Skip to content
Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Oldenbourg February 16, 2016

Firms’ Evaluation of Location Quality: Evidence from East Germany

Alexander Eickelpasch, Georg Hirte and Andreas Stephan

Abstract

Our study provides evidence for firms’ evaluation of location quality. We use a 2004 survey of 6,000 East German firms that contained questions on the importance and assessment of 15 different location factors ranging from closeness to customers and suppliers, transport infrastructure, and proximity to research institutions and universities, as well as questions about the local financial institutions and region’s “image”. The results show (1) a great deal of heterogeneity in terms of which firm- or regional-level characteristics are important in the evaluation of a specific location factor, (2) that the model’s explanatory power is, overall, low and thus neither location characteristics nor internal factors are fully reflected in the perceptions of location quality, (3) that a firm’s business situation and whether a location factor is considered important have explanatory power for perception. One policy-relevant conclusion that we derive from these findings is that location policy should consider firms’ perception of a specific location in addition to improving the actual attributes of that location.

JEL Classification: R3; R12; L2

References

Adams, J.D., A.B. Jaffe (1996), Bounding the Effects of R&D: An Investigation Using Matched Establishment-Firm Data. Rand Journal of Economics 27: 700–721.Search in Google Scholar

Alcácer, J., W. Chung (2007), Location Strategies and Knowledge Spillovers. Management Science 53: 760–776.Search in Google Scholar

Arauzo-Carod, J.-M., D. Liviano-Solid, M. Manjón-Antolín (2010), Empirical Studies in Industrial Location: An Assessment of Their Methods and Results. Journal of Regional Science 50: 685–711.Search in Google Scholar

Arauzo, J.M., M. Manjón (2004), Firm Size and Geographical Aggregation: An Empirical Appraisal in Industrial Location. Small Business Economics 22: 299–312.Search in Google Scholar

Audretsch, DB., O. Falck, M.P. Feldman, S. Heblich (2012), Local Entrepreneurship in Context. Regional Studies 46: 379–389.Search in Google Scholar

Bade, F.-J., E.A. Nerlinger (2000), The Spatial Distribution of New Technology-Based Firms: Empirical Results for West-Germany. Papers in Regional Science 79: 155–176.Search in Google Scholar

Baldwin, J.R., W.M. Brown, D.L. Rigby (2010), Agglomeration Economies: Microdata Panel Estimates from Canadian Manufacturing. Journal of Regional Science 50: 915–934.Search in Google Scholar

Barrios, S., H. Gorg, E. Strobl (2006), Multinationals’ Location Choice, Agglomeration Economies and Public Incentives. International Regional Science Review 29: 81–107.Search in Google Scholar

Basile, R., D. Castellani, A. Zanfei (2008), Location Choice of Multinational Firms in Europe: Empirical Results for West-Germany. Papers in Regional Science 79: 155–176.Search in Google Scholar

Bathelt, H., Glückler, J. (2011), The Relational Economy: Geographies of Knowing and Learning. Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Beaudry, C., A. Schiffauerova (2009), Who’s Right, Marshall or Jacobs? The Localization versus Urbanization Debate. Research Policy 38: 318–337.Search in Google Scholar

Beise, M., H. Stahl (1999), Public Research and Industrial Innovations in Germany. Research Policy 28: 397–422.Search in Google Scholar

Brouwer, A.E., I. Mariotti, J.N. van Ommeren (2004), The Firm Relocation Decision: An Empirical Investigation. Annals of Regional Science 38: 335–347.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, J.P., R.J.G.M. Florax, K.T. McNamara (2009), Determinants of Investment Flows in U.S. manufacturing. Review of Regional Studies 39: 269–286.Search in Google Scholar

Buch, C., J. Kleinert, A. Lipponer, F. Toubal (2005), Determinants and Effects of Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from German Firm-Level Data. Economic Policy 41: 51–110.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, M.X., M.O. Moore (2010), Location Decision of Heterogeneous Multinational Firms. Journal of International Economics 80: 188–199.Search in Google Scholar

