Skip to content
Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter May 4, 2018

Research on the impact factors of GRACE precise orbit determination by dynamic method

Nan-nan Guo, Xu-hua Zhou, Kai Li and Bin Wu

Abstract

With the successful use of GPS-only-based POD (precise orbit determination), more and more satellites carry onboard GPS receivers to support their orbit accuracy requirements. It provides continuous GPS observations in high precision, and becomes an indispensable way to obtain the orbit of LEO satellites. Precise orbit determination of LEO satellites plays an important role for the application of LEO satellites. Numerous factors should be considered in the POD processing. In this paper, several factors that impact precise orbit determination are analyzed, namely the satellite altitude, the time-variable earth’s gravity field, the GPS satellite clock error and accelerometer observation. The GRACE satellites provide ideal platform to study the performance of factors for precise orbit determination using zero-difference GPS data. These factors are quantitatively analyzed on affecting the accuracy of dynamic orbit using GRACE observations from 2005 to 2011 by SHORDE software. The study indicates that: (1) with the altitude of the GRACE satellite is lowered from 480 km to 460 km in seven years, the 3D (three-dimension) position accuracy of GRACE satellite orbit is about 3∼4 cm based on long spans data; (2) the accelerometer data improves the 3D position accuracy of GRACE in about 1 cm; (3) the accuracy of zero-difference dynamic orbit is about 6 cm with the GPS satellite clock error products in 5 min sampling interval and can be raised to 4 cm, if the GPS satellite clock error products with 30 s sampling interval can be adopted. (4) the time-variable part of earth gravity field model improves the 3D position accuracy of GRACE in about 0.5∼1.5 cm. Based on this study, we quantitatively analyze the factors that affect precise orbit determination of LEO satellites. This study plays an important role to improve the accuracy of LEO satellites orbit determination.

Funding source: National Natural Science Foundation of China

Award Identifier / Grant number: 11573053

Award Identifier / Grant number: 11173049

Funding statement: This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11573053, 11173049) and Science and Technology Innovation Fund of First Crust Monitoring and Application Center, China Earthquake Administration (Grant No. FMC2018003).

Acknowledgment

We are grateful to GFZ, JPL and IGS, which providing the GRACE observation, the precise orbits of GRACE and the GPS satellites. Additionally, the authors extend great appreciation to the editors and the anonymous reviewers for their constructive suggestions that helped to enhance the original manuscript.

References

[1] Bock H, Jaggi A, Beutler G, et al. GOCE: precise orbit determination for the entire mission. Journal of Geodesy, 88(2014), 1047–1060.10.1007/s00190-014-0742-8Search in Google Scholar

[2] Bruinsma S. The DTM-2013 thermosphere model. Journal of Space Weather & Space Climate, 5(2015).Search in Google Scholar

[3] Chen Q J, Shen Y Z, Chen W, et al. An improved GRACE monthly gravity field solution by modeling the non-conservative acceleration and attitude observation errors. Journal of Geodesy, 90(2016), 503–523.10.1007/s00190-016-0889-6Search in Google Scholar

[4] Guo N N, Zhou X H, Wu B. Rapid precise orbit determination for Haiyang-2A using on-board GPS data (in Chinese). Journal of Astronautics, 36(2015), 797–803.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Guo N N, Zhou X H, Wu B, Zhao G. A model of the time-variable gravity field inverted from combined GRACE on-board GPS and KBR range rate data. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 7(2017), 2568–2577.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Guo J, Zhao Q L, Li M, Hu Z G. Centimeter level orbit determination for HY2A using GPS data (in Chinese). Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 38(2013), 52–55.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Jaggi A, Dahle C, Arnold D, et al. Swarm kinematic orbits and gravity fields from 18 months of GPS data. Advances in Space Research, 57(2016), 218–233.10.1016/j.asr.2015.10.035Search in Google Scholar

[8] van den Ijssel J, Encarnacao J, Doornbos E, Visser P. Precise science orbits for the Swarm satellite constellation. Advances in Space Research, 56(2015), 1042–1055.10.1016/j.asr.2015.06.002Search in Google Scholar

[9] Kang Z G, Tapley B, Bettadpur S, Ries J, Nagel P, Pastor R. Precise orbit determination for the GRACE mission using only GPS data. Journal of Geodesy, 80(2006), 322–331.10.1007/s00190-006-0073-5Search in Google Scholar

[10] Kang Z G, Tapley B D, Bettadpur S, Ries J, Nagel P. Precise orbit determination for GRACE using accelerometer data. Advances in Space Research, 38(2006), 2131–2136.10.1016/j.asr.2006.02.021Search in Google Scholar

[11] Lemoine J M, Bruinsma S, Loyer S, et al. Temporal gravity field models inferred from GRACE data. Advances in Space Research, 39(2007), 1620–1629.10.1016/j.asr.2007.03.062Search in Google Scholar

[12] Lyard F, Lefevre F, Letellier T, Francis O. Modelling the global ocean tides: modern insights from FES2004. Ocean Dynamics, 56(2006), 394–415.10.1007/s10236-006-0086-xSearch in Google Scholar

[13] Peng D J, Wu B. The Effect of GPS Ephemeris on the Accuracy of Precise Orbit Determination of LEO Satellite-borne GPS. Chinese Astronomy and Astrophysics, 33(2009), 206–216.10.1016/j.chinastron.2009.03.007Search in Google Scholar

[14] Peng D J, Wu B. Application of Accelerometer Data in Precise Orbit Determination of GRACE-A and-B. Chinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 5(2008), 603–610.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Petit G, Luzum B. IERS Conventions (2010), IERS Technical Note No. 36, International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service, Verlag des Bundesamts für Kartographie und Geodäsie, Frankfurt, Germany, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Rim H J. TOPEX Orbit Determination Using GPS Tracking System, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Schall J, Eicker A, Kusche J. The ITG-Goce02 gravity field model from GOCE orbit and gradiometer data based on the short arc approach. Journal of Geodesy, 88(2014), 403–409.10.1007/s00190-014-0691-2Search in Google Scholar

[18] Švehla D, Rothacher M. Kinematic and reduced-dynamic precise orbit determination of low earth orbiters. Advances in Geosciences, 1(2003), 47–56.10.5194/adgeo-1-47-2003Search in Google Scholar

[19] Tapley B, Ries J, Bettadpur S, et al. GGM02 – An improved Earth gravity field model from GRACE. Journal of Geodesy, 79(2005), 467–478.10.1007/s00190-005-0480-zSearch in Google Scholar

[20] Visser P, Van Den Ijssel J. Aiming at a 1-cm orbit for Low Earth Orbiters: Reduced-dynamical and kinematic precise orbit determination. Space Science Review, (108)2003, 27–36.10.1023/A:1026253328154Search in Google Scholar

[21] Weigelt M, Van Dam T, Jaggi A, et al. Time-variable gravity signal in Greenland revealed by high-low satellite-to-satellite tracking. Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth, 118(2013), 3848–3859.10.1002/jgrb.50283Search in Google Scholar

[22] Zhao Q L, Guo J, Hu Z G, et al. GRACE gravity field modeling with an investigation on correlation between nuisance parameters and gravity field coefficients. Advances in Space Research, 47(2011), 1833–1850.10.1016/j.asr.2010.11.041Search in Google Scholar

[23] Zhao Q L, Liu J N, Ge M R, Shi C, Du R L. Precise Orbit Determination of GPS and CHAMP Satellites with PANDA Software (in Chinese). Crustal Deformation & Earthquake, 25(2005), 113–116.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-01-31
Accepted: 2018-04-15
Published Online: 2018-05-04
Published in Print: 2018-07-26

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston