Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published online by De Gruyter January 7, 2022

Diabetic wound healing approaches: an update

Raghuvir Keni, Farmiza Begum, Karthik Gourishetti, Gollapalle Lakshminarayanashastry Viswanatha, Pawan Ganesh Nayak, Krishnadas Nandakumar and Rekha R Shenoy

Abstract

Diabetic wounds are of profound clinical importance. Despite immense efforts directed towards its management, it results in the development of amputations, following a diagnosis of diabetic foot. With a better understanding of the complexities of the microbalance involved in the healing process, researchers have developed advanced methods for the management of wounds as well as diagnostic tools (especially, for wound infections) to be delivered to clinics sooner. In this review, we address the newer developments that hope to drive the transition from bench to bedside in the coming decade.


Corresponding author: Rekha R Shenoy, Department of Pharmacology, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India, E-mail:
Raghuvir Keni and Farmiza Begum contributed equally to this work.

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author Contribution: Conceptualization R.K.; Investigation R.K., K.G.; Original draft preparation R.K, F.B., K.G.; Review, and Editing G.L.V., K.G., P.N., R.R.S.; Image designing R.K.; Supervision K.N., R.R.S.

  3. Conflict of Interest: Authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1. Ghosh, P, Valia, R. Burden of Diabetic Foot Ulcers in India: Evidence Landscape from Published Literature. Value Heal. 2017;20:A485, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2017.08.489.Search in Google Scholar

2. Wallace, HA, Zito, PM. Wound Healing Phases. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2019.Search in Google Scholar

3. Urao, N, Koh, TJ. Manipulating inflammation to improve healing. Wound Heal Biomater. 2016:117–50, https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-78242-455-0.00005-7.Search in Google Scholar

4. Park, JE, Barbul, A. Understanding the role of immune regulation in wound healing. Am J Surg. 2004;187:S11–6, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(03)00296-4.Search in Google Scholar

5. Postlethwaite, AE, Keski-Oja, J, Moses, HL, Kang, AH. Stimulation of the chemotactic migration of human fibroblasts by transforming growth factor-beta. J Exp Med. 1987;165:251–6, https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.165.1.251.Search in Google Scholar

6. Li, W, Fan, J, Chen, M, Guan, S, Sawcer, D, Bokoch, GM, et al.. Mechanism of human dermal fibroblast migration driven by type I collagen and platelet-derived growth factor-BB. Mol Biol Cell. 2004;15:294–309, https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e03-05-0352.Search in Google Scholar

7. Barrientos, S, Stojadinovic, O, Golinko, MS, Brem, H, Tomic-Canic, M. Growth factors and cytokines in wound healing. Wound Repair Regen. 2008;16:585–601, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-475x.2008.00410.x.Search in Google Scholar

8. Efron, DT, Witte, MB, Barbul, A. Wound Healing: Physiology, Clinical Progress, Growth Factors, and the Secret of the Fetus. Mult Organ Fail. 2000:553–61, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1222-5_56.Search in Google Scholar

9. Pierce, GF, Mustoe, TA, Altrock, BW, Deuel, TF, Thomason, A. Role of platelet‐derived growth factor in wound healing. J Cell Biochem. 1991;45:319–26, https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.240450403.Search in Google Scholar

10. Lawrence, WT, Diegelmann, RF. Growth factors in wound healing. Clin Dermatol. 1994;12:157–69, https://doi.org/10.1016/0738-081x(94)90266-6.Search in Google Scholar

11. Gabbiani, G, Ryan, GB, Majno, G. Presence of modified fibroblasts in granulation tissue and their possible role in wound contraction. Experientia. 1971;27:549–50, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02147594.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Ud‐Din, S, Bayat, A. Keloid scarring or disease: Unresolved quasi‐neoplastic tendencies in the human skin. Wound Repair Regen. 2020;28:42–6.10.1111/wrr.12793Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Pastar, I, Stojadinovic, O, Yin, NC, Ramirez, H, Nusbaum, AG, Sawaya, A, et al.. Epithelialization in wound healing: a comprehensive review. Adv Wound Care. 2014;3:445–64, https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2013.0473.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Broughton, G, Janis, JE, Attinger, CE. The basic science of wound healing. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:12S–34S, https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000225430.42531.c2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Margolis, DJ, Hofstad, O, Feldman, HI. Association between renal failure and foot ulcer or lower-extremity amputation in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:1331–6, https://doi.org/10.2337/dc07-2244.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Ritz, E, Schömig, M, Schöomig, S, Standl, E, Allenberg, J. The diabetic foot in the dialyzed patient. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2000;11:1153–59, https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.V1161153.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Pinto, A, Tuttolomondo, A, Di Raimondo, D, Fernandez, P, La Placa, S, Di Gati, M, et al.. Cardiovascular risk profile and morbidity in subjects affected by type 2 diabetes mellitus with and without diabetic foot. Metabolism. 2008;57:676–82, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2008.01.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Weiss, N A critical review on the use of lipid apheresis and rheopheresis for treatment of peripheral arterial disease and the diabetic foot syndrome. Semin Dial. 2012;25:220–7, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-139x.2011.01036.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Wagner, FW. The diabetic foot. Orthopedics. 1987;10:163–72, https://doi.org/10.3928/0147-7447-19870101-28.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Bakker, K, Apelqvist, J, Lipsky, BA, Van Netten, JJ, Schaper, NC. The 2015 IWGDF guidance documents on prevention and management of foot problems in diabetes: development of an evidence-based global consensus. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016;32:2–6, https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.2694.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Wong, SL, Demers, M, Martinod, K, Gallant, M, Wang, Y, Goldfine, AB, et al.. Diabetes primes neutrophils to undergo NETosis, which impairs wound healing. Nat Med. 2015;21:815–9, https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3887.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Brem, H, Tomic-canic, M. Cellular and molecular basis of wound healing in diabetes. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:1219–22, https://doi.org/10.1172/jci32169.Search in Google Scholar

23. Basu Mallik, S, Jayashree, BS, Shenoy, RR. Epigenetic modulation of macrophage polarization- perspectives in diabetic wounds. J Diabetes Complications. 2018;32:524–30, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2018.01.015.Search in Google Scholar

24. Shaikh‐Kader, A, Houreld, NN, Rajendran, NK, Abrahamse, H. The link between advanced glycation end products and apoptosis in delayed wound healing. Cell Biochem Funct. 2019;37:432–42, https://doi.org/10.1002/cbf.3424.Search in Google Scholar

25. Greenhalgh, DG. Wound healing and diabetes mellitus. Clin Plast Surg. 2003;30:37–45, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0094-1298(02)00066-4.Search in Google Scholar

26. Loots, MAM, Kenter, SB, Au, FL, Van Galen, WJM, Middelkoop, E, Bos, JD, et al.. Fibroblasts derived from chronic diabetic ulcers differ in their response to stimulation with EGF, IGF-I, bFGF, and PDGF-AB compared to controls. Eur J Cell Biol. 2002;81:153–60, https://doi.org/10.1078/0171-9335-00228.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Alavi, A, Sibbald, RG, Mayer, D, Goodman, L, Botros, M, Armstrong, DG, et al.. Diabetic foot ulcers: Part I. Pathophysiology and prevention. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;1:e1–18, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2013.06.055.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Younan, G, Ogawa, R, Ramirez, M, Helm, D, Dastouri, P, Orgill, DP. Analysis of nerve and neuropeptide patterns in vacuum-assisted closure–treated diabetic murine wounds. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:87–96, https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e3181da86d0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Perez-Favila, A, Martinez-Fierro, ML, Rodriguez-Lazalde, JG, Cid-Baez, MA, Zamudio-Osuna, MDJ, Martinez-Blanco, MDR, et al.. Current therapeutic strategies in diabetic foot ulcers. Medicina. 2019;55:714, https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55110714.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

30. Volmer-Thole, M, Lobmann, R. Neuropathy and diabetic foot syndrome. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:917, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17060917.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

31. Hart, CE, Loewen-Rodriguez, A, Lessem, J. Dermagraft: use in the treatment of chronic wounds. Adv Wound Care. 2012;1:138–41, https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2011.0282.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

32. Marston, WA, Hanft, J, Norwood, P, Pollak, R, Dermagraft Diabetic Foot Ulcer Study Group. The efficacy and safety of Dermagraft in improving the healing of chronic diabetic foot ulcers: results of a prospective randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:1701–5, https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.26.6.1701.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Kirsner, RS, Margolis, DJ, Baldursson, BT, Petursdottir, K, Davidsson, OB, Weir, D, et al.. Fish skin grafts compared to human amnion/chorion membrane allografts: A double-blind, prospective, randomized clinical trial of acute wound healing. Wound Repair Regen. 2020;28:75–80, https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12761.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

34. Weller, C, Weller, C, Team, V. Interactive dressings and their role in moist wound management. Adv Text Wound Care. 2019:105–34, https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-102192-7.00004-7.Search in Google Scholar

35. Dr, M, Jha, A, Kumar, M, Ajmal, G, Bonde, GV, Mishra, B. Electrospun nanofiber based drug delivery platform: Advances in diabetic foot ulcer management. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2021;18:25–42, https://doi.org/10.1080/17425247.2021.1823966.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

36. Lee, CH, Hung, KC, Hsieh, MJ, Chang, SH, Juang, JH, Hsieh, IC, et al.. Core-shell insulin-loaded nanofibrous scaffolds for repairing diabetic wounds. Nanomedicine. 2020;24:102123, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2019.102123.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Ren, X, Han, Y, Wang, J, Jiang, Y, Yi, Z, Xu, H, et al.. An aligned porous electrospun fibrous membrane with controlled drug delivery – an efficient strategy to accelerate diabetic wound healing with improved angiogenesis. Acta Biomater. 2018;70:140–53, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.02.010.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

38. Xie, X, Li, D, Su, C, Cong, W, Mo, X, Hou, G, et al.. Functionalized biomimetic composite nanfibrous scaffolds with antibacterial and hemostatic efficacy for facilitating wound healing. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2019;16:1267–79, https://doi.org/10.1166/jbn.2019.2756.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

39. Weller, CD, Team, V, Sussman, G. First-line interactive wound dressing update: a comprehensive review of the evidence. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:155, https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.00155.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

40. Bowlby, M, Blume, P, Schmidt, B, Donegan, R. Safety and efficacy of Becaplermin gel in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Chronic Wound Care Manag Res. 2014;1:11–14, https://doi.org/10.2147/cwcmr.s64905.Search in Google Scholar

41. Diabetic ulcer gel gets black box warning [Internet]. Medscape. 2022 [cited 1 January 2022]. Available from: https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/575748.Search in Google Scholar

42. Merrell, JG, McLaughlin, SW, Tie, L, Laurencin, CT, Chen, AF, Nair, LS. Curcumin-loaded poly(ε-caprolactone) nanofibres: Diabetic wound dressing with anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2009;36:1149–56, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1681.2009.05216.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

43. Singla, R, Soni, S, Patial, V, Kulurkar, PM, Kumari, A, Mahesh, S, et al.. Cytocompatible anti-microbial dressings of syzygium cumini cellulose nanocrystals decorated with silver nanoparticles accelerate acute and diabetic wound healing. Sci Rep. 2017;7:10457, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08897-9.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

44. Kandhare, AD, Ghosh, P, Bodhankar, SL. Naringin, a flavanone glycoside, promotes angiogenesis and inhibits endothelial apoptosis through modulation of inflammatory and growth factor expression in diabetic foot ulcer in rats. Chem Biol Interact. 2014;219:101–12, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2014.05.012.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

45. Nicholas, MN, Yeung, J. Current status and future of skin substitutes for chronic wound healing. J Cutan Med Surg. 2017;21:23–30.10.1177/1203475416664037Search in Google Scholar PubMed

46. Lopes, L, Setia, O, Aurshina, A, Liu, S, Hu, H, Isaji, T, et al.. Stem cell therapy for diabetic foot ulcers: a review of preclinical and clinical research. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018;9:188.10.1186/s13287-018-0938-6Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

47. Chen, S, Quan, Y, Yu, YL, Wang, JH. Graphene quantum dot/silver nanoparticle hybrids with oxidase activities for antibacterial application. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2017;3:313–21.10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00644Search in Google Scholar PubMed

48. Li, YJ, Harroun, SG, Su, YC, Huang, CF, Unnikrishnan, B, Lin, HJ, et al.. Synthesis of self-assembled spermidine-carbon quantum dots effective against multidrug-resistant bacteria. Adv Healthc Mater. 2016;5:2545–54.10.1002/adhm.201600297Search in Google Scholar PubMed

49. Boomi, P, Ganesan, R, Prabu Poorani, G, Jegatheeswaran, S, Balakumar, C, Gurumallesh Prabu, H, et al.. Phyto-engineered gold nanoparticles (aunps) with potential antibacterial, antioxidant, and wound healing activities under in vitro and in vivo conditions. Int J Nanomedicine. 2020;15:7553–68.10.2147/IJN.S257499Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

50. Turnbaugh, PJ, Ley, RE, Hamady, M, Fraser-Liggett, CM, Knight, R, Gordon, JI. The human microbiome project. Nature. 2007;449:804–10.10.1038/nature06244Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

51. Long, J, Cai, Q, Steinwandel, M, Hargreaves, MK, Bordenstein, SR, Blot, WJ, et al.. Association of oral microbiome with type 2 diabetes risk. J Periodontal Res. 2017;52:636–43.10.1111/jre.12432Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

52. Chen, B, Wang, Z, Wang, J, Su, X, Yang, J, Zhang, Q, et al.. The oral microbiome profile and biomarker in Chinese type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Endocrine. 2020;68:564–72.10.1007/s12020-020-02269-6Search in Google Scholar PubMed

53. Ong, JS, Taylor, TD, Yong, CC, Khoo, BY, Sasidharan, S, Choi, SB, et al.. Lactobacillus plantarum USM8613 aids in wound healing and Suppresses Staphylococcus aureus infection at wound sites. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2020;12:125–37.10.1007/s12602-018-9505-9Search in Google Scholar

54. Kim, JH, Ruegger, PR, Lebig, EG, VanSchalkwyk, S, Jeske, DR, Hsiao, A, et al.. High levels of oxidative stress create a microenvironment that significantly decreases the diversity of the microbiota in diabetic chronic wounds and promotes biofilm formation. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:259.10.3389/fcimb.2020.00259Search in Google Scholar

55. Hernandez, R. The use of systemic antibiotics in the treatment of chronic wounds. Dermatol Ther. 2006;19:326–37.10.1111/j.1529-8019.2006.00091.xSearch in Google Scholar

56. Lipsky, BA, Berendt, AR. Principles and practice of antibiotic therapy of diabetic foot infections. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2000;16:S42–6.10.1002/1520-7560(200009/10)16:1+<::AID-DMRR109>3.0.CO;2-BSearch in Google Scholar

57. Kalan, LR, Meisel, JS, Loesche, MA, Horwinski, J, Soaita, I, Chen, X, et al.. Strain- and species-level variation in the microbiome of diabetic wounds is associated with clinical outcomes and therapeutic efficacy. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;25:641–55.10.1016/j.chom.2019.03.006Search in Google Scholar

