Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter December 5, 2020

Law, Mercy, and Reconciliation in the Achaemenid Empire

  • Daniel Beckman EMAIL logo

Abstract

The kings of the Achaemenid Empire are known for employing a number of particularly gruesome punishments for those who were deemed guilty of rebellion. While it is certainly true that the Achaemenids punished rebels with utmost severity, it is also true that they were, at times, willing to forgive rebels, and even to rehabilitate them. In this paper, I investigate the mechanisms by which the Achaemenid kings were able to show mercy to rebels. By examining a number of relevant cases from a period of a century and a half, I argue that the decision to be merciful was based on the king’s familial or social relationship with the rebel, the rebel’s relative strength vis-à-vis the king, the geography of the revolt, and the presence of other external factors which might also restrict the king’s powers. By a comparison with royal inscriptions and texts found throughout the empire, I demonstrate the ways in which these reconciliations stood apart from, and even in contradiction to, administrative and ideological norms concerning law and justice within the Achaemenid Empire. Finally, by reviewing the traditions and attitudes towards justice and mercy among the Achaemenids' Near Eastern predecessors, I put this policy in historical context and show that it is a unique response to a problem faced by other ancient empires.

Bibliography

Badian, E. “Herodotus on Alexander I of Macedon: a study in some subtle silences.” In Greek Historiography, edited by S. Hornblower, 107–130. Oxford: Oxford U. P., 1994.Search in Google Scholar

Bichler, R. “Der Lyder Inaros. Über die ägyptische Revolte des Ktesias von Knidos.” In Altertum und Mittelmeerraum, edited by R. Rollinger, B. Truschnegg and P. Haider, 445–459. Stuttgart: Steiner, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

Biondi, E. “Mégabyze de Zopyros et le roi Artoxerxès Ier.” Klio 98 (2016): 139–157. 10.1515/klio-2016-0004Search in Google Scholar

Boyce, M. “On Mithra, Lord of Fire.” In Monumentum H. S. Nyberg, 70–76. Tehran: Bibliothèque Pahlavi, 1975.Search in Google Scholar

Briant, P. “Histoire impériale et histoire régionale. À propos de l’histoire de juda dans l’Empire Achéménide.” In International Organization for the Study of the Old Testament, edited by A. Lemaire and M. Sæbø, 235–245. Leiden: Brill, 200010.1163/9789004276055_016Search in Google Scholar

Briant, P. From Cyrus to Alexander. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns, 200210.1515/9781575065748Search in Google Scholar

Bucci, O. “L’Impero achemenide come ordinamento giuridico sovrannazionale e arta come principio ispiratore di uno « jus commune Persarum » (data).” Publications de l’École Française de Rome 67 (1983): 89–122.Search in Google Scholar

Costa, E. “Evagoras I and the Persians, ca. 411 to 391 BC.” Historia 23 (1974): 40–56.Search in Google Scholar

Da Riva, R. The Neo-Babylonian Royal Inscriptions. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

Dandamaev, M. Iranians in Achaemenid Babylonia. Costa Mesa, CA: Mazda, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

Dandamaev, M. “Achaemenid Mesopotamia: traditions and innovations.” In Continuity and Change, edited by H. Sancisi-Weerdenburg, A. Kuhrt and M. Cool. Root, 229–234. Leiden: Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten, 1994.Search in Google Scholar

Dandamaev, M. “Assyrian traditions during Achaemenid times.” In Assyria 1995, edited by S. Parpola and R. Whiting, 41–48. Helsinki: Neo-Assyrian Text Corpus Project, 1997.Search in Google Scholar

Ehrenberg, E. “Dieu et mon droit: kingship in late Babylonian and early Persian times.” In Religion and Power, edited by N. Brisch, 103–131. Chicago: Oriental Institute, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

Frei, P. “Zentralgewalt und Lokalautonomie im Achmenidenreich.” In Reichsidee und Reichsorganisation im Perserreich, by P. Frei and K. Koch, 8–43. Göttingen: Vandenhoek and Ruprecht, 1984.Search in Google Scholar

Frei, P. “Persian imperial authorization: a summary.” In Persia and Torah, edited by J. Watts, 5–40. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

Fried, L. The Priest and the Great King. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns, 2004.10.1515/9781575065502Search in Google Scholar

Gammie, J. “Herodotus on kings and tyrants: objective historiography or conventional portraiture?” JNES 45 (1986): 171–195.10.1086/373186Search in Google Scholar

Hallock, R. Persepolis Fortification Tablets. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1969.Search in Google Scholar

Holtz, S. “Neo-Babylonian cecision records and related documents: typological, procedural and comparative aspects.” Ph.D. Dissertation University of Pennsylvania, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

Holtz, S. Neo-Babylonian Trial Records. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2014.10.2307/j.ctt5vjz1sSearch in Google Scholar

Jacobs, B. “Mechanismen der Konfliktbewältigung in der Verwaltungsorganisation Kleinasiens zur Achämenidenzeit.” In A Persian Perspective, edited by A. Kuhrt and W. Henkelman, 239–262. Leiden: Nederlands Instituut Voor Het Nabije Oosten, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

Johandi, A. “Mesopotamian influences on the Old Persian royal ideology and religion: the example of Achaemenid royal inscriptions.” Estonian National Defense College Proceedings 16 (2012): 159–179.Search in Google Scholar

Karavites, P. “Spondai-Spendein in the fifth century BC.” AntClass 53 (1984): 60–70. 10.3406/antiq.1984.2113Search in Google Scholar

Karlsson, M. Relations of Power in Early Neo-Assyrian State Ideology. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2016.10.1515/9781614516910Search in Google Scholar

Keaveney, A. “The trial of Orontas: Xenophon, Anabasis I, 6.” AntClass 81 (2012): 31–41.10.3406/antiq.2012.3809Search in Google Scholar

Klinkott, H. “Xerxes und der Kopf des Leonidas: Handlungszwänge und Rollenverständnis eines persischen Großkönigs.” In Zwischen Assur und Athen, edited by H. Klinkott and N. Kramer, 61–83. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

Kramer, N. “Athen: keine Stadt des Grosskönigs!” Hermes 132 (2004): 257–270.Search in Google Scholar

Kuhrt, A. “Earth and water.” In Method and Theory, edited by H. Sancisi-Weerdenburg and A. Kuhrt, 87–99. Leiden: Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten, 1988.Search in Google Scholar

Lenfant, D. Les histoires perses de Dinon et d’Héraclide, fragments édités, traduits et commentés. Paris: De Boccard, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

Lincoln, B. Religion, Empire, and Torture. Chicago: University of Chicago, 2007.10.7208/chicago/9780226481913.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Liverani, M. Assyria. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

MacGinnis, J. “A judgment of Darius the king”. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 60 (2008): 87–99.10.1086/JCS25608624Search in Google Scholar

Martin, D. “The vision of Zoroaster: an essay on the mystical origins of ‘the good vision.’” Iran & the Caucasus 3 (1999): 9–32.10.1163/157338499X00029Search in Google Scholar

Meyer, E. “The Athenian expedition to Egypt and the value of Ctesias.” Phoenix 72 (2018): 43–61.10.1353/phx.2018.0049Search in Google Scholar

Munn, M. The Mother of the Gods, Athens, and the Tyranny of Asia. Berkeley: University of California, 2006.10.1525/9780520931589Search in Google Scholar

Novotny, J. and J. Jeffers. The Royal Inscriptions of Ashurbanipal (668–631 BC), Aššur-Etal-Ilāni (630–627 BC), and Sîn-Šarra-Iškun (626–612 BC), Kings of Assyria. Vol. 1. RINAP 5. University Park: Eisenbrauns, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Olmstead, A. History of the Persian Empire. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1948.10.7208/chicago/9780226826332.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Osborne, M. “Orontes.” Historia 22 (1973): 515–551.10.1093/iclqaj/22.3.515Search in Google Scholar

Panaino, A. “The Mesopotamian heritage of Achaemenian kingship.” In The Heirs of Assyria, edited by S. Aro and R. Whiting. Helsinki: Neo-Assyrian Text Corpus Project, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

Petit, T. “Xénophon et la vassalité achéménide.” In Xenophon and his World, edited by C. Tuplin, 175–199. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

Pongratz-Leisten, B. “‘Lying king’ and ‘false prophet,’ the intercultural transfer of a rhetorical device within the ancient Near Eastern ideologies.” In Ideologies as Intercultural Phenomena, edited by A. Panaino and G. Pettinato, 215–243. Milan: Associazione Culturale Mimesis, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

Porten, B. The Elephantine Papyri in English. Leiden: Brill, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

Raubitschek, A. “The treaties between Persia and Athens.” GRBS 5 (1964): 151–159.Search in Google Scholar

Rawlinson, G. The Seven Great Monarchies of the Ancient Eastern World. Vol. 2. New York: John B. Alden, 1885.Search in Google Scholar

Rop, J. “The assassination of Tissaphernes: royal responses to military defeat in the Achaemenid Empire.” In Brill’s Companion to Military Defeat in Ancient Mediterranean Society, edited by J. Clark and B. Turner, 51–73. Leiden: Brill, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Rung, E. “Athens and the Achaemenid Persian Empire in 508/7 BC: prologue to the conflict.” Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 6 (2015): 257–262.10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n3s2p257Search in Google Scholar

Ruzicka, S. “Glos, son of Tamos, and the end of the Cypriot War.” Historia 48 (1999): 23–43.Search in Google Scholar

Schachermeyr, F. “Athen als Stadt des Großkönigs.” Grazer Beiträge 1 (1973): 211–220.Search in Google Scholar

Schaudig, H. Die Inschriften Nabonids von Babylon und Kyros’ des Grossen samt den in ihrem Umfeld entstandenen Tendenzschriften. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

Schmitt, R. The Bisitun Inscriptions of Darius the Great Old Persian Text. London: School of Oriental and African Studies, 1991.Search in Google Scholar

Schmitt, R. The Old Persian Inscriptions of Naqsh-i Rustam and Persepolis. London: Lund Humpries, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

Schmitt, R. Die altpersischen Inschriften der Achaimeniden. Wiesbaden: Reichert, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

Stausberg, M. “Hell in Zoroastrian history.” Numen 56 (2009): 217–253.10.1163/156852709X404991Search in Google Scholar

Stevenson, R. “Lies and inventions in Deinon’s Persica.” In The Greek Sources, edited by H. Sancisi-Weerdenburg and A. Kuhrt, 27–35. Leiden: Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten, 1987.Search in Google Scholar

Stronk, J. Ctesias’ Persian History. Düsseldorf: Wellem, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

Stylianou, P. A Historical Commentary on Diodorus Siculus Book 15. Oxford: Clarendon, 1998.Search in Google Scholar

Tavernier, J. “Elamite and Old Iranian afterlife concepts.” In Susa and Elam, edited by K. De Graef and J. Tavernier, 471–489. Leiden: Brill, 2012.10.1163/9789004207417_028Search in Google Scholar

Tuplin, C. “All the king’s men.” In The World of Achaemenid Persia, edited by J. Curtis and S. Simpson, 51–62. London: I. B. Tauris, 2010.10.5040/9780755625420.ch-006Search in Google Scholar

Tuplin, C. “The justice of Darius. Reflections on the Achaemenid Empire as a rule-bound environment.” In Assessing Biblical and Classical Sources for the Reconstruction of Persian Influence, History and Culture, edited by A. Fitzpatrick-McKinley, 73–126. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

Waters, M. ‘Notes on the Medes and their empire from Jer. 25.25 to Hdt. 1.134.” In A Common Cultural Heritage, edited by G. Frame, et al., 243–253. Bethesda: CDL, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

Weiskopf, M. The So-Called ‘Great Satraps Revolt’, 366–360 BC. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 1989.Search in Google Scholar

West, S. “A diplomatic fiasco. The first Athenian embassy to Sardis (Hdt. 5,73).” RhM 154 (2011): 9–21.Search in Google Scholar

Wiesehöfer, J. “‘Reichsgesetz’ oder ‘Einzelfallgerechtigkeit’? Bemerkungen zu P. Freis These von der achaimenidischen ‘Reichsautorisation.’” Zeitschrift für altorientalische und biblische Rechtsgeschichte 1 (1995): 36–46.Search in Google Scholar

Wiesehöfer, J. “Law and religion in Achaemenid Iran.” In Law and Religion in the Eastern Mediterranean, edited by A. Hagedorn and R. Kratz, 41–57. Oxford: Oxford U. P., 2013.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199550234.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-12-05
Published in Print: 2020-11-27

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 29.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jah-2019-0034/html
Scroll to top button