Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Oldenbourg March 14, 2019

On-Demand Digital Economy: Can Experience Ensure Work and Income Security for Microtask Workers?

Uma Rani and Marianne Furrer

Abstract

Digital labour platforms have been increasingly gaining popularity over the past decade. In particular, there has been much debate about workers’ motivations and working conditions on microtask platforms. There exists little evidence on whether dependence on digital microtask platforms provides workers with work and income security in the long term and whether it provides opportunities for skill development. This paper explores the extent to which the seemingly flexible platform work ensures work and income security and provides opportunities for skill development for workers with different levels of experience, based on novel survey data collected on five globally operating microtask platforms and in-depth interviews with workers. The findings show that despite high financial dependence on this work, returns to experience on the platform are meagre in terms of earnings, and highly experienced workers face the same risks as new entrants with regard to discrimination, high work intensity, lack of autonomy and control over work, and social protection. There is also a skills gap between the nature of tasks available on these microtask platforms and the workers’ education levels. Finally, experience does not ensure that workers have the opportunities to undertake complex and challenging tasks, and the possibilities to develop their skills and improve career prospects are limited.

JEL Classification: J24; J31; J32; J81

References

Agrawal, A., J.J. Horton, N. Lacetera, E. Lyons (2015), Digitization and the Contract Labor Market: A Research Agenda. pp. 219–250 in: A. Goldfrab, S.M. Greenstein, C.E. Tucker (eds.), Economic Analysis of the Digital Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226206981.003.0008Search in Google Scholar

Barnes, S.A., A. Green, M. de Hoyos (2015), Crowdsourcing and Work: Individual Factors and Circumstances Influencing Employability. New Technology. Work and Employment 30 (1): 16–31.10.1111/ntwe.12043Search in Google Scholar

Beerepoot, N., B. Lambregts (2015), Competition in Online Job Marketplaces: Towards a Global Labour Market for Outsourcing Services. Global Networks 15 (2): 236–255.10.1111/glob.12051Search in Google Scholar

Berg, J. (2016), Income Security in the On-Demand Economy: Findings and Policy Lessons from a Survey of Crowdworkers. Conditions of Work and Employment Series No. 74.Search in Google Scholar

Berg, J., M. Furrer, E. Harmon, U. Rani, M.S. Silberman (2018), Digital Labour Platforms and the Future of Work: Towards Decent Work in the Online World. Geneva: ILO.Search in Google Scholar

Bergvall-Kareborn, B., D. Howcroft (2014), Amazon Mechanical Turk and the Commodification of Labour. New Technology, Work and Employment 29 (3): 213–223.10.1111/ntwe.12038Search in Google Scholar

Bertschek, I., J. Ohnemus, S. Viete (2016), Befragunng zum sozioökonomischen Hintergrund und zu den Motiven von Crowdworkern. Forschungsbericht 462. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales.Search in Google Scholar

Borchert, K., M. Hirth, M. Kummer, U. Laitenberger, O. Slivko, S. Viete (2018), Unemployment and Online Labor. ZEW Discussion Paper No. 18–023.10.2139/ssrn.3178692Search in Google Scholar

Bourdreau, K.J., K.R. Lakhani (2013), Using the Crowd as an Innovation Partner. Harvard Business Review April 2013. https://hbr.org/2013/04/using-the-crowd-as-an-innovation-partner.Search in Google Scholar

Cantarella, M., C. Strozzi (2018), Labour Market Effects of Crowdwork in US and EU: An Empirical Investigation. Paper presented at the 2nd IZA/OECD Workshop on Labour Productivity and the Digital Economy, Paris.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, J., J. Teevan, S.T. Iqbal, M.S. Bernstein (2015), Break It Down: A Comparison of Macro- and Micro-Tasks. Proceedings of the CHI ‘15 Conference, Seoul, pp. 4061–4064.Search in Google Scholar

De Stefano, V. (2016), The Rise of the “Just-In-Time Workforce”: On-Demand Work, Crowdwork and Labour Protection in the “Gig-Economy”. Conditions of Work and Employment Series No. 71.10.2139/ssrn.2682602Search in Google Scholar

Dillahunt, T.R., A.R. Malone (2015), The Promise of the Sharing Economy among Disadvantaged Communities. Proceedings of the CHI ‘15 Conference, Seoul, pp. 2285–2294.10.1145/2702123.2702189Search in Google Scholar

Dontcheva, M., R. Morris, J. Brandt, E. Gerber (2014), Combining Crowdsourcing and Learning to Improve Engagement and Performance. Proceedings of the CHI ‘14 Conference, Toronto, pp. 3379–3388.10.1145/2556288.2557217Search in Google Scholar

Dow, S., A. Kulkarni, S. Klemmer, B. Hartmann (2012), Shepherding the Crowd Yields Better Work. Proceedings of the CSCW ‘12 Conference, Seattle, pp. 1013–1022.10.1145/2145204.2145355Search in Google Scholar

Durward, D., I. Blohm (2017), I Am a Crowd Worker – How Individuals Identify with a New Form of Digital Work. Proceedings of the 25th ECIS Conference, Guimarães, pp. 3025–3035.Search in Google Scholar

European Parliament (2017), The Social Protection of Workers in the Platform Economy. Brussels: European Union.Search in Google Scholar

Felstiner, A. (2011), Working the Crowd: Employment and Labour Law in the Crowdsourcing Industry. Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labour Law 32 (1): 143–204.Search in Google Scholar

Gadiraju, U., R. Kawase, S. Dietze (2014), A Taxonomy of Micro Tasks on the Web. Proceedings of the HT ‘14 Conference, Santiago, pp. 218–223.Search in Google Scholar

Graham, M., I. Hjorth, V. Lehdonvirta (2017), Digital Labour and Development: Impacts of Global Digital Labour Platforms and the Gig Economy on Worker Livelihoods. Transfer 23 (2): 135–162.10.1177/1024258916687250Search in Google Scholar

Hara, K., A. Adams, K. Milland, S. Savage, C. Callison-Burch, J.P. Bigham (2018), A Data-Driven Analysis of Workers’ Earning on AMT. Proceedings of the CHI ‘18 Conference, Montreal.10.1145/3173574.3174023Search in Google Scholar

Hirth, M., T. Hossfeld, P. Tran-Gia (2011), Anatomy of a Crowdsourcing Platform - Using the Example of Microworkers.Com. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing (IMIS), pp. 322–329. IEEE.10.1109/IMIS.2011.89Search in Google Scholar

Howe, J. (2006), Crowdsourcing: A definition. Retrieved on 2018-02-20: http://crowdsourcing.typepad.com/cs/2006/06/crowdsourcing_a.html.Search in Google Scholar

Hug, A.S. (2017), Crowdwork als Form der Arbeits-intergration von jungen Erwachsenene mit einer psychischen Störung (Master Thesis). Hochschule für Soziale Arbeit FHNW, Olten.Search in Google Scholar

Huws, U., N.H. Spencer, D.S. Syrdal, H. Holts (2017), Work in the European Gig Economy: Research Results from the UK, Sweden, Germany, Austria, the Netherlands, Switzerland and Italy. Brussels: FEPS, UNI Europa and University of Hertfordshire.Search in Google Scholar

ILO (2016). Non-Standard Employment around the World: Understanding Challenges, Shaping Prospects. Geneva: ILO.Search in Google Scholar

Ipeirotis, P.G. (2010), Analyzing the Amazon Mechanical Turk Marketplace. ACM XRDS 17 (2): 16–21.10.1145/1869086.1869094Search in Google Scholar

Irani, L.C., M.S. Silberman (2013), Turkopticon: Interrupting Worker Invisibility in Amazon Mechanical Turk. Proceedings of the CHI ‘13 Conference, New York, pp. 611–620.10.1145/2470654.2470742Search in Google Scholar

Johnston, H., C. Land-Kazlauskas (2018), Organizing On-Demand: Representation, Voice, and Collective Bargaining in the Gig Economy. Conditions of Work and Employment Series No. 94, Geneva, ILO.Search in Google Scholar

Kässi, O., V. Lehdonvirta (2016), Online Labour Index: Measuring the Online Gig Economy for Policy and Research. Paper presented at Internet, Politics & Policy 2016, Oxford, UK, 22–23 September. Retrieved on 2018-2-20: http://ilabour.oii.ox.ac.uk/online-labour-index/.10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.056Search in Google Scholar

Katz, L.F., A.B. Krueger (2016), The Rise and Nature of Alternative Work Arrangements in the United States, 1995–2015. NBER Working Paper Series, No. w22667.10.3386/w22667Search in Google Scholar

Kessler, S. (2018), The Crazy Hacks One Woman Used to Make Money on Mechanical Turk. Wired (12 06 2018).https://www.wired.com/story/the-crazy-hacks-one-woman-used-to-make-money-on-mechanical-turk/.Search in Google Scholar

Kittur, A., J.V. Nickerson, M.S. Bernstein, E.M. Gerber, A. Shaw, J. Zimmerman, M. Lease, J.J. Horton (2013), The Future of Crowd Work. Proceedings of the CSCW ‘13 Conference, San Antonio, TX, pp- 1301–1318.10.1145/2441776.2441923Search in Google Scholar

Kuek, S.C., C. Paradi-Guilford, T. Fayomi, S. Imaizumi, P. Ipeirotis, P. Pina, M. Singh (2015), The Global Opportunity in Online Outsourcing. Washington, DC: World Bank.Search in Google Scholar

Lehdonvirta, V. (2017), The online gig economy grew 26% over the past year. Retrieved on 2018-07-18: http://ilabour.oii.ox.ac.uk/the-online-gig-economy-grew-26-over-the-past-year/.Search in Google Scholar

Leimeister, J.M., D. Durward, S. Zogaj (2016), Crowd Worker in Deutschland: Eine empirische Studie zum Arbeitsumfeld auf externen Crowdsourcing-Platformen. Study der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, No. 323, Düsseldorf, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung.Search in Google Scholar

Margaryan, A. (2016), Understanding Crowdworkers’ Learning Practices. Proceedings of Internet, Policy and Politics 2016 Conference, Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, UK.Search in Google Scholar

Margaryan, A. (2017), Nature of work tasks in crowdwork: microwork vs. online freelancing. Retrieved on 2018-7-10: https://chartingthelabyrinths.wordpress.com/2017/12/07/nature-of-work-tasks-in-crowdwork-microwork-vs-online-freelancing/.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, D., B.V. Hanrahan, J. O’Neill, N. Gupta (2014), Being a Turker. Proceedings of the CSCW ‘14 Conference, Baltimore, MD, pp. 224–235.10.1145/2531602.2531663Search in Google Scholar

McInnis, B., D. Cosley, C. Nam, G. Leshed (2016), Taking a HIT: Designing around Rejection, Mistrust, Risk, and Workers’ Experiences in Amazon Mechanical Turk. Proceedings of the CHI ‘16 Conference, San Jose, CA, pp. 2271–228210.1145/2858036.2858539Search in Google Scholar

Narula, P., P. Gutheim, D. Rolnitzky, A. Kulkarni, B. Hartman (2011), MobileWorks: A Mobile Crowdsourcing Platform for Workers at the Bottom of the Pyramid. Conference Paper, January 2011. Retrieved on 2018-2-20: https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/WS/AAAIW11/paper/download/3962/4263.Search in Google Scholar

Nickerson, J.V. (2014), Crowd Work and Collective Learning. pp. 39–49 in: A. Littlejohn, A. Margaryan (eds.), Technology-Enhanced Professional Learning. New York/London: Routledge. on 2018-2-20: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2246203.Search in Google Scholar

O’Neill, J. (2018), From Crowdwork to Ola Auto: Can Platform Economies Improve Livelihoods in Emerging Markets?. pp. 28–31 in: H. Galperin, A. Alarcon (eds.), The Future of Work in the Global South. Ottawa, ON: International Development Research Centre.Search in Google Scholar

Pasquale, F. (2015), The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms that Control Money and Information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674736061Search in Google Scholar

Pesole, A., M.C. Urzí Brancati, E. Fernández-Macías, F. Biagi, I. González Vázquez (2018), Platform Workers in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Search in Google Scholar

Rani, U., M. Furrer (forthcoming), Work and Income Security among Workers in On-Demand Digital Economy: Issues and Challenges in Developing Economies. Competition & Change.Search in Google Scholar

Ross, J., L. Irani, M.S. Silberman, A. Zaldivar, B. Tomlinson (2010), Who are the Crowdworkers? Shifting Demographics in Amazon Mechanical Turk. CHI ‘10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2863–2872.Search in Google Scholar

Ross, J., A. Zaldivar, L. Irani, B. Tomlinson (2009), Who are the Turkers? Worker Demographics in Amazon Mechanical Turk. Department of Informatics, University of California, Irvine, USA, Tech. Rep.10.1145/1753846.1753873Search in Google Scholar

Roy, S., C. Balamurugan, S. Gujar (2013), Sustainable Employment in India by Crowdsourcing Enterprise Tasks. Proceedings of the ACM DEV ‘13 Annual Symposium, Bangalore.10.1145/2442882.2442904Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, F.A. (2017), Digital Labour Markets in the Platform Economy: Mapping the Political Challenges of Crowd Work and Gig Work. Bonn: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.Search in Google Scholar

Schriner, A., D. Oerther (2014), No Really, (Crowd) Work Is the Silver Bullet. Procedia Engineering 78: 224–228.10.1016/j.proeng.2014.07.060Search in Google Scholar

Sundararajan, A. (2016), The Sharing Economy: Then End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Thies, W., A. Ratan, J. Davis (2011), Paid Crowdsourcing as a Vehicle for Global Development. ACM CHI 2011 Workshop on Crowdsourcing and Human Computation.Search in Google Scholar

Zaidan, O.F., C. Callison-Burch (2011), Crowdsourcing Translation: Professional Quality from Non-Professionals. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1220–1229.Search in Google Scholar

Zyskowski, K., M.R. Morris, J.P. Bigham, M.L. Gray, S.K. Kane (2015), Accessible Crowdwork? Understanding the Value in and Challenge of Microtask Employment for People with Disabilities. Proceedings of the CSCW ‘15 Conference, Vancouver, BC, pp. 1682–1693.10.1145/2675133.2675158Search in Google Scholar


Note

The views expressed in the paper are those of the authors and do not represent those of the Organisation. This article is part of the special issue “Digitalisation and the Labor Market” published in the Journal of Economics and Statistics. Access to further articles of this special issue can be obtained at www.degruyter.com/journals/jbnst.


Published Online: 2019-03-14
Published in Print: 2019-07-26

© 2019 Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag GmbH, Published by De Gruyter Oldenbourg, Berlin/Boston

Scroll Up Arrow