Abstract
Digital labour platforms have been increasingly gaining popularity over the past decade. In particular, there has been much debate about workers’ motivations and working conditions on microtask platforms. There exists little evidence on whether dependence on digital microtask platforms provides workers with work and income security in the long term and whether it provides opportunities for skill development. This paper explores the extent to which the seemingly flexible platform work ensures work and income security and provides opportunities for skill development for workers with different levels of experience, based on novel survey data collected on five globally operating microtask platforms and in-depth interviews with workers. The findings show that despite high financial dependence on this work, returns to experience on the platform are meagre in terms of earnings, and highly experienced workers face the same risks as new entrants with regard to discrimination, high work intensity, lack of autonomy and control over work, and social protection. There is also a skills gap between the nature of tasks available on these microtask platforms and the workers’ education levels. Finally, experience does not ensure that workers have the opportunities to undertake complex and challenging tasks, and the possibilities to develop their skills and improve career prospects are limited.
References
Agrawal, A., J.J. Horton, N. Lacetera, E. Lyons (2015), Digitization and the Contract Labor Market: A Research Agenda. pp. 219–250 in: A. Goldfrab, S.M. Greenstein, C.E. Tucker (eds.), Economic Analysis of the Digital Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226206981.003.0008Search in Google Scholar
Barnes, S.A., A. Green, M. de Hoyos (2015), Crowdsourcing and Work: Individual Factors and Circumstances Influencing Employability. New Technology. Work and Employment 30 (1): 16–31.10.1111/ntwe.12043Search in Google Scholar
Beerepoot, N., B. Lambregts (2015), Competition in Online Job Marketplaces: Towards a Global Labour Market for Outsourcing Services. Global Networks 15 (2): 236–255.10.1111/glob.12051Search in Google Scholar
Berg, J. (2016), Income Security in the On-Demand Economy: Findings and Policy Lessons from a Survey of Crowdworkers. Conditions of Work and Employment Series No. 74.Search in Google Scholar
Berg, J., M. Furrer, E. Harmon, U. Rani, M.S. Silberman (2018), Digital Labour Platforms and the Future of Work: Towards Decent Work in the Online World. Geneva: ILO.Search in Google Scholar
Bergvall-Kareborn, B., D. Howcroft (2014), Amazon Mechanical Turk and the Commodification of Labour. New Technology, Work and Employment 29 (3): 213–223.10.1111/ntwe.12038Search in Google Scholar
Bertschek, I., J. Ohnemus, S. Viete (2016), Befragunng zum sozioökonomischen Hintergrund und zu den Motiven von Crowdworkern. Forschungsbericht 462. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales.Search in Google Scholar
Borchert, K., M. Hirth, M. Kummer, U. Laitenberger, O. Slivko, S. Viete (2018), Unemployment and Online Labor. ZEW Discussion Paper No. 18–023.10.2139/ssrn.3178692Search in Google Scholar
Bourdreau, K.J., K.R. Lakhani (2013), Using the Crowd as an Innovation Partner. Harvard Business Review April 2013. https://hbr.org/2013/04/using-the-crowd-as-an-innovation-partner.Search in Google Scholar
Cantarella, M., C. Strozzi (2018), Labour Market Effects of Crowdwork in US and EU: An Empirical Investigation. Paper presented at the 2nd IZA/OECD Workshop on Labour Productivity and the Digital Economy, Paris.Search in Google Scholar
Cheng, J., J. Teevan, S.T. Iqbal, M.S. Bernstein (2015), Break It Down: A Comparison of Macro- and Micro-Tasks. Proceedings of the CHI ‘15 Conference, Seoul, pp. 4061–4064.Search in Google Scholar
De Stefano, V. (2016), The Rise of the “Just-In-Time Workforce”: On-Demand Work, Crowdwork and Labour Protection in the “Gig-Economy”. Conditions of Work and Employment Series No. 71.10.2139/ssrn.2682602Search in Google Scholar
Dillahunt, T.R., A.R. Malone (2015), The Promise of the Sharing Economy among Disadvantaged Communities. Proceedings of the CHI ‘15 Conference, Seoul, pp. 2285–2294.10.1145/2702123.2702189Search in Google Scholar
Dontcheva, M., R. Morris, J. Brandt, E. Gerber (2014), Combining Crowdsourcing and Learning to Improve Engagement and Performance. Proceedings of the CHI ‘14 Conference, Toronto, pp. 3379–3388.10.1145/2556288.2557217Search in Google Scholar
Dow, S., A. Kulkarni, S. Klemmer, B. Hartmann (2012), Shepherding the Crowd Yields Better Work. Proceedings of the CSCW ‘12 Conference, Seattle, pp. 1013–1022.10.1145/2145204.2145355Search in Google Scholar
Durward, D., I. Blohm (2017), I Am a Crowd Worker – How Individuals Identify with a New Form of Digital Work. Proceedings of the 25th ECIS Conference, Guimarães, pp. 3025–3035.Search in Google Scholar
European Parliament (2017), The Social Protection of Workers in the Platform Economy. Brussels: European Union.Search in Google Scholar
Felstiner, A. (2011), Working the Crowd: Employment and Labour Law in the Crowdsourcing Industry. Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labour Law 32 (1): 143–204.Search in Google Scholar
Gadiraju, U., R. Kawase, S. Dietze (2014), A Taxonomy of Micro Tasks on the Web. Proceedings of the HT ‘14 Conference, Santiago, pp. 218–223.Search in Google Scholar
Graham, M., I. Hjorth, V. Lehdonvirta (2017), Digital Labour and Development: Impacts of Global Digital Labour Platforms and the Gig Economy on Worker Livelihoods. Transfer 23 (2): 135–162.10.1177/1024258916687250Search in Google Scholar
Hara, K., A. Adams, K. Milland, S. Savage, C. Callison-Burch, J.P. Bigham (2018), A Data-Driven Analysis of Workers’ Earning on AMT. Proceedings of the CHI ‘18 Conference, Montreal.10.1145/3173574.3174023Search in Google Scholar
Hirth, M., T. Hossfeld, P. Tran-Gia (2011), Anatomy of a Crowdsourcing Platform - Using the Example of Microworkers.Com. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing (IMIS), pp. 322–329. IEEE.10.1109/IMIS.2011.89Search in Google Scholar
Howe, J. (2006), Crowdsourcing: A definition. Retrieved on 2018-02-20: http://crowdsourcing.typepad.com/cs/2006/06/crowdsourcing_a.html.Search in Google Scholar
Hug, A.S. (2017), Crowdwork als Form der Arbeits-intergration von jungen Erwachsenene mit einer psychischen Störung (Master Thesis). Hochschule für Soziale Arbeit FHNW, Olten.Search in Google Scholar
Huws, U., N.H. Spencer, D.S. Syrdal, H. Holts (2017), Work in the European Gig Economy: Research Results from the UK, Sweden, Germany, Austria, the Netherlands, Switzerland and Italy. Brussels: FEPS, UNI Europa and University of Hertfordshire.Search in Google Scholar
ILO (2016). Non-Standard Employment around the World: Understanding Challenges, Shaping Prospects. Geneva: ILO.Search in Google Scholar
Ipeirotis, P.G. (2010), Analyzing the Amazon Mechanical Turk Marketplace. ACM XRDS 17 (2): 16–21.10.1145/1869086.1869094Search in Google Scholar
Irani, L.C., M.S. Silberman (2013), Turkopticon: Interrupting Worker Invisibility in Amazon Mechanical Turk. Proceedings of the CHI ‘13 Conference, New York, pp. 611–620.10.1145/2470654.2470742Search in Google Scholar
Johnston, H., C. Land-Kazlauskas (2018), Organizing On-Demand: Representation, Voice, and Collective Bargaining in the Gig Economy. Conditions of Work and Employment Series No. 94, Geneva, ILO.Search in Google Scholar
Kässi, O., V. Lehdonvirta (2016), Online Labour Index: Measuring the Online Gig Economy for Policy and Research. Paper presented at Internet, Politics & Policy 2016, Oxford, UK, 22–23 September. Retrieved on 2018-2-20: http://ilabour.oii.ox.ac.uk/online-labour-index/.10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.056Search in Google Scholar
Katz, L.F., A.B. Krueger (2016), The Rise and Nature of Alternative Work Arrangements in the United States, 1995–2015. NBER Working Paper Series, No. w22667.10.3386/w22667Search in Google Scholar
Kessler, S. (2018), The Crazy Hacks One Woman Used to Make Money on Mechanical Turk. Wired (12 06 2018).https://www.wired.com/story/the-crazy-hacks-one-woman-used-to-make-money-on-mechanical-turk/.Search in Google Scholar
Kittur, A., J.V. Nickerson, M.S. Bernstein, E.M. Gerber, A. Shaw, J. Zimmerman, M. Lease, J.J. Horton (2013), The Future of Crowd Work. Proceedings of the CSCW ‘13 Conference, San Antonio, TX, pp- 1301–1318.10.1145/2441776.2441923Search in Google Scholar
Kuek, S.C., C. Paradi-Guilford, T. Fayomi, S. Imaizumi, P. Ipeirotis, P. Pina, M. Singh (2015), The Global Opportunity in Online Outsourcing. Washington, DC: World Bank.Search in Google Scholar
Lehdonvirta, V. (2017), The online gig economy grew 26% over the past year. Retrieved on 2018-07-18: http://ilabour.oii.ox.ac.uk/the-online-gig-economy-grew-26-over-the-past-year/.Search in Google Scholar
Leimeister, J.M., D. Durward, S. Zogaj (2016), Crowd Worker in Deutschland: Eine empirische Studie zum Arbeitsumfeld auf externen Crowdsourcing-Platformen. Study der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, No. 323, Düsseldorf, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung.Search in Google Scholar
Margaryan, A. (2016), Understanding Crowdworkers’ Learning Practices. Proceedings of Internet, Policy and Politics 2016 Conference, Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, UK.Search in Google Scholar
Margaryan, A. (2017), Nature of work tasks in crowdwork: microwork vs. online freelancing. Retrieved on 2018-7-10: https://chartingthelabyrinths.wordpress.com/2017/12/07/nature-of-work-tasks-in-crowdwork-microwork-vs-online-freelancing/.Search in Google Scholar
Martin, D., B.V. Hanrahan, J. O’Neill, N. Gupta (2014), Being a Turker. Proceedings of the CSCW ‘14 Conference, Baltimore, MD, pp. 224–235.10.1145/2531602.2531663Search in Google Scholar
McInnis, B., D. Cosley, C. Nam, G. Leshed (2016), Taking a HIT: Designing around Rejection, Mistrust, Risk, and Workers’ Experiences in Amazon Mechanical Turk. Proceedings of the CHI ‘16 Conference, San Jose, CA, pp. 2271–228210.1145/2858036.2858539Search in Google Scholar
Narula, P., P. Gutheim, D. Rolnitzky, A. Kulkarni, B. Hartman (2011), MobileWorks: A Mobile Crowdsourcing Platform for Workers at the Bottom of the Pyramid. Conference Paper, January 2011. Retrieved on 2018-2-20: https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/WS/AAAIW11/paper/download/3962/4263.Search in Google Scholar
Nickerson, J.V. (2014), Crowd Work and Collective Learning. pp. 39–49 in: A. Littlejohn, A. Margaryan (eds.), Technology-Enhanced Professional Learning. New York/London: Routledge. on 2018-2-20: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2246203.Search in Google Scholar
O’Neill, J. (2018), From Crowdwork to Ola Auto: Can Platform Economies Improve Livelihoods in Emerging Markets?. pp. 28–31 in: H. Galperin, A. Alarcon (eds.), The Future of Work in the Global South. Ottawa, ON: International Development Research Centre.Search in Google Scholar
Pasquale, F. (2015), The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms that Control Money and Information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674736061Search in Google Scholar
Pesole, A., M.C. Urzí Brancati, E. Fernández-Macías, F. Biagi, I. González Vázquez (2018), Platform Workers in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Search in Google Scholar
Rani, U., M. Furrer (forthcoming), Work and Income Security among Workers in On-Demand Digital Economy: Issues and Challenges in Developing Economies. Competition & Change.Search in Google Scholar
Ross, J., L. Irani, M.S. Silberman, A. Zaldivar, B. Tomlinson (2010), Who are the Crowdworkers? Shifting Demographics in Amazon Mechanical Turk. CHI ‘10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2863–2872.Search in Google Scholar
Ross, J., A. Zaldivar, L. Irani, B. Tomlinson (2009), Who are the Turkers? Worker Demographics in Amazon Mechanical Turk. Department of Informatics, University of California, Irvine, USA, Tech. Rep.10.1145/1753846.1753873Search in Google Scholar
Roy, S., C. Balamurugan, S. Gujar (2013), Sustainable Employment in India by Crowdsourcing Enterprise Tasks. Proceedings of the ACM DEV ‘13 Annual Symposium, Bangalore.10.1145/2442882.2442904Search in Google Scholar
Schmidt, F.A. (2017), Digital Labour Markets in the Platform Economy: Mapping the Political Challenges of Crowd Work and Gig Work. Bonn: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.Search in Google Scholar
Schriner, A., D. Oerther (2014), No Really, (Crowd) Work Is the Silver Bullet. Procedia Engineering 78: 224–228.10.1016/j.proeng.2014.07.060Search in Google Scholar
Sundararajan, A. (2016), The Sharing Economy: Then End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Thies, W., A. Ratan, J. Davis (2011), Paid Crowdsourcing as a Vehicle for Global Development. ACM CHI 2011 Workshop on Crowdsourcing and Human Computation.Search in Google Scholar
Zaidan, O.F., C. Callison-Burch (2011), Crowdsourcing Translation: Professional Quality from Non-Professionals. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1220–1229.Search in Google Scholar
Zyskowski, K., M.R. Morris, J.P. Bigham, M.L. Gray, S.K. Kane (2015), Accessible Crowdwork? Understanding the Value in and Challenge of Microtask Employment for People with Disabilities. Proceedings of the CSCW ‘15 Conference, Vancouver, BC, pp. 1682–1693.10.1145/2675133.2675158Search in Google Scholar
Note
The views expressed in the paper are those of the authors and do not represent those of the Organisation. This article is part of the special issue “Digitalisation and the Labor Market” published in the Journal of Economics and Statistics. Access to further articles of this special issue can be obtained at www.degruyter.com/journals/jbnst.
© 2019 Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag GmbH, Published by De Gruyter Oldenbourg, Berlin/Boston
