002/tea.21090 Search in Google Scholar

24. M. J. Raddick, G. Bracey, P. L. Gay, C. J. Lintott, C. Cardamone, P. Murray, K. Schawinski, A. S. Szalay and J. Vandenberg. Galaxy Zoo: Motivations of Citizen Scientists. Astronomy Education Review, 12(1), 2013. Search in Google Scholar

25. A. Richter, T. Turrini, K. Ulbrich, M. Mahla and A. Bonn. Citizen Science – Perspektiven in der Umweltbildung, Nachhaltigkeit erfahren. Engagement als Schlüssel einer Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung, A. Bittner, T. Pyhel and V. Bischoff editors. Oekom Verlag, 2016. Search in Google Scholar

26. H. Riesch, C. Potter and L. Davies. Combining citizen science and public engagement: the Open AirLaboratories Programme. Journal of Science Communication, 12(3), 2013. Search in Google Scholar

27. S. Schaal and A. Lude. Using Mobile Devices in Environmental Education and Education for Sustainable Development—Comparing Theory and Practice in a Nation Wide Survey. Sustainability, 7(8): 10153–10170, 2015.10.3390/su70810153 Search in Google Scholar

28. K. Scheliga, S. Friesike, C. Puschmann and B. Fecher. Setting up crowd science projects. Public Understanding of Science, 1–20, 2016. Search in Google Scholar

29. M. Sharples, I. Arnedillo-Sánchez, M. Milrad, G. Vavoula. Mobile Learning: Small devices, Big Issues, Technology Enhanced Learning: Principles and Products, N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. de Jong, A. Lazonder and S. Barnes editors, Springer Verlag, 2009. Search in Google Scholar

30. M. Sharples. Mobile learning: research, practice and challenges. Distance Education in China, 3(5): 5–11, 2013. Search in Google Scholar

31. J. Silvertown. A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(9): 467–471, 2009.10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.017 Search in Google Scholar

32. J. Silvertown, M. Harvey, R. Greenwood, M. Dodd, J. Rosewell, T. Rebelo, J. Ansine and K. McConway. Crowdsourcing the identification of organisms: A case-study of iSpot. Zookeys, (480): 125–146, 2015. Search in Google Scholar

33. Statistisches Bundesamt. Wirtschaftsrechnungen. Private Haushalte in der Informationsgesellschaft – Nutzung von Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien. Fachserie, 15(4): 14–25, 2016. Search in Google Scholar

34. U. Sturm, S. Schade, L. Ceccaroni, M. Gold, C. Kyba, B. Claramunt, M. Haklay, D. Kasperowski, A. Albert, J. Piera, J. Brier, C. Kullenberg, S. Luna. Defining principles for mobile apps and platforms development in citizen science. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e21283, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e21283. Search in Google Scholar

35. A. Wiggins and K. Crowston. From conservation to crowdsourcing: a typology of citizen science. Proceedings of 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS ’10), Hawaii, United States of America, January 2011. Search in Google Scholar

36. W. Woods and E. Scanlon. iSpot Mobile – A Natural History Participatory Science Application. Proceedings of the World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning (Mlearn), Helsinki, Finland, October 2012. Search in Google Scholar

37. P. Yadav and J. Darlington. Design Guidelines for the User-Centred Collaborative Citizen Science Platforms. Human Computation, 3(1): 205–211, 2016. Search in Google Scholar

38. D. Ziegler and L. Pettibone. Potential für lebenslanges Lernen. Weiterbildung, 2: 18–21, 2015. Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-8-31
Revised: 2017-11-13
Accepted: 2018-1-29
Published Online: 2018-2-28
Published in Print: 2018-3-1

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston