Abstract
Herodotos and Thoukydides report on many occasions that kings, polis leaders, and other politicians speak and behave in ways that unintentionally announce or analyze situations incorrectly (misinformation). Elsewhere, they represent as facts knowingly false constructs or “fake news” (disinformation), or they slant data in ways that advance a cause personal or public (propaganda, true or false). Historians attempt to or claim to acquaint audiences with a truer fact situation and to identify subjects’ motives for distortion such as immediate personal advantage, community advantage, or to encourage posterity’s better (if mistaken) opinion. Such historiographical bifocalism enhances the historian’s authority with readers (as he sees through intentional or unintentional misrepresentations) as well as sets straight distorted historical records. This paper surveys two paradigmatic Hellenic historians’ texts, how they build their investigative and analytic authority, and how they encourage confidence in their truth-determining skills. The material collected confirms and assesses the frequency of persons and governments misleading their own citizens and subjects as well as rival persons and powers. Finally, it demonstrates that these two historians were aware of information loss, information control (dissemination and suppression), and information chaos.
Bibliography
Alty, J. “Dorians and Ionians.” JHS 102 (1982): 1–14.10.2307/631122Search in Google Scholar
Asheri, D., et al. A Commentary on Herodotus I-IV. Oxford: Oxford U. P., 2007.Search in Google Scholar
Azoulay, V. The Tyrant-Slayers of Ancient Athens. Trans. J. Lloyd, orig. 2014. Oxford: Oxford U. P., 2017.Search in Google Scholar
Badian, E. “Herodotus on Alexander I of Macedon: a study in some subtle silences.” In Greek Historiography, edited by S. Hornblower, 107–130. Oxford: Oxford U. P., 1994.Search in Google Scholar
Bakker, M. de. “Authorial comments in Thucydides.” In Balot, Forsdyke and Foster 2017, 239–256.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199340385.013.30Search in Google Scholar
Balot, R., S. Forsdyke and E. Foster, editors. The Oxford Handbook of Thucydides. Oxford: Oxford U. P., 2017.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199340385.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Bayliss, A. “‘Artful dodging’ or the side-stepping of oaths.” In Oaths and Swearing in Ancient Greece, edited by A. Sommerstein and I. Torance, 240–280. De Gruyter, Berlin: De Gruyter, 2014.10.1515/9783110227369.240Search in Google Scholar
Bowie, A. Herodotus: Histories Book VIII. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 2007.Search in Google Scholar
Branscome, D. Textual Rivals. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 2013.10.3998/mpub.1735403Search in Google Scholar
Byre, C. “Failed inquiry: Xerxes and his scout in Herodotus, 7.208–209.” Mouseion 4 (2004): 1–16.Search in Google Scholar
Camerer, L. Praktische Klugheit bei Herodot. Tübingen: Muth, 1965.Search in Google Scholar
Christ, M. “Herodotean kings and historical inquiry.” ClassAnt 13 (1994): 167–202. 10.2307/25011013Search in Google Scholar
Connor, W. “Tribes, festivals, and processions: civic ceremonial and political manipulation in archaic Greece.” JHS 107 (1987): 40–50.10.2307/630068Search in Google Scholar
Crahay, R. La littérature oraculaire chez Hérodote. Paris: “Les Belles Lettres,” 1956.Search in Google Scholar
Cooper, G. after K. Krüger. Attic Greek Prose Syntax. 2 Vols. Rev ed., orig. 1875. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1998. Search in Google Scholar
Darbo-Peschanski, C. Le Discours du particulier. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1987.Search in Google Scholar
Darbo-Peschanski, C., editor. La Citation dans l’antiquité. Grenoble: Editions J. Millon, 2004.Search in Google Scholar
Dewald, C. “Reading the world: the interpretation of objects in Herodotus’ Histories.” In Nomodeiktes, edited by R. Rosen and J. Farrell, 55–70. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1993.Search in Google Scholar
Flower, H. The Art of Forgetting. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, 2006.Search in Google Scholar
Flower, M. and J. Marincola. Herodotus. Histories Book IX. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 2002.Search in Google Scholar
Fontenrose, J. The Delphic Oracle. Berkeley: University of California, 1978.10.1525/9780520331310Search in Google Scholar
Fowler, R. “Herodotus and his prose predecessors.” In The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus, edited by C. Dewald and J. Marincola, 29–45. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 2006.10.1017/CCOL052183001X.003Search in Google Scholar
Fragoulaki, M. “Thucydides Homericus and the episode of Mycalessus (7.29–30): myth and history, space and collective memory.” In Shaping Memory in Ancient Greece, edited by C. Constantakopoulou and M. Fragoulaki, 37–86. Newcastle: Histos, Suppl. 11, 2020.Search in Google Scholar
Gerolymatos, A. Espionage and Treason in Classical Greece. Lanham: Lexington, 2020.Search in Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. “How not to do history: Xerxes in Herodotus’ Histories.” AJPh 130 (2009): 95–218.10.1353/ajp.0.0054Search in Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. “The rise of Greek historiography and the invention of prose.” In The Oxford History of Historical Writing, edited by D. Woolf, A. Feldherr and G. Hardy, 148–170. Oxford: Oxford U. P., 2011.10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199218158.003.0008Search in Google Scholar
Hunter, V. Policing Athens. Princeton: Princeton U. P., 1994.Search in Google Scholar
Hylands, J. Persian Interventions. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins U. P., 2018.Search in Google Scholar
Immerwahr, H. Form and Thought in Herodotus. Ann Arbor: American Philological Association, 1966.Search in Google Scholar
Jozefacka, A., et al., editors. The Propaganda Front. Boston: MFA, 2018.Search in Google Scholar
Kelly, T. “Persian propaganda—a neglected factor in Xerxes’ invasion of Greece and Herodotus.” Iranica Antiqua 38 (2003): 173–219.10.2143/IA.38.0.139Search in Google Scholar
Konijnendijk, R. “Mardonius’ senseless Greeks.” CQ 66 (2016): 1–12.10.1017/S0009838816000367Search in Google Scholar
Koselleck, R. The Practice of Conceptual History. Stanford: Stanford U. P., 2002.10.1515/9781503619104Search in Google Scholar
Krentz, P. “Deception in archaic and classical Greek warfare.” In War and Violence in Ancient Greece, edited by H. van Wees, 167–200. Swansea: Duckworth, 2000.10.2307/j.ctvvnbwv.10Search in Google Scholar
Lateiner, D. “The speech of Teutiaplus.” GRBS 16 (1975):175–184.Search in Google Scholar
Lateiner, D. “Tissaphernes and the Phoenician fleet.” TAPhA 106 (1976): 267–290.10.2307/284103Search in Google Scholar
Lateiner, D. “No laughing matter: a literary tactic in Herodotus.” TAPhA 107 (1977a): 173–182.10.2307/284034Search in Google Scholar
Lateiner, D. “Pathos in Thucydides.” Antichthon 11 (1977b): 42–51.10.1017/S0066477400002422Search in Google Scholar
Lateiner, D. The Historical Method of Herodotus. Toronto: Toronto U. P., 1989.10.3138/9781442675773Search in Google Scholar
Lateiner, D. “Deceptions and delusions in Herodotus.” ClassAnt 9 (1990): 230–246.10.2307/25010930Search in Google Scholar
Lateiner, D. “The style of Herodotus, 7.229.” CW 95 (2002): 363–371.10.2307/4352675Search in Google Scholar
Lateiner, D. “Appendix P: oracles, religion and politics in Herodotos.” In The Landmark Herodotus, edited by R. Strassler, 810–815. New York: Pantheon, 2009.Search in Google Scholar
Lateiner, D. “Oaths: theory and practice in the Histories of Herodotus and Thucydides.” In Thucydides and Herodotus, E. Foster and D. Lateiner, 154–184. Oxford: Oxford U. P., 2012.Search in Google Scholar
Lateiner, D. “Elpis as emotion and reason (hope and expectation) in fifth-century Greek historians.” In Hope in Ancient Literature, History, and Art, edited by G. Kazantzides and D. Spatharis, 131–149. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2018.10.1515/9783110598254-008Search in Google Scholar
Lazenby, J. The Defence of Greece. 490–479 BC. Warminster: Aris & Phillips, 1993.Search in Google Scholar
Lazenby, J. The Peloponnesian War. A Military Study. London: Aris & Phillips, 2004.10.4324/9780203508794Search in Google Scholar
Lewis, D. Sparta and Persia. Leiden: Brill, 1977.Search in Google Scholar
Lewis, S. News and Society in the Greek Polis. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, 1996.Search in Google Scholar
Liotsakis, V. Redeeming Thucydides’ Book VIII. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2017.10.1515/9783110533071Search in Google Scholar
Macan, R. Herodotus, The Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Book. London: Macmillan, 1895.Search in Google Scholar
Marincola, J. Authority and Tradition in Ancient Historiography. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 1997.10.1017/CBO9780511584831Search in Google Scholar
Munson, R. “Artemisia in Herodotus.” ClassAnt 7 (1988): 91–106.10.2307/25010881Search in Google Scholar
Mynott, J., editor and translator. The War of the Peloponnesians and the Athenians. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 2013.Search in Google Scholar
Parke, H. “Citation and recitation, a convention in early Greek historians.” Hermathena 67 (1946): 80–92.Search in Google Scholar
Parke, H. Greek Oracles. Oxford: Oxford U. P., 1967.Search in Google Scholar
Pearson, L. “Propaganda in the Archidamian war.” CPh 31 (1936): 33–52.10.1086/361892Search in Google Scholar
Powell, J. A Lexicon to Herodotus. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 1938.Search in Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. “Philosophy, science, politics: Herodotus and the intellectual trends of his time.” In Brill’s Companion to Herodotus, edited by E. Bakker, I. de Jong and H. van Wees, 149–186. Leiden: Brill, 2002.Search in Google Scholar
Rengakos, A. and A. Tsakmakis, editors. Brill’s Companion to Thucydides, Leiden: Brill, 2006.10.1163/9789047404842Search in Google Scholar
Rood, T. “Objectivity and authority: Thucydides’ historical method.” In Rengakos and Tsakmakis 2006, 223–249.10.1163/9789047404842_010Search in Google Scholar
Rosnow, R. and G. Fine. Rumor and Gossip. New York: Elsevier, 1976.Search in Google Scholar
Russell, F. Information Gathering in Classical Greece. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 199910.3998/mpub.23087Search in Google Scholar
Shu, K., et al., editors. Journalism, “Fake News” and Disinformation. New York: Springer, 2020.Search in Google Scholar
Stahl, H.-P. Thucydides. Swansea: University Press of Wales. 2003.Search in Google Scholar
Starr, C. Political Intelligence in Classical Greece. Leiden: Brill, 1974.10.1163/9789004327405Search in Google Scholar
Ste. Croix, G. de. The Class Struggle in the Ancient Greek World. London: Duckworth, 1981.Search in Google Scholar
Stein, H. Herodot. 5 Vols. Berlin: Wiedemann, 1887–1893.Search in Google Scholar
Thomas, R. Herodotus in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 2000.Search in Google Scholar
Thomas, R. “Thucydides’ intellectual milieu and the plague.” In Rengakos and Tsakmakis 2006, 87–108.10.1163/9789047404842_005Search in Google Scholar
Thomas, R. “Thucydides and his intellectual milieu.” In Balot, Forsdyke and Foster 2017, 567–586.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199340385.013.15Search in Google Scholar
West, S. “Herodotus’ epigraphical interests.” CQ 35 (1985): 278–305.10.1017/S0009838800040179Search in Google Scholar
Westlake, H. Individuals in Thucydides. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 1968.Search in Google Scholar
Westlake, H. Studies in Thucydides and Greek History. Orig. ed. 1973. Chippenham: Bristol Classical, 1989.Search in Google Scholar
Will, E. Doriens et Ioniens. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1956.Search in Google Scholar
Wolpert, A. “Thucydides on the Four Hundred and the fall of Athens.” In Balot, Forsdyke and Foster 2017, 179–191.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199340385.013.26Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
