In a lab experiment, two milk bottles with different levels of omega-3 were offered to participants for eliciting willingness to pay. We find that a simple message on the difference regarding the omega-3 content between bottles significantly impacts the participants’ willingness to pay for these bottles. The exit questionnaire also shows that participants would prefer the exclusive use of the omega-3 label posted on the bottle with the highest content in omega-3. From an interpretation of questionnaires and elicited willingness to pay, simulations show that the exclusive use of one label signaling omega-3 would have a positive impact on both profits and consumers’ surpluses.
Loureiro, M. L., J. J.McCluskey, and R. C.Mittelhammer. 2001. “Assessing Consumer Preferences for Organic, Eco-Labeled, and Regular Apples.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics26(2):404–16.Search in Google Scholar
Lusk, J., and S.Marette. 2012. “Can Labeling and Information Policies Harm Consumers?” Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization10(2012):1–13.10.1515/1542-0485.1373Search in Google Scholar
Marette, S. 2010. “Consumer Confusion and Multiple Equilibria.” Economics Bulletin30(2):1120–8.Search in Google Scholar
Rousu, M. C., W. E.Huffman, J. F.Shogren, and A.Tegene. 2007. “Effects and Value of Verifiable Information in a Controversial Market: Evidence from Lab Auctions of Genetically Modified Food.” Economic Inquiry45(3):409–32.10.1111/j.1465-7295.2007.00017.xSearch in Google Scholar
©2014 by De Gruyter