Combes, P.-P., G. Duranton, L. Gobillon (2011), The Identification of Agglomeration Economies. Journal of Economic Geography 11: 253–266.Search in Google Scholar

Combes, P.-P., T. Magnac, J.-M. Robin (2004), The Dynamics of Local Employment in France. Journal of Urban Economics 56: 217–243.Search in Google Scholar

Crozet, M., T. Mayer, J.-L. Mucchielli (2004), How Do Firms Agglomerate? A Study of FDI in France. Regional Science and Urban Economics 34: 27–54.Search in Google Scholar

Cyert, R.M., J.G. March, (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NI: Prentice Hall.Search in Google Scholar

Czarnitzki, D., H. Hottenrott (2009), Are Local Milieus the Key to Innovation Performance. Journal of Regional Science 49: 81–112.Search in Google Scholar

De Mooij, R.A., S. Ederveen (2003), Taxation and Foreign Direct Investment: A Synthesis of Empirical Research. International Tax and Public Finance 10: 673–693.Search in Google Scholar

Devreux, M.P., R. Griffith, H. Simpson (2007), Firm Location Decisions, Regional Grants and Agglomeration Externalities. Journal of Public Economics 91: 41–435.Search in Google Scholar

Eickelpasch, A., I. Pfeiffer (2006), Unternehmen in Ostdeutschland – wirtschaftlicher Erfolg mit Innovationen. Wochenbericht des DIW 73(14): 173–180.Search in Google Scholar

Feld, L.P., J.H. Heckemeyer (2011), FDI and Taxation: A Meta-Study. Journal of Economic Surveys 25: 233–272.Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, G., J. Wahse, V. Dahms, M. Frei, A. Riedmann, F. Janik (2007), Standortbedingungen und Beschäftigung in den Regionen West- und Ostdeutschlands: Ergebnisse des IAB-Betriebspanels 2006, IAB-Forschungsbericht, No. 2007, 5.Search in Google Scholar

Frenkel, A. (2001), Why High-Technology Firms Choose to Locate in or Near Metropolitan Areas. Urban Studies 38:1083–1101.Search in Google Scholar

Gordon, I.R., P. McCann (2005), Innovation, Agglomeration and Regional Development. Journal of Economic Geography 5: 523–543.Search in Google Scholar

Grabow, B., D. Henckel et al. (1995), Weiche Standortfaktoren: Schriftenreihe des Deutschen Instituts für Urbanistik 89.Search in Google Scholar

Grundig, B., C. Pohl, H. Schmalholz (2008), Ostdeutschland im internationalen Standortvergleich. ifo berichtet 1/2008: 33–40.Search in Google Scholar

Guimarães, P., O. Figuiredo, D. Woodward (2004), Industrial Location Modelling: Extending the Random Utility Framework. Journal of Regional Science 44: 1–20.Search in Google Scholar

Haltiwanger, J.C., J.I. Lane, J.R. Spletzer (1999), Productivity Differences Across Employers: The Roles of Employer Size, Age and Human Capital. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 53: 1–28.Search in Google Scholar

Hayter, R. (1997), The Dynamics of Industrial Location. Chichester: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

Head, K., T. Mayer (2004), Market Potential and the Location of Japanese Investment in the European Union. The Review of Economics and Statistics 86: 959–972.Search in Google Scholar

Helpman, E., M. Melitz, S. Yeaple (2004), Export versus FDI with Heterogeneous Firms. American Economic Review 94: 605–627.Search in Google Scholar

Henderson, V. (2003), Marshall’s Scale Economies. Journal of Urban Economics 89: 94–98.Search in Google Scholar

Hodgson, G. (1988), Economic Institutions: A Manifesto for a Modern Institutional Economics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hoogstra, G.J., J. van Dijk (2004), Explaining Firm Employment Growth: Does Location Matter? Small Business Economics 22: 179–192.Search in Google Scholar

Jaffe, A., M. Trajtenberg, R. Henderson (1993), Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108: 577–598.Search in Google Scholar

Jofre-Monseny, J., R. Marín-López, E. Viladecans-Marsal (2011), The Mechanisms of Agglomeration: Evidence from the Effect of Inter-Industry Relations on the Location of New Firms. Journal of Urban Economics 70: 61–74.Search in Google Scholar

Krugman, P. (1991), Increasing Returns and Economic Geography. Journal of Political Economy 99: 483–499.Search in Google Scholar

Lejpras, A., A. Eickelpasch, A. Stephan (2011), Locational and Internal Sources of Firms Competitive Advantage: Applying Porter’s Diamond Model at the Firm Level. Journal of Strategic Management Education 7: 1–26.Search in Google Scholar

Lejpras, A., A. Stephan (2011), Locational Conditions, Cooperation, and Innovativeness: Evidence from Research and Company Spin-Offs. Annals of Regional Science 46: 543–575.Search in Google Scholar

Lundvall, B.-A., B. Johnson (1994), The Learning Economy. Journal of Industry Studies 1: 23–42.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, P., T. Mayer, F. Mayneris (2011), Spatial Concentration and Plant-Level Productivity in France. Journal of Urban Economics 69: 182–195.Search in Google Scholar

Maskell, P., H. Eskelinen, I. Hannibalsson, A. Malmberg, E. Vatne (2002), Competitiveness, Localised Learning and Regional Development – Specialisation and Prosperity in Small Open Economies 14. Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Mayer, T., I. Mejean, B. Nefussi (2010), The Location of Domestic and Foreign Production Affiliates by French Multinational Firms. Journal of Urban Economics 68: 115–128.Search in Google Scholar

McDermott, P.J., M.J. Taylor (1996), Attitudes, Images, and Location: The Subjective Context of Decision Making in New Zealand Manufacturing. Economic Geography 52: 325–347.Search in Google Scholar

Meesters, W.J. (2004), Locational Preferences of Entrepreneurs. Stated Preferences in the Netherlands and Germany (Contributions to Economics). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Moretti, E., (2004), Workers’ Education, Spillovers, and Productivity: Evidence from Plant-Level Production Functions. American Economic Review 94: 656–690.Search in Google Scholar

Nelson, R.R., S.G. Winter (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of the Firm. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Search in Google Scholar

Powell, W. (1990), Neither Market Nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organizations. Research in Organizational Behaviour 12: 295–336.Search in Google Scholar

Pred, A. (1967), Behaviour and location, Part I. Lund studies in Geography, Series B, No. 27. Lund: University of Lund.Search in Google Scholar

Rigby, D.L., J. Essletzbichler (2002), Agglomeration Economies and Productivity Differences in US Cities. Journal of Economic Geography 2: 407–432.Search in Google Scholar

Roodman, D. (2011), Estimating Fully Observed Recursive Mixed-Process Models with CMP. Stata Journal 11: 159–206.Search in Google Scholar

Roodman, D. (2014), CMP: Stata module to implement conditional (recursive) mixed process estimator. Statistical software components. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s456882.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Stephan, A. (2011), Locational Conditions and Firm Performance: Introduction to the Special Issue. Annals of Regional Science 46: 487–494.Search in Google Scholar

Stephan, A. (2014), Are Public Research Spin-Offs More Innovative? Small Business Economics 43: 353–368.Search in Google Scholar

Strange, W., W. Hejyzi, J. Tang (2006), The Uncertain City: Competitive Instability, Skills, Innovation and the Strategy of Agglomeration. Journal of Urban Economics 59: 331–351.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, M., B. Asheim (2001), The Concept of the Firm in Economic Geography. Economic Geography 77: 315–328.Search in Google Scholar

van Dijk, J., P.H. Pellenbarg (2000), Firm Relocation Decisions in The Netherlands: An Ordered Logit Approach. Papers in Regional Science 79: 191–219.Search in Google Scholar

Zukin, S., DiMaggio, P. (eds.) (1990), Structures of Capital: The Organization of the Economy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-2-16
Published in Print: 2016-3-1

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton