Abstract
The formation and perpetuation of intellectual canons – as consensually agreed upon corpora considered most significant and representative of a time, place or person – rely heavily on closed systems of knowledge. The bound-paper book exemplifies such a closed system and has been a primary form of constructing and disseminating canons of ancient works. The Internet, however, challenges the very structuring principles of knowledge production inherent in books, offering potentially boundless networks of unorchestrated knowledge bits. As scholars, teachers, and students turn more to the Internet for publication, research, and learning, sharply defined canons face disruption. This article analyzes some of the structuring principles of knowledge production and dissemination in the specific case of ancient Near Eastern art, first considering traditional book-based textbooks. These textbooks follow a model of linear temporal development that unfolds from the first to the last page. It then explores the academic trend toward edited, multi-authored compendia as a concurrent development with the open-ended, networked structure of the Internet. Both vehicles of knowledge production offer more diverse sets of works and multivocality; the Internet in particular permits a radical break from authored and edited narratives. Last, the article considers some of the possibilities, as well as limitations, inherent in the Internet, presenting several existing Internet-based platforms with a specific focus on pedogogy, in order to consider the implications and consequences for knowledge production and dissemination in the Digital Age.
Bibliography
Amiet, P. 1976. L’art d’Agadé au Musée du Louvre. Paris: Éditions des Musées nationaux.Search in Google Scholar
Baca, M. and A. Helmreich. 2013. Introduction. Visual Resources 29/1–2: 1–4. 10.1080/01973762.2013.761105.Search in Google Scholar
Bahrani, Z. 2017. Art of Mesopotamia. New York: Thames & Hudson.Search in Google Scholar
Battles, M. and M. Maizels. 2016. Collections and/of Data: Art History and the Art Museum in the DH Mode. Pp. 325–344 in Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016, eds. M.K. Gold and L.F. Klein. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.10.5749/j.ctt1cn6thb.30Search in Google Scholar
Booth, W.C., G.G. Colomb, and J.M. Williams. 2008. The Craft of Research, 3rd. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226062648.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Brown, B.A. and M.H. Feldman. eds. 2014. Critical Approaches to Ancient Near Eastern Art. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9781614510352Search in Google Scholar
Brzyski, A. 2007a. Introduction: Canons and Art History. Pp. 1–25 in Partisan Canons, ed. A. Brzyski. Durham and London: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822390374-001Search in Google Scholar
Brzyski, A. ed. 2007b. Partisan Canons. Durham and London: Duke University Press.10.2307/j.ctv125jnz7Search in Google Scholar
Camille, M., Z. Çelik, J. Onians, A. Rifkin, and C.B. Steiner. 1996. Rethinking the Canon. The Art Bulletin 78/2: 198–217.10.2307/3046172Search in Google Scholar
Chun, W.H.K., R. Grusin, P. Jagoda, and R. Raley. 2016. The Dark Side of the Digital Humanities. Pp. 493–509 in Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016, eds. M.K. Gold and L.F. Klein. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.10.5749/j.ctt1cn6thb.41Search in Google Scholar
Collon, D. 1995. Ancient Near Eastern Art. London: Published for the Trustees of the British Museum by British Museum Press.Search in Google Scholar
D’haen, T. 2011. How Many Canons Do We Need? World Literature, National Literature, European Literature. Pp. 19–37 in The Canonical Debate Today: Crossing Disciplinary and Cultural Boundaries, eds. L. Papadima, D. Damrosch and T. D’haen. Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi B.V.10.1163/9789042032828Search in Google Scholar
Duro, P. adn M. Greenhalgh. 1992. Essential Art History. London: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar
Earhart, A.E. 2012. Can Information Be Unfettered? Race and the New Digital Humanities Canon. Pp. 309–318 in Debates in the Digital Humanities, ed. M.K. Gold. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.10.5749/minnesota/9780816677948.003.0030Search in Google Scholar
Evans, J.M. 2012. Sumerian Origins, 1850–1930: Making the Body Visible. Pp. 15–45 in The Lives of Sumerian Sculpture: An Archaeology of the Early Dynastic Temple, J.M. Evans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139084147.002Search in Google Scholar
Fiormonte, D. 2016. Toward a Cultural Critique of Digital Humanities. Pp. 438–458 in Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016, eds. M.K. Gold and L.F. Klein. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.10.5749/j.ctt1cn6thb.38Search in Google Scholar
Franke, W. 2011. The Canon Question and the Value of Theory: Towards a New (Non-) Concept of Universality. Pp. 55–71 in The Canonical Debate Today: Crossing Disciplinary and Cultural Boundaries, eds. L. Papadima, D. Damrosch and T. D’haen. Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi B.V.10.1163/9789042032828_005Search in Google Scholar
Frankfort, H. 1996 [1954]. The Art and Architecture of the Ancient Orient, 5th. The Yale University Press Pelican History of Art. New Haven: Yale University Press. [first published Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England: Penguin Books, 1954]Search in Google Scholar
Gold, M.K. ed. 2012. Debates in the Digital Humanities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.10.5749/minnesota/9780816677948.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Gold, M.K. and L.F. Klein. eds. 2016. Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.10.5749/j.ctt1cn6thbSearch in Google Scholar
Gunter, A.C. ed. Forthcoming. A Companion to the Art of the Ancient Near East. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Halbertsma, M. 2007. The Call of the Canon: Why Art History Cannot Do Without. Pp. 16–30 in Making Art History: A Changing Discipline and Its Institutions, ed. E.C. Mansfield. New York and Oxon: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Harris, J. 2006. Art History: The Key Concepts. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203627198Search in Google Scholar
Locher, H. 2012. The Idea of the Canon and Canon Formation in Art History. Pp. 29–40 in Art History and Visual Studies in Europe: Transnational Discourses and National Frameworks, eds. M. Rampley, T. Lenain, H. Locher, A. Pinotti, C. Schoell-Glass and K. Zijlmans. Leiden and Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789004231702Search in Google Scholar
Mansfield, E.C. ed. 2007. Making Art History: A Changing Discipline and Its Institutions. New York and Oxon: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Mansfield, E.C. 2014. Google Art Project and Digital Scholarship in the Visual Arts—Http://Www.Google.Com/Culturalinstitute/Project/Art-Project. Visual Resources 30/1: 110–117. 10.1080/01973762.2014.879409.Search in Google Scholar
Martin, E. 2011. ‘Ceci tuera cela’? Literary Canons and the Challenge of Visual Imagery and Popular Culture. Pp. 229–245 in The Canonical Debate Today: Crossing Disciplinary and Cultural Boundaries, eds. L. Papadima, D. Damrosch and T. D’haen. Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi B.V.10.1163/9789042032828_018Search in Google Scholar
Moortgat, A. 1969. The Art of Ancient Mesopotamia: The Classical Art of the Near East. London and New York: Phaidon. [first published as Die Kunst des alten Mesopotamien: Die klassische Kunst Vorderasiens, Cologne: M. DuMont Schauberg, 1967]Search in Google Scholar
Papadima, L. 2011. Introduction: A Can(n)on in Need Is A Can(n)on Indeed. Pp. 9–16 in The Canonical Debate Today: Crossing Disciplinary and Cultural Boundaries, eds. L. Papadima, D. Damrosch and T. D’haen. Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi B.V.10.1163/9789042032828_002Search in Google Scholar
Parrot, A. 1961a. Sumer: The Dawn of Art. New York: Golden Press. [first published as Sumer, Paris: Librairie Gallimard, 1960]Search in Google Scholar
Parrot, A. 1961b. The Arts of Assyria. New York: Golden Press. [first published as Assur, Paris: Librairie Gallimard, 1961]Search in Google Scholar
Perry, G. and C. Cunningham. eds. 1999. Academies, Museums and Canons of Art. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Pollock, G. 1999. Differencing the Canon: Feminist Desire and the Writing of Art’s Histories. London and New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Reade, J. 2010. The Early Exploration of Assyria. Pp. 86–106 in Assyrian Reliefs from the Palace of Ashurnasirpal II: A Cultural Biography, eds. A. Cohen and S.E. Kangas. Hanover and London: University Press of New England.Search in Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, R. and R. Bass. 2007. Rewiring the History and Social Studies Classroom: Needs, Frameworks, Dangers, and Proposals. Pp. 92–109 in Clio Wired: The Future of the Past in the Digital Age, ed. R. Rosenzweig. New York: Columbia University Press. [first published in Journal of Education 181, no. 3 (1999), and Computing in the Social Sciences and Humanities, ed. Orville Vernon Burton (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2002), 20–48]Search in Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, R. and M. O’Malley. 2007. Brave New World or Blind Alley? American History on the World Wide Web. Pp. 155–178 in Clio Wired: The Future of the Past in the Digital Age, ed. R. Rosenzweig. New York: Columbia University Press. [first published in Journal of American History (June 1997): 132–55].Search in Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, R. 2007. Wikipedia: Can History Be Open Source. Pp. 51–82 in Clio Wired: The Future of the past in the Digital Age, ed. R. Rosenzweig. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Sasson, J.M. ed. 1995. Civilizations of the Ancient Near East, 4 Volumes. New York: Scribner.Search in Google Scholar
Sayers, J. 2016. Dropping the Digital. Pp. 475–492 in Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016, eds. M.K. Gold and L.F. Klein. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.10.5749/j.ctt1cn6thb.40Search in Google Scholar
Searle, J. 1990. The Storm over the University. The New York Times Review of Books. December 6, 1990.Search in Google Scholar
Weinberger, D. 2011. Too Big to Know: Rethinking Knowledge Now that the Facts Aren’t the Facts, Experts are Everywhere, and the Smartest Person in the Room Is the Room. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar
© 2017 Walter de Gruyter Inc., Boston/Berlin
