Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter December 9, 2016

Systematic Effects in Laser Scanning and Visualization by Confidence Regions

  • Karl-Rudolf Koch EMAIL logo and Jan Martin Brockmann


A new method for dealing with systematic effects in laser scanning and visualizing them by confidence regions is derived. The standard deviations of the systematic effects are obtained by repeatedly measuring three-dimensional coordinates by the laser scanner. In addition, autocovariance and cross-covariance functions are computed by the repeated measurements and give the correlations of the systematic effects. The normal distribution for the measurements and the multivariate uniform distribution for the systematic effects are applied to generate random variates for the measurements and random variates for the measurements plus systematic effects. Monte Carlo estimates of the expectations and the covariance matrix of the measurements with systematic effects are computed. The densities for the confidence ellipsoid for the measurements and the confidence region for the measurements with systematic effects are obtained by relative frequencies. They only depend on the size of the rectangular volume elements for which the densities are determined. The problem of sorting the densities is solved by sorting distances together with the densities. This allows a visualization of the confidence ellipsoid for the measurements and the confidence region for the measurements with systematic effects.


The authors are indebted to Ernst-Martin Blome for taking care of the measurements and to Boris Kargoll for his valuable comments.


[1] Abramowitz M, Stegun IA (1972) Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover, New York.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Falk M (1999) A simple approach to the generation of uniformly distributed random variables with prescribed correlations. Commun Statist–Simula, 28:3 785–791.10.1080/03610919908813578Search in Google Scholar

[3] Gentle JE (2003) Random Number Generation and Monte Carlo Methods, 2nd Ed. Springer, Berlin.Search in Google Scholar

[4] ISO (1995) Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. International Organization for Standardization, Geneve.Search in Google Scholar

[5] JCGM (2011) Evaluation of measurement data–Supplement 2 to the “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement”–Extension to any number of output quantities. JCGM 102:2011. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, in Google Scholar

[6] Kacker RN, Lawrence JF (2007) Trapezoidal and triangular distributions for type B evaluation of standard uncertainty. Metrologia, 44:2 117–127.10.1088/0026-1394/44/2/003Search in Google Scholar

[7] Koch KR (1999) Parameter Estimation and Hypothesis Testing in Linear Models, 2nd Ed. Springer, Berlin.10.1007/978-3-662-03976-2Search in Google Scholar

[8] Koch KR (2007) Introduction to Bayesian Statistics, 2nd Ed. Springer, Berlin.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Koch KR (2010) Uncertainty of results of laser scanning data with correlated systematic effects by Monte Carlo methods. ZfV–Z Geodäsie, Geoinformation und Landmanagement, 135:6 376–385.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Koch KR, Kargoll B (2015) Outlier detection by the EM algorithm for laser scanning in rectangular and polar coordinate systems. J Applied Geodesy, 9:3 162–173.10.1515/jag-2015-0004Search in Google Scholar

[11] Koch KR, Kuhlmann H, Schuh W-D (2010) Approximating covariance matrices estimated in multivariate models by estimated auto- and cross-covariances. J Geodesy, 84:6 383–397.10.1007/s00190-010-0375-5Search in Google Scholar

[12] Lira I, Wöger W (2006) Comparison between conventional and Bayesian approaches to evaluate measurement data. Metrologia, 43:4 S249–S259.10.1088/0026-1394/43/4/S12Search in Google Scholar

[13] Mood AM, Graybill FA, Boes DC (1974) Introduction to the Theory of Statistics. McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, Tokyo.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Papoulis A (1977) Signal Analysis. McGraw-Hill, Auckland.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Priestley MB (1981) Spectral Analysis and Time Series. Academic Press, London.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Silverman BW (1986) Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Chapman and Hall, London.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-5-17
Accepted: 2016-9-30
Published Online: 2016-12-9
Published in Print: 2016-12-1

© 2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Munich/Boston

Downloaded on 3.10.2023 from
Scroll to top button