58. Ogba, OM, Nsan, E, Eyam, ES. Aerobic bacteria associated with diabetic foot ulcers and their susceptibility pattern. Biomed Dermatol; 2019;3:1–6.10.1186/s41702-019-0039-xSearch in Google Scholar

59. Yue, H, He, Y, Fan, E, Wang, L, Lu, S, Fu, Z. Label-free electrochemiluminescent biosensor for rapid and sensitive detection of pseudomonas aeruginosa using phage as highly specific recognition agent. Biosens Bioelectron; 2017;94:429–32.10.1016/j.bios.2017.03.033Search in Google Scholar

60. Brown, MS, Ashley, B, Koh, A. Wearable technology for chronic wound monitoring: current dressings, advancements, and future prospects. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018;6:1–21.10.3389/fbioe.2018.00047Search in Google Scholar

61. Lim, J, Choi, J, Guk, K, Son, SU, Lee, DK, Yeom, SJ, et al.. Peptidoglycan binding protein (PGBP)-modified magnetic nanobeads for efficient magnetic capturing of Staphylococcus aureus associated with sepsis in blood. Sci Rep. 2019;9:1–7.10.1038/s41598-018-37194-2Search in Google Scholar

62. S GARY, Alhogail, S, Zourob, M. Rapid and low-cost biosensor for the detection of Staphylococcus aureus. Biosens Bioelectron; 2017;90:230–7.10.1016/j.bios.2016.11.047Search in Google Scholar

63. Costantini, E, Sinjari, B, D’Angelo, C, Murmura, G, Reale, M, Caputi, S. Human gingival fibroblasts exposed to extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields: in vitro model of wound-healing improvement. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:2108.10.3390/ijms20092108Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

64. Stratmann, B, Costea, TC, Nolte, C, Hiller, J, Schmidt, J, Reindel, J, et al.. Effect of cold atmospheric plasma therapy vs standard therapy placebo on wound healing in patients with diabetic foot ulcers: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw open. 2020;3:e2010411.10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.10411Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

65. Fathollah, S, Mirpour, S, Mansouri, P, Dehpour, AR, Ghoranneviss, M, Rahimi, N, et al.. Investigation on the effects of the atmospheric pressure plasma on wound healing in diabetic rats. Sci Rep. Nature2016;6:1–9.10.1038/srep19144Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

66. Mohd Nasir, N, Lee, BK, Yap, SS, Thong, KL, Yap, SL. Cold plasma inactivation of chronic wound bacteria. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2016;605:76–85.10.1016/j.abb.2016.03.033Search in Google Scholar PubMed

67. Kang, SM, Cho, H, Jeon, D, Park, SH, Shin, DS, Heo, CY. A matrix metalloproteinase sensing biosensor for the evaluation of chronic wounds. Biochip J. 2019;13:323–32.10.1007/s13206-019-3403-4Search in Google Scholar

68. Gianino, E, Miller, C, Gilmore, J. Smart wound dressings for diabetic chronic wounds. Bioengineering. 2018;5:51.10.3390/bioengineering5030051Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

69. Nixon, M, Moore, C. White paper a three-dimensional approach to measuring, imaging and documenting wounds evidence-based wound surveillance [Internet]. Aranzmedical.com. 2016 [cited 4 January 2022]. Available from: https://www.aranzmedical.com/wp-content/uploads/ARANZ-Medical_WP_Evidence-Based-Wound-Surveillance_201608_A4.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

70. RoyChoudhury, S, Umasankar, Y, Jaller, J, Herskovitz, I, Mervis, J, Darwin, E, et al.. Continuous monitoring of wound healing using a wearable enzymatic uric acid biosensor. J Electrochem Soc. 2018;165:B3168–75.10.1149/2.0231808jesSearch in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-11-09
Accepted: 2021-12-19
Published Online: 2022-01-07

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Scroll Up Arrow