Abstract
The role of syllable weight in Gújjolaay Eegimaa, an Atlantic language spoken in south-western Senegal, is evidenced by reduplicative patterns in the perfective stem, where we witness a difference in the surface representation of verb roots with underlying voiced obstruents from those with underlying voiceless obstruents. We argue that voiced plosives are weight bearing and therefore considered as moraic when in coda position in this language. We attribute the triggering of the gemination in the reduplicative perfective with roots having final voiced plosives to compensatory lengthening in order to make up for the loss of a mora as motivated by Hayes (1989). Gemination, rather than vowel lengthening, occurs because, as stated by de Chene and Anderson (1979) compensatory lengthening of vowels only occurs in a language where vowel length is contrastive. In this paper, we show evidence to support the proposition that there are no long vowels in this variety of Eegimaa, and therefore gemination (which is a contrastive feature in the language) is the repair strategy employed to compensate for the loss of a mora. Through a description of the weight-related processes observed in perfective reduplication in Eegimaa, we will detail the moraic analysis of the various patterns and discuss general phonological implications.
Eegimaa abstract
Ñammeŋe uomal me n’elob, pan úgulenoral bavvoger babu baa waf wawu wo nulobale me mala wo. Uno me n’eggitten búoh an natebe waf, nújue uoh natetteb. Eno bi epikkor bavvoger babu, pan uoh na teb-teb. Burokk babu bo joom me n’ekkan toute, eggitten wa ukkane, ni bu balober ti boubu nahi búgulenori.
Funding source: European Research Council (ERC)
Funding source: Leverhulme Trust Research
Funding source: ESRC
Funding: This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No 758232). This work was also funded in part by the Leverhulme Trust Research Project Grant ‘Crossroads: Investigating the Unexplored Side of Multilingualism’, ESRC & Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) (Grant number ES/P000304/1) and ESRC Future Research Leaders Grant (Grant K001922/1).
References
Bassène, Alain C. 2007. Morphosyntaxe du jóola banjal: Langue atlantique du Sénégal. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe.Search in Google Scholar
Bassène, Mamadou. 2012. Morphophonology of Joola Eegimaa. PhD thesis. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.Search in Google Scholar
de Chene Brent & Stephen R Anderson. 1979. Compensatory lengthening. Language 55(3). 505–535. https://doi.org/10.2307/413316.Search in Google Scholar
Curtis, Emily. 2003. Geminate weight: Case studies and formal models. PhD thesis. Seattle, Washington: University of Washington.Search in Google Scholar
Davis, Stuart. 2000. The flowering of optimality theory: Ponapean nasal substitution and the problem of intermediate forms. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology 6. 249–305.Search in Google Scholar
Davis, Stuart. 2011a. Quantity. In John, Goldsmith, Jason Riggle & Alan Yu (eds.), The handbook of phonological theory, 103–140, 2nd edn. Malden, MA: Blackwell.10.1002/9781444343069.ch4Search in Google Scholar
Davis, Stuart. 2011b. Geminates. In Marc, van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, vol. 2, 837–859. Malden, MA and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0037Search in Google Scholar
Downing, Laura. 2006. Canonical forms in prosodic morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199286393.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Hantgan-Sonko, Abbie. 2017. A weight-based analysis of Jóola Eegimaa lenition. In Samuel, Obeng & Christopher Green (eds.), Festschrift for Paul Newman’s 80th Birthday African Linguistics in the 21st Century. Essays in Honor of Paul Newman, 47–56. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe.Search in Google Scholar
Hantgan-Sonko, Abbie. 2020. Synchronic and diachronic strategies of mora preservation in Gújjolaay Eegimaa. Journal of African Languages and Literatures 1. 1–25. https://doi.org/10.6092/jalalit.v1i1.6732.Search in Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1989. Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 20. 253–306.Search in Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry. 1985. A theory of phonological weight. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110854794Search in Google Scholar
Itô, Junko. 1988. Syllable theory in prosodic phonology. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, 1986. New York: Garland Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kager, René. 1999. Optimality theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511812408Search in Google Scholar
McCarthy, John. 1999. Sympathy and phonological opacity. Phonology 16. 331–399. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675799003784.Search in Google Scholar
McCarthy, John & Alan Prince. 1986. Prosodic morphology. Report no. RuCCS-TR-32.Search in Google Scholar
McCarthy, John, Wendell Kimper, & Kevin Mullin. 2012. Reduplication in harmonic serialism. Morphology 22. 173–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-012-9203-3.Search in Google Scholar
Morén, Bruce. 1999. Distinctiveness, coercion and sonority: A unified theory of weight. PhD thesis. College Park, Maryland: University of Maryland.Search in Google Scholar
Parker, Steven. 2002. Quantifying the sonority hierarchy. PhD thesis. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts.Search in Google Scholar
Parker, Steven. 2011. Sonority. In van Oostendorp Mark, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, vol. 2, 1160–1180. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1093/obo/9780199772810-0042Search in Google Scholar
Ringen, Catherine & Robert Vago. 2011. Geminates: Heavy or long? In Cairns Charles & Eric Remy (eds.), Handbook of the syllable, 155–169. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/ej.9789004187405.i-464.47Search in Google Scholar
Sagna, Serge. 2008. Formal and semantic properties of the Gújjolaay Eegimaa (a.k.a Banjal) nominal classification system. PhD thesis. London, UK: School of Oriental and African Studies.Search in Google Scholar
Sapir, David. 1965. A grammar of Diola Fogny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1991. On the inalterability of geminates. In Bertinetto Pier M., Michael Kenstowicz & Michele Loporcaro (eds.), Certamen phonologicum II: Papers from the 1990 cortona phonology meeting, 187–210. Turin: Rosenberg and Sellier.Search in Google Scholar
Zec, Draga. 1988. Sonority constraints on syllable structure. PhD thesis, Standford University, Stanford, California.10.1017/S0952675700002396Search in Google Scholar
Zec, Draga. 1995. Sonority constraints on syllable structure. Phonology 12. 85–129. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675700002396.Search in Google Scholar
Zec, Draga. 2007. The syllable. In de Lacy Paul (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of phonology, 161–193. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486371.009Